blaster1
Gaffer
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 158
Likes: 42
Location:
Last Online Mar 5, 2024 19:15:50 GMT -5
|
Post by blaster1 on May 5, 2018 19:58:00 GMT -5
Because then he would just be Thanos, not The Mad Titan. Marvel had to play it safe because there was always the possibility that Warner Bros was gonna pull Darkseid out of their ass. They had to make Thanos more distinctive than his comic book counterpart. I think this adaptation was great. Anything resembling the comic book would have seemed D.C.-esque. I'm not saying that the cinematic purpose isn't better for the masses, especially children. The fact that the Infinity Stones would have allowed him to find another solution to his presumed problem. Plus, in the comics his mass slaughter to appease death IS why he is called the Mad Titan.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on May 5, 2018 21:00:00 GMT -5
Still seems like a common arch villain motive is some form of "cleansing."
|
|
Wyldstaar
Producer
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,900
Likes: 1,267
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 19:45:09 GMT -5
|
Post by Wyldstaar on May 5, 2018 21:11:09 GMT -5
Still seems like a common arch villain motive is some form of "cleansing." Yes, but the common baddies desire for "cleansing" is almost always discriminatory in some fashion. Their motivation is getting to remove a population they feel has wronged them in some fashion, or is inferior in their view.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,106
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 22:45:58 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on May 5, 2018 21:18:07 GMT -5
Still seems like a common arch villain motive is some form of "cleansing." I think the villain from Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol had a similar thing going on.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on May 5, 2018 21:30:43 GMT -5
Thanos, like The Joker, was incredible, but neither of their plans made sense.
The best part? It didn't matter.
Of course they'll reverse the ending, but if you weren't shaken by those last 10 minutes then what are you watching the cinema for?
Marvel's achievement is unprecedented and should be rightly lauded. As DC have shown, it could have gone so wrong so easily but it has culminated in a movie that you almost feel they had written 10 years ago after Iron Man.
I for one am not suffering from "comic book movie burnout", certainly not from Marvel.
Funnily enough, i used to hold the first Avengers in the highest regard but I watched it again recently and it is insane how far they've come even from there.
Credit must go to Kevin Feige. His vision has come to fruition.
Now they just need to get us invested in the new Avengers...
|
|
blaster1
Gaffer
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 158
Likes: 42
Location:
Last Online Mar 5, 2024 19:15:50 GMT -5
|
Post by blaster1 on May 6, 2018 2:11:11 GMT -5
Thanos, like The Joker, was incredible, but neither of their plans made sense. The best part? It didn't matter. Of course they'll reverse the ending, but if you weren't shaken by those last 10 minutes then what are you watching the cinema for? Marvel's achievement is unprecedented and should be rightly lauded. As DC have shown, it could have gone so wrong so easily but it has culminated in a movie that you almost feel they had written 10 years ago after Iron Man. I for one am not suffering from "comic book movie burnout", certainly not from Marvel. Funnily enough, i used to hold the first Avengers in the highest regard but I watched it again recently and it is insane how far they've come even from there. Credit must go to Kevin Feige. His vision has come to fruition. Now they just need to get us invested in the new Avengers... Agreed.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,792
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 26, 2024 1:12:58 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on May 6, 2018 3:33:55 GMT -5
Still seems like a common arch villain motive is some form of "cleansing." Still seems like a common arch villain motive is some form of "cleansing." I think the villain from Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol had a similar thing going on. I mean, it's basically the plot to Moonraker.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on May 6, 2018 10:31:12 GMT -5
Yeah, I almost said that. But like with what Wyldstar said, Drax only wanted pretty people. (Hugo Drax, not Guardian Drax)
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,106
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 22:45:58 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on May 6, 2018 10:46:56 GMT -5
Yeah, I almost said that. But like with what Wyldstar said, Drax only wanted pretty people. (Hugo Drax, not Guardian Drax) He also saw himself as being the leader of this "brave new world," whereas Thanos seems content to fuck off and let the world deal with the fallout.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,650
Likes: 4,067
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 21:43:34 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on May 6, 2018 16:36:23 GMT -5
Yeah, I almost said that. But like with what Wyldstar said, Drax only wanted pretty people. (Hugo Drax, not Guardian Drax) Glad you distinguished the Draxes, especially since MCU Drax seems to prefer ugly people. Maybe the two Draxes should have a debate.
