Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 3:13:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Mar 7, 2024 14:49:53 GMT -5
I thought Tintin was fine-ish at the time but looking back on it the whole project was clearly one of Spielberg's bigger misfires.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,645
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 23:47:45 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Mar 7, 2024 15:10:36 GMT -5
I was lukewarm on Tintin at the time but rewatched it a couple years ago and had a blast.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Mar 7, 2024 15:21:26 GMT -5
I was lukewarm on Tintin at the time but rewatched it a couple years ago and had a blast. I was honestly kind of hoping for a similar experience myself, but alas...
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Mar 8, 2024 16:48:46 GMT -5
It's yet another movie where they said 'we're turning this into a franchise!' and you knew right away that wasn't going to fly. Peter Jackson didn’t hold up his end of bargain.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Mar 17, 2024 14:50:23 GMT -5
Recently got back from seeing Jurassic Park on the big screen. My first time in that format. I already love the hell out of it, but in a theater, it’s just on a whole other level.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Mar 17, 2024 16:16:36 GMT -5
Recently got back from seeing Jurassic Park on the big screen. My first time in that format. I already love the hell out of it, but in a theater, it’s just on a whole other level. I remember I went to watch Jurassic Park in its third week and it was still selling out, so I watched Dennis the Menace instead. I know Doomsday will back me up when I say it’s the better movie.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,295
Likes: 6,760
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 1:33:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Mar 17, 2024 16:49:01 GMT -5
One has Christopher Lloyd, the other doesn’t. What choice is there to make?
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Mar 17, 2024 16:55:01 GMT -5
Recently got back from seeing Jurassic Park on the big screen. My first time in that format. I already love the hell out of it, but in a theater, it’s just on a whole other level. I remember I went to watch Jurassic Park in its third week and it was still selling out, so I watched Dennis the Menace instead. I know Doomsday will back me up when I say it’s the better movie. Do you want to just change your screenname to Hot Take McGee?
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Mar 26, 2024 2:40:20 GMT -5
letterboxd.com/phantomknight/film/the-flintstonesAs a kid, I didn't really know what embezzlement was, but didn't care while watching this movie. Now as an adult, I know what embezzlement is, and I still don't care. Because who wants to see a Flintstones movie where Fred is made the stooge of an embezzlement scheme at his company? Doomsday doesn’t know what the male patriarchy is, but does that make Barbie a bad movie?? The embezzlement plot is just that, a plot. It’s not what the movie is about. It’s what propels the story. The Flintstones isn't a total wash. The production design is really impressive and a lot of fun, and there's at least a sense of passion here that's evident on the part of director Brian Levant to lovingly recreate the feel of the show. Also, I can't honestly say it feels like the actors are phoning it in, which is especially commendable in the case of John Goodman, who's gone on record saying he never actually wanted to do this movie. Growing up, I was a huge fan of the animated series and enjoyed the movie as much as a crowded 1994 would allow me to. We got not one, not two, but three Jim Carrey movies. The Flintstones movie is lucky I gave it any attention. But it is that passion that hooked me and what makes the movie hold up today. The beginning of the movie is a love letter to the cartoon, and when we get to the “embezzlement plot”, it continues to be about the characters and their relationship with each other. It’s about Fred getting caught up in his success. It’s about Barney plowing through his slump. It’s about the ups and downs of their friendship. If all you see is embezzlement and ignore everything around it, I don’t know what to tell you. Also, in defense of the embezzlement plot, you gotta give something to the parents. It can’t just be stone-age hijinks. I actually think the Flintstones handles the embezzlement plot better than Barbie handles the male patriarchy. It does have some valid things to say about worker culture and corporate shenanigans.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Mar 26, 2024 17:04:02 GMT -5
That's the thing, though -- all of the character drama and arcs and humor that stem from the embezzlement plot really aren't all that good. Despite the actors leaning into it. I was into this movie as a kid, too, but it just doesn't hold up that well for me.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Mar 26, 2024 17:21:14 GMT -5
