1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on May 10, 2020 21:05:25 GMT -5
Hot take: The first Pirates movie is just as bad as the rest. And the second is the most obnoxious one.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,299
Likes: 6,765
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:34:18 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on May 10, 2020 21:18:18 GMT -5
I enjoyed the first one when it came out. I haven't watched it since it first came out on DVD but I had as good a time as anyone else. I didn't hate the second one as much as some people did but it was clear that they were just spending the entire movie setting up the third one. The third is a piece of garbage and because the second one was setting up said garbage it became garbage retroactively. That scene with Barbossa 'marrying' Will and Elizabeth while they're all fighting is so, so stupid, I was embarrassed just watching it. The fourth and fifth movies are just forgettable filler. I love how the fourth one leaves so many loose ends and nobody making the movie seemed to care, as if the writers just stopped one random day and said 'no more writing, here's your movie.'
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,528
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:33:37 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on May 10, 2020 22:24:40 GMT -5
Hot take: The first Pirates movie is just as bad as the rest. And the second is the most obnoxious one. Hotter take: At World's End is one of the best, most fun and under-appreciated blockbusters of the 2000's. And Curse of the Black Pearl is up there, too.
And....*sigh*...
Guess I might need to offer a rebuttal to PG Cooper's assessments.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on May 10, 2020 22:34:46 GMT -5
Hot take: The first Pirates movie is just as bad as the rest. And the second is the most obnoxious one. Hotter take: At World's End is one of the best, most fun and under-appreciated blockbusters of the 2000's. And Curse of the Black Pearl is up there, too.
And....*sigh*...
Guess I might need to offer a rebuttal to PG Cooper's assessments. I watched At World’s End on opening night. Audience loved it. I watched Spider-Man 3 on opening night. Audience was deathly silent. I watched Transformers on opening night. It was a regular screening. At World’s End really was the crowd-pleasing blockbuster of 2007. Maybe Harry Potter challenged it. Maybe. But... you gotta give Pirates its props.
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on May 10, 2020 22:35:26 GMT -5
World's End is the least annoying one, I'll give you that.
Buffering the pain is the fact that the title was turned into a much better Edgar Wright movie.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,103
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on May 10, 2020 22:38:41 GMT -5
Hot take: The first Pirates movie is just as bad as the rest. And the second is the most obnoxious one. I'm not sure if I percieve a huge dropoff in quality either. I think it's a situation where there were enough good ideas in that franchise to sustain one and only one movie, and the Curse of the Black Pearl just so happened to be that one movie. It could have been any of the other ones.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:40:06 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on May 10, 2020 22:39:51 GMT -5
But... you gotta give Pirates its props. No I don't.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on May 10, 2020 22:45:59 GMT -5
But... you gotta give Pirates its props. No I don't. The general consensus, among haters, is that the series became over bloated. At least that was the big criticism against Dead Man’s Chest. But I watched At World’s End in a sold out screening, a movie that concludes all the plotlines from Dead Man’s Chest, and everyone was following along just fine and totally invested in it and loving it. Again. This movie came out three weeks after Spider-Man 3. The screenings were night & day. Pirates of the Caribbean is a crowd pleaser. It’s an effective blockbuster.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:40:06 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on May 10, 2020 23:16:23 GMT -5
The general consensus, among haters, is that the series became over bloated. At least that was the big criticism against Dead Man’s Chest. But I watched At World’s End in a sold out screening, a movie that concludes all the plotlines from Dead Man’s Chest, and everyone was following along just fine and totally invested in it and loving it. Again. This movie came out three weeks after Spider-Man 3. The screenings were night & day. Pirates of the Caribbean is a crowd pleaser. It’s an effective blockbuster. I don't doubt it works for fans in a midnight screening context. It's a spectacle and if you like the characters they all technically have a moment to shine. But I don't know how much props I have to give to a crowdpleaser that only really works for the kind of dedicated superfans who are going to see the film on opening midnight. Something like Endgame is a much better example give that someone like my Dad, who has seen maybe a third of the MCU and liked less, could stroll in on a Sunday afternoon and have a great time.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,528
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:33:37 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on May 10, 2020 23:26:11 GMT -5
The general consensus, among haters, is that the series became over bloated. At least that was the big criticism against Dead Man’s Chest. But I watched At World’s End in a sold out screening, a movie that concludes all the plotlines from Dead Man’s Chest, and everyone was following along just fine and totally invested in it and loving it. Again. This movie came out three weeks after Spider-Man 3. The screenings were night & day. Pirates of the Caribbean is a crowd pleaser. It’s an effective blockbuster.
