Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Nov 11, 2017 10:54:10 GMT -5
I haven't even seen Justin Long in a movie in years. It's going to be OK, skink.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 11, 2017 12:24:18 GMT -5
He didn’t survive the embarrassment of starring in Kevin Smith’s Tusk.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 12, 2017 21:00:06 GMT -5
What are Doomsday’s thoughts on Simon Birch?
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,295
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 1:33:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Dec 7, 2017 0:28:55 GMT -5
Kanga-urkey: Almost Famous
Now I'm not saying this is a bad movie. On the contrary, I've always really enjoyed it and I know most people do as well. My main issue is one that I have with many Cameron Crowe films and it really drives me crazy after a while. Many of his movies, from Almost Famous to Jerry Maguire, have really notable and quotable scenes that people still reference all the time. The thing is these are characters who would never, ever exist in society doing and saying things that no one would ever do or say. Cameron Crowe movies are often about real people with real, relatable problems. Relationships, acceptance, accomplishing goals and doing the right thing, all are meant to attract an audience. That's why it drives me crazy when we have characters like William goes through these forced scenes that would never happen, beginning with him finding out that he's actually younger than his mom originally let on (why?) to his melodramatic scenes with Penny Lane ('Who am I to you?' is cringe-worthy yet people love it). Characters in this movie are more like caricatures after a while, from Lester Bangs to William's stewardess sister. It's a good movie worthy of it's reputation and accolades, just some of the things that rubbed me raw at first have only worn on me even more as time goes on.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,295
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 1:33:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Dec 7, 2017 0:33:45 GMT -5
What are Doomsday ’s thoughts on Simon Birch? It came out when I was in the 8th grade. At that age it's impossible not to like. I specifically remember how uncomfortable I was watching the BOOOOBS! scene with my mom since all you want to do at that age is grab a woman's boobs. At the end of the day though it's a pretty contrived story that's predictable and kinda disturbing when you think about the priest banging Ashley Judd and then her getting killed by a fly ball. Not a bad movie though, it's pretty funny too.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,645
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 9:19:10 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Dec 7, 2017 18:43:40 GMT -5
Turkey: For a Few Dollars MoreBefore everyone gives me shit for this, let me say up front I still like this movie a whole lot. Eastwood is still great, Lee Van Cleef is super cool, and the film has a handful of really good scenes. As a teenager though, I thought this was a stone-cold classic and one of the best Westerns ever. Watching it as an adult, I still like the movie a lot, but I see it more as a stepping stone for Leone to make his true masterpieces. Kangaroo: Batman ReturnsI'm sure Neverending will get a kick out of this. I've been all over the place with this movie. As a teen, the film annoyed me because of how much it differed from the comics. But as time goes by and comic book movies have become increasingly homogenized, Batman Returns general weirdness has only become more charming. There's so much creativity on display in terms of visuals and character. What's more, the film's bizarre perversions make for a great study of a bunch of lonely misfits who are shuned by society and find themselves lashing out in their own ways. In this regard, the film which seemingly doesn't "get" Batman actually proves a very interesting reflection of the character's psyche. The film also boasts the same amazing art direction and score which made Tim Burton's first Batman film a classic.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,492
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:37:07 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Dec 7, 2017 19:54:47 GMT -5
I find For a Few Dollars More very forgettable. Why? Because I remember almost nothing about it.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,295
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 1:33:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Dec 7, 2017 20:24:03 GMT -5
When I saw Coop's headline of 'Turkey: A Fistful of Dollars' I was about to go into beast mode but it's a fair point, it's a stepping stone especially when compared to The Good, The Bad and the Ugly.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Dec 7, 2017 23:51:21 GMT -5
Hmm, Almost Famous remains one of my favorite movies.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,295
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 1:33:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Dec 8, 2017 0:01:31 GMT -5
Kangaroo: Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery
Austin Powers is a character who's near and dear to my heart believe it or not. I was in junior high/high school when it was huge in the mainstream, the perfect age for peak enjoyment of those films. When we think of Austin Powers nowadays we think of Fat Bastard, Mini-Me and a bunch of stupid puns that are funny if you're 14. We think of the apex of Mike Myers' career, now a dated franchise, a relic of the 90s/early 2000s like Limp Bizkit and Britney Spears. While the Austin Powers series is more or less defined by the characters and scenes found in the 2nd and 3rd movies, the original is still a very funny film. The first was more than a spoof on James Bond, it was a spoof on pop culture of the 60s and 90s. Sure there were sex and dick jokes but there was more to it than that, there were actual set-ups and payoffs. There were actual jokes, unlike the sequels which were strictly sex and dick references and total carbon copies of jokes from the original. Had Austin Powers stuck to one movie I think it would be much more highly regarded than it is today and while we all had fun growing up with them it's best to leave the franchise where it is, in the early-00s. Still, the original Austin Powers is a solid comedy.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,295
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 1:33:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Dec 8, 2017 0:03:51 GMT -5
Hmm, Almost Famous remains one of my favorite movies. It might be my favorite movie of 2000. I would never consider it even close to a 'turkey' because that implies that I don't like it or found some glaring error. My main beef is with Cameron Crowe and how he fashions (or maybe over-fashions) his characters.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,492
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:37:07 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Dec 8, 2017 7:47:15 GMT -5
Kangaroo: Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery
Austin Powers is a character who's near and dear to my heart believe it or not. I was in junior high/high school when it was huge in the mainstream, the perfect age for peak enjoyment of those films. When we think of Austin Powers nowadays we think of Fat Bastard, Mini-Me and a bunch of stupid puns that are funny if you're 14. We think of the apex of Mike Myers' career, now a dated franchise, a relic of the 90s/early 2000s like Limp Bizkit and Britney Spears. While the Austin Powers series is more or less defined by the characters and scenes found in the 2nd and 3rd movies, the original is still a very funny film. The first was more than a spoof on James Bond, it was a spoof on pop culture of the 60s and 90s. Sure there were sex and dick jokes but there was more to it than that, there were actual set-ups and payoffs. There were actual jokes, unlike the sequels which were strictly sex and dick references and total carbon copies of jokes from the original. Had Austin Powers stuck to one movie I think it would be much more highly regarded than it is today and while we all had fun growing up with them it's best to leave the franchise where it is, in the early-00s. Still, the original Austin Powers is a solid comedy. I agree.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,492
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:37:07 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Dec 8, 2017 7:47:33 GMT -5
Hmm, Almost Famous remains one of my favorite movies. It might be my favorite movie of 2000. I would never consider it even close to a 'turkey' because that implies that I don't like it or found some glaring error. My main beef is with Cameron Crowe and how he fashions (or maybe over-fashions) his characters. I'm a Sorkin fan so I can't really say anything.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jan 13, 2018 11:18:13 GMT -5
Kangaroo: Chinatown
I re-watched this a couple weeks back, and did my opinion of it jump up. Not that I originally thought it was bad or anything, but before, I think I just liked/admired it or didn't fully appreciate it. This time, though, I did. Polanski's direction is phenomenal and the plot unfolds at a compelling and intriguing pace. And I was much more invested in everything as well. I can't really think of anything about it that was lackluster in any way. Great, great film.
Sidenote: Chinatown and Vertigo make for a pretty awesome double feature.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jan 13, 2018 17:45:32 GMT -5
Kangaroo: Chinatown
I re-watched this a couple weeks back, and did my opinion of it jump up. Not that I originally thought it was bad or anything, but before, I think I just liked/admired it or didn't fully appreciate it. This time, though, I did. Polanski's direction is phenomenal and the plot unfolds at a compelling and intriguing pace. And I was much more invested in everything as well. I can't really think of anything about it that was lackluster in any way. Great, great film. Sidenote: Chinatown and Vertigo make for a pretty awesome double feature. How does PG Cooper’s cock taste?
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jul 25, 2019 13:33:06 GMT -5
Turkey: Elysium
I remember the majority being down on this one back in 2013. At the time, I (surprise, surprise) liked it.
Ooof, this does not hold up.
A re-watch all these years later has done it no favors. Most of all...I'll now say that I don't think Neil Blomkamp is a good director. This movie feels incredibly choppy and not well-paced at all. He also gets some pretty bad performances out of his actors here. Matt Damon is fine, but everybody else, not so much. Sharlto Copley is just plain bad here and makes weird decisions, Jodie Foster -- I don't know what the hell she's doing -- and everybody else just feels awkward. Then there's the script, which feels very underwritten and way too preachy for its own good. Not to mention being full of just plain dumb decisions.
