Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Feb 20, 2015 20:49:05 GMT -5
The 2014 Novas
A lot of changes this year, so listen up.
First of all, there's more movies and more categories. 30 movies and 10 categories, in all. With so many movies and only one award presentation per year, I'm not going to quibble with my info coming out in little blurbs for each category. Instead, The Novas are going to be done by posting 3 reviews at a time, starting with the worst and ending with the best. With 10 categories, I will post one award each time, but most of the time they will be unrelated with the three reviews (though I tried to combine quite a few.) Doing it this way allows me to talk more about each movie, but the categorized awards keep it from being boring early on where I'm only trashing the bad movies.
Speaking of talking more about the movies, each review will be similar to what some of you have probably already seen me say in Letterboxd, but each one will have an additional section called "Sci-fi Talk with Jibbs" where I go into the themes and ideas of each movie. It's fun for me, hopefully fun for you, and I get to show off a bit by bringing up similarities to sub-genres of science fiction, past movies, and literature.
One more thing. Inspired by Dracula's "CS Top Movies of the Year," I'd like to do the same thing but with science fiction films, so from now on there will be voting for top sci-fi films. Only it will be PRIVATE, and you can send your list to me at any time, and I'll compare the results to my own at the end. If you're not sure if something classifies as science fiction or "2014," then just make the list with 11 movies...or 12 if you're sending two that you're unsure of. (But to help, Under the Skin is eligible, as are the comic book movies, Guardians, Captain 2 and X-Men.) If you don't watch 10 or more sci-fi films like I do, send as many as you can. Remember to rank them, of course.
And with that, we shall begin shortly. Be patient for updates as I have not written everything up yet and I don't have as much free time as I used to with the older Nova Awards.
Enjoy!
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Feb 20, 2015 20:51:34 GMT -5
Woo-hoo!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 14:30:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2015 20:53:24 GMT -5
You pick the coolest photos.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Feb 20, 2015 21:05:59 GMT -5
You pick the coolest photos. Let's have a separate award just for the photos!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 14:30:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2015 21:21:07 GMT -5
Sounds good to me.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Feb 20, 2015 21:45:52 GMT -5
2014 Ed Wood Award
Left Behind
Directed by: Vic Armstrong Written by: Jerry B. Jenkins & Tim LaHaye (based on novel), Paul Lalonde and John Patus Stars: Nicolas Cage, Lea Thompson, Cassi Thomson
Left Behind is an action/thriller that follows a family on the day of the Rapture. It was directed by the acclaimed director of Total Recall, Starship Troopers, Tomorrow Never Dies, War of the Worlds, and The Amazing Spider-Man...oh, no sorry, he was the second unit director of those films. And a professional stuntman of Harrison Ford's and more. But that's OK, let's see how he did. The first 20 minutes takes place almost entirely of talking in an airport with Nicholas Cage, his daughter, and some love interest, I guess. Ostensibly, it's character development, but really it's to build up that they're atheists with issues. Nicholas Cage, the co-pilot of a commercial airline takes off with his daughter and son on the land, and in the blink of an eye, a fair portion of adults and all the children of the Earth disappear. What follows is a silly, slow-paced story where simple heathens try to figure out what happened and land a plane. It's The Langoliers without intelligent deduction; it's Die Hard 2 without copyright infringement.
But it's worse than that, because it's Christian propaganda, but only as subtle as it had to be to still be marketable, I suppose. I could bash this as an atheist, but I don't have to, because the movie tears itself apart on its own. There's the mother who was allowed into heaven despite only finding religion a year previous, so good news, you can avoid being left behind anytime you want. But it gets worse with the Muslin on the plane. If there was any doubt that it was only Christians who were saved, it's squashed with this character. Because at one point, this man shows he's religious by suggesting a prayer on the plane. I guess the Quran wasn't enough. The plane is landed safely in a moderately exciting scene, though ripped-off from the aforementioned Die Hard 2, but as you could imagine, the very ending isn't a happy one as they have to live on the forsaken planet. As a last minute gift, we're left with a bible quote. I guess Vic Armstrong just had one thing to say as his own director.
