PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,649
Likes: 4,066
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 22:17:18 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Jan 17, 2015 18:44:07 GMT -5
Martin Luther King Jr. is one of the most important figures of the 20th century. His efforts of protest and is goals for equality of black citizens were highly influential and ground-breaking. He was at the forefront of the civil rights movement during a tumultuous decade of change, helping to bring issues of race and discrimination to the forefront of public discussion and it’s hard to imagine how American history would have turned out without him. Today, King is still seen as a paragon of equality and progress. Given such a pedigree, it’s amazing to think the man has never received a proper biopic to bring his legacy to the screen. Far less important icons have received film adaptations and if Malcolm X, the other major civil rights leader of the 1960s, was worthy of such a high profile film, surely Martin Luther King was too. There have been a few interesting looking documentaries, and some made-for-TV movies, but there has still been a gaping hole for a feature. That hole has finally been filled by newcomer Ava DuVernay’s film Selma. The film opens in 1965, with Martin Luther King Jr. (David Oyelow) already being a highly known figure of the civil rights movement. Despite his efforts and the slow progress of race relations, tensions are still high, with many black citizens unable to vote. Though technically they have the right to vote, there are still a plethora of barriers which keep blacks from having a voice in politics. King meets with President Lyndon B. Johnson (Tom Wilkinson) to discuss the issue, but is politely told that while Johnson is sympathetic and supportive of King’s efforts, he simply has too much on his plate to really deal with the issue now. Unsatisfied, King takes matters into his own hands by leading a protest march from Selma, Alabama to Montgomery. This proves to be very dangerous due to the extremely high racial tensions in the state, but it also has the potential to propel the struggle into the mainstream media. Additionally, the march places tremendous stress on King’s own familial relationship, specifically to his wife, Coretta (Carmen Ejogo). The first major decision that was made with this film was the decision not to make a birth to death biopic of Martin Luther King Jr., but to look at a specific chapter of the man’s life. This allows writer/director Ava DuVernay and co-writer Paul Webb really focus on some key elements and themes. The Selma marches are an extremely important part of the civil rights struggle and the film’s presentation of the facts are engaging, interesting, and educational. What works best about the story is not necessarily the grand speeches and big moments of the march, but the behind the scenes political machinations taken by all sides. It’s very interesting to see these backroom dealings explored and it gives a greater sense of why civil change was so hard. The approach rather reminded me of Steven Spielberg’s Lincoln, both in how it focuses on a specific part of its subject’s life, and how it explores the gritty politics that went behind landmark historical moments. Interesting as the history is, the real reason Selma resonates as powerfully as it does is because its exploration of the past bears heavily on contemporary issues. The catalyst for the Selma marches was the blocking of racialized groups in voting, which is still a common issue today. Though technically everyone has the right to vote, systemic prejudice has led to certain votes counting for less. Additionally, a major theme of the film is the idea that while the civil rights movement is important, it is not a top priority for the President. Given that we still live in a time where black citizens often feel their struggles are seen as an afterthought, such material hits hard. However perhaps the most contemporary issue is raised in the scenes of police brutality, both militaristic response to the protesters, as well as a scene where a young black man is shot in cold blood by an officer. Coming off the summer of Michael Brown’s death and the resulting riots in Ferguson, such material depicting tensions between police and the black community is extraordinarily relevant. This is important to note because when films of this type come out, many people have a reaction of, “It’s crazy how bad things used to be,” but one of the most essential themes of Selma is how little things have actually changed from the 1960s to now. Yes, progress has been made, but the battle is far from over. It’s why the film ends on the original song “Glory”, which refers to how victory will come one day, but not yet. Though David Oyelow does not like much like Martin Luther King Jr., he does an excellent job embodying the spirit and legacy of the man. This is not an impression, but a passionate and real performance from an actor who really proves himself here. Oyelow is great both in the large scale speech scenes and the intellectual political scenes, but also in humble and quiet moments among family and friends. It’s a fully three-dimensional character. I was also quite impressed with Carmen Ejogo’s performance as King’s