1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Dec 18, 2019 22:22:02 GMT -5
Oh I remember the Pearl Harbor hype. I still think it's hilarious.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Dec 19, 2019 18:11:01 GMT -5
The Patriot and Braveheart are the reason Mel Gibson is banned from entering the UK. I'm just amazed he didn't find a way to blame the crucifixion of Christ on the English.
I guess there's always the sequel!
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Dec 27, 2019 23:14:56 GMT -5
SnoBorderZero PG CooperDEATH WISH 4: THE CRACKDOWN (1987)J. Lee Thompson directed a Death Wish movie. First, let’s recap the first three directed by Michael Winner. The original is a pretty good 1970’s thriller. Controversial, but it played into the zeitgeist of the era. The sequel is a waste of celluloid. The third is a camp classic, and in a strange way, kinda wraps up the series in a nice bow. That’s why it’s peculiar for there to be a fourth one. It makes sense financially, I guess, but also not really. These weren’t necessarily blockbuster films. They were action films shot on a low budget and that would turn out a decent profit, but you could say that of any Charles Bronson movie. It didn’t need to be a Death Wish movie. But, I suppose, since Bronson was disappointed with Part 3, he needed to rectify it. In the previous three installments, Bronson goes up against your everyday street hoodlums, but here, he sets out to eliminate drug lords in California. It defeats the point of this series... but it’s also kinda funny. It’s a movie you’d expect to see a 1980’s Mel Gibson or Kevin Costner in, but it’s senior citizen Charles Bronson. It... might be... my favorite of the bunch. Part 3 is silly but it’s also self aware. In Part 4 they kinda take it seriously. There’s moments of humor but it’s mostly pretty serious. It’s just... absurdly hilarious.
|
|
Wyldstaar
Producer
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,900
Likes: 1,267
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 14:50:30 GMT -5
|
Post by Wyldstaar on Dec 28, 2019 8:52:21 GMT -5
Like most Bronson movies of the era, Death Wish 4 was produced by Cannon. Those guys would make just about anything, as long as it could be done cheaply and had some kind of name recognition. Cannon could have probably stayed in business far longer if they'd had the sense to develop a distribution arm for the company. That's where the real money is. Instead, they just let Warner Bros. handle the distribution, and keep most of that sweet home video money for themselves.
|
|
Ramplate
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Apr 2005
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hamster
Posts: 30,425
Likes: 493
Location:
Last Online Oct 13, 2020 13:56:48 GMT -5
|
Post by Ramplate on Dec 28, 2019 9:12:37 GMT -5
RelatedTrivia
Charles Bronson is buried in West Windsor, Vermont.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Dec 29, 2019 15:37:30 GMT -5
SnoBorderZero Doomsday PG Cooper IanTheCoolDEATH WISH V: THE FACE OF DEATH (1994)72-year-old Charles Bronson returns for one final Death Wish. Here, he tackles the Canadian mafia. I guess they wanted to go easy on him. Is this what it’s gonna feel like when Harrison Ford does a fifth Indiana Jones? The guy couldn’t even bother to shave and comb his hair for Star Wars 9. Anyway, I wanted to enjoy Death Wish 5 on premise alone, but it just feels off. It has the cinematography of a 1990’s cable TV movie. Not even HBO or Showtime caliber but Disney Channel quality. And it’s shot in Canada. How do you go from the gritty streets of 1970’s New York to 1990’s Toronto? That’s more ridiculous than 72-year-old Charles Bronson murdering Canadian gangsters. Is the Indiana Jones gonna take place at a condo in Florida?
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,624
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 13:48:27 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Dec 29, 2019 16:24:55 GMT -5
Canada has a mafia?
And crime?