I've lost count of how many people have said "Oh, At World's End was so confusing. I couldn't follow it." And I'm always left scratching my head at that. The movie is VERY easy to follow.
To sum up quickly, here's why I love 2 and 3:
- They took the time to get in deeper with the story and characters, making both more complex and interesting. Even if that sometimes meant they were betraying each other to accomplish their own ends, you could still understand their emotional motivations, so it all succeeded in resonating. The movies are called PIRATES of the Caribbean. What are the characters behaving like? Pirates. But the key to the writing is how they keep the charisma of the characters intact, so that even when Will sells out the crew in At World's End or Elizabeth leaves Jack to die in Dead Man's Chest, you understand why and can sympathize with them.
- The addition of The East India Trading Company provides an interesting theme of oppression that Verbinski seems to love (it was also a theme in Lone Ranger), and gives the story a bit more intrigue and bigger stakes.
- Gore Verbinski. With the sequels, he embraces the weirdness of this universe even more and I eat it up. The expansion of the mythology is fascinating to me, from Davy Jones and The Flying Dutchman, to The Kraken, Calypso, The Pirate Lords -- it's pretty impressive worldbuilding for a franchise that started out as a simple swashbuckler adventure, and not only does it lean into this new direction unapologetically, it does so confidently, like it doesn't give a fuck. Props to that. You can't look at Dead Man's Chest and At World's End and say they're just run-of-the-mill studio blockbusters. There's WAAAY more effort put into them than that, and you can absolutely feel Verbinski's stamp on them. His passion for the characters, story and lore is in every scene and every frame.
- The action scenes are energetic and amazing. The simultaneous three-way swordfights on Isla Cruces in Dead Man's Chest. The climactic Kraken battle. The Singapore sequence that opens At World's End. The maelstrom battle.
- The scores. My God, the scores.
- This scene:
- Will and Elizabeth's marriage mid-battle. Doomsday
- The balls on At World's End to pull a bittersweet ending, instead of a traditional Disney one.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:40:06 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on May 10, 2020 23:37:43 GMT -5
It's not that the movie is confusing, it's that none of the plot developments mean anything because characters are constantly switching sides and striking deals without consequence. Coupled with a near three runtime and several overbloated action scenes that for all their flash can't come close to the excitement of Sparrow and Will's duel from the first movie and the whole thing is just tedious.
I understood what was happening in Pirates 3 just fine, I just didn't care about any of it.