wife, Coretta. Her scenes in the film appear somewhat sporadically, but she still leaves a powerful impression as a woman who values her husband’s work, but is emotionally strained by what she has to go through. The rest of the supporting cast features several lesser known black actors, along with some names, who perfectly embody their characters and sink into their roles well. The white historical figures are played by more known celebrities, which can be a little distracting, but each play their role well so one adjusts quickly enough. This isn’t Ava DuVernay’s first film, but it is her first work to be seen by a major audience and she makes a strong case for herself. Selma is directed with focus and control, with DuVernay putting together a tight package full of great performances from a large cast. DuVernay is also able to craft some very strong scenes and set-pieces. Some of the protests which erupt into police brutality are especially shocking in their violence and DuVernay does a good job capturing the horror of it on film. She also compiled an excellent soundtrack with great use of period music, an appropriate cover of Bob Dylan’s “Masters of War”, and an especially powerful montage near the end set to modern track “Yesterday Was Hard On All Of Us”. Granted, DuVernay does make some missteps. A few shots feel over directed and I also wasn’t very fond of the film’s cinematography, which felt messily lit. Still, on the whole this is a pretty polished film with high production values and a firm sense of control. Every year around Oscar season there are a slew of historical biopics released which feel tailored solely for awards bodies. 2014’s The Theory of Everything and certainly The Imitation Game were guilty of just that. I don’t blame anyone who had mentally lumped Selma in as that type of film but this is not the case at all. This is a rich and powerful film which is very well-made and features some great performances. It also depicts a crucial moment in the history of 20th century America and its commentary on contemporary issues is timely and nuanced. People often praise various historical films as being important due to the events they depict. Selma is indeed an important film, not for what it says about yesterday, but for what it says about today. A
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,529
Likes: 3,133
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 23:37:17 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jan 17, 2015 19:35:48 GMT -5
I saw it today, and was pretty close to giving it an A myself, but I felt DuVernay's direction during the riots and police brutality sequences was a bit too noticeable and took me out of the film a little, because her use of slow motion and whatnot in scenes like those seemed to call attention to itself a bit too much. Everything else was impressive, though. David Oyelowo kills it.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,105
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 22:57:55 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Jan 17, 2015 19:36:40 GMT -5
Selma(1/11/2015)
After decades of seeming neglect, African American history stories have suddenly become very popular in Hollywood. In just the last three years we’ve seen movies about the struggle for civil rights as varied as Red Tails, 42, The Help, 12 Years a Slave, The Butler, and Get on Up. There are probably a number of rather cynical explanations for this. Biopics in general tend to get made because they have the same name brand recognition advantage of a sequel or a comic book adaptation while appealing to a different and arguably underserved audience and biopics of famous African Americans serve as a means for studios to bow to pressures for more diversity while still keeping racial issues “safely in the past.” Still, let’s not look a gift horse in the mouth. These stories are important and it’s about time that Hollywood at least attempted to tell them. Of course for all the Civil Rights heroes that have had movies made about them, one has remained elusive: Marin Luther King himself. King is basically considered a saint among American historical figures and as such he’s kind of a hard figure to really tackle, but someone has finally tried to do it and the resulting film is called Selma.
Selma extensively features Martin Luther King, but it isn’t exactly a biopic. Rather it’s about the various struggles leading up to the 1964 Selma to Montgomery March and a number of the people involved in that episode. The film sets the situation with a conversation in the Oval office between King (David Oyelowo) and President Lyndon Johnson (Tom Wilkinson) with King pushing for the 1964 Voting Rights Act and Johnson asking King to lean hold off on any further action so that Johnson can save his political clout for the passage of his Great Society programs. King does not accept this proposal and instead decides to begin a series of protests in Alabama with the openly hostile town of Selma as his staging ground. There he collaborates with other civil rights leaders like James Bevel (Common), Bayard Rustin (Ruben Santiago-Hudson), and Hosea Williams (Wendell Pierce) to plan a march to Montgomery that will be harshly opposed by the locals, including Alabama’s infamous governor George Wallace (Tim Roth).
