FShuttari
CS! Bronze
Join Date: Jan 2005
SPIDEY do! What SPIDEY DOES!
Posts: 14,031
Likes: 225
Location:
Last Online Nov 18, 2024 14:51:59 GMT -5
|
Post by FShuttari on Jun 21, 2015 8:44:14 GMT -5
Inside Out - Review Thread
Let's get one thing straight, this movie is not a come back movie. This film right here, Holds up to standards of Pixar not seen since "Wall-E" Once in a while Pixar makes a movie more for adults then children. I don't want to give too much away, since this movie is a ride, the message at the end? wow.... That takes guts to give a message like that. The inner workings of a human child looks like something taken out of Monsters Inc, instead of a door to another realm, we are greeted with a the inner workings of emotions.
Yes the characters here are cute, interesting, and fun and lots of kids will enjoy them. But really the true essence lies in within the entire spectrum of this world it plays with your head, and really you get out of the movie, and youre still thinking about all the underlying messages you were presented with days later.
11/10
Pixar Rating
1. Walle/Inside out 2. The Incredibles 3. Toy Story 1/2/3/ 4. Up 5. Finding Nemo 6. Monsters Inc.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,622
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:45:46 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Jun 21, 2015 22:08:08 GMT -5
I'm often never interested in family film fare most of the time, even when the reviews for something like "How to Train your Dragon" are very positive I really could care less about watching it. Studios often fail at balancing fun for children with entertaining the adults taking them to the movies, and you're often stuck watching a noisy and pandering affair that never seems like it will end. And then there's Pixar films, of which I always seek out in theaters and I've seen every film except for the critically lambasted "Cars 2", because they not only maintain that balance but excel at it. Though some of Pixar's recent efforts of "Brave" and "Monsters University" pale in comparison to their greatest works, they still have that Pixar magic that keeps me coming back for each new entry.
I can say with great confidence that "Inside Out" is Pixar's best work in years and a true return to form for the brilliant studio. While the concept itself has been done several times, Pixar always finds a way to breathe new life into their story lines and of course fills them with the sharp wit and humor we've come to love over the years. The story focuses on Riley, an 11-year-old girl who is heartbroken to learn that the life she loves in Minnesota will be abandoned as she and her family move to San Francisco. San Francisco isn't home; she doesn't know anyone, it's not her room, and no one plays hockey there much to Riley's dismay. Pixar has always been the best at tugging at the heart strings and creating relatable and believable characters, and "Inside Out" is no exception. Keeping Riley's emotions in check, literally, are her emotions. Joy, voiced by Amy Poehler, is in charge, Anger (Lewis Black) had me cracking up several times, Fear (Bill Hader) and Disgust (Mindy Kaling) provide great banter throughout, and Sadness (Phyllis Smith) almost steals the show with her constant buzzkill lines and antics. The cast does a terrific job here and mirror the film's frantic energy extremely well, and I found myself laughing whenever they were together.
The second act isn't quite as strong and has a bit of a "go to point A then to point B then to point C" feeling, but Pixar keeps it all moving as we weave through creative allegories for memories and imagination. They keep the laughs coming and it's easy to overlook, especially given the film's quick running time. This isn't exactly groundbreaking plot material, but Pixar has some very clever ideas on display and manages to make it all feel fresh even if we know it isn't. The film never gets preachy or heavy handed, but if it doesn't strike an emotional chord with you then you might be a boulder. If you've been at all underwhelmed by Pixar's recent efforts, do yourself a favor and go see "Inside Out". It's funny, creative, and echoes the Pixar of the past that could signal a true return to form for the studio, even if they only slightly wandered off track in the first place.
8/10
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Jun 22, 2015 22:25:12 GMT -5
Inside Out (2015)
I've been an avid supporter of Pixar for over 10 years. I've been a big enough fan that I have felt genuine rage multiple times over the last few years from phrases like "Pixar is dead" or "the Golden Age is over." While I've been more accepting of their recent solid outings such as "Brave" and "Monsters University," deep inside I was really hoping for a real hit as well. I wouldn't say this is the next Toy Story, but it's certainly fresh, smart and emotionally impactful enough to demand some space on the Pixar hall of fame mantle.
The trailers only skim the surface of this movie, that it's about the five emotions (joy, sadness, disgust, fear and anger) personified inside of a 11-year-old's mind. If you don't want to know anything about the real plot, than I guess you shouldn't read anymore. What happens is Joy and Sadness get shot out of the main part of the brain where all the emotions are dishes out to Riley, the human, and they have to get back for her to ever feel joy and sadness again.