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on May 10, 2020 23:38:40 GMT -5
I never found the movie confusing. A movie that dumb can never be confusing.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on May 11, 2020 9:51:09 GMT -5
That's not a fair comparison. A better example would be this: The Matrix. The first Matrix was beloved by all and all were hyped for the sequels. Matrix Reloaded comes out. Box office hit. But most people hate it. Matrix Revolution is then released to little or no fanfare. With Pirates of the Caribbean, everyone falls in love with Jack Sparrow and SnoBorderZero masturbates to Orlando Bloom. Dead Man's Chest comes out. People supposedly hate it but it becomes the THIRD movie to ever gross a billion dollars worldwide. At World's End follows, supposedly with the stink of Dead Man's Chest, and it manages to become the highest grossing movie of 2007 worldwide. Beating Harry Potter. A fourth one comes out a few years down the line. Supposedly no one asked for it but it grosses a billion dollars worldwide. These movies, in spite of their bad reputation, were more successful than The Matrix. The Matrix! They're doing something right. The only other comparable franchise would be Transformers. Those movies were insanely popular BUT they alienated fans WAY MORE by the end. That fifth Pirates outgrossed that fifth Transformers by over $200 million worldwide. And if that wasn't enough. That fifth Pirates outgrossed the freakin Justice League. The Justice League! The damn Pirates franchise has their shit together more than DC. Again. They're doing something right.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,103
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on May 11, 2020 10:03:17 GMT -5
That's not a fair comparison. A better example would be this: The Matrix. The first Matrix was beloved by all and all were hyped for the sequels. Matrix Reloaded comes out. Box office hit. But most people hate it. Matrix Revolution is then released to little or no fanfare. With Pirates of the Caribbean, everyone falls in love with Jack Sparrow and SnoBorderZero masturbates to Orlando Bloom. Dead Man's Chest comes out. People supposedly hate it but it becomes the THIRD movie to ever gross a billion dollars worldwide. At World's End follows, supposedly with the stink of Dead Man's Chest, and it manages to become the highest grossing movie of 2007 worldwide. Beating Harry Potter. A fourth one comes out a few years down the line. Supposedly no one asked for it but it grosses a billion dollars worldwide. These movies, in spite of their bad reputation, were more successful than The Matrix. The Matrix! They're doing something right. The only other comparable franchise would be Transformers. Those movies were insanely popular BUT they alienated fans WAY MORE by the end. That fifth Pirates outgrossed that fifth Transformers by over $200 million worldwide. And if that wasn't enough. That fifth Pirates outgrossed the freakin Justice League. The Justice League! The damn Pirates franchise has their shit together more than DC. Again. They're doing something right. That mostly speaks to the fact that international audiences (specifically China) kept sticking by these movies even as things dried out in the U.S. market. The fourth and fifth movies would have been total bombs if they had to rely on the domestic market, those movies both made more than 75% of their box office overseas. Even the third movie, which basically got a "too big to fail" tent pole release only barely made back its budget domestically.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,528
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:33:37 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on May 11, 2020 10:48:25 GMT -5
It's not that the movie is confusing, it's that none of the plot developments mean anything because characters are constantly switching sides and striking deals without consequence. No consequence? Tell that to Will, Elizabeth and Norrington. Will and Elizabeth have the most significant and meaningful arc of the movies -- hell, the trilogy is centered around them and their story -- and they certainly don't sail off into the sunset without having to face the consequences of the choices they made. Will, especially. Which makes the ending of Dead Men Tell No Tales all the more cathartic.
Speaking of, though, I do agree about how they should've driven the plot of that movie more than just be relegated to cameos. I think a simple rewrite could've fixed that:
Instead of setting it so long after At World's End, set it three to five years later. Elizabeth has been using her status/connections as Pirate King to chase down any and all leads on how to free Will from his curse. That's how she stumbles upon The Trident, and its legend of being able to break any and all sea curses. Meanwhile, Jack's plight of bad luck is still the same, as is his problem of Salazar coming after him, motivating him to try and find a solution/way out. This would eventually reunite the two on a new quest where both their motivations would be aligned but still different/selfish enough to cause friction, and then you throw in all the adventure/shenanigans. Then throw in a subplot about Will being conflicted about wanting to be free vs. feeling obligated to keep fulfilling his new duties, lest it upset some sort of predetermined balance.