I was way too generous to this back in 2013.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 9:16:16 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Jul 25, 2019 13:47:51 GMT -5
Turkey: Elysium
I remember the majority being down on this one back in 2013. At the time, I (surprise, surprise) liked it.
Ooof, this does not hold up.
A re-watch all these years later has done it no favors. Most of all...I'll now say that I don't think Neil Blomkamp is a good director. This movie feels incredibly choppy and not well-paced at all. He also gets some pretty bad performances out of his actors here. Matt Damon is fine, but everybody else, not so much. Sharlto Copley is just plain bad here and makes weird decisions, Jodie Foster -- I don't know what the hell she's doing -- and everybody else just feels awkward. Then there's the script, which feels very underwritten and way too preachy for its own good. Not to mention being full of just plain dumb decisions.
I was way too generous to this back in 2013.
Been a little scared of revisiting that one as well. Did the Golden Stake winning art direction at least hold up?
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jul 25, 2019 13:58:42 GMT -5
Sure, the movie achieves an appropriately grungy aesthetic and Elysium itself in the movie is pretty to look at. But those are some of the few things this movie does right. After watching this again, maybe it's a good thing Blomkamp never got to make Alien 5.
And hey, at least it wasn't as bad as Chappie.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 9:16:16 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Jul 25, 2019 14:06:46 GMT -5
Sure, the movie achieves an appropriately grungy aesthetic and Elysium itself in the movie is pretty to look at. But those are some of the few things this movie does right. After watching this again, maybe it's a good thing Blomkamp never got to make Alien 5.
And hey, at least it wasn't as bad as Chappie.
I don't know, I have a soft spot for Chappie just because it's so fucking weird. It's like the South African equivalent of watching a crazy Japanese movie but with a Hollywood budget.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 25, 2019 14:14:08 GMT -5
Turkey: Elysium
I remember the majority being down on this one back in 2013. At the time, I (surprise, surprise) liked it.
Ooof, this does not hold up.
A re-watch all these years later has done it no favors. Most of all...I'll now say that I don't think Neil Blomkamp is a good director. This movie feels incredibly choppy and not well-paced at all. He also gets some pretty bad performances out of his actors here. Matt Damon is fine, but everybody else, not so much. Sharlto Copley is just plain bad here and makes weird decisions, Jodie Foster -- I don't know what the hell she's doing -- and everybody else just feels awkward. Then there's the script, which feels very underwritten and way too preachy for its own good. Not to mention being full of just plain dumb decisions.
I was way too generous to this back in 2013.
You won’t be talking shit about this movie when rich people are living in the moon and you’re rotting here on Earth.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Jul 25, 2019 14:14:56 GMT -5
Chappie? More like Crappie.
BOOYAH
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jul 25, 2019 14:42:18 GMT -5
Sure, the movie achieves an appropriately grungy aesthetic and Elysium itself in the movie is pretty to look at. But those are some of the few things this movie does right. After watching this again, maybe it's a good thing Blomkamp never got to make Alien 5.
And hey, at least it wasn't as bad as Chappie.
I don't know, I have a soft spot for Chappie just because it's so fucking weird. It's like the South African equivalent of watching a crazy Japanese movie but with a Hollywood budget. And with two South African rappers as the leads who can't act worth shit.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 9:16:16 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Jul 25, 2019 15:04:12 GMT -5
I don't know, I have a soft spot for Chappie just because it's so fucking weird. It's like the South African equivalent of watching a crazy Japanese movie but with a Hollywood budget. And with two South African rappers as the leads who can't act worth shit. That's the part which pushes it from misguided to amusingly crazy.
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,945
Likes: 2,015
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by frankyt on Jul 25, 2019 16:44:59 GMT -5
I remember reading an interview with blomkamp and he made it abundantly clear he does not care to tell a story with allusions and hints to the real world. He does not want to say a single thing outside telling the story he has written down.
It's unfathomable someone working in science fiction for as long as he has to not try to go beyond the strictures of sci fi to allude to greater causes and shine a light on things he considers important. He is not an artist.
I do love how he openly shits on all things ninja tho. DA puts on a good show but likable they certainly are not. The stories from filing chappie are legend.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jul 25, 2019 18:58:26 GMT -5
And with two South African rappers as the leads who can't act worth shit. That's the part which pushes it from misguided to amusingly crazy. I think you mean from misguided to ungodly annoying.
|
|