This is where the disbelief of the Death Wish series has finally gone too far.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Dec 29, 2019 18:02:46 GMT -5
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Dec 29, 2019 18:24:52 GMT -5
Canada has a mafia? And crime? This is where the disbelief of the Death Wish series has finally gone too far. Did you not see Kevin Smith’s Tusk? Canada is a place of villainy.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,624
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 13:48:27 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Dec 30, 2019 20:02:11 GMT -5
Canada has a mafia? And crime? This is where the disbelief of the Death Wish series has finally gone too far. Did you not see Kevin Smith’s Tusk? Canada is a place of villainy. I don't watch Kevin Smith post-Clerks II.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,300
Likes: 6,766
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 14:53:39 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Dec 30, 2019 20:10:22 GMT -5
I don't watch Kevin Smith movies post-1985.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,528
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:33:37 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jan 21, 2020 11:45:19 GMT -5
Batman Returns (1992)
When I was much, much younger, I did actually used to like Batman Returns. But time really hasn't been kind to it. I keep giving it more chances in the hope that maybe I'll see what its current supporters see in it, but no, I think this viewing pretty much sealed its fate for me. People always complain about the jarring shift in tone from the Burton movies to the Schumacher ones, but, um...have they really paid attention to this one? This movie was already transitioning to the Schumacher levels of stupidity. From some of the dialogue (Catwoman's especially), to the ways in which some of the action is executed and other stylistic touches from Burton, suddenly the shift over to Batman Forever doesn't feel so shocking. I mean, you've got a climax featuring marching penguins with rockets strapped to their backs, bumbling goons dressed as circus performers who are most certainly precursors to the henchmen in the following two movies, gadgets employed by Penguin that would feel at home in those as well, a scene where he controls the Batmobile via what amounts to one of those cheap kiddie toys outside of supermarkets -- a scene in which the movie ALSO goes out of its way for the classic old lady crossing the street gag. The Penguin ultimately being brought down mostly by DJ Batman. I could go on. Point is, all this silliness just serves to constantly undercut any and all efforts this movie makes to delve into legitimate drama. Credit where credit's due, Michael Keaton is still aces as Bruce Wayne/Batman (whenever the movie actually remembers to use him), and despite some bad writing for Catwoman individually, the scenes between Bruce and Selina Kyle really do sing. But that's another thing: for a movie titled Batman Returns.......nooooot a lot of the title character in it. Michael Keaton is BARELY in the first half of this movie, and when he eventually does start to play a more prominent part in the second half, he seems second fiddle to two villains who feel like they traveled back in time from the Schumacher era. Penguin isn't sympathetic at all. He's just annoying, grotesque and representative of Burton going weird/dark at times in this movie just for the sake of it. As for Catwoman...again, you can already see with her how the series was gonna transition to the Schumacher years. And by the way...who in Gotham was honestly fooled by Penguin's public persona? Did stuff like biting a guy's nose in front of a pretty big crowd, followed by him declaring "Burn, baby, burn!" a couple minutes later in front of the same people NOT set off any red flags? Or are the citizens of Gotham just morons? I know there are plenty of you Batman Returns fans out there, but for me, it's with this movie - and not Batman Forever - where the franchise really starts to go downhill.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 14:41:31 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Jan 21, 2020 12:54:28 GMT -5
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,528
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:33:37 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jan 21, 2020 13:16:31 GMT -5
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Jan 21, 2020 13:36:04 GMT -5
Batman Returns suuuuuuuuuuucks.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,528
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:33:37 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jan 21, 2020 13:39:12 GMT -5
Batman Returns suuuuuuuuuuucks.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 14:41:31 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Jan 21, 2020 13:50:51 GMT -5
Batman Returns suuuuuuuuuuucks.
