Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Feb 7, 2017 9:56:37 GMT -5
UNDER SIEGE (1992) / UNDER SIEGE 2: DARK TERRITORY (1995)I have no idea how Under Siege (Die Hard on a Navy Boat) managed to do well back in the 90's. You can't put a tank top on Steven Seagal and pretend he's Bruce Willis. The guy has zero charisma and zero acting skills. You're also gonna tell me that Miss Playboy 1989 goes from a bimbo to an action star within minutes of screen time? The ONLY good things about this movie are Gary Busey and Tommy Lee Jones, but their performance aren't something you can't watch in other movies. To sum it up, Under Siege is shit. Now... Under Siege 2 (Die Hard on a Train) ... is not that bad. Seagal is Seagal. He isn't pretending to be something he isn't. Eric Bogosian plays a pretty good villain. And the score by Basil Poledouris is really good. PAYCHECK (2003)2016 was a rough year for Ben Affleck. Batman vs Superman is the new Batman & Robin. The Accountant came and went. Live By Night was a gigantic flop. But heck, at least it ain't Gigli. Am I right? Well... for all the shit Affleck got back in the day, I don't think his movies were THAT terrible. Daredevil is pretty decent. Jersey Girl isn't Gigli. What else did he make? Oh, yeah. Paycheck. John Woo. Philip K. Dick. It's not THAT bad. Affleck plays a guy who... does computer things, I guess... and he gets his memory erased after every job. But now, the FBI is after him and Two-Face from the Nolan movies is trying to kill him and he needs to restore his memory and Uma Thurman is in it for whatever reason. I don't know. I guess that's what the movie is about. Basically, I wasn't bored. It's John Woo. Why you guys hating on John Woo? Dude makes good movies. The worst John Woo movie is better than the best Kevin Smith movie. Well... not really... but you get the point. Paycheck. Good shit. Now where's my paycheck... Paramount?
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,299
Likes: 6,764
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Feb 7, 2017 12:15:33 GMT -5
No no no, Under Siege is awesome. Tommy Lee Jones is on Tommy Lee Jones overload and has one of the most awesomely and unnecessarily brutal death in movie history. Under Siege 2 is the shit movie....but is also a pretty sweet guilty pleasure, I've seen it a bunch of times over the years and still have fun with how ridiculous it is. I mean he programs a bomb to say 'You're fucked' before it blows up. You're right about the score though, it's pretty good for a Steven Seagal movie.
Also Under Siege has tits. Not just tits, Playboy Playmate tits (just ignore her manly eyebrows). Under Siege 2 has a lame sex scene.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Feb 7, 2017 13:34:25 GMT -5
No no no, Under Siege is awesome. When a Navy ship is attacked, only the kitchen staff can save the day. He out-acted Gary Busey. Not an easy task. Under Siege 2 has Red Forman. Erika Eleniak > Pamela Anderson
|
|
ManFromAtlantis
Intern
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Location:
Last Online Feb 8, 2017 15:35:24 GMT -5
|
Post by ManFromAtlantis on Feb 7, 2017 15:38:32 GMT -5
This is so bad its good. anyone heard of the cool ones? (1967)
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Feb 8, 2017 7:45:27 GMT -5
No no no, Under Siege is awesome. Tommy Lee Jones is on Tommy Lee Jones overload and has one of the most awesomely and unnecessarily brutal death in movie history. Under Siege 2 is the shit movie....but is also a pretty sweet guilty pleasure, I've seen it a bunch of times over the years and still have fun with how ridiculous it is. I mean he programs a bomb to say 'You're fucked' before it blows up. You're right about the score though, it's pretty good for a Steven Seagal movie. Also Under Siege has tits. Not just tits, Playboy Playmate tits (just ignore her manly eyebrows). Under Siege 2 has a lame sex scene. Is the correct answer. This is so bad its good. anyone heard of the cool ones? (1967) Never heard of it. What's it about?