|
|
Wyldstaar
Producer
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,900
Likes: 1,267
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 19:45:09 GMT -5
|
Post by Wyldstaar on May 6, 2018 20:49:11 GMT -5
Yeah, I almost said that. But like with what Wyldstar said, Drax only wanted pretty people. (Hugo Drax, not Guardian Drax) Glad you distinguished the Draxes, especially since MCU Drax seems to prefer ugly people. Maybe the two Draxes should have a debate. I have serious doubts about Drax The Destroyer having the attention span required to engage in any sort of debate. My suspicion is that he would stop listening as soon as the notion was put to him.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,650
Likes: 4,067
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 21:43:34 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on May 6, 2018 21:16:16 GMT -5
Glad you distinguished the Draxes, especially since MCU Drax seems to prefer ugly people. Maybe the two Draxes should have a debate. I have serious doubts about Drax The Destroyer having the attention span required to engage in any sort of debate. My suspicion is that he would stop listening as soon as the notion was put to him. That's what would make the scene great! You'd have the monologuing Bond villain trying to get his point across while repeatedly being ignored.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,106
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 22:45:58 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on May 7, 2018 18:57:58 GMT -5
Avengers: Infinity War(4/28/2018)
Warning: Review contains spoilers
Shortly after I went to a Saturday afternoon screening of Avengers: Infinity War I went onto Twitter and tweeted the following: “#AvengersInfinityWar All I'm going to say is, if you're invested in the MCU you're going to want to see this and do so before the spoilers get to you” and I’d say that’s still more or less what I have to say about the movie for anyone who hasn’t seen it yet. Truth be told I’ve found writing reviews for MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe) as if anyone is looking for advice as to whether or not they should see them is pretty delusional. That isn’t to say that these movies are “critic-proof” as I do think truly negative reviews of them could take their toll if the movies suddenly took a real dip in quality, but while they continue to live up to expectations the people who are interested are simply going to keep going and this notion that anyone is waiting for little old me to weigh in before they put down their money would be even more egotistical than it would be for most of my reviews. So, after this paragraph (and the perfunctory summery after it) this review is going to just dive in and talk about everything that happens in this movie and what it means to this whole enterprise and things will probably be a little more informal than usual.
The film picks up right where Thor: Ragnarok left off with the Asgardian refugees spaceship running into Thanos’ giant space base. The Asgardian ship is quickly boarded and Thanos (Josh Brolin), who appears to have gotten a hold of the Power Stone from Guardians of the Galaxy, makes quick work of Thor (Chris Hemsworth), Loki (Tom Hiddleson), and even The Hulk (Mark Ruffalo). Thanos then takes the Tesseract, which had been at the center of The Avengers and was re-stolen by Loki in Thor: Ragnarok, and proceeds to kill Loki on the spot and take the space stone from the Tesseract. Heimdall (Idris Elba) is also killed but as he’s dying he manages to use the bifrost to teleport Bruce Banner back to Earth. The Asgardian ship is destroyed but Thor, being a god, survives in the vacuum of space and is rescued by The Guardians of the Galaxy, who are chasing down the distress signal that the Asgardian ship was sending out. From there He, Groot (Vin Diesal), and Rocket (Bradley Cooper) decide to seek out a weapons forge while Quill (Chris Pratt), Gamora (Zoe Saldana), Drax (Dave Bautista), and Mantis (Pom Klementieff) go to The Collector (Benicio del Toro) to try to find the Reality Stone from Thor: The Dark World. Meanwhile, Banner finds himself having been teleported back to earth, where the Mind Stone is in the hands of Vision (Paul Bettany) and Scarlet Witch (Elizabeth Olsen) after the events of Avengers: Age of Ultron and the Time Stone is in the hands of Dr. Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch) after the events of his film. Banner immediately seeks out Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.) and shortly after warning him and Dr. Strange about Thanos finds New York under attack by Thanos’ minions.