This is where the movie gets very complex and metaphorical, and it handles these merging scenes almost perfectly. While her emotions are working themselves out in her huge (and wonderfully designed) brain, this is being acted out in the hectic life of a young girl who has just moves and will be hitting puberty soon. Whenever the film is in danger of getting contrived, it manages to ride this duality with aplomb. To cite a few examples, early on Joy is trying to keep Sadness away from the girl's memories and the main console with the idea that she is not necessary. It's here that the final message will be clear, in fact, many things are predictably, but these turn out NOT to be flaws, but an experience we get to share since we've all been 11 before. But what Joy sounds like is someone who doesn't understand the importance of showing emotion, but more deeper she's showing a misunderstanding of depression.
It would be a stretch to say that this movie is about depression, not to mention a bit far even by Pixar's standards to make a kid's movie into a whole family one. But it's impossible to ignore that Riley is not just without Joy throughout most of the movie, but without sadness, and this lack of showing the largest of emotions is a staple of depression. This is the main thread in which the movie runs through, but there are many smaller parallels as well as wonderful gags, such as memory janitors who are clearing out "useless" things such as phone numbers and all presidents except "Washington, Lincoln, and the fat one." The movie is similar to Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, but more objective than subjective. Instead of going through memories vicariously, we see the workings of a brain through the eyes Pete Doctor and crew. Speaking of Pete Doctor, this movie is also similar to Monsters Inc., in that two people are on a journey through the inner workings of a foreign society and...for other spoilery reasons.
So, we've covered the intelligence and creativity of the movie, what about Pixar's best strength: emotion. In movie about emotions, one would hope that it shows some and brings some out in the audience. While Riley arc is a well-created one, this might be what keeps this movie away from being a classic to me. It's didn't fail at this, in fact, the movie didn't fail at anything, it just wasn't really the direction it went. The movie could have been all that and more, but it spent its energy on the universe it created and fully exploring and realizing it. I'm not sure I've ever said this as a criticism against a Pixar movie, but I think being a kid's movie held it back in this sense. I mean, how far can we really go with the emotions of a little girl in what's essentially a kid's movie? But make no mistake, they did an amazing job, and you will still be fully satisfied once the movie is over.
***.5/****
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 7, 2015 20:00:27 GMT -5
Well... here's the first Best Picture contender of the year, unless the Oscars break tradition and consider Mad Max: Fury Road. Pixar's Inside Out explores the creatures inside of us that control our emotions and memories and fantasies. It's a VERY creative way to tell the story of a little girl who turns into an annoying pre-teen. Best of all, she's from Minnesota where Dracula lives. I really hope he sees the movie and laughs at himself. This is the most Dracula movie since Benjamin Button. All kidding aside, Inside Out lives up to the hype and will be remembered as one of their most important movies. The fact it has already sparked discussions among parents and children about psychology is evidence of that. So if you get the chance, watch this movie. A+ says DoomsdayPhantomKnight
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 7, 2015 20:10:52 GMT -5
I almost forgot. That short film about the volcano was... um... can we just give it the Oscar already? Also can my team of Oscar analysts ( iverdawg PG Cooper SnoBorderZero ) find out if that damn song is eligible for a nomination? If not, I'm gonna punch the fucking wall.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 23, 2015 13:10:53 GMT -5
There are different versions of this movie. In the UK, where Deexan lives, the dad daydreams about soccer instead of hockey. In Japan, the girl hates green pepper instead of broccoli.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,622
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:45:46 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Jul 23, 2015 13:14:46 GMT -5
That's actually really cool.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Jul 23, 2015 18:02:42 GMT -5
It's stupid. They don't know what hockey is? They won't create an emotional attachment with the characters without soccer? They have to be pandered to?
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 23, 2015 18:28:53 GMT -5
The girl still plays hockey in the movie. It's just the scene where the dad is daydreaming during dinner.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jul 23, 2015 18:45:17 GMT -5
While Inside Out didn't strike me as the kind of ultimate achievement we've come to expect from Pixar time and again, it's still a welcome return to form for the studio, who's had a string of films over the past few years that in one way or another, haven't been up to their usually high standards. However, I will concede that I already want to see it again, and I feel there's the definite possibility that this film could go up on re-watches.