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Feb 10, 2017 8:49:36 GMT -5
THE SPECIALIST (1994)Back in the 90's, someone gave me this movie on VHS for my birthday. I had no idea why until I saw the shower sex scene featuring Sharon Stone. Granted, it also had a naked Sylvester Stallone but that was a small price to pay. At the time I thought the movie was kinda boring, but now I see the charm. Stallone plays a former CIA explosives expert whose now working as a hit man in Miami. His old rival, played by James Woods, is also there and working for the police department. Stone plays the woman who hires him to kill the people that murdered her parents. Stallone and Stone are pretty shitty in the movie and their romance is super awkward. That shower sex scene is their only redeeming value. Woods, on the other hand, is amazing. The guy is pretty good in everything I've seen him in, but he's especially good here. I don't know if they paid him more or if he was having sex with Sharon Stone, but his performance is ridiculously over-the-top and hilarious. Watch the movie for him and for some of the decent action scenes. Oh - and the shower sex scene. Also... John Barry's score is REALLY good. Woods. Barry. Action. Nudity. Sex. What more do you want? This shit's better than Under Siege.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Mar 22, 2017 4:15:28 GMT -5
Our Man Flint (1966) / In Like Flint (1967)These movies were terrible. I can't tell if they were James Bond spoofs, campy alternatives or both. 007 producers must have been equally confused considering how cheesy You Only Live Twice turned out. Only reason to watch them is for James Coburn as Derek Flint. Dude's hilarious. Remember when Jibbs complained about James Bond stopping his heart in Die Another Day? That happens here. Remember when SnoBorderZero complained about James Bond going into outer space in Moonraker? That happens here too. Weird, huh? Remember Hans Gruber in Die Hard? There's a Hans Gruber here. Strange how influential these dumb movies were. Surprised there wasn't a 3rd one. Surprised there isn't a 4th Austin Powers. When they gonna make silly James Bond movies again? So many questions, not enough answers.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Mar 22, 2017 7:24:50 GMT -5
Yeah, but, dat phone.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Mar 22, 2017 12:22:05 GMT -5
I love the fight scenes in these movies. Better than James Bond?
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,945
Likes: 2,015
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 9:15:52 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Mar 22, 2017 12:46:59 GMT -5
Flint movies are fantastic. Coburn is such a great smug sarcastic asshole.
He's the perfect American bond.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Mar 30, 2017 21:35:06 GMT -5
Spider-Man 3I was gonna wait for the 10th anniversary, which is only a month away, but Doomsday had to start shit. Let's cut to the chase. Let's begin with the negative. Mary Jane is a bitch. I get she has daddy issues but why you treating Spider-Man like garbage. He's only saved your life, like, 50 times. Harry is also a moron. Your dad was the Green Goblin. He murdered his company executives right in front of your face. Shut your mouth and stop hating on Spider-Man. And why does he lose his memory when it's convenient to the plot and then regain it when it's convenient to the plot? Lazy writing. What's with the jazzy music when Peter and Harry get into a fight at the mansion? What's with the cheesy symbiote theme music? Danny Elfman, where are you?! But you know what really takes the cake? Forgiving Sandman at the end. Accident or not, he killed a defensively old man. Toss his ass back in jail. With that out of the way, let me tell you WHY Spider-Man 3 is NOT a bad movie. Notice I left out Emo Peter Parker. That happened 90 minutes into the movie and was largely a montage. Get over it. Spider-Man 3 works because Peter Parker works. Fanboys always whine about not getting the wisecracking Spider-Man from the comics but I enjoy Sam Raimi's melodramatic interpretation. With Tobey Maguire along for the ride, Peter Parker is a doofus and a man child but his heart is pure. He's honored by New York City and let's a pretty girl innocently kiss him. Mary Jane gives him shit. His next door neighbor is hungry for his cock, but he never takes advantage of her and treats her like a friend. He could cheat on you, Mary Jane. He could cheat on you. There's a job promotion at work and J. Jonah Jameson makes him jump through hopes to get it. He could easily go to a competitor but he's loyal. His uncle's killer is on the loose, he puts on the symbiotic suit and does crazy shit but realizes on his own that it was a mistake. He didn't need some speech by Aunt May to see the