*/****
Sci-Fi Talk with Jibbs
This is only borderline science fiction to begin with, but I knew in my heart this just had to be the “winner.” Nicholas Cage. Rapture. C’mon. I guess the only theme to talk about is the mixture of science fiction (or let’s just call it live action reality, in this case) and religion. You rarely see it despite the long feud between the two. This movie doesn’t have near the intellectual capacity to give this duel a fair shot, but I am a sucker for science fiction to take a chance and aim for the impossible. (See a similar bad movie, also staring Nicholas Cage, called “Knowing.” Pretty poor, but the ending takes a fun chance.)
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Feb 20, 2015 21:50:44 GMT -5
Young Ones
Written and directed by: Jake Paltrow Stars: Nicholas Hoult, Kodi Smit-McPhee, Michael Shannon
Yikes, what a boring piece of crap. I'm not sure what it was more: boring, or a piece of crap. On one hand, it’s a pretentious piece of crap complete with awkward artsy choices, "Chapter" subtitles for no reason (does ANY movie really need chapters?), lame characters, lame story, and awful acting. On the other hand, I had little to no interest in the film. Young Ones takes place in the future where the world is a lot hotter and dryer. The world has a real Mad Max quality to it where people will kill you for looking at you the wrong way...but there's still Major League Baseball on the radio. Technology seems to be doing pretty well too, as there are advancements in robots for paralysis and robots that help you to do farming. But before I get too hard on the movie for this irony, I should say this isn't always a paradox and can be done pretty well. In fact, it's kind of the world we live in. But this movie seems to throw in technologies and CGI for no good reason and it only adds to a movie that really had no clear vision. Also, the movie isn't about anything except a guy who steals a farm from Michael Shannon.
*/****
Sci-Fi Talk with Jibbs
Again, there won’t be as much to talk about with the dregs, but we’ll get there. As I said, this was more about a family feud than any science fiction ideas. I often say the best films use science fiction as a spice, but here it almost feels like an afterthought. This movie has no original ideas to speak of, so let’s move on.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Feb 20, 2015 21:55:00 GMT -5
This is fun.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Feb 20, 2015 21:57:49 GMT -5
Space Station '76
Directed by: Jack Plotnick Written by: Jennifer Elise Cox & Sam Pancake & Jack Plotnick & Kali Rocha & Michael Stoyanov Stars: Patrick Wilson, Liv Tyler, Marisa Coughlan
Now here's an interesting, quirky little film. Unfortunately it kind of sucked, but its style gave it much more potential. Basically it follows the lives of a half dozen or so people on a space station, but the movie is produced as if it was made in the 70s. I was hoping for more technological jokes (like how all the robots in this film are like the tiny toy robots we had in the 80s) or references to cheesy movies of the time like Saturn 3 and Silent Running, but instead it tried to play it serious most of the way with these people's stupid lives. It tried to be profound and funny at the same time, but really it just came off as an awkward debut film from a director who had a couple thousand dollars to blow. The film actually had a few hilarious spots, like anything involving the robots which were both butlers and psychiatrists in this movie. But the one scene that has to be mentioned was a brief scene involving Keir Dullea, best known for playing the lead Dave Bowman in 2001: A Space Odyssey. He plays the father of the main character, played by Liv Tyler. In the scene, they are talking to each other in a video phone conversation, an obvious reference to the conversation in 2001, except with the modern twist of the old man who can't figure out technology. Most of the conversation is Keir Dullea trying to frame himself properly in the screen, but instead being out of frame, too close up, or both. A pretty funny moment in an otherwise disappointing (but not forgettable) film.
