frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,946
Likes: 2,017
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 21:34:40 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Mar 30, 2015 8:28:38 GMT -5
The music. My goodness the music. It was used so perfectly. In any good horror movie music can make or break the whole thing.
It Follows is about a spirit or demon or... something... that keeps following every person that it 'infects'. How you get infected is by having sex with someone that already has it. There was some really well done scenes in it, when the protagonist first gets infected and the person who infectred her has to make sure she understands the seriousness of... 'It' there is a great scene in an abandoned building/parking lot.
The movie doesn't rely on jump scares and has some interesting symbolism. The movie isn't anything higher level or even pretending to be, the enemy is never really explained which I think makes for a much better horror movie. Multiple scenes stand out though, namely any time someone is following the protagonist(s).
Overall, I would say check this movie out. It is a well made low budget horror movie with solid cinematography and some really creepy scenes, one in particular really stands out for me, but I don't want to give anything away, even in spoiler tags.
And the younger actors actually aren't insufferably annoying, and they always follow the rules laid out from the beginning scene "always be somewhere with an exit, it might be slow but it isn't stupid", so they don't make explicit dumb decisions like most horror movies seem to do.
8/10
Music/Score? - 10/10.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Mar 30, 2015 11:40:06 GMT -5
Glad to hear you enjoyed it, I'll probably be seeing it this weekend now that it's playing everywhere.
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,946
Likes: 2,017
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 21:34:40 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Mar 30, 2015 11:52:27 GMT -5
The way people die from It is also rather interesting. Not sure how the first girl dies in the opening scene, but damn if it doesn't look intense.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Mar 30, 2015 12:55:32 GMT -5
And it's more reliant on atmosphere and story than pop-scares? That's a relief, I can't stand when horror movies settle for lazy, cheap scares like that for the whole film. One or two is fine, but ten is just excessively annoying.
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,946
Likes: 2,017
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 21:34:40 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Mar 30, 2015 13:26:42 GMT -5
Only a few of them. And I thought they were used really well, a couple were blatant and they poke fun at jump scares at a certain point in the film too.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Apr 2, 2015 1:42:30 GMT -5
10/10? For really reals?
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,946
Likes: 2,017
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 21:34:40 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Apr 2, 2015 11:49:51 GMT -5
A return to form of the 80s and early 90s horror movies that used synth and bass appropriately.
For really reals.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Apr 10, 2015 11:03:54 GMT -5
"It Follows" centers on Jay, who after having sex with a guy is told by him that he's now passed "It" along to her. "It" is a relentless demon that will kill you if it touches you (in a rather brutal and bizarre way at that), as he mercifully explains to her, and Jay's only real options are to either constantly escape it or to have sex with someone else and pass it along. The demon will only go after the person who "has it", but if that person dies then "It" will go after the person before it and so on. It's a fun concept, reminded me of "The Thing" meets "The Ring" in a way, and they do an excellent job of not bogging the film with tired cliches and plot elements. The film doesn't throw cheap scares at you, and instead relies on its very effective atmosphere to invoke fear into the audience. Shot in Detroit likely sometime in the fall, the film makes great use of its dark skies, eerie abandoned Detroit homes, and full fledged paranoia that keeps you on edge for the film's entire duration. Mitchell does an excellent giving the camera life. His tracking and 360 shots are excellent, and even before Jay gets "It" there always feels like there's a heavy, ominous presence that presides over the film. You'll find yourself constantly scanning every inch of the frame to see if "It" is there, or if there's something out of place, and even as the film loses a bit of steam towards the end, it's never less than unsettling.
The cast does a very good job here, and there's certainly an indie-like charm surrounding the film. In some ways it's as humorous and as poignant a coming of age film as it is a horror movie. Even towards the climax the film still stops to evaluate the relationships of the characters, their jealousies, and the unsettled actions of their pasts. They don't succumb to stupid horror movie "why the hell would you do this?" antics and actually play it all pretty smart. We don't have to jump through the boring hoops of "we don't believe you until it's too late" or "we have to keep uncovering origins about 'It' and find a way to stop the damn thing" crap. The film grabs hold of you from the first frame (one of many perfectly executed long-takes in the film) and doesn't let go and never bogs itself down with the typical poison of most horror movies. Oh, and the soundtrack, man was it good. The film has this very atmospheric lost in time feeling, and the soundtrack does a great job of creating the environment with its late-80s sounding synthesizers mixing with that heavy, ominous pounding that goes oh-so-well with the fluid camera movements. The plot itself might not be groundbreaking, and by the third act some can understandably be a little disappointed in how it all plays out, but there's no denying the film's technical achievements in sound and cinematography that elevates it above others. If you thought "The Conjuring" was well shot, you'll be smitten with "It Follows". Plus, the film leaves a lot of things unanswered and open ended, which also leaves a resonating sting on the viewer after the film. This is easily one of the best horror films in recent years and should not be missed. A ton of fun with a brain to boot, who knew horror films could still be both anymore?