Selma will likely draw comparisons to some of the other recent Black History biopics, but in many ways it actually reminded me a lot more of Steven Spielberg’s Lincoln. I always thought that movie would have been better served if it had been called “The Amendment” or something, because it wasn’t really a biopic so much as a dramatization of one of Lincolns finer accomplishments, the passing of the 13th amendment. Similarly, Selma is less of a biopic than a sort of procedural about how Martin Luther King was able to organize this one demonstration. Also, like Lincoln, it isn’t too afraid to dig into some of the less glamorous politics that its subject needed to get involved in even while staying overwhelmingly positive in its ultimate assessment. The film hovers around, but doesn’t necessarily dwell on, the somewhat questionable practice of putting activists in danger in order to draw national attention to his protests. The film also doesn’t shy away from discussing King’s infidelity and the way it was used by the FBI to blackmail him.
King is played here by David Oyelowo, who does a very good job of replicating the famous civil rights leader’s speaking style and mannerisms. However, I feel like I’ve seen so many actors effectively imitate historical figures at this point that a performance really need to do more than that to really impress me at this point and that’s why I consider Oyelowo’s work here to merely be “very good” rather than “masterful.” When Oyelowo’s King is giving rousing speeches in front of crowds it’s very easy to get caught up in the moment and be very impressed, but I’m not sure that Oyelowo was quite as able to humanize the character in some of the quieter moments. I don’t know that I could really picture this version of King telling a joke or engaging in a little small talk and even when he’s getting into some rather unpleasant arguments with his wife he never seems like anything less than a living saint and icon.
Oyelowo is surrounded by an very large and very impressive supporting cast of actors who each do a great job in their own right of portraying the various historical figures involved. Tom Wilkinson does a pretty good Lyndon Johnson, certainly better than the one Liev Schreiber did in last year’s The Butler. Tim Roth also has a wonderfully shit-eating turn as George Wallace, which is one of the best roles he’s been given in years. Below the lines there are just a ton of notable actors like Cuba Gooding, Jr., Oprah Winfrey, and Dylan Baker who do a great job of playing small roles without having them feel like stunt cameos. The only actor who really stands out as a somewhat distracting presence is probably Martin Sheen as Judge Frank Minis Johnson, who needs to maybe lay off playing inspirational leaders going forward. Beyond that there are a ton of less famous actors like Wendell Pierce, Ruben Santiago-Hudson, Lorraine Toussaint, and Colman Domingo who bring a lot of the inter-movement discussions alive without being weighed down by all the baggage that Oyelowo had to deal with.
Martin Luther King is different than most American heroes because he wasn’t an elected official, a general, or a frontiersman. Rather, he’s an activist, and Selma is largely a film about the nature of protest and activism. King says early on that his ultimate goal is to influence the hearts and minds of white America and specifically the heart and mind of the white man who happens to be sitting in the oval office. The film pains Lyndon Johnson as someone who sees the passage of civil rights as inevitable but also someone who’s more than willing to slow the process down in order to focus on other priorities and progress in the film is gauged by how far away Johnson is to changing his mind and focusing in on the Voting Rights Act. This has not gone over too well with certain historians who view Johnson more as a sort of collaborator who intended to pass the Voting Rights Act from the beginning. That this has become such a matter of controversy is perhaps a bit curious because aside from one rather questionable moment where Johnson all but orders J. Edgar Hoover’s infamous “suicide letter” to King, Johnson is depicted as a mostly well intentioned leader who comes through in the end.
When I first finished watching Selma I was pretty damn impressed, but I’ve maybe cooled on it a little in the couple days since I watched it. The film was directed by Ava DuVernay, who had up to this point only made tiny self-distributed films like I Will Follow and Middle of Nowhere. She does a very proffetional job of mounting and pacing Selma but I also kind of got the impression that DuVernay could have maybe benefited from a little more time in the minors before trying to mount an epic like this. I was particularly bothered by a choice that she and cinematographer Bradford Young made to soften a lot of the black levels in the film and sort of wash out the whole image. At times it looked like I was watching an otherwise well shot film on a television that had had the brightness setting turned all the way up. That probably sounds like a minuscule thing to be bothered by but it is omnipresent and was a pretty big distraction for me during the whole film. Ultimately I don’t think this is on the same level as something like 12 Years a Slave and I also don’t think it’s quite as strong as Lincoln was, but it is significantly better than something like 42 or Red Tails. I’d definitely recommend it to anyone who wants to learn more about Martin Luther King, the