Much as I do enjoy the fifth movie, that's the version of it they should've done. Though you'd need to get Keira Knightley and Orlando Bloom back full-time.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,622
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 21:31:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on May 11, 2020 15:41:34 GMT -5
That's not a fair comparison. A better example would be this: The Matrix. The first Matrix was beloved by all and all were hyped for the sequels. Matrix Reloaded comes out. Box office hit. But most people hate it. Matrix Revolution is then released to little or no fanfare. With Pirates of the Caribbean, everyone falls in love with Jack Sparrow and SnoBorderZero masturbates to Orlando Bloom. Dead Man's Chest comes out. People supposedly hate it but it becomes the THIRD movie to ever gross a billion dollars worldwide. At World's End follows, supposedly with the stink of Dead Man's Chest, and it manages to become the highest grossing movie of 2007 worldwide. Beating Harry Potter. A fourth one comes out a few years down the line. Supposedly no one asked for it but it grosses a billion dollars worldwide. These movies, in spite of their bad reputation, were more successful than The Matrix. The Matrix! They're doing something right. The only other comparable franchise would be Transformers. Those movies were insanely popular BUT they alienated fans WAY MORE by the end. That fifth Pirates outgrossed that fifth Transformers by over $200 million worldwide. And if that wasn't enough. That fifth Pirates outgrossed the freakin Justice League. The Justice League! The damn Pirates franchise has their shit together more than DC. Again. They're doing something right. Don't drag me into a discussion about the Pirates sequels. Yuck.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:40:06 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on May 11, 2020 16:11:38 GMT -5
It's not that the movie is confusing, it's that none of the plot developments mean anything because characters are constantly switching sides and striking deals without consequence. No consequence? Tell that to Will, Elizabeth and Norrington. Will and Elizabeth have the most significant and meaningful arc of the movies -- hell, the trilogy is centered around them and their story -- and they certainly don't sail off into the sunset without having to face the consequences of the choices they made. Will, especially. Which makes the ending of Dead Men Tell No Tales all the more cathartic. I cover this in my review, but Norrington's death happens too early and with minimal impact. What does he accomplish other than getting Elizabeth off the Dutchman? There's still another hour of fighting and spectacle and comedy (did we really need two unfunny buddy duos in these movies?) that by the time I get to the end I hardly remember Norrington was in the movie. And it's especially overshadowed by Jack Sparrow performing a similar heroic sacrifice, giving up immortality to save Will. And while Will and Elizabeth's story does have a consequential ending, the road to get there is so long and bogged down by unnecessary baggage that it's ultimate impact is minimal. Yeah, there is something rather ballsy about ending their story in such a dark way, but there's so much other stuff that it's ultimately drowned out. I agree more or less entirely with this. I also wanted to respond to some of your other points now that I'm at my laptop and not on my phone. Yes, they dive more into the characters, but the only people who really benefit from this are Will and Elizabeth (and maybe Norrington, even if I stand by they drop the ball with him). The expanded focus on Sparrow mostly shows how thin the character is and he starts to get annoying. The worst parts of At World's End are probably the scenes with multiple Depps playing off of each other. Barbossa's return doesn't add much apart from the general entertainment value of Geoffrey Rush, but he doesn't really need to be there. The East India Trading Company is a good idea but one which is swallowed by everything else. Although I agree, homeboy's death scene is pretty cool. The weird Verbinski touches do add a lot of personality, but my enthusiasm for some of the design elements and visual flourishes has to be balanced by the series's god awful comedy. Obviously this is pretty subjective, but man these movies become painfully unfunny as they go (this is admittedly worse when Verbinski leaves). I generally find the action in this series chaotic and dull given they're often battles with supernatural creatures who seemingly can't die. I do like the three-way duel you mention at first, at least until it becomes a cartoon. I will agree that the Kraken scene at the end of Dead Man's Chest is genuinely awesome and the action high point of the series. But this makes it all the more infuriating when the creature is killed off-screen. As for the music, it's definitely good, but it doesn't rock my world the way other franchise themes to. Again, a highly subjective point, but it's how I feel.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,528
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:33:37 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on May 11, 2020 18:52:36 GMT -5
I'm at least glad you like my re-write pitch for 5. I'd add/tweak a bit more, but bottom line, go back to the trilogy model of having Will and Elizabeth be the driving force, with Jack as the wild card who's along for the ride.
As for the rest of my points...obviously, it's all subjective. Clearly, these characters and this franchise matter more to me than you, so I'm just always gonna have a stronger reaction to it. Though, I will say that I rather like the addition of all the supernatural elements, but they are stronger in the first three, where the filmmakers commit to them more and make them feel cool and unique. Honestly, if I ever got the chance to write one of these, I too would make the supernatural part of the story. But my vision for those elements would be closer to something like the first two, i.e. not as massive as At World's End but not sort of more obligatory like 4 and 5. But stuff like the Davy Jones Locker scene in 3, as well as Jack in the brig with the other hims...I like that stuff.