*.5/****
Sci-Fi talk with Jibbs
Now this is a fun movie to discuss. I actually had an idea long ago for a short story that would be written from the point of view of the 60s during the Cold War. So the enemy spaceships would be USSR, and so on. I was THRILLED to see someone actually try this very creative idea and I hope it’s done more in the future. The problem is, I think the director had more than he thought. Perhaps he thought he was too good for a parody, even though the fruit was ripe for the taking with this set of characters. Every idea has already been done, yes, so it’s up to filmmakers now to do them differently. We also need more comedies in science fiction.
|
|
Knerys
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Nov 2001
Live long and prosper.
Posts: 34,317
Likes: 358
Location:
Last Online Mar 22, 2021 9:54:16 GMT -5
|
Post by Knerys on Feb 20, 2015 22:02:03 GMT -5
\o/ Woohoo!!
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Feb 23, 2015 22:07:08 GMT -5
Mr. Peabody & Sherman
Yes, I watched a lot of sci-fi this year. Perhaps too much.
Mr. Peabody & Sherman is the adaptation of the TV show from the 50s and 60s which itself was sort of a companion TV series to The Bullwinkle Show. It was about an intellectual genius dog and his adopted boy and they would travel through time. This is pretty much the whole movie but with an additional female child companion as a wild card and some other disappointing things I'll get to later. It was a cute movie and for the most part I was interested in it. There were some decent history jokes, and even a few less childish ones, like Mr. Peabody writing Shakespeare's plays for him. But in the end it was definitely aimed as a children's movie. This is clear from the numerous jokes involving butts, but also less forgivable details, like a complete disregard for plot holes. In one instance Penny steals the time machine and goes to ancient Egypt, so Mr. Peabody and Sherman take the time machine to go get her. See the problem there? There's only one time machine. Ouch. Also, Mr. Peabody has to get back from ancient Rome to the present without the time machine at one point, so he explains he built one out of items from that time period and "yak fat." Kind of funny, but also just lazy writing.
Here's my main peeves with this film, though. One is that Mr. Peabody is voiced by Ty Burrell. I realize we are long gone from the golden age of animation where the movie voiceover actors were professionals and nobody knew who they were, but we're talking about an iconic voice here. Find someone who can freaking do his voice, not someone who walks around the whole movie sounding like Phil Dunphy. And my second peeve is the ending. Oh my God, the finale is based around an impending disaster (a wormhole) around New York City. Do I have to say anything else?
That leads me to my summary which is that although it was a cute, harmless movie, it also reeks of laziness and had no inspiration whatsoever. (Oh, and there was also some weird subplot about Mr. Peabody losing custody over Sherman because he was a dog.)
*.5/****
Sci-fi Talk with Jibbs
Not a whole lot to discuss seeing as time-travel might be the most common (or at least most accessible) for of science fiction. But hey, time travel is fun. You would think with the freedom of time travel, animation, and a family audience, they could have given us some good stuff, but this one was clearly on the fast track to make a few bucks. I mean, my god, who green-lit the New York in trouble thing? And if I recall, Mr. Peabody was also supposed to be educational for children, and you don’t even see much of that here either. There was some brief time travel fun in this one when there were two Sherman’s or something, but it felt like it was there because it was expected.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Feb 23, 2015 22:10:10 GMT -5
Transformers: Age of Extinction
Transformers 4 is a movie that stars a man named Cade Yeager. I don't know if I should root for him or drink him. It's a movie where bad guys say things like "My face is my warrant!" and robots say "good luck, Earth." It's a movie filled with men and male robots, and one 17-year-old girl who's main purpose is to get captured, chicken-out, look like a Barbie doll, and be discussed as jail-bait. There's also a doozy of a scene where she's napping and her father (Cade Yeager) tells her boyfriend about how he won't always be able to protect her and essentially passes on those duties to the next guy. I'm glad she can live a long life now. Bay's movies may be introvertedly racist and sexist, but it's getting tiring. Transformers is a movie where we learn they are made from Transformium. It's a movie with podracing, humans being harvested for metal, characters who are established as professional drivers, and a whole lot of slo-mo. It's a movie with hit and miss and miss and miss humor, and a US flag in every other shot. The flag thing kind of made sense in Armageddon in a jingoistic kind of way, but I'm not sure I even understand the thought processes of this one.