8/10
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,649
Likes: 4,066
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Apr 13, 2015 13:25:38 GMT -5
In the last few years, it seems a lot of the genre films that receive a lot of praise are ones that are self-conscious genre deconstructions. In the realm of horror, the poster child for this is The Cabin in the Woods, but it’s a trend that can be spotted in other films as well and I’m growing tired of. It’s not the deconstruction of genre that bothers me, it’s the smug attitude these films have about pointing out genre conventions which annoy me. Horror’s most recently acclaimed film, It Follows, certainly seems like it could be such a film at first glance. The film certainly plays with conventions of the genre relating to sexual promiscuity, and it’s also a pretty clear throwback to the horror films of the late 1970s and 80s (namely John Carpenter), but it’s not defined a sense of “irony”. Instead, this is an interesting little horror film which chooses a unique angle and is made with conviction.
Jay (Maika Monroe) is a young girl living with her single mother (Debbie Williams) and sister, Kelly (Lili Sepe). Jay has been seeing a boy named Hugh (Jake Weary) and after a few dates the two have sex. After this, Hugh explains to Jay that he has been being stalked by a supernatural entity which can take the form of any human being (someone known or a stranger) which kills by touching the victim. He inherited this affliction by having sex with someone also “cursed”, and the only way to remove it is to pass it to another through sex. Naturally, Jay doesn’t believe him, but it soon becomes apparent is words are true as various forces only she can see have been relentlessly pursuing her. Her options are to flee, or to try and pass it on to someone else.
The exact nature of what has caused or created this strange entity is never revealed, and that’s probably for the best. “It” is a lot creepier when you don’t exactly know what it is. Such ambiguity has also opened the film up to a number of metaphorical readings. The prevailing wisdom is that “It” represents AIDS or other sexually transmitted diseases. It’s certainly a plausible theory given how it spreads, and the fact that those being followed don’t tell their partners can represent how some people with diseases in real life don’t come clean with their partners. However in real life this lack of information comes from selfish desire, whereas in It Follows it stems from basic survival needs. Because of this, I interpret “It” as more of a manifestation of guilt regarding promiscuity and certain societal pressures.
Personally, I really like the fact that It Follows invites interpretation and gives the audience something intellectual to chew on. There’s also something to be said about the fact that teen sexuality is intrinsically linked with the horror genre, and here it’s essential to the plot. However the film doesn’t hinge on a viewer’s ability to read into the sexual politics on display. Those looking for an effective horror film should be satisfied as this is a really neat high concept executed well. Director David Robert Mitchell puts together some really solid horror set-pieces and effectively builds a sense of dread throughout. This is a slow burn, but this really contributes to the atmosphere. The camera work here is also really slick and the visual style well-realized. Mitchell was also clearly influenced by the works of John Carpenter. The suburban setting is very reminiscent of Halloween, the killer that can take on multiple identities can be compared to The Thing, and the idea that only a few can see the creature also reminded me of They Live. These connections are pretty clear to those who know, but I appreciate how the film isn’t trying to be self-aware or wink at these audiences with these references. The score by composer Disasterpeace is also heavily inspired by the synth heavy beats which are so prominent in many of Carpenter’s films. It can be a little overbearing at points, but for the most part it’s pretty damn awesome, and a highlight. The only throwback element which bothered me is that the film can’t quite commit to a time period. There is a lot of 70s iconography which fits the style, but it’s also clear the film is set in modern day.
