PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Aug 10, 2016 22:13:51 GMT -5
Something I've come to appreciate and love over the past couple of years about No Country For Old Men is that it's a movie that could've been directed by Alfred Hitchcock if here still around. I took a Hitchcock class in the Fall of '09, and not long after, I re-watched the movie and was blown away by just how many of Hitchcock's tropes, techniques and plot devices were used in it.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,295
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 1:33:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Aug 11, 2016 18:26:30 GMT -5
Burn After Reading (2008)
View count: Dozens of timeBurn After Reading was my favorite movie of 2008. I think part of the reason was that it came completely out of nowhere for me. Coming less that a year after No Country For Old Men it seemed like a more modest ensemble comedy. While that's true it's also a huge understatement. Burn After Reading turned out to be the funniest Coen comedy in over a decade and demonstrated that they can indeed craft an original and equally funny movie, something that they weren't quite able to do with their last couple of efforts messing around in the genre. While I wouldn't rate it as highly as The Big Lebowski it certainly is the same style; a complex narrative centered around something totally ridiculous. It's a theme that the Coens have demonstrated is in their wheelhouse so I can certainly get behind it. Much like Lebowski was a whole crime-driven plot that was centered around The Dude's quest for a new rug, Burn After Reading is an espionage/murder story that's all based around the digital memoirs of a drunken, disgraced CIA analyst. Osbourne Cox (John Malkovich) lives with his wife Katie (Tilda Swinton) who is having an affair with Harry (George Clooney). Katie decides to divorce Osbourne and steals what she thinks are financials off his computer. She accidentally leaves it at her gym Hardbodies where it's found by 'moronic' Linda (Frances McDormand) and Chad (Brad Pitt in what might be my favorite performance he's given). Linda also happens to be sleeping with Harry by the way. They discover the disk has some 'sensitive CIA shit' and they attempt to blackmail Osbourne. In expected fashion these events play out ending in brutal violence and paranoia with every character getting the brunt of the fallout. The movie takes the time to remind us that it's supposed to seem overly complicated while in reality it's completely ridiculous. JK Simmons plays a CIA chief in a couple of scenes who is there to mostly recap the insanity of the movie and he's great as he gives it to us straight. Admittedly there aren't a lot of laughs in roughly the first half of the film. It spends most of the time setting up the relationships between each of the characters, mostly who's sleeping with whom. It's definitely not the first Coen movie to deal with adultery in this fashion. In fact affairs are usually harbingers of doom for the characters involved in all their films, from Blood Simple to The Man Who Wasn't There. It's no different in Burn After Reading. It makes me wonder if something happened to the Coens in the past that makes them revisit the topic of adultery time and again. At least here they're able to spin it into a comedy film while making it funny which is more than what can be said for their other two-timing comedy Intolerable Cruelty. Burn After Reading is a crazy, funny movie that's a 180 degree change of pace from their previous effort No Country For Old Men. It is however their best comedy of the new millennium and is a great vehicle for the stars to show their chops. Brad Pitt to me is the funniest person in the movie and that's something I never thought I would say. Like all Coen movies, I can see how it might not be for everybody but the more I go through their filmography the more tired I get of saying that. There comes a point where if you aren't a Coen Bros. fan I think it's less about their product and more about it going over your head.
|
|
Justin
Script Supervisor
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 739
Likes: 355
Location:
Last Online Oct 17, 2017 12:05:25 GMT -5
|
Post by Justin on Aug 11, 2016 18:28:40 GMT -5
Usually my opinion on art is that if you didn't care for it, it says more about you than the art itself.