I think the style and attitude that went into this movie can be summed up by one character. That would be Titus Welliver's character of James Savoy. Or as I know him, the bad spirit from Lost. He walks around in a Neo-esque black coat, sunglasses, unshaven face, and walks around in everyone's face, chewing gum, and insulting their mothers while widely making hand gestures to emphasize his points. I may have made up a few of those last ones, but that's how I now picture him. I also see him as the embodiment of Michael Bay and whatever nut he uses as his cinematographer.
Why do the Transformers have such nuanced faces?
*.5/****
Sci-fi talk with Jibbs
Eh, these movies could be epic and a lot of fun in the right hands. Toys coming form space to have epic battles in our back yards? Robots riding dinosaurs? Sign me up! But somehow even metallic, transforming robots on a metal Tyrannosaurus is only midly amusing in this movie. Wow, I guess that DOES take talent. The movie occasionally attempts science fiction legitimacy, but fails with ideas like harvesting humans for metal (which is somehow worse than harvesting them for energy like a battery), and lore involving vague magic boxes and shit.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 14:30:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 22:12:48 GMT -5
Wasn't that Peabody show the one where they stop and explain the history or science behind whatever it is they're doing?
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Feb 23, 2015 22:13:26 GMT -5
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
It would appear we don't even need superheroes to make superhero movies anymore. Sure, the turtles fight crime and have a nemesis, but is saving New York from chemical warfare really their M.O.?
It might be something that hadn't caught my attention if it wasn't for all of the other adjustments for the never-ending Hollywood assembly line. This could have been a movie about the turtles and their exuberant personalities, but instead of playing to its strengths, this movie takes any part of the mythos that has any flexibility and gives us what we've seen many times before. The similarities of the premise to Spider-Man is unfortunate enough, but at times it felt like I was watching it all over again with the added changes of O'Neil's father. There's also an early scene taken right from Batman Begins.
But mostly, I'd say the biggest Superhero dependent slip-up was the movie's reliance on technology. You can't have a big, bad action flick without computers, rocket launchers and countdowns, can you? Turning Donatello into the tech geek, complete with techno-babble, taped-up glasses and odd calculating is only a small price to pay, I guess. Of course, this raises the question of how recluse mutant turtles (and a rat) can afford state of the art technology for their sewer. Remember, they're teenagers, so they can't yet hold a job.
Still, a lot of this could be forgiven if it was a decent, well-directed movie, but it's not. Instead of focusing on the characters, the plot meanders from boring plot point to the next complete with rescues, NY skyline trouble, and a really obvious bad guy twist thanks to lazy casting. Some of the action scenes are pretty decent, but most of them are messy and uncreative.
The movie has a few highlights. Mikey has some good, funny moments, I like something they changed with April O'Neil's backstory, and there's a good scene in an elevator that stands as the only scene that shows the turtles bonding in any significant manner. In a word, the movie is uninspired.
*.5/****
Sci-fi talk with Jibbs
This is a unique entry because here’s a movie that shouldn’t have been so sci-fi. I realize turtles turning into humans because of radioactive goo leads itself to some imaginative fiction, but this all becomes white noise, or “scifiplotation,” a term that I would lobby harder to being coined if it rolled off the tongue a bit better. It’s basically action movies that are drenched with explosive tech and smacked with an Apple Store. Your eyes get a work out, but you remember nothing months later.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:10:40 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Feb 23, 2015 22:17:23 GMT -5
Wow... you're pretty damn dedicated to this project.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Feb 23, 2015 22:19:54 GMT -5
Stan Winston Award
2nd Runner up:
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes
Too much can’t be said about the work being down in the newest Planet of the Apes movies, but I’ve already given the first movie an award, so…I guess too much can be said. The apes are amazing in this movie and they’re all given their own personalities thanks to the wonderful motion capture done by Andy Serkis and Co., but beyond that there’s isn’t much to speak of in this film.