errors of his way. Or heck - the family butler that was ignored for the bulk of the trilogy. His best friend is constantly trying to kill him, but he looks past that and always gives him the chance to do the right thing. He even FORGIVES his uncle's murderer and let's him float away. It's easy to call him an idiot but that's why he's a superhero and you're not. You're the asshole. They say Superman is outdated. Nah. We're outdated. We're the ones who let corporations pollute the planet. We're the ones who let the government mess with our health care. We're the ones who don't support small businesses and stare at our phones instead of participating in our community. Superman is the good guy. Spider-Man is the good guy. Sam Raimi never lost sight of that. Tobey Maguire never lost sight of that. They put Peter Parker through situations that challenged who he is and what he represented. Think back to Spider-Man 2 when Harry got drunk and slapped him across the face in the middle of a party. He could have said, "hey asshole, your dad was the Green Goblin" but he took the slapping cause he cared about his friend. Think about the scene in this movie when he's about to propose but Mary Jane gives him shit cause she got fired from a play and he innocently kissed a girl at the Spider-Man celebration. He just stared at her confused and heartbroken, never once showing anger. The guy is better than everyone else and never acknowledges it or even realizes it. Spider-Man 3 is good because I care. I care about what happens to Peter Parker. I care to see how he gets out of it. And most importantly, Sam Raimi gives me reasons to care. Not once, in three movies, does he resort to explosions as a solution. We can mock Peter Parker for forgiving the bad guy but what's the alternative? Blowing up New York City? Breaking the villains neck and then getting something to eat? These movies were always about people, yes, fantasy people, but people nonetheless. They're not about end-of-the-world and good vs evil. They're about emotions, struggles, solutions, growing as a person. These movies are about something when a lot of these movies are about nothing. Can't fault it for that.
|
|
Wyldstaar
Producer
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,900
Likes: 1,267
Location:
Last Online Nov 20, 2024 20:53:38 GMT -5
|
Post by Wyldstaar on Mar 30, 2017 23:03:23 GMT -5
No mention at all of the five song and dance numbers in this thing? No mention of it being a step-by-step remake of the first two movies?
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Mar 30, 2017 23:44:12 GMT -5
No mention of Peter Parker, our supposed hero, largely being kind of a dick for most of this movie?
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Mar 31, 2017 0:35:36 GMT -5
No mention of Peter Parker, our supposed hero, largely being kind of a dick for most of this movie? lol. No. Even when Peter was under the influence of the symbiote, he was usually justified. Eddie faked a photo and used it to steal the promotion from Peter. Difficult to feel bad for Eddie when he got fired. Sandman killed his Uncle. You really think the subway fight was out of line? As for his landlord, guy was asking for a lawsuit and Peter did apologize afterwards. No foul. His daughter? He could have fucked her. Didn't even touch her. The fight with Harry? N---a was asking for it. Only really messed up part was smacking MJ and that was an accident and did snap him out of it. As for the pre-symbiote stuff, MJ was being the unreasonable one. Guy's out there risking his life every day. Cut him some slack. Your acting career isn't that important.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 18, 2017 1:07:52 GMT -5
For SnoBorderZeroNavy Seals (1990)A group of navy seals, led by Charlie Sheen and Michael Biehn, go after a Middle Eastern terrorist group in possession of stinger missiles. Lots of action scenes. Lots of scenes of the soldiers horseplaying. Lots of scenes of Sheen and Biehn butting heads with their superiors. Did I mention lots of action scenes? This is what you'd call... military porn. Picture Trump supporters jerking off to this movie. America, fuck yeah! There isn't much else to say. Navy Seals probably killed Biehn's career. He never again starred in a major film - unless you wanna count Tombstone which is a Kurt Russell vanity project. Sheen quickly bounced back with Hot Shots. That man is always - winning.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Apr 18, 2017 6:37:54 GMT -5
I loved Navy Seals when I was a kid. And Hudson Hawk. Misunderstood classics.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,622
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 21:31:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Apr 18, 2017 13:06:52 GMT -5
The 80s and 90s: when even Charlie Sheen was an action star.