I enjoyed Burn After Reading quite a bit when I saw it. Then again, I'm a fan of almost all of their comedies. The more mean spirited it is, the more I'll probably like it.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,295
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 1:33:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Aug 15, 2016 9:13:39 GMT -5
A Serious Man (2009)
View count: Second timeThere's a scene in A Serious Man where the main character Larry Gopnick (Michael Stuhlbarg), a physics professor whose wife if leaving him, consults a rabbi looking for advice and meaning to his pain. The rabbi tells him the tale of a dentist who sees a message written onto the back of one of his patient's teeth. Distressed, the dentist searches for answers, checking other patients teeth, going through his old records for other hidden messages, even ascribing numbers to the letters he found to find phone numbers. The dentist then goes on about his life. The story confuses Larry and he asks what happens to the dentist? What did he find out? Why did the rabbi even tell him the story? The rabbi tells him 'it doesn't matter.' I think that scene more than any is a good reflection of A Serious Man, the Coens' follow-up to their Academy Award winning No Country For Old Men. Michael Stuhlbarg is an actor I'm quickly starting to admire. You have probably seen him in one place or another typically in a supporting role like in Trumbo, Lincoln or Steve Jobs. I really took notice of him in Boardwalk Empire where he gives a tremendous turn as gangster Arnold Rothstein, maybe my favorite character on the show. He's great at playing the frustrated, somewhat neurotic Larry who tries desperately to figure out what it all means. The rest of the cast give solid performances as well especially recognizable character actor Richard Kind as the weird Uncle Arthur who is constantly draining the cyst on his neck. Casting obscure, mostly non-recognizable actors gives A Serious Man might have been a departure from the Coens previous movies with the likes of George Clooney, John Goodman, etc. but here the actors help give the film a sense of authenticity. To be honest I really wasn't sure what to make of this movie the first time I saw it. Initially I thought the Coens were trying to repeat the same obscure drop-off ending like they gave us in No Country for Old Men (yes, I'm aware that's how the book ends). Perhaps that's why I never really gave much thought to the film after my first viewing. This time I was able to delve into and almost identify with Larry's plight, one that everyone has at some time or another; What's the point? Why me? Why all this suffering? What does it all mean? And the answer is the same one the rabbi gave to him, 'who cares?' From that perspective it's actually one of the most philosophical movies the Coens have made. Many people ask the same question of religion or belief in a higher power. 'If there is a god then why is there suffering?' There are myriad answers to that question whether it has to do with free will, human nature, an indifferent deity, etc. Rather than have Larry embark on some sort of faith journey he goes about his day trying to make sense of his struggles and fortunes while reminding himself and others that he's just a good man trying to do what's right. I think that's why it ended the way it did. Much like No Country for Old Men it leaves you hanging in mid-air. Granted No Country is based on a novel which ends the same way while A Serious Man fades to black on a final lingering shot of a tornado heading toward Larry's son's school. When I watched it 7 years ago already I thought it was some pretentious Coen ending. This time it made more sense seeing it as just one of a series of unending events in the life of a regular guy who was put on this earth to endure fortunes and misfortunes like the rest of us. It's a movie that could have taken place at any point in Larry's life, really. It's not a reflection of THE human experience but of human experiences altogether. I said earlier that The Man Who Wasn't There might be my favorite of the newly watched Coen movies. I think it's safe to say A Serious Man is the movie that I had previously seen but appreciate much more after the rewatch. I look forward to watching this again in the near future. My favorite scene I mentioned above that really helps define what it's all about:
|
|
Justin
Script Supervisor
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 739
Likes: 355
Location:
Last Online Oct 17, 2017 12:05:25 GMT -5
|
Post by Justin on Aug 15, 2016 9:17:21 GMT -5
Great write-up. I'm a huge fan of this film.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Aug 15, 2016 18:25:46 GMT -5
Two great movies. Nice write-ups.