Basically, what Inside Out does well, it does REALLY well. There's a lot of creativity shown in the representation of a little girl's mind, and on top of that, it's great to see how the shift from care-free innocence to teen adolescence is portrayed. The ways in which the script deals with the ideas of how we react emotionally to various things in life are great and ring pretty true, making for quite a few emotionally satisfying moments. The rest of the story, like I said, has quite a bit of creativity to it, and Inside Out is always an entertaining movie to watch. There are a few aspects that perhaps don't gel quite as well as the rest, but this is still a very strong movie at the end of the day. Welcome back, Pixar.
***1/2 /****
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 23, 2015 18:55:27 GMT -5
I will concede that I already want to see it again. What I wanna see again is the damn lava movie.
|
|
Fanible
Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2002
I peered into the vastness and saw nothing. Felt nothing.
Posts: 19,184
Likes: 788
Location:
Last Online Nov 6, 2024 0:31:29 GMT -5
|
Post by Fanible on Jul 23, 2015 21:56:44 GMT -5
Meh
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Jul 25, 2015 14:38:51 GMT -5
If one were to discuss the film landscape in the last twenty years or so, the subject of Pixar Animation studios is inevitable. Pixar made its first splash in 1995 with Toy Story, a film which has become a modern classic. In the following years, Pixar proved their debut was no fluke with a series of highly regarded films like Monsters Inc., Finding Nemo, WALL-E, and Up. These films were beloved by children, but also by adults due to their clever writing, creativity, smart comedy, and emotionally resonant stories. 15 years after Toy Story, Pixar brought a close to the trilogy with Toy Story 3, an excellent film and one of 2010’s best. However the film also marked the end of Pixar’s golden era. The next film from the studio would be Cars 2, a sequel to Pixar’s most uninspired film to begin with and an all-around terrible movie. Next was Brave, which came and went to little fanfare, and a Monsters Inc. prequel which wasn’t bad, but was also quickly forgotten. Pixar also have a plethora of sequels in the works, including Finding Dory, Cars 3, and Toy Story 4. All pointed to signs that the classic Pixar which took ambitious risks with new ideas and well-rounded films would be giving way to a more safe and conventional animation studio. There was however a ray of hope; Inside Out, an original IP with an enticing high concept which promised to explore emotions and the human mind. Early reviews indicated this was indeed a grand comeback for the studio. I had some reservations based on the trailer, but I still went into the film with the utmost optimism.
Inside Out follows Riley (Kaitlyn Dias), a young girl who lives with her loving family in Minnesota. Like most kids, Riley is governed in large part by her emotions, which in this film are personified as characters which live inside of her head, operating a control room influencing her actions. These emotions are Joy (Amy Poehler), Sadness (Phyllis Smith), Fear (Bill Hader), Anger (Lewis Black), and Disgust (Mindy Kaling). For most of Riley’s life, Joy has been the dominant emotion, but this is challenged when Riley’s family are forced to move to San Francisco. Struggling with the move and leaving her old friends, Sadness begins to take a more prominent role in Riley’s life. Joy attempts to resist this, and such a struggle threatens to throw all of Riley’s emotions into chaos.
Many of Pixar’s films deal with exploring worlds, such as the world of sentient toys or Monsters who make a living scaring children. In this film, we explore the world of a personified human mind, and such an exploration is rewarding. Purely on a visual level, there are a lot of creative things going on, particularly in the third act. The animation here is also gorgeous, with the colourful inner workings of Riley’s mind being extremely well-rendered and fun. On a deeper level, I think the film does a really admirable job depicting how someone’s mind works on a figurative level. The way the various emotions interact with Riley’s console for example, is simple, but a neat way of portraying how our emotions influence our actions. There’s also the idea of “core memories”, those moments in life that played a large role in shaping identity. This further manifests itself through the “islands of personality”, literal islands inside Riley which each represent a core aspect of her personality. “Hockey Island” denotes her love for the sport, “Family Island” her strong bond with her parents, and “Goofball Island” her silly humour, just to name a few. There are other unique aspects to this world, but I don’t want to give too many things away. The bottom line is the world here is great and much of the film’s success is owed to it.
