|
Post by RedVader on Aug 7, 2015 15:47:53 GMT -5
Vader go watch the movie... Stop looking at others opinions if you don't care about review threads and what we think. You are not going to change my mind or anyone else's on what you think is good or not good. If you like it, Great! If you don't, Great! It doesn't matter. Some of us here, like to know what a movie is like, and worth watching... Before spending 12 bucks... You clearly don't. Good for you. I dont mind average movie goer review threads im just kinda shocked everyone is hating the movie and now the director is pulling th rug out from under marvel and his cast. I was unsure about reviews until the director pointed fingers in saying its not my fault if the movie sucks. If not the director then who is too blame.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,628
Likes: 3,184
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 18:12:32 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Aug 7, 2015 15:48:53 GMT -5
All that fuss and you aren't even gonna go see it?
|
|
|
Post by RedVader on Aug 7, 2015 16:37:01 GMT -5
Really depends on if me and my friend want too see the same movie. The next movies planned was F4. But i have not seen Minions, Mission Impossible, Wanna see Man From Uncle and Agent 47 so may skip f4 which saddens me but the director made me question the movie. The Director Paniced and no director panics even if the movie tanks. Be a man and dont use excuses or least back the movie if thats the cut you approved.
|
|
Wyldstaar
Producer
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,900
Likes: 1,267
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 19:45:09 GMT -5
|
Post by Wyldstaar on Aug 7, 2015 19:33:29 GMT -5
Yep, it's pretty bad. The reasons why are already beginning to creep into the media, and there are sure to be more on the way. The main story I've seen so far is that after Fox and Trank agreed upon what the movie should be and prepared to move from pre-production to filming, Fox decided that they wanted to slash the budget at the last second. Fox decided the best way to do that would be to remove three big action scenes which they had previously given Trank approval on. Fox also decided to change the finale, and take away the final edit from Trank and his team.
Having seen the movie myself, it explains a lot. There is very little action in the film, and the finale doesn't have any setup worth speaking of. It's just, "Doom's arrived, and he's killing everyone for no readily apparent reason." His character for most of the movie is that of a highly intelligent smug ass who looks down on others, but is in no way unstable. At the finale, Doom is suddenly a genocidal megalomaniac who kills as casually as a child stomping on bugs in the back yard. I wouldn't be a bit surprised if it was the Assistant Director and not Trank that handled the finale, because it has a completely different tone from the rest of the movie. A great deal about the home life of Reed Richards as a child was clearly left on the editing room floor. He's got scars all over his face, and it's vaguely implied that his step-father is responsible for them. This would be a spoiler if it was part of the story or Reed's character development, but it's not in any way. It's ignored, aside from one throwaway line.
While I'm willing to lay much of the blame on the studio, Josh is not without fault. So far at least, there is no indication that the look of Doom is any different from what Trank wanted, and it's beyond terrible. He looks like a crash test dummy that's had glow stick fluid spilled all over him.
The story about Doom being the Avatar name of an internet blogger named Victor Domashev that was leaked last year is total BS. He's named Victor Von Doom and he's from Latveria, although there's no mention of him being royalty or anything like that. I don't know if this was changed due to nerd rage or if it was always BS, though.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Aug 7, 2015 21:45:55 GMT -5
Amid scathing reviews, embattled filmmaker Josh Trank took to Twitter to denounce his own superhero movie.
As negative reviews piled on his critically-savaged, schadenfreude-ridden Fantastic Four, director Josh Trank took to Twitter on Thursday to suggest that his 20th Century Fox studio overlords were responsible for the perplexingly awful cut of the superhero reboot set to hit theaters Friday.
“A year ago I had a fantastic version of this,” Trank tweeted from his verified account. “And it would’ve received great reviews. You’ll probably never see it. That’s reality though.”
The sad Trank tweet didn’t last long online before it was deleted for unknown reasons, although keen-eyed Twitter watchers archived it for posterity.
It marked a rare public statement from the embattled 31-year-old director, who’s denied reports that his erratic behavior and messy dogs caused drama during filming on Fantastic Four and lost him a high-profile gig directing the next Star Wars stand-alone flick.
Trank (with Simon Kinberg and Jeremy Slater) also wrote the $122 million blockbuster, which mounts a promising ensemble character drama before completely falling apart in a hot mess of truncated plot and empty CGI action.