Which brings me to the comedy -- it hits my funnybone. From the small things in the first like Jack sarcastically offering Barbossa an apple to Jack cursing Will under his breath after Will threatens to shoot himself and then to broader moments in At World's End where Jack and Barbossa constantly bicker like children (including Doomsday's favorite line WHAT ARRR YA DOIN' ??) constantly get me cackling in laughter. Five, though...even I'll admit, there's some cringeworthy stuff in there involving Jack. He might as well have been fully animated, because he's a cartoon character in that one.
At World's End also has some great smaller moments as well. For instance, the scene where they find the dead Kraken. There's some realy great dialogue exchanged between Jack and Barbossa there. And then there's the equally great cross-cutting negotiation scene between Jack and Beckett and Barbossa and Sao Feng. Also, Elizabeth's confession to Will about why she left Jack to die. A lot of these scenes are stuck in my memory word-for-word.
But, yeah...all subjective. You think all the good gets drowned out in nonsense, where I think all the "nonsense" of DMC and AWE is just as captivating.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,299
Likes: 6,765
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:34:18 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on May 11, 2020 19:01:18 GMT -5
It makes me wonder whether their decision to do a reboot sans Depp is a good one. Doubtful Johnny comes back even though people loved Jack Sparrow and Barbossa is dead. Orlando Bloom can't carry a franchise by himself and is hardly a movie star at this point so they'll have to go with someone completely new, rumor has it it's going to be a chick. I dunno, they could bury this franchise if it's not done exactly right.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,103
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on May 11, 2020 20:29:57 GMT -5
It makes me wonder whether their decision to do a reboot sans Depp is a good one. I would argue that it's a bad idea to keep the franchise going at all.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,528
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:33:37 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on May 11, 2020 22:34:03 GMT -5
I would argue if they really want to keep it going, something direct to Disney+ might be a more viable option than theatrical.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,299
Likes: 6,765
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:34:18 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on May 14, 2020 13:10:02 GMT -5
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on May 14, 2020 13:19:00 GMT -5
Next they’re gonna bitch about the Matrix sequels
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on May 14, 2020 16:44:58 GMT -5
THE DEAD POOL (1988)"You're shit out of luck."Unlike PG Cooper who doesn't believe that Clint Eastwood made movies before 1992, I grew up on Dirty Harry and other classic Eastwood movies. So I'm very aware of why people disliked The Dead Pool from an historical perspective. For starters, as the last Dirty Harry movie in the series, it did nothing special. There was no closure whatsoever. There was no "WE ARE FAMILY" moment like in Lethal Weapon 4. It was just another Dirty Harry movie and that left a bad taste in people's mouth. And secondly, there was no controversy. The Dirty Harry series was, and is, famous for tackling hot topic issues. But here, it played it safe. Or at least that was the perspective back in the day. Watching it now, it's obvious that The Dead Pool was ahead of its time. It tackled media sensationalism and a celebrity obsessed culture before most people even realized those things were happening. The Dead Pool is essentially The King of Comedy of action movies. Also, I find the concept of the death pool to be amusing because that's something that's commonly done on the Internet these days, but in 1988, it must have seemed really weird. And finally, having Jim Carrey and Liam Neeson in early roles is very interesting. In Jim Carrey's case, it does more harm than good because his character is totally campy and ridiculous and it dates the movie because he's playing a fictionalized version of Axel Rose. But in Liam Neeso's case, it actually enhances the movie's appeal. 20 years after The Dead Pool, Neeson re-invented his career by taking Eastwood's place as "the old man action hero" in Taken. Seeing him stand next to Eastwood is strange foreshadowing. So overall, I would argue that The Dead Pool is actually a pretty good movie. Eastwood continues to be awesome as Dirty Harry. The action scenes are... unique. If you've seen the movie, you know what I'm talking about. And I do like the storyline of a killer using a "death pool" as inspiration for his crimes. So despite my initial objection, I'd argue that The Dead Pool is better than The Enforcer and neck-and-neck with Sudden Impact. B+ Rewatched this. The toy car chase is fucking great.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,299
Likes: 6,765
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:34:18 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on May 14, 2020 18:06:20 GMT -5
Haha why did you watch Dead Pool?
|
|