all of the character drama and arcs and humor that stem from the embezzlement plot really aren't all that good. I disagree. The movie opens with Fred giving his savings to Barney so he and Betty can adopt Bam-Bam. Wilma confronts him about it when she needs the money to fix the “garbage disposal”. Fred pretends to be the man in the house, but we quickly learn that’s not the case. The Flintstones was an animated rip-off of the Honeymooners (the Jackie Gleason sitcom) and I think this section of the movie captures that well. Plus all the sight gags and world building that perfectly recreated the cartoon. Then we get to the infamous embezzlement plot which came as a result of Barney repaying Fred the favor. I think this speaks to both their characters and their relationship. Now, where I think the embezzlement plot works for the grownups watching this movie, is in the satire that all the workers (aside from Fred and Barney) are basically neanderthals and the corporate bigwigs taking advantage of them are more “evolved.” The good-nature of Fred & Barney overcoming the embezzlement plot worked out quite nice in whatever commentary the movie was trying to make. Unlike the Barbie movie where the male patriarchy message was muddled at best.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,295
Likes: 6,760
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 1:33:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Mar 26, 2024 17:58:56 GMT -5
The Flintstones, psh. More made up patriarchy bullshit.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Mar 26, 2024 20:34:20 GMT -5
The Flintstones, psh. More made up patriarchy bullshit. The next Flintstones sees Wilma go join the workforce while Fred becomes a stay-at-home dad.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Mar 26, 2024 21:11:06 GMT -5
I only ever committed to his directorial efforts. In light of recent events, you’re doing Cape Fear next.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Mar 26, 2024 21:35:15 GMT -5
all of the character drama and arcs and humor that stem from the embezzlement plot really aren't all that good. I disagree. The movie opens with Fred giving his savings to Barney so he and Betty can adopt Bam-Bam. Wilma confronts him about it when she needs the money to fix the “garbage disposal”. Fred pretends to be the man in the house, but we quickly learn that’s not the case. The Flintstones was an animated rip-off of the Honeymooners (the Jackie Gleason sitcom) and I think this section of the movie captures that well. Plus all the sight gags and world building that perfectly recreated the cartoon. Then we get to the infamous embezzlement plot which came as a result of Barney repaying Fred the favor. I think this speaks to both their characters and their relationship. Now, where I think the embezzlement plot works for the grownups watching this movie, is in the satire that all the workers (aside from Fred and Barney) are basically neanderthals and the corporate bigwigs taking advantage of them are more “evolved.” The good-nature of Fred & Barney overcoming the embezzlement plot worked out quite nice in whatever commentary the movie was trying to make. Unlike the Barbie movie where the male patriarchy message was muddled at best. Let me rephrase...
I only ever committed to his directorial efforts. In light of recent events, you’re doing Cape Fear next. I believe you have your own thread...
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Mar 26, 2024 21:38:27 GMT -5
I believe you have your own thread... I pass on the baton to you.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Apr 13, 2024 18:52:24 GMT -5
WAR HORSE (2011)
War Horse is a movie that's both easy and hard to really go in depth talking about, because really, how much is there to say here? The movie is every bit the obvious and schmaltzy Oscar bait period drama it's always been, and time hasn't been kind to it. It's at least not an awful movie, and while absolutely being one of Steven Spielberg's weakest movies, it's still not one of the worst. And that's because the filmmaking here is still very competent, with the cinematography feeling grand and epic during all of the war-focused sequences (but really just in general), the production values being quite high and the war scenes especially benefitting from that. And while I can't say that the movie is ever outright boring (kind of a remarkable feat, in all honesty), the story still never manages to truly engage. As a pet owner, I can acknowledge that the film is able to tap into a certain emotional truthfulness to a certain degree when showing the bond that can develop between an animal and their owners, but the movie lays this on so thick, that it starts to feel kind of suffocating a lot of the time. Part of that is also because Albert, the main human, is a really bland character whose main purpose seems to just be to moan and yearn about how much he loves his horse and how he'll do anything to be with him; not a very compelling character trait in the grand scheme, all told. And apart from him, while the rest of the performances are uniformly pretty solid, none of the other characters that this horse comes across on his journey are all that interesting, either. Most of this movie is spent simply waiting for the inevitable sentimental conclusion, but the movie never does a whole lot to earn that sentimentality. And that's really War Horse in a nutshell: hollow sentimentality wrapped inside admittedly very solid production values. Steven Spielberg has certainly made worse movies -- hello, 1941 and Kingdom of the Crystal Skull -- but War Horse is one of his more unremarkable ones at the end of the day. Many people have labeled it as a project he did mainly to get all of his worst instincts out of his system for Lincoln, and it certainly has the feeling of a loosening-up exercise before a main workout. I still maintain that the most memorable thing to come out of it is Conan O' Brien's spoof theme song for it.