1st Runner up: X-Men: Days of Future Past
A bit light on the CGI, as a lot of the movie is just characters roaming around in the 70s, but when the special effects hit, they hit hard. There’s a finale based around the relocation of a major league baseball stadium, there’s personal mutant special effects, but the king-daddy of it all is the stuff in the future setting. Post-apocalyptic settings, and wonderful, ever-changing sentinels. This movie might not have the most ground-breaking special effects (are special effects really “groundbreaking” anymore?), but it uses its weapons wonderfully with CGI, imaginatively fight scenes (Sentinels vs. Portal Girl (Blink)), and make-up.
And the winner of the Stan Winston Award is… Guardians of the Galaxy
Now here’s a movie that’s packed head to toe with special effects. We’ve got spaceships, cities, space stations, more space ships, planetoid skulls, but most importantly it’s all done with great care, color, and personality. This movie also gets points for make-up.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Feb 23, 2015 22:22:54 GMT -5
Wasn't that Peabody show the one where they stop and explain the history or science behind whatever it is they're doing? Yeah, I believe so. Wow... you're pretty damn dedicated to this project. Yep. (Try not to quote entire reviews. It sloshes everything up.)
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Feb 23, 2015 22:25:37 GMT -5
Wow, guess I should have reminded myself what the Transformers poster looked like before I found that second photo.
But I dunno, it's kind of fitting...
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Feb 23, 2015 22:32:06 GMT -5
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
Fuck the Oscars, this is what matters.
But the real question is, what are we all wearing?
Personally, I'm clad in David Beckham 'Bodywear' long johns and an unofficial 'House Martell' poorly fitting £5 vest from Ebay with a sunspear motif on the front and 'Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken' on the rear. A classic Nova look that took me in excess of 35 seconds to properly don.
Back to you, Ryan...
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Feb 23, 2015 23:08:08 GMT -5
No Interstellar for the Stan Winston award?
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Feb 23, 2015 23:10:51 GMT -5
Thanks Deex,
People are still in shock and awe of Mr. Cruise comments on the "Transformers conspiracy" and following attack on Mr. Bay, but I think we can all agree that we'll never look at bananas the same way again.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Feb 23, 2015 23:13:45 GMT -5
No Interstellar for the Stan Winston award? Hmmm, I thought about it for a long time and...I'm not sure I saw the same movie the Academy did (obviously...) I mean...what special effects? What was great about the effects for Interstellar was just how natural everything was. Yeah, there were some great models, some good shots of a black hole and five dimensional space, but otherwise it wasn't really that kind of movie.
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,945
Likes: 2,015
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by frankyt on Feb 23, 2015 23:32:47 GMT -5
Peabody and Sherman would always give ridiculous and incorrect scientific and historical facts. They are kind of really fun in how ridiculous all their 'facts' are, especially considering it kind of seems like it should be legitimate at some point.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Feb 23, 2015 23:47:47 GMT -5
No Interstellar for the Stan Winston award? Hmmm, I thought about it for a long time and...I'm not sure I saw the same movie the Academy did (obviously...) I mean...what special effects? What was great about the effects for Interstellar was just how natural everything was. Yeah, there were some great models, some good shots of a black hole and five dimensional space, but otherwise it wasn't really that kind of movie. Is the Winston award more dedicated to physical effects? I assumed that's why you ignored Interstellar. If not, then I have to go with the academy. The wormhole sequence...just trying to realise that is a headfuck, the 'flame rings' around the black hole, the closing of the tesseract, even the tessaract itself, actually. How the fuck did they film that? I have no idea. Not to mention all of the take off and outside earth shots that leave you thinking, "yeah, they must have filmed from the ISS." Then there's the waves, TARS and CASE, which must have been CGI for a lot of it.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Feb 23, 2015 23:49:34 GMT -5
Then the beautiful shots of Saturn.
All the dust sequences.
|
|