I do think the writing here can be a little problematic. Much as I enjoy the high concept and think Mitchell builds a number of nice scenes around it, things do start to get repetitive. We get similar scenes involving the gang of kids over and over and while they never become dull, it is noticeable. Additionally, I’m not sure the film ever really hit the highs it could have with the central idea. There just seems to be something missing. It’s also important to note that Mitchell’s roots lie in mumblecore and the more annoying hipster elements of that subgenre do come through a little in the characterization, particularly early on. Scenes of these teens all sitting around watching black and white horror movies on TV or reading Dostoevsky’s The Idiot on a seashell shaped kindle strike as false. Simply put, I don’t really know anyone who actually acts like that. These elements do dissipate once the horror becomes the predominant focus, but they do sneak back in from time to time.
I’ve made no secret of the fact that I’ve been underwhelmed by the horror genre for the past few years. A lot of what’s coming out of Hollywood just looks lame and even the horror films I like tend to be with a number of caveats. However I have hope that things are on the upswing. Last year’s The Babadook was an exceptional work and while It Follows doesn’t quite excel at that level (though both are really quite different), this is still one of the strongest efforts from the genre currently out there. The film certainly has problems, but it’s also a stylish and clever work which I enjoyed my time with.
B+
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Apr 13, 2015 13:40:43 GMT -5
Excellent review, I agree with everything you said. The film does lose some steam by the end, and like you said, I was hoping for it to push its boundaries a little more both narrative-wise and with the concept. That's a good interpretation of "It" and I agree with you that it's not exactly an STD metaphor but rather sex with bad intentions or promiscuity that's gone out of control. I'm also very with you on the notion that it was nice that the film doesn't get annoying with its genre awareness, which I felt "The Cabin in the Woods" became overly guilty of and wasn't nearly as smart a film as it thought it was, this was definitely a far superior film in every way. And yes, the hipsterisms were on full display here, though all of my colleagues in the industry (like 85% anyways) are hipsters, so unfortunately any "indie" films these days are going to convey those exact styles. Which is fine, sort of, but when they have a high school girl avidly reading Dostoevsky it's eye-rolling, especially since the rest of the young casts' interaction feel so sincere and genuine.
But yeah, though the film doesn't push itself enough to quite reach the heights of classic, there's so many bright positives going on within the film (cinematography, soundtrack, atmosphere, cast that doesn't do stupid horror cliches) that I can easily overlook the faults.
|
|
mikeyb
Production Manager
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 847
Likes: 62
Location:
Last Online Mar 20, 2024 7:30:07 GMT -5
|
Post by mikeyb on Jun 22, 2015 7:21:08 GMT -5
Fuck this film was dull 4.5/10
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,529
Likes: 3,133
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 23:37:17 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Nov 16, 2015 15:02:23 GMT -5
It's no secret that the horror genre is, more often than not, simply not good these days. So many movies in it undervalue the concept of atmosphere and dread that can make the genre so cool and enjoyable to begin with, but It Follows is one of the welcome exceptions. This movie is creepy, weird, nightmarish and fairly gripping. Writer/director David Robert Mitchell has a sure hand behind the camera, and he's certainly not afraid to let the story unfold at a gradual pace. But right away, he makes it obvious that It Follows is going to be an interesting film to watch stylistically; the opening shot is a very impressive 360-degree spinning one that hooks you right away, and it's a shot that's employed twice more in the film to equally satisfying effect. It Follows is a not-so-subtle metaphor for unprotected sex, but it also feels like a metaphor for the inevitability of death; it's something we can't outrun, no matter how fast or how hard we try to. Also, David Robert Mitchell gets props for only putting in two jump scares in the entire film, and they're well-earned. On that note, there was also a moment about halfway through where a scene is playing out and "It" just shows up, which proves that this is a movie where you always have to keep an eye on the background. Plus, awesome score.
The performances from the main cast are good. They combine the muted style that fits a movie like this with elements of pure terror and confusion that help make the acting feel less pretentious. But I do have a complaint about It Follows, and I watched the movie twice to make sure it was a complaint: sometimes, this movie's a little too open-ended or too reliant on a certain kind of dream logic, I guess you could say. In particular, there are one or two instances where a scene is set up a certain way, but there's no payoff to the set-up. There's a scene at a school in the middle of the movie that does this, and the scene just ends without much resolution. Going by the logic/mythology the film establishes, I guess you could say it makes sense for the movie to do that, but it still stood out as jarring to me, and building off that, while the ending DOES make sense, at the same time, it shows that coming up with a proper ending to a film this is difficult.
Overall, though, It Follows is a very good example of what you can really do with the horror genre and it's certainly one of the better horror movies in recent years.
***1/2 /****
|
|