|
|
Justin
Script Supervisor
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 739
Likes: 355
Location:
Last Online Oct 17, 2017 12:05:25 GMT -5
|
Post by Justin on Aug 15, 2016 18:40:31 GMT -5
That scene where Larry just screams in utter confusion,"What the hell is going on?!", just encapsulates so much about life. It had me in stitches.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 8:40:40 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Aug 15, 2016 20:34:23 GMT -5
To be honest I really wasn't sure what to make of this movie the first time I saw it. Initially I thought the Coens were trying to repeat the same obscure drop-off ending like they gave us in No Country for Old Men (yes, I'm aware that's how the book ends). Perhaps that's why I never really gave much thought to the film after my first viewing. This time I was able to delve into and almost identify with Larry's plight, one that everyone has at some time or another; What's the point? Why me? Why all this suffering? What does it all mean? And the answer is the same one the rabbi gave to him, 'who cares?' From that perspective it's actually one of the most philosophical movies the Coens have made. Many people ask the same question of religion or belief in a higher power. 'If there is a god then why is there suffering?' There are myriad answers to that question whether it has to do with free will, human nature, an indifferent deity, etc. Rather than have Larry embark on some sort of faith journey he goes about his day trying to make sense of his struggles and fortunes while reminding himself and others that he's just a good man trying to do what's right. I think that's why it ended the way it did. Much like No Country for Old Men it leaves you hanging in mid-air. Granted No Country is based on a novel which ends the same way while A Serious Man fades to black on a final lingering shot of a tornado heading toward Larry's son's school. When I watched it 7 years ago already I thought it was some pretentious Coen ending. This time it made more sense seeing it as just one of a series of unending events in the life of a regular guy who was put on this earth to endure fortunes and misfortunes like the rest of us. It's a movie that could have taken place at any point in Larry's life, really. It's not a reflection of THE human experience but of human experiences altogether. The film has often been compared to the book of Job in the bible/torah which has god testing one of his believers by sending misfortune after misfortune to him. One of the tests was to have a giant whirlwind come and kill his Job's entire family. That can't be a coincidence. BTW, you might enjoy this video essay
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Aug 16, 2016 12:19:37 GMT -5
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Aug 16, 2016 18:49:42 GMT -5
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,295
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 1:33:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Aug 24, 2016 1:24:26 GMT -5
True Grit (2010)
View count: Four or five times John Wayne version: HundredsI was raised on 1969's True Grit, the western that earned John Wayne an Academy Award for his iconic performance of Rooster Cogburn. I always considered John Wayne to be one of the biggest, if not THE biggest, movie star of all time. He might not have been in the best movies nor was he really that good of an actor but he's one of the few who's probably just as famous or even more famous after his death. I bet each person reading this has a dad, uncle, cousin or close friend who is 'the John Wayne fan,' the guy with dozens of VHS tapes or DVDs of every John Wayne movie you can think of. Add to that the fact that he still holds the record for most lead roles for an American actor and you can safely say that he has a pretty solid place in film history. I'm not a fanatic by any stretch of the imagination however I'm very familiar with his movies and I have a deep appreciation for the movies he starred in that actually are important, quality films like Stagecoach and The Searchers among others. That's why I was a little perplexed when I learned not only that it was being remade but it was going to be written and helmed by The Coens with Steven Spielberg as executive producer. Not McG, not Roland Emmerich but the Coens, legitimately good filmmakers. The Coens retell the story of Mattie Ross (Hailee Steinfeld), a young girl whose father is killed by the 'coward' Tom Chaney (Josh Brolin), one of the hired hands. Chainy has escaped into Indian territory so Mattie hires the drunken U.S. Marshall Rooster Cogburn (Jeff Bridges) to give chase. Also on Chaney's trail is LaBoeuf (Matt Damon), a Texas Marshall who teams up with Cogburn to bring Chaney in alive. Mattie is the central focus and narration of the film and her performance isn't as annoying as it could have been which was a good change from the original. She plays the headstrong yet naive character very well and hits all the right beats when appropriate. It's even more apparent when she finds herself captured by Lucky Ned Pepper (Barry Pepper) and talks to him like a businesswoman rather than the child she is. Her character is very consistent and she brings it out well. Although the accolades for this movie went mostly to Bridges, Steinfeld warrants a good portion of that praise. Of all the Coen films, this is one of the most straight-forward. It's a remake of a popular western that offers its own take without being a shot-for-shot rehash. I haven't read the source material but like No Country I remember reading how the Coens tried to stick to it very, very closely. Personally it's hard for me not to compare the original True Grit with the Coen version but I think it would be appropriate as the positive comparisons far outweigh the negatives. John Wayne's Rooster Cogburn was made larger than life which is how Wayne is portrayed in all his movies. He was a tough as nails Marshall who also happens to be silly and drink in a couple scenes. Otherwise it's not unlike most other Wayne performances. Jeff Bridges played Rooster very differently and I imagine more appropriately for the story. The first time Rooster is on screen we don't even see him, we hear him talking while he's using the outhouse. Bridges' Rooster is much more of a drunkard and scoundrel than the previous incarnation which keeps the movie centered on Mattie who is really the main character. The ending is also more somber, not the happy ending from the original that John Wayne fans are used to seeing. For western fans it really boils down to what kind of movie you prefer, an easy, fun and generic western or a more melancholic, dramatic and character driven movie that might not be as cheery but takes itself more seriously. True Grit is a good, solid western. Even though at first glance it seems that the western is all but dead we still get plenty of them and this movie fortunately sits among the good ones. While it's not the most thematically rich or thought-provoking movie the Coens have made it's a good effort for their first foray into the time period.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Aug 24, 2016 2:36:14 GMT -5
No one in my family gives a shit about John Wayne. I grew up on Clint motherfucking Eastwood. And none of that Unforgiven bullshit. The actual classics. Dollars Trilogy. Two Mules for Sister Sara. High Plains Drifter. Josey Wales. Pale Rider.