That above summery is a good example of why this is a hard write a normal review of this movie. It’s a paragraph that will make very little sense to anyone who hasn’t already seen eighteen movies that preceded this one, and if anyone has already seen eighteen Marvel movies why the hell would they skip this one? There are other Marvel movies that you can go to and more or less enjoy without worrying about how they fit into the overall story, but this certainly isn’t one of them. This also isn’t a Marvel movie that’s trying to be some kind of Marvel infused take on some other genre. It isn’t trying to be a blockbuster take on the high school movie like Spider-Man: Homecoming, it isn’t trying to be a comedic space opera that so happens to fit into the universe like Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 was, and it isn’t trying to be a politically charged science fiction film like Black Panther. This is, at its heart, purely and simply a Marvel movie. Of course it does need to bring in disparate elements from all those other movies and at times while watching the movie I was almost reminded of the early episodes of Marvel’s Netflix crossover series “The Defenders,” which gave the audience the impression that they were flipping between four different TV series. Certain sacrifices are of course going to be made. For instance The Guardians of the Galaxy are generally not accompanied by the 70s music they’re associated with and the trippy visuals associated with Dr. Strange are a lot more restrained here but for the most part the Russo Brothers do a pretty good job of bringing all these characters together efficiently while still providing all the action and witty banter that people expect from these movies.
All in all the movie plays out exactly as most audiences are expecting it to play out in grand entertaining fashion… and then everybody dies. Now this is an ending that’s going to play out very differently to different audiences. Personally I kind of saw it coming. I had vague memories of hearing that something like that happening in the comic books and leading up to my screening I saw a lot of headlines in the early reviews talking about the “shocking ending” in ways that probably seemed vague to the people writing them but which were pretty easy for someone who pays to much attention to this stuff to put two and two together. It’s also going to be less shocking to the over-informed simply because it’s a lot easier to be cynical about how permanent any of these deaths are likely to be if you know too much about who has what contracts. We already know that there’s going to be a third Guardians of the Galaxy so there’s no way those characters are really dead and that Sony is trying to build a Spider-Man cinematic universe which ensures that that character is coming back and that there’s no way in hell that Disney is going to let the Black Panther money train movie end here. However, it is maybe worth taking a couple steps back and considering how that played to the vast majority of the millions of people who are going to see this thing. While I’m sure a lot of them will also have a hunch that some of these characters are coming back they probably didn’t see this cliffhanger coming and Marvel has done a pretty good job of downplaying the fact that another Avengers movie is coming next year with the general public. In particular I wonder how the children in the audience would react to seeing the bad guy win and kill a bunch of their heroes. Is that going to be traumatic to them? I certainly hope so.
Anyway, the other thing about the movie I want to talk about has less to do with the ending itself so much as what led up to it. Thanos was really only able to enact his insane plan because a lot of the heroes make a lot of selfish decisions. Thanos only learns the location of the Soul Stone because Quill fails to follow Gamora’s instructions to shoot her rather than let her be captured and interrogated by Thanos, Gamora makes the same mistake herself by giving Thanos the location rather than see her sister tortured, Dr. Strange ostensibly only gives up the time stone to save Iron Man, Quill screws up yet again by losing his cool when the other heroes are about to take the gauntlet, and of course the possibility of that unhappy ending easily could have been cut of right from the beginning if Scarlett Witch had just yanked the mind stone from Vision’s head and wrecked it. Absolutely none of these decisions can be justified on any logical level. The whole damn movie is like a precession of so-called heroes making wildly selfish choices where they put the lives of their friends and family above the lives of literally trillions of other people and in doing so. It’s like the anti-Casablanca, no one seems to realize that the lives of a couple little people does not amount to a hill of beans in a crazy universe where a madman wants to wipe out half of the universe’s population with the snap of the fingers… and yet thematically this series of events is not an accident. The emotional and arguably selfish actions of all these characters stands in stark contrast to Thanos’ philosophy, which takes the notion of “the ends justify the means” to a deranged extreme. Thanos is willing to kill trillions “for the greater good” and the heroes often can’t even kill one person “for the greater good,” presumably there’s a middle ground somewhere to be found and we’ll have to see if they address this in the as of yet untitled next Avengers movie.