Behind-the-scenes rumors had it that Fox execs freaked out over a lack of action in Trank’s original cut, prompting headline-grabbing reshoots. The disjointedness is so apparent in the final cut, it’s entirely possible Trank’s version would have been more of a piece, if not fully “fantastic.”
Regardless: Critics have utterly decimated Fantastic Four, which stars Miles Teller, Kate Mara, Michael B. Jordan, Jamie Bell, and Toby Kebbell in the origin tale of Marvel superheroes Mr. Fantastic, The Invisible Woman, The Human Torch, and The Thing. A sequel has already been dated for 2017, although it remains to be seen if it will come to fruition. www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/08/07/fantastic-four-director-josh-trank-slams-his-own-movie.html
|
|
|
Post by RedVader on Aug 7, 2015 21:59:26 GMT -5
I am willing to bet Bryan Singer could have done more with this and not been making excuses. But this has Bomb on it due too the fact its in aug and if you dont clean up first weekend there is no hope. my feeling is the man from uncle will be a hit that this should have been.
|
|
thebtskink
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jul 2000
It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again.
Posts: 19,462
Likes: 4,984
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 18:41:41 GMT -5
|
Post by thebtskink on Aug 7, 2015 23:40:17 GMT -5
Critic opinions on movies should be taken seriously for one reason Vader: they watch a LOT of movies. For the same reason I'm going to take advice from anyone who does a lot of something. I'm going to assume the person who watches every NFL game of the season knows more about football than someone who only watches the playoffs. I'm going to assume someone who plays the piano every day knows more about music than myself. Same thing here. Stephen A Smith and Skip Bayless and almost every talking head on ESPN, including Chris Mortensen after Deflategate, have rendered your analogy moot.
|
|
thebtskink
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jul 2000
It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again.
Posts: 19,462
Likes: 4,984
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 18:41:41 GMT -5
|
Post by thebtskink on Aug 7, 2015 23:43:42 GMT -5
Also, Trank is 31?
Maybe Chronicle was a fluke, but he's young enough to rebound.
I also think there is no 31 year old American that can competently direct a "blockbuster" currently. This is setting a chump up for failure.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,791
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 17:56:45 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Aug 8, 2015 1:04:36 GMT -5
Also, Trank is 31? Maybe Chronicle was a fluke, but he's young enough to rebound. I also think there is no 31 year old American that can competently direct a "blockbuster" currently. This is setting a chump up for failure. That's what Max Landis said. He's the son of John Landis, co-writer of Chronicles and friend of our buddy, daniel . He said going from a small movie to a big movie is a giant mistake for a rookie filmmaker. He needed something in between, like when Chris Nolan did Insomnia in between Memento and Batman Begins.
|
|
daniel
Producer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,072
Likes: 245
Location:
Last Online Mar 13, 2022 22:49:30 GMT -5
|
Post by daniel on Aug 8, 2015 1:20:02 GMT -5
Maybe I am reaching too much, but when Johnny Blaze was re-cast as a black person and the origin story changed to accommodate that, I had a suspicion the movie was going to suck. It's not because he is black, but I got the impression they were trying to be edgy and progressive, and that already struck me as wanting to have some agenda rather than focusing on making the age-old story great. While my misgivings may have been false and the movie would have sucked if he was white and they weren't really focused on making the movie more present-day-inclusive, this could be confirmation bias for me. I dunno, it just struck me as an odd move, something that said to me "Great, these people aren't interested in giving us the Fantastic Four, let's see what else they re-interpret."
From the reviews I have read, I have seen a universal response that Ben Grimm was not Ben Grimm and was a major letdown. I'm no huge FF fan by any means, but even I have a good idea of how Ben is supposed to be.