Another major advantage the film has is its cast. The core emotions are all played by veteran comedic actors, and while none of them are particular favourites of mine, all are perfectly cast in their roles here. Lewis Black in particular has some really strong comedic moments as Anger. However the real focus here is on Amy Poehler as Joy and Phyllis Smith as Sadness, who both work very well here. Poehler’s manic energy and uncontainable enthusiasm comes through strong, while Phyllis Smith’s melancholic and regretful turn is great for both comedy and pathos. There’s a real richness to their voice work here and you can tell a real effort was made. Kaitlyn Dias may not have many credits to her name, but I did find her portrayal of Riley very likable and dramatic when need be. Inside Out also boasts a very strong sense of humour. Most of the jokes do land and I found myself laughing out loud a lot. The writing is sharp and film’s comedic timing is excellent, to the point that even the lesser jokes mostly pass by. On the whole, the film has a boundless energy which helps propel it through, particularly in its third act when there is a sort of race against the clock with Joy and Sadness which is quite exciting. The animation here is also stunning. The work on the humans especially seems a breakthrough. Rather than strive for photorealism, Pixar has embraced the cartoonishness of animated humans and has instead focused on making their characters as expressive and nuanced as possible. On a purely visual level, these are the most real people I’ve seen in a CGI film.
I’ve spoken a lot about what I like about the film, but I haven’t really touched on the story. In truth, I don’t what to say too much, in large part because I think the actual plot is quite simple, and is better experienced than explained. What I will say is that the film does a very good job in dealing with Riley’s emotional development. In a lot family films about upset children, the child often comes off as annoying and entitled. Here, we get a greater sense of why Riley feels the way she does and how her situation gradually worsens. It all comes down to the struggle between Joy and Sadness, and the resolution the film provides is a great one. It’s predictable and simple, but it’s also a powerful and true message for both parents and children. It also culminates in a genuinely very touching scene. Much as I dig Riley’s arc, I do think it has some problems. Part of it is rushing. Despite all Riley goes through, the bulk of the narrative is only a few days, and I think the story would have benefited from seeing Riley’s development over a longer time span. The film also runs into big problems in the second act, where the story begins to meander and the visuals seem a lot more like cutesy stuff for the kids. This is perhaps best personified by the character Bing Bong (Richard Kind), an imaginary friend created from various animals and cotton candy. The character annoyed me as soon as he showed up and unfortunately he becomes a key player for much of the film. Granted, the film does some interesting things with his character and there is still some strong material here, but it also feels sloppy.
There are a lot of things I really like in Inside Out. At its core, the film has a very strong story, some strong performances, great animation and music, and a wonderfully realized world. It’s also a funny film, and an exciting one too. But I really do think that second act is an anchor that weighs the whole down. Much of that section feels like a missed opportunity, to the point that I can’t shake the feeling that the film didn’t quite live up to the potential it set up in the beginning. Having said that, this is almost certainly Pixar’s best film since Toy Story 3 and their most creative since WALL-E. It maybe isn’t on the level of those great films, but Inside Out is still really, really good.
B+
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 25, 2015 17:59:10 GMT -5
Despite all Riley goes through, the bulk of the narrative is only a few days, and I think the story would have benefited from seeing Riley’s development over a longer time span. You praise the movie for having a realistic child but also criticize it for having a realistic child. She was only in San Francisco for a few days and hated it so much that she ran away from home and got in a bus for Minnesota. That's impulsive behavior - something functioning adults don't usually have. Once you're grown-up, you think about the pro's and con's of major decisions. Kids rely on gut instincts and emotions because they haven't experienced enough in life to know that there's consequences, both good and bad, of everything they do. This is one of the reasons why the movie works so well. It isn't simply a story of a middle class child turning into a pre-teen and facing problems for the first time. It's about the people, places and things that define a person. That's why they also made a big deal about memories and personality lands. Childhood is the foundation of people's lives. Leaving Minnesota represented the end of her childhood and the beginning of her journey towards adulthood and she wasn't ready to do that yet. It took the memories of the saddest moments in her life to remind her that she can overcome obstacles and learn something in the process. Leaving Minnesota and her childhood isn't gonna derail her life. That experience is always gonna define part of who she is and will also serve as a guide to her new life. The movie didn't need to spend 6 months in the life of this girl to get that point across.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,492
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:37:07 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Jul 25, 2015 18:07:39 GMT -5
I really need to see the last 15 minutes of this movie.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Jul 25, 2015 21:45:52 GMT -5