So I guess the last question is why this movie works so well despite theoretically having all the same problems that Avengers: Age of Ultron had. I called that movie an over-stuffed mess and on paper this movie is even more “stuffed” than that movie was, but it still manages to flow a lot better. It also manages to find a lot more time to develop its villain than that earlier movie did. In fact I was kind of shocked at how much effort they put into giving Thanos, a character I expected to have something of a Dr. Evil quality, some real motivations and personality. Above all I think what makes this work so much better than Avengers: Age of Ultron is just that it has a purpose. The surrounding solo Marvel films simply hadn’t been building towards Age of Ultron, it was a movie that largely just existed because they needed an Avengers movie in “phase two,” the movie those solo movies had been building towards pretty much since the beginning had been Infinity War and the fact that they actually managed to deliver on that promise and deliver on it this well is quite the achievement. Now granted, a lot of this movie’s overall legacy is going to depend on whether they stick the landing in the follow-up and that remains to be seen, but if the goal for now was to make us excited for the finale then mission accomplished.
**** out of Five
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on May 7, 2018 19:32:31 GMT -5
In particular I wonder how the children in the audience would react to seeing the bad guy win and kill a bunch of their heroes. Is that going to be traumatic to them? I certainly hope so.
|
|
blaster1
Gaffer
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 158
Likes: 42
Location:
Last Online Mar 5, 2024 19:15:50 GMT -5
|
Post by blaster1 on May 8, 2018 12:22:38 GMT -5
The Russo Brothers now need to go and bring their talents to the Star Wars franchise.
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,947
Likes: 2,017
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 22:21:29 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on May 8, 2018 14:23:07 GMT -5
They only directed the dialogue. The action scenes were completely the second unit. Some of the action scenes were a little... Uninspired if you ask me.
Even bay at least had some ideas when he made his action sequences, these were all so similar. Small complaint overall but would be cooler if they were a little more stylized.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,497
Likes: 2,865
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 19:57:35 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on May 8, 2018 18:43:26 GMT -5
The Russo Brothers now need to go and bring their talents to the Star Wars franchise. I don't know that their talent level is that exceptional. They're serviceable.
|
|
Fanible
Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2002
I peered into the vastness and saw nothing. Felt nothing.
Posts: 19,184
Likes: 788
Location:
Last Online Nov 6, 2024 0:31:29 GMT -5
|
Post by Fanible on May 10, 2018 11:05:27 GMT -5
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,307
Likes: 6,774
Location:
Last Online Nov 26, 2024 1:47:44 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on May 10, 2018 21:45:43 GMT -5
Currently at #13 on the all-time list. It’ll crack the top 10 by the end of the weekend.
|
|
daniel
Producer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,072
Likes: 245
Location:
Last Online Mar 13, 2022 22:49:30 GMT -5
|
Post by daniel on May 11, 2018 16:58:55 GMT -5
Thanos only learns the location of the Soul Stone because Quill fails to follow Gamora’s instructions to shoot her rather than let her be captured and interrogated by Thanos, Gamora makes the same mistake herself by giving Thanos the location rather than see her sister tortured, Dr. Strange ostensibly only gives up the time stone to save Iron Man, Quill screws up yet again by losing his cool when the other heroes are about to take the gauntlet, and of course the possibility of that unhappy ending easily could have been cut of right from the beginning if Scarlett Witch had just yanked the mind stone from Vision’s head and wrecked it. Absolutely none of these decisions can be justified on any logical level. The whole damn movie is like a precession of so-called heroes making wildly selfish choices where they put the lives of their friends and family above the lives of literally trillions of other people and in doing so. You have some factual inaccuracies in this review. 1. Quill did not fail to follow Gamora's instructions. He did what she asked, Thanos turned his bullet/laser to bubbles. 2. Gamora did not give up the location, Thanos replayed a memory and then told her how bad of a liar she is because she did not give up the location. 3. Dr Strange saw 1 possible victorious outcome. He later told Tony "It was the only way." I think there was enough inference there that he had to give up the time stone to make that 1 outcome possible. 4. I agree Quill made an emotionally-selfish decision. 5. I don't quite agree that SW should have just destroyed the stone as soon as they were told Thanos was after it - I don't think they realized how unstoppable he was. Then, they were given an alternative solution: removing the stone from Vision, so they went with the easier decision of just destroying it instead of risking a fight against Thanos. I found this movie entertaining, but the stakes were entirely undercut by knowing that these people aren't going to remain dead. The film really did itself a disservice by putting all of its stakes into one big buildup of "he's going to destroy half of us," which anyone who is paying half-attention to knows isn't going to stick in the Marvel Universe. Again, I found this entertaining to watch, but there was zero suspense in it for me. 7/10