|
|
Justin
Script Supervisor
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 739
Likes: 355
Location:
Last Online Oct 17, 2017 12:05:25 GMT -5
|
Post by Justin on Apr 18, 2017 17:40:20 GMT -5
Just look at his badass pose.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 20, 2017 21:25:41 GMT -5
Cuba (1979)If you were making a movie about the communist takeover of Cuba, you might consider putting the spotlight on the issues that led to the change in government and all the major players. Richard Lester, however, had a different approach. He focused on Sean Connery rekindling a love affair with an old flame. Lame. Saddest part is that it's a really well made movie. Beautifully shot. Great locations. Top talent. All wasted on a shitty script.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 9:56:36 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Apr 20, 2017 22:10:13 GMT -5
Never heard of this. Connery has a great mustache.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 20, 2017 22:43:16 GMT -5
Never heard of this. Connery has a great mustache. Same stache from Meteor: METEOR (1979)Before Armageddon and before Deep Impact there was... METEOR. Remember all the Nova Awards you gave this movie, Jibbs ? Remember... Nova Awards? Anyway, Sean Connery plays a guy who has to stop an asteroid from hitting the earth. Does he put on a space suit and go into space like Roger Moore did in Moonraker? Of course not. The man has too much dignity. He stays on earth and remotely sends a shitload of nuclear bombs to destroy the asteroid. The movie is basically Connery trying to get the American and Soviets to join forces for the greater good. To keep the audience awake there's a series of smaller asteroids that hit different parts of the world. It's more of a 70's disaster movie than a post-Star Wars science fiction movie. It's okay for what it is, but Roger Moore went into space in 1979 and Sean Connery didn't. Fucked up, man.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Apr 21, 2017 20:53:52 GMT -5
True facts: Connery got the bond gig as the producers thought he moved like a panther as they watched him cross a London street.
Next Bond: an actual panther.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 23, 2017 2:38:01 GMT -5
The Cotton Club (1984)Now that Doomsday survived New York New York, it's time for him to tackle The Cotton Club. You too SnoBorderZero ... and PG Cooper . This might be Francis Ford Coppola worst movie. Seriously. Even Jack is better. I first watch The Cotton Club in high school and fell asleep a quarter into it. It was time to give it a second chance since Dooms' sat through the awful New York New York and Sno watched some of Coppola's early work. The Cotton Club revolves around three characters: Richard Gere as a musician (and eventually Hollywood actor) who falls in love with a gangster's girlfriend (played by a barely legal Diane Lane), Gregory Hines as a dancer (naturally) and Nicolas Cage as a young man rising in the ranks of the mob. What does any of this have to do with the legendary Cotton Club? Very little. Quick history lesson for those out of the loop. The Cotton Club was a whites only nightclub in Harlem, New York during the Prohibition era. The performers were mostly Black entertainers. I hate to pull the race card but it's warranted here. This movie should have obviously been about race relations and not white gangsters shooting each other. That's the least of the problems, however, because even as a gangster movie it doesn't work. It's slow, boring and none of the characters are interesting except for maybe Gregory Hines who's just playing himself. Only redeeming parts are the musical numbers and the overall look of the movie. But those aren't enough to sit through 2 hours of this shit.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,299
Likes: 6,764
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Apr 24, 2017 20:38:05 GMT -5
Everything about that sounds terrible.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 8, 2017 12:41:36 GMT -5
Clue / Cluedo (1985)Murder on the Orient Express comes out tomorrow. No one spoil it for daniel and FShuttari . If tomorrow is too far away, you can watch Clue (or Cluedo for you Brits). Yes, the one based on a board game instead of a book. This is what society has been reduced to. Ain’t that right, board game specialist IanTheCool. The movie is the gigantic piece of shit you expect and a waste of great talent. It boils down to just being stupid. Six people from Washington DC, all with ties to politics, are invited to a mansion to meet with their blackmailer. He gets killed and they have to figure out which of the six is the murderer. Simple premise... if you actually do something with it. Not for one second do you believe any of these people are murderers. It’s just too lighthearted and the characters are just too goofy for the most part. You gotta add a little grit to your murder mystery. The energy is good and the alternate endings are fun, but overall, it’s too meh-tastic to be of any value. To the Orient Express we go.
|
|