**/****
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 13, 2024 19:00:06 GMT -5
The best thing I can say about War Horse is that I remember it exists. On a related note, since SnoBorderZero is busy indulging on Tarantino’s podcast, Tarantino did come to defend 1941 and I can see where he’s coming from. Spielberg still had balls and was willing to take chances when he made 1941. War Horse, by contrast, shows Spielberg at his most content. Spielberg makes movies just to make movies these days.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Apr 13, 2024 19:12:23 GMT -5
Spielberg makes movies just to make movies these days. At the same time, though...he's one of the ones who's earned that right. But even then, there's still some strong stuff in his modern output.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on May 29, 2024 17:25:06 GMT -5
Lmao. variety.com/2024/tv/news/young-sherlock-holmes-series-amazon-hero-fiennes-tiffin-guy-ritchie-1236018539/YOUNG SHERLOCK HOLMES AND THE PYRAMID OF FEAR (1985)This is the Steven Spielberg/Chris Columbus/Barry Levinson collaboration that J.K. Rowling ripped off when penning the original Harry Potter book. Like Donald Trump, PhantomKnight will shout "fake news" if you tell him that but the rest of us can see the evidence quite clearly. It's about three British teenagers in boarding school (two boys and a girl) solving a fantasy-based mystery where a teacher turns out to be the villain. This is also the movie that begins the decline of the Steven Spielberg brand. People are expecting to watch Young Sherlock Holmes but instead get Young Indiana Jones. What the fuck were they thinking when they made this movie, that no one would notice it's a repurposed Indiana Jones script? My God, what great delusions. Following this, we got Harry and the Hendersons, Innerspace and Batteries Not Included to wrap up 80's Spielberg alongside the more fondly remembered Roger Rabbit and Back to the Future Part II. But it was never quite the heights of that Poltergeist-Gremlins-BTTF-Goonies run. Sherlock soured the experience by giving audiences the feeling that all these movies were the same. That was back when such things mattered. Now Marvel can make 50 movies with the same plot and make billions at the box office. But hey, at least this movie gave us the first CGI character. Cinema was forever better for it, am I right? How could Ready Player One had been a clutter of CGI without Young Sherlock Holmes. Spielberg, I think you can retire. Your journey is complete.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Nov 21, 2024 20:22:04 GMT -5
LINCOLN (2012)
There seems to be something of a debate in certain circles about what the last great Steven Spielberg movie has been. Some say Munich, while others say Lincoln (sidenote: I think The Fabelmans has negated said debate, but that's for another time). I've now seen Lincoln a grand total of three times, and I'll say this: this most recent viewing has been where my appreciation for this film most strongly solidified, to the point where I can comfortably go so far as to say that I think Lincoln most definitely seems to be one of Spielberg's more underappreciated films, but do I fully love it? Not quite, but make no mistake -- this is still a really damn good movie. And when I say underappreciated, it feels odd, considering all the awards love and recognition that this film got upon release. But there still seems to be this certain perception of this movie that it's another stuffy period drama to go along with the likes of War Horse, and I admit that I sort of bought into that perception myself at times in the years since it came out. Yet much like my subsequent viewings of The Post, my appreciation for Lincoln is now much deeper than it was the first time around. That's because this movie's positioning more as a political drama in the company of something like The West Wing is now something that captures my attention more. Of course, it certainly helps that aspects such as Spielberg's filmmaking itself feeling very assured and even subtly lively at times and the all-around knockout performances from the cast, particularly an amazing Daniel Day-Lewis, are there, but the story and overall approach for this film really does help elevate it above a vast majority of a lot of the typical biopic fare. To go back to The West Wing comparison, this has the same kind of vigor and whip-smart dialogue, characterization and plotting that you'd find in a lot of Aaron Sorkin's stronger works -- just delivered in a more understated, yet no less effective, style. I think it was a wise choice on Spielberg and screenwriter Tony Kushner's parts to frame this movie more as an account of the last great and influential thing that Abraham Lincoln did in his Presidency before his death rather than another cradle-to-the-grave biopic. It helps the movie have a more clearly-defined purpose and narrative drive than just an account of a life. Let it also be said that Spielberg also pulls back a lot on some of the schmaltz that can often be associated with him on a lot of projects. Here, he focuses on just delivering a compelling and stirring drama, which he absolutely does. For a movie that essentially boils down to just people in rooms talking, there's still a certain rhythm here that holds your attention and keeps the events themselves engaging. And that's owed in equal parts to Spielberg's direction, Tony Kushner's screenplay and Daniel Day-Lewis's incredibly endearing performance. My main complaints have to do with how the movie opens and ends; more so the ending. I think the film would have been better-served by not going into Lincoln's death and instead having the final shot being him walking out of the White House to go to the theatre, which would have been powerful enough in its own right and a lingering final image. But even then, it's hard to fault this movie too much, given everything else that it does right. A lot of people seem to shrug Lincoln off, when they really shouldn't. Is it one of Steven Spielberg's best? For me, not quite, but it is definitely one of his stronger efforts even then and proof that there can still be life in the historical figure genre.
***1/2 /****
|
|