Despite all Riley goes through, the bulk of the narrative is only a few days, and I think the story would have benefited from seeing Riley’s development over a longer time span. You praise the movie for having a realistic child but also criticize it for having a realistic child. She was only in San Francisco for a few days and hated it so much that she ran away from home and got in a bus for Minnesota. That's impulsive behavior - something functioning adults don't usually have. Once you're grown-up, you think about the pro's and con's of major decisions. Kids rely on gut instincts and emotions because they haven't experienced enough in life to know that there's consequences, both good and bad, of everything they do. This is one of the reasons why the movie works so well. It isn't simply a story of a middle class child turning into a pre-teen and facing problems for the first time. It's about the people, places and things that define a person. That's why they also made a big deal about memories and personality lands. Childhood is the foundation of people's lives. Leaving Minnesota represented the end of her childhood and the beginning of her journey towards adulthood and she wasn't ready to do that yet. It took the memories of the saddest moments in her life to remind her that she can overcome obstacles and learn something in the process. Leaving Minnesota and her childhood isn't gonna derail her life. That experience is always gonna define part of who she is and will also serve as a guide to her new life. The movie didn't need to spend 6 months in the life of this girl to get that point across. I get what you're saying, but I still found the arc rushed. I'm not seeing it needed to be spread over months, nor do I need it to an overly large "growing up" story, but having her go from disappointed about her move to stealing from her parents and running away from home seemed like too big a leap. You can say kids are impulsive all you want, but I was ten once and even then it would have taken more than two days to force me to come to such conclusions. I should also point out that while I stand by my criticism, it isn't really a huge deal for me. The story still works emotionally and the messages still come through.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 26, 2015 1:40:17 GMT -5
I was ten once and even then it would have taken more than two days to force me to come to such conclusions. That's because Joy and Sadness weren't missing from the control room.
|
|
FShuttari
CS! Bronze
Join Date: Jan 2005
SPIDEY do! What SPIDEY DOES!
Posts: 14,031
Likes: 225
Location:
Last Online Nov 18, 2024 14:51:59 GMT -5
|
Post by FShuttari on Jul 26, 2015 9:59:48 GMT -5
Not to mention the other emotions were trying to take control and we're having a terrible time without Joy to stabilize.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Jul 26, 2015 13:15:11 GMT -5
I was ten once and even then it would have taken more than two days to force me to come to such conclusions. That's because Joy and Sadness weren't missing from the control room. How do you know? You weren't there, man.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 26, 2015 14:32:02 GMT -5
That's because Joy and Sadness weren't missing from the control room. How do you know? You weren't there, man. Or was I?
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,492
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:37:07 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Nov 7, 2015 10:18:21 GMT -5
It took me two attempts to see Inside Out. When it was in theaters, I decided it would be fun to take my 4 year old niece. Now, it was fun however, not a lot of movie watching was actually done. Most of it was taking breaks in the lobby, getting more popcorn, and eventually leaving early because she was getting too restless. Somehow the metaphorical undertones of maturing emotions went over her head. Oh well.
So I finally managed to watch the whole film this week with its release to Blu-ray. And now I know what I was only able to glimpse previously: its brilliant. It starts off really cutesy and high energy, but as it continues it really settles down into one of those classic Pixar think pieces that is both entertaining and actually has a strong element of theme. In this case its taking a pretty close and honest look at what it means to grow up.
The creativity behind how this girl's head is designed is a lot of fun. The idea of long term memory being endless shelves, how memories themselves are translucent balls that fade as they're forgotten, how dreams are created with a Hollywood-like studio, its all really cool.
And within this framework, Pixar puts together a great story about how two emotions, Joy and Sadness, have to figure out how to get the girl Riley through a major period of change for her. And as this story is told, we get a lot of insights into how the growing human mind works, how childish things like imaginary friends are put away, how emotions sometimes need to blend,, and why sometimes being happy isn't everything. Pretty deep stuff when you dig into it.
But what is really great is that Pixar never spells all that out for you, its all visual and action-based. For example, at one point we see inside the parents heads. Anger is running the Dad's brain, while Sadness is running the moms. Those are quick glances, but when you think about it it says a lot.
Inside out is a great movie, thats what this comes down to. Pixar has done it again. 9/10
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,945
Likes: 2,015
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 14:37:23 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Nov 7, 2015 11:25:38 GMT -5
I liked it a lot.
9/10.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Nov 8, 2015 0:37:00 GMT -5
This movie was even better for me the second time. Four stars.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Nov 8, 2015 2:05:09 GMT -5
Pixar surprised a lot of people with this one.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 8, 2015 2:09:16 GMT -5
Pixar surprised a lot of people with this one. And the lava movie too.
|
|