I will not be seeing this movie.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,791
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 17:56:45 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Aug 8, 2015 1:30:45 GMT -5
danielYou can blame the fanboys. The 2005 movie was fine. The 2007 movie was fine. But we're not allowed to have "funny superheroes" so they went with the other extreme and made things worse.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,628
Likes: 3,184
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 18:12:32 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Aug 10, 2015 9:45:19 GMT -5
Those movies weren't fine, I don't think anyone was being unreasonable in hoping for better than what those movies offered. The fact that this is far worse than those movies is the most astounding part of all this. You would've thought the only place to go was up, but nope.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,791
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 17:56:45 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Aug 10, 2015 16:56:19 GMT -5
daniel 's friend, Max Landis, wrote a script for the Fantastic Four in 2011. Here's the first four pages:
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,650
Likes: 4,067
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 20:05:13 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Aug 10, 2015 20:49:05 GMT -5
danielYou can blame the fanboys. The 2005 movie was fine. The 2007 movie was fine. But we're not allowed to have "funny superheroes" so they went with the other extreme and made things worse. These movies suck, but not because of the light tone. They suck because they're lazy, uninspired, soulless, and boring.
|
|
daniel
Producer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,072
Likes: 245
Location:
Last Online Mar 13, 2022 22:49:30 GMT -5
|
Post by daniel on Aug 13, 2015 5:34:20 GMT -5
I watched the original two, then the new one (I did not pay for it).
Yeah, the two older ones were better - not great, but better. The new movie just sucked. I was wondering when they were going to get somewhere and something was going to happen and realised the movie was an hour in and about 2/3 of the way through, just awful.
|
|
Ramplate
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Apr 2005
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hamster
Posts: 30,425
Likes: 493
Location:
Last Online Oct 13, 2020 13:56:48 GMT -5
|
Post by Ramplate on Aug 15, 2015 7:58:34 GMT -5
|
|
Wyldstaar
Producer
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,900
Likes: 1,267
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 19:45:09 GMT -5
|
Post by Wyldstaar on Aug 15, 2015 10:12:23 GMT -5
I realized it years ago after finally seeing The Incredibles, and have been saying that Fox should go this route with them. Whenever Marvel Studios finally gets the FF back, I suspect this is what they'll do with them.
|
|
Wyldstaar
Producer
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,900
Likes: 1,267
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 19:45:09 GMT -5
|
Post by Wyldstaar on Aug 16, 2015 8:40:07 GMT -5
Mr. Sunday put together a really good collection of all the various articles and interviews regarding what went wrong with this film. I've seen most of it before from the individual sources, but not all brought together like this into a cohesive narrative. His video provides excellent context as to how FF imploded so badly.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,791
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 17:56:45 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Aug 16, 2015 13:26:55 GMT -5
Yeah... people have been saying that since 2004. The biggest criticism about the 2005 Fantastic Four is that it wasn't The Incredibles.
|
|
|
Post by RedVader on Aug 16, 2015 16:06:22 GMT -5
My problem was i did like the 2005 Fantatsic Four cast and felt that The Sequel suffered from the run time being too short and not doing a better job with showing Galactus. Rise of The Silver Sufer gave you a cool character but fans still did not go. I think Studios panic and messed up ff and spiderman for sony. Would loved to had seen was Joss Whedon could have done with the cast we had in 2005 on a effects ability from today. This movie felt missing the family element and thats why 2005 ff is my definative version unless Marvel can do better.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,532
Likes: 3,134
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Aug 22, 2015 10:09:10 GMT -5
Not the trainwreck I was expecting after all the reviews, but still not good. The first half of this movie really isn't that bad and establishes some potentially interesting stuff...but the movie never follows up on or delves into anything. Stuff just happens and the movie keeps chugging along. The four get their powers and the movie abruptly cuts to one year later. Um...what? And that's exactly when the nosedive starts, gaining speed with each new scene. This movie is all set-up, no payoff. And the Third Act? Are you kidding me? Doctor Doom is introduced at the tail end of Act 2, then after maybe three lines of dialogue and thirty seconds, he starts going crazy and killing people. This Third Act is one of the worst Third Acts I've ever seen in any movie, period.
The frustrating thing is, you can still see what Josh Trank wanted to do with this movie, and it was a good idea. But while parts of the first half are mildly interesting, this movie never has time to breathe due to a hacked studio editing job. It's the best of the three Fantastic Four movies so far, but that's not saying much.
*1/2 /****
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,791
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 17:56:45 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Aug 22, 2015 14:57:03 GMT -5
Not a trainwreck and yet you gave it 1.5 stars.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Aug 22, 2015 15:11:04 GMT -5
A train wreck is one star. Everyone knows that.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,791
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 17:56:45 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Aug 22, 2015 15:32:29 GMT -5
A train wreck is one star. Everyone knows that. Is a 1.4 still considered a trainwreck?
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Aug 22, 2015 16:07:15 GMT -5
Maybe a train snafu.
|
|