If the Coens ever remake an Eastwood movie, they better cast Hugh Jackman as Clint Eastwood. None of that Jeff Bridges bullshit.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,645
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 8:19:34 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Aug 24, 2016 8:16:39 GMT -5
No one in my family gives a shit about John Wayne. I grew up on Clint motherfucking Eastwood. And none of that Unforgiven bullshit. The actual classics. Dollars Trilogy. Two Mules for Sister Sara. High Plains Drifter. Josey Wales. Pale Rider. You and Unforgiven, it's like Doomsday and Christopher Nolan. No one in my family really cares for John Wayne either. I'm actually probably the biggest fan of him in the family, which isn't saying much. Anyway, regarding True Grit, I think the Coens remake is superior to the original in every way. The original is fine, I suppose, but it came out when the traditional Western was largely dying and you can see that in the film. It just feels tired and old, particularly when you think the same year it was released also offered Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid and The Wild Bunch. The remake is a lot more substantial and, like Dooms, I love the slightly somber tone.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,621
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 19, 2024 19:49:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Aug 24, 2016 10:26:53 GMT -5
Unforgiven is a phenomenal film, the hell you bitchin' about Neverending?
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,295
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 1:33:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Aug 24, 2016 11:18:56 GMT -5
To be honest I really wasn't sure what to make of this movie the first time I saw it. Initially I thought the Coens were trying to repeat the same obscure drop-off ending like they gave us in No Country for Old Men (yes, I'm aware that's how the book ends). Perhaps that's why I never really gave much thought to the film after my first viewing. This time I was able to delve into and almost identify with Larry's plight, one that everyone has at some time or another; What's the point? Why me? Why all this suffering? What does it all mean? And the answer is the same one the rabbi gave to him, 'who cares?' From that perspective it's actually one of the most philosophical movies the Coens have made. Many people ask the same question of religion or belief in a higher power. 'If there is a god then why is there suffering?' There are myriad answers to that question whether it has to do with free will, human nature, an indifferent deity, etc. Rather than have Larry embark on some sort of faith journey he goes about his day trying to make sense of his struggles and fortunes while reminding himself and others that he's just a good man trying to do what's right. I think that's why it ended the way it did. Much like No Country for Old Men it leaves you hanging in mid-air. Granted No Country is based on a novel which ends the same way while A Serious Man fades to black on a final lingering shot of a tornado heading toward Larry's son's school. When I watched it 7 years ago already I thought it was some pretentious Coen ending. This time it made more sense seeing it as just one of a series of unending events in the life of a regular guy who was put on this earth to endure fortunes and misfortunes like the rest of us. It's a movie that could have taken place at any point in Larry's life, really. It's not a reflection of THE human experience but of human experiences altogether. The film has often been compared to the book of Job in the bible/torah which has god testing one of his believers by sending misfortune after misfortune to him. One of the tests was to have a giant whirlwind come and kill his Job's entire family. That can't be a coincidence. BTW, you might enjoy this video essay Just watched, that was very good. I found A Serious Man on Amazon for $5 so I'll watch it again sometime this week with those ideas in mind. Good find!