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,106
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 22:45:58 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on May 11, 2018 17:40:17 GMT -5
Thanos only learns the location of the Soul Stone because Quill fails to follow Gamora’s instructions to shoot her rather than let her be captured and interrogated by Thanos, Gamora makes the same mistake herself by giving Thanos the location rather than see her sister tortured, Dr. Strange ostensibly only gives up the time stone to save Iron Man, Quill screws up yet again by losing his cool when the other heroes are about to take the gauntlet, and of course the possibility of that unhappy ending easily could have been cut of right from the beginning if Scarlett Witch had just yanked the mind stone from Vision’s head and wrecked it. Absolutely none of these decisions can be justified on any logical level. The whole damn movie is like a precession of so-called heroes making wildly selfish choices where they put the lives of their friends and family above the lives of literally trillions of other people and in doing so. You have some factual inaccuracies in this review. 1. Quill did not fail to follow Gamora's instructions. He did what she asked, Thanos turned his bullet/laser to bubbles. 2. Gamora did not give up the location, Thanos replayed a memory and then told her how bad of a liar she is because she did not give up the location. 3. Dr Strange saw 1 possible victorious outcome. He later told Tony "It was the only way." I think there was enough inference there that he had to give up the time stone to make that 1 outcome possible. 4. I agree Quill made an emotionally-selfish decision. 5. I don't quite agree that SW should have just destroyed the stone as soon as they were told Thanos was after it - I don't think they realized how unstoppable he was. Then, they were given an alternative solution: removing the stone from Vision, so they went with the easier decision of just destroying it instead of risking a fight against Thanos. I found this movie entertaining, but the stakes were entirely undercut by knowing that these people aren't going to remain dead. The film really did itself a disservice by putting all of its stakes into one big buildup of "he's going to destroy half of us," which anyone who is paying half-attention to knows isn't going to stick in the Marvel Universe. Again, I found this entertaining to watch, but there was zero suspense in it for me. 7/10My memory is a tad hasty but I would suggest that: 1. Quill's mistake in the first scene was hesitating and that he could have killed her if he had just done it before Thanos realized what was going on. 2. I could be misremembering but I believe that memory only revealed that Gamora knew where the soul stone was, not it's actual location, and that the sister's torture is what caused her to break down and reveal the location itself. 3. I could tell that there was a little more going on with the Dr. Strange thing, which is why I threw an "ostensibly" in there, but the fact remains that they threw in yet another scene of this kind of thing for a reason. 5. There is certainly an argument to be made for that, but as with #3 I think my point was less to judge these people than to establish that the filmmakers were intentionally filling their movie with these kind of decisions in order to make a thematic statement: the humanity of these heroes is both their greatest strength and greatest weakness when contrasted with Thanos' hyper-logical mania.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,307
Likes: 6,774
Location:
Last Online Nov 26, 2024 1:47:44 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on May 16, 2018 19:00:07 GMT -5
|
|
thebtskink
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jul 2000
It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again.
Posts: 19,462
Likes: 4,984
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 23:36:50 GMT -5
|
Post by thebtskink on May 16, 2018 19:01:43 GMT -5
|
|
blaster1
Gaffer
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 158
Likes: 42
Location:
Last Online Mar 5, 2024 19:15:50 GMT -5
|
Post by blaster1 on May 25, 2018 2:31:11 GMT -5
I was disappointed that my theory about the Soul Stone being in Wakanda didn't pan out. I was sure it would be there with James Brown- the Godfather of Soul.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,497
Likes: 2,865
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 19:57:35 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on May 26, 2018 8:27:25 GMT -5
If my calculations are correct, I think this is the 50th Marvel movie.
|
|