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Jan 21, 2020 13:59:12 GMT -5
Batman Returns suuuuuuuuuuucks.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 1, 2020 21:10:08 GMT -5
VAN DAMME TRIPLE FEATUREDoomsday SnoBorderZero frankyt @dukeleto DeexanLIONHEART (1990)Lionheart, or the birth of UFC, is about Van Damme joining an underground fighting circuit in order to pay his brother's medical bills. I guess it's also a great commercial for Obamacare. Fans of the muscle from Brussels rank Lionheart as one of his classics. I grew up on Van Damme and I've never agreed with that. This is the 3rd movie where he plays a fighter. Or the 4th if you wanna count No Retreat No Surrender. It was getting old by this point. I do have to give the filmmakers credit for keeping the fight scenes fresh and for filling the story with entertaining characters. But it's not enough. The plot is too paper thin and Van Damme doesn't add anything new to his role. A for effort C for content HARD TARGET (1993)I would have loved to have been at the pitch meeting for Hard Target. "It's about rich people hunting homeless people for sport and it takes place in modern day New Orleans. John Woo is directing and Sam Raimi is producing. Write me a check for millions of dollars." And you know what? It was worth every penny. This movie stays true to what it is and doesn't apologize for it. Either you accept that or don't waste your time watching it. It's a really stupid movie and the action scenes are beyond ridiculous but I have to respect filmmakers who stick to their vision and don't worry about other people's opinions. A for balls B- for content SUDDEN DEATH (1995)This is Doomsday's favorite Die Hard rip-off and it features Franklyn's Pittsburgh Penguins. The owner of the team actually wrote and produced the movie. It's also Van Damme's second movie with Peter Hyams. They worked together on Timecop, Van Damme's highest grossing movie. Anyway... I don't know how all these Die Hard rip-offs got made without people being sued. They're so blatant it's ridiculous. Here, Van Damme plays the fire inspector for a sports arena and he's the only one who can stop the terrorists that kidnapped his daughter and are threatening to blow up the place. The movie is well-made. The action scenes are entertaining. And I do like that there's a hockey game being intercut with the main story. But it's still a Die Hard rip-off and one that doesn't hide the fact that it's a Die Hard rip-off. It's so shameless that I can't fully support it. A for technique C for content DOUBLE TEAM (1997)My brain pulled a Mandela Effect and combined Double Team with Knock Off. I was very disappointed when Rob Schneider never showed up. It also meant this movie wasn’t nearly as campy as I had hoped. Van Damme stars as counter-terrorist agent Jack Quinn. He’s after Mickey Rourke whose face still looks human. After an assignment goes wrong, Van Damme goes rogue, and with the help of arms dealer Dennis Rodman, continues his mission to take down human-faced Mickey Rourke. The action scenes are good. Movie is directed by Hong Kong veteran Tsui Hark. But the cinematography ( SnoBorderZero’s area of expertise) and the overall aesthetic bothered me. It’s part softcore porn (without the porn) and part skateboarding video (without the skateboarding). It’s like a 13-year-old trying to be cool, but doesn’t know what cool is. But there’s moments like these to make up for it: Almost forgot to mention that Doomsday favorite Ivan Ooze is in it. He’s the third guy running in that clip.
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Apr 1, 2020 22:31:30 GMT -5
Watch Desert Heat.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Apr 2, 2020 11:27:39 GMT -5
" Ein 2-mann-waffenarsenal… Genug, um die red been ze lassen!" translates to " A 2-man arsenal... Enough to leave the earth!"