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Aug 25, 2016 18:32:43 GMT -5
Unforgiven is a phenomenal film Only thing I un-forgive is that fucking movie.
|
|
Justin
Script Supervisor
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 739
Likes: 355
Location:
Last Online Oct 17, 2017 12:05:25 GMT -5
|
Post by Justin on Aug 28, 2016 18:35:34 GMT -5
I have literally no interest in anything Eastwood has ever directed.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,295
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 1:33:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Sept 2, 2016 12:54:22 GMT -5
In Coen-related side news:
It's kinda eerie, not more than 20 minutes ago I was quoting the line from Lebowski 'Who the fuck are the Knutsens?' with my coworker. RIP.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,295
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 1:33:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Sept 14, 2016 20:15:25 GMT -5
Inside Llewyn Davis (2013)
View count: Few timesInside Llewyn Davis was one of my favorite movies of 2013. Although I'm not a musician nor am I in any way interested in folk music, it's a movie that's quite relatable for me and I'm sure for many others trying to find their way and their place. As is common with Coen films, it's a step in a new direction both thematically and in terms of setting. It's not quite a musical but has musical numbers. It's a character study but moreso a breakdown of a person's decisions rather than their life story. Llewyn Davis takes us on a funny and sorrowful journey as we see him go through life trying to figure out where to go and what to do next. Llewyn Davis is the main character in a movie that, like A Serious Man, isn't so much of a story as much as it is a collection of events at a particular point in time. Maybe I shouldn't say particular, I could use 'random' just as well. The events are there to gives us a sense as to what kind of person Llewyn is and that all depends on how you relate to him. On the one hand Llewyn can be seen as a struggling, down on his luck musician just trying to get by any way he can. On the other hand he's a selfish, destructive person who takes advantage of those around him while his mistakes weigh on him even more heavily. There's enough for you to feel invested in him and at the same time there's enough for you to wake up and realize that his problems and his station are his own doing. Llewyn's whole existence is grounded in bad decision making and paying for his mistakes in one way or another. Sometimes these decisions cost money, sometimes they cost relationships. He's constantly fixing things in his life while struggling to move forward. Whether that makes Llewyn a sympathetic person or pathetic person is up to you. The ending of the movie might leave you scratching your head and to me is symbolic of how Llewyn and people like Llewyn are constantly on this unending loop, trying to do something and get somewhere while never doing anything or getting anywhere. Sometimes those factors are outside of our control, most of the time they're within our control. I think we've all felt like that at one point or another. From a filmmaking perspective it's still a standout film. We have some Coen aces like John Goodman making appearances and the Coens successfully highlight the dank, dirty lifestyle of the struggling artist. Personally I'm well-acquainted with the couch hopping methods employed by those of us who've had to live as nomads for a time (12-packs of beer helped me establish a solid couch network throughout Los Angeles back in the day). Even rewatching it I found myself expecting certain things to happen like having the manager offer him a deal or him pulling over to see the kid he didn't know he had, neither of which happened but both of which fit his character. Llewyn isn't the kind of person who would step into his child's life nor would he be the guy to hit it big. He's the person that none of us want to be but many are relegated to becoming, the person who keeps going around. After watching Inside Llewyn Davis and comparing it to other Coen films it has become apparent that many of their films have very effective personal and philosophical themes. I also think that if I were to watch it again I could come away with something entirely different. I know I keep sounding mushy after these Coen reviews but there's just so much you can take away from them (most of them anyway). Not to sound desperate but I'd be interested in hearing what other people thought of this film in particular and how it sits with them. Me, I think it's an engaging movie that can tell you a lot about yourself if you look at it a certain way.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,645
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 8:19:34 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Sept 14, 2016 21:11:44 GMT -5
I love Inside Llewyn Davis. It's one of my favourite Coen Brothers films and most certainly their best since No Country for Old Men.
Here's a brief bit I wrote a few months ago:
Inside Llewyn Davis is awesome. This is a modest little film which tells a really involving story and features a pretty compelling lead. Llewyn himself can be kind of a prick, but there's an honesty to him and Oscar Isaac does a great job making him sympathetic. This viewing really emphasized how much pain the dude is in. He's in a tough place both professionally and personally and really he's just trying to figure out what to do.