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 4, 2020 23:06:52 GMT -5
For PG Cooper and PhantomKnightNANCY DREW AND THE HIDDEN STAIRCASE (2019) The red-haired chick from Stephen King’s IT plays Nancy Drew. She investigates “the ghosts” in some old ladies house, but it just turns out to be some dude using hallucinating drugs, similar to Scarecrow in Batman. This old ladies house is literally the Narrows from Batman Begins. Weird shit, man. I don’t know if y’all watch the U.S. version of Shameless on Showtime. The blonde chick from season one, with the nice titties, is here playing Nancy Drew’s frenemy. Girl’s like 30-years-old. Red-head girl is like 12. Weird shit, man. Anyway, this ain’t no Judy Moody but it’s alright.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 9, 2020 21:49:11 GMT -5
BIG TOP PEE WEE (1988)The bizarre Pee-Wee Herman movie in which he joins the circus and bangs Valeria Golino. A fucking nightmare.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on May 10, 2020 16:52:13 GMT -5
MOMMIE DEAREST (1981)Nooooo wiiirrre HAAANGERRRS — EVERRR!!!! What a rollercoaster ride. Faye Dunaway hams it up as Joan Crawford in this slanderous biopic. As she ages. As her acting career declines. As her personal life is in turmoil. Joan Crawford keeps her composure in public, but as soon as she gets home, she takes out her frustration on her adopted children by turning into a lunatic. The movie is part hilarious and part horrifying. I can’t tell if it’s good nor bad but it’s certainly captivating.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 14:41:31 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on May 10, 2020 20:57:44 GMT -5
Pirates of the Caribbean
The Curse of the Black Pearl
I've always liked this movie, but it's never struck me as anything exceptional, even as a kid. A lot of the movie's charms are readily apparent, with the cast being a highlight and Gore Verbinski rendering the spectacle with skill and style. Much as Johnny Depp got the most credit for this movie's success but on rewatches it's really Geoffrey Rush that ties it all together. The overall film is entertaining and generally fun, but held back by the supernatural elements. It's not just that the ghost pirates haven't really held up visually, but their presence defuses the action of any real danger. At a certain point it's clear that most of participants in the various sword fights aren't in any real danger and that reduces the climax to empty spectacle. That's not without it's charm but it does start to get old, at least for me.
B-
Dead Man's Chest
These movies descended into noisy chaos quite quickly. There's a lot of nonsense in Dead Man's Chest with Jack worshiped as a God by a tribe, while most of the plot machinations mainly exist to set up the third movie and don't really have much narrative resonance here. Still, the movie does rebound as it goes. I especially like the conflict which emerges between Jack, Will, and Norrington. Everyone has clear motivations that are understandable and drive the story, even if the action eventually gets a little too over the top for my tastes. I also think the final set-piece against the Kracken is really awesome and probably the best action scene of the series. Oh, and Davy Jones still looks pretty great even 14 years later. Overall, Dead Man's Chest has enough charm to get by, but the writing is on the wall.
C
At Worlds End
All of the tedious plot machinations from the first half of Dead Man's Chest are finally paid off in this over-bloated slog. I think what torpedoed this franchise is when it started thinking it was The Lord of the Rings when it's really The Mask of Zorro. The best elements of The Curse of the Black Pearl are the light-hearted swashbuckling elements. Fun characters who we like with clear motivations engaging in adventure and mischief. Jack Sparrow may be a different type of swashbuckling hero, but those core elements were still there. But by the time we get to At World's End, the series is pushing towards being "epic", with huge armies, effects-heavy battles, and a gargantuan runtime. The thing is, neither the characters or the story are deep enough to really warrant this style of epic storytelling, so we get an overstuffed plot full of twists and betrayals and double-crosses that end up not meaning much. Alliances come and go so quickly that I just stop caring.
I think one of the best examples of this is what I'll call the tragedy of James Norrington. Though playing a rival for Elizabeth's affection in The Curse of the Black Pearl, I always liked that the movie never framed him as a villain or a bad guy. He's a sympathetic character in spite of everything. In Dead Man's Chest, we see his life has fallen apart after failing to capture Jack Sparrow and that film ends with Norrington selling his soul to the East India Trading Company. But after realizing the full scope of his moral degradation, Norrington turns on the villains, sacrificing himself to aid the heroes in their battle against tyranny. Sounds like a great arc right? Well it would be, except Norrington's big moment precedes another hour of action and spectacle. His impact is really quite minimal and by the end of the movie you barely remember he did anything. That's the thing about At World's End, there's some good stuff in it, but it's such a monstrosity of stuff that none of it really matters.
There are other things I could complain about, like the fact that Jack Sparrow has really worn out his welcome by this time (those scenes with multiple Sparrows are brutal) or the fact that the Kraken is killed off-screen, but I think I've made my point. Contrary to how this review might read, I don't hate this movie. Gore Verbinski is able to stage some entertaining action and for all the film's problems it's clear a director's vision is coming through. I also quite like the meeting of the pirate lords, which is the most fun and playful the movie gets.
D+
On Stranger Tides
I made sure to end my review of At World's End by stating that, despite a negative review and low score, I didn't hate the third Pirates movie. No such clarification will be needed for On Stranger Tides; I hate this movie. I didn't think I hated it. When I watched the DVD in 2011 I mostly dismissed it as a lame mediocrity. But on a rewatch the film represents the ultimate nadir of the Pirates franchise, a completely shallow and uninteresting movie with almost nothing going for it. Action scenes go on endlessly without motivation or creativity as the film shambles from one uninteresting set-piece to another. I criticized At World's End for being overstuffed, but On Stranger Tides has the opposite problem. There's virtually no story here. There is a plot with Jack Sparrow searching for the fountain of youth and a badguy doing the same, but there's no character growth or interesting choices to be made or any substance that makes an adventure worthwhile.
There's a brief moment where Jack Sparrow and Barbosa need fight while trying to balance their weight in a precariously placed ship. I kind of like that scene. Otherwise, this movie sucks.
D-
Dead Men Tell No Tales
And so my partner and I have come to the end of our little Pirates of the Caribbean marathon. Not a moment too soon. While certainly an improvement over On Stranger Tides, Dead Men Tell No Tales (a.k.a Salazar's Revenge on Disney Plus for some reason) just further emphasizes how little gas is left in the tank. The once charming Jack Sparrow has been reduced to an embarrassing joke whose buffoonery grates on the eyes and the ears. New characters Henry and Carina don't fare much better. I think Kayla Scodelario has some charm despite the unimaginative character she's tasked with playing, but Brenton Thwaites is an absolute bore. The character who bums me out the most though is Barbossa. Much as resurrecting this character never felt particularly necessary, I didn't really mind because I like watching Geoffrey Rush so much. But it's clear On Stranger Tides and Dead Men Tell No Tales had no idea what to do with this character, so the once frightful and imposing villain sacrifices himself for his long lost daughter or whatever. I miss when Barbossa was cool.
What saves the film is that the pacing is a bit stronger and the action scenes are generally more inventive and exciting. Javier Bardem also gets a lot more to do as the villain even if he's not exactly stretching himself. Those elements help, but the film's awful sense of humour also holds it back, as does the desperately nostalgia pandering in the ending. Had this been a story about Elizabeth trying to save Will that actually might have worked, but relaying this story through the pair's dopey and uninteresting son robs any poignancy.
D
Personally, I'd be more than happy if they never made another one of these movies. This is very much a Jurassic Park situation where one good idea spawned a wave of misbegotten sequels leaching off a carcass of a first movie that was never meant to support them. But another film is in the works so it seems highly likely we'll see the further swashbuckling adventures of Jack Sparrow. Despite my at best apathy and at worst disdain for the Pirates franchise, I do think it can be saved. First and foremost, the filmmakers need to figure out Sparrow. The dude can't be the narrative drive of a movie. There's a reason the first movie is really Will Turner's story. That said, Sparrow is also not the comic buffoon these last two movies thinks he is. Verbinski always took care to show Sparrow's humanity and genuine heroism, something that has been sorely lacking from this series since then. Second, and this is gonna sound pretty basic, but we need an actual story to grasp onto. Dead Men Tell No Tales made a gesture this way but got bogged down in mcguffins and too many boring characters. The heroes need a clear goal and the villain strong motivation to stop them. Otherwise, it's just noise. Tying into that, these movies need to cut out the supernatural shit. Every film has Jack Sparrow fighting ghost pirates or squid pirates or a voodo pirate or Spanish ghost pirates. It's an unnecessary step that robs the action scenes of stakes and it also feels like the filmmakers spend way more time crafting the look of these guys than coming up with motivation.
So there's some improvements you could make to fix this franchise. Or just stop making them. That works too.
|
|