Inside Llewyn Davis is just a glimpse into a few days of the titular character, but the film is a lot more complete and satisfying than slice of life movies tend to be. The cyclical structure the Coens employ really does provide a sense of closure to the story, particularly in the ending. The film also spots some really great original music, great performances from damn near everyone (the Coens are masters at casting extras), subtly awesome art direction, and some really cool cinematography. This is a modest film, but I think it's right up there with Gravity, 12 Years a Slave, and The Wolf of Wall Street when it comes to 2013's best films.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Sept 14, 2016 22:31:11 GMT -5
I SURE AS SHIT DON'T FUCKING ROLL. I love ILD too. I like that he's a bit of an unsympathetic dick. It helps you accept the circular nature of the film at the end. You don't really care he's stuck in an infinite loop of eternal recurrence because he's no Jeff Lebowski and he kinda deserves it. BTW Doomsday I watched The Big Lebowski for the first time in several years recently. Still my favourite scene, handle the jazz music...is that from the film or added on YouTube? I can't even tell! Who the fuck are the Knutsens? shut the fuck up donny
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,295
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 1:33:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Sept 19, 2016 16:03:03 GMT -5
Hail, Caesar! (2016)
View count: First timeHail, Caesar is a series of vignettes centered around Eddie Mannix (Josh Brolin) and his turbulent life as a studio executive at Capitol Pictures. He juggles pregnant starlets (Scarlett Johanssen), kidnapped actors (George Clooney) and Communist conspiracies (Channing Tatum). At the end of the day he's able to put out fires and reassess his place in the world resistant to outside temptations. My reaction to Hail, Caesar! is similar to what many people felt; it was hard to connect with it. There's no central storyline and the thread connecting these chapters is thin so we're essentially watching Mannix take care of business for a few hours. Some of the developments are pretty funny but the rest is rather tame and expected. The movie takes place in the 1960s and Communists make sense but it's not much of a surprise. We've seen Communists before, we know they were our enemies. The Channing Tatum reveal was also obvious from the moment we learned of an insider. In short, it's a movie that seemed to be a collection of minor ideas from the Coen brothers. There wasn't a clear message, it wasn't terribly funny nor was it very thought provoking, it just didn't seem like a movie that needed to be made. Watching Hail, Caesar! is like visiting Jay Leno's car garage only to have him spend the afternoon showing off his 2006 Honda Civic. As a fan of classic Hollywood like many reading this, it was fun to see the time period come to life in a somewhat irreverent and comedic style. The Coens have individual scenes throwing back to the Frank Sinatra/Gene Kelly style musicals, hokey westerns, Biblical epics and noir films while at the same time squeezing in the Hollywood sex scandals that are almost commonplace nowadays but were swept under the rug way back when (just Google Judy Garland). In this way I do admire Hail, Caesar! but at the same time it's not a movie that stands up with their other works either stylistically, comedically or really overall. It's not bad, I think some of the more extreme criticism is rather unfair, it's just a lesser effort by filmmakers who have done much, much better work. Although it was pretty neat to see that the bar scenes were filmed at my favorite bar in Los Angeles. www.yelp.com/biz/good-luck-bar-los-angeles
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,295
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 1:33:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Sept 19, 2016 16:16:55 GMT -5
So what have I personally picked up from going through the list of Coen films? For starters, there were some fantastic films that I was able to discover (The Man Who Wasn't There) and rediscover (A Serious Man). I saw just how masterful the Coen Bros. are at adapting their style to particular genres and time periods and can't think of any other filmmakers off the top of my head who are able to do the same so well. I always considered them to be among the best in the business today and although I won't say anyone is the best at anything you could make a strong case that the Coen Bros. are at the top. The Coens have a style and technique that is wholly their own and tackle each genre almost with perfection. Although there were low points as with any filmmaker, their heights are great films that range from cult classics (The Big Lebowski) to Academy Award winners (Fargo, No Country for Old Men).
Although I don't have the longest or most in-depth reviews, hopefully you guys were able to enjoy reading and contributing a little. And in case anyone is wonder, I do plan on doing another filmography run-through with another filmmaker. I have the person in mind already however if anyone has any suggestions or recommendations and would perhaps like to do it with me that would be welcome.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Sept 19, 2016 17:46:34 GMT -5
I kind of want to watch them all myself, now. Though I already did that for the site once. Should I repost my findings?
|
|
thebtskink
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jul 2000
It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again.
Posts: 19,462
Likes: 4,984
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 13:25:50 GMT -5
|
Post by thebtskink on Sept 19, 2016 22:48:13 GMT -5
I have the person in mind already however if anyone has any suggestions or recommendations and would perhaps like to do it with me that would be welcome. Is it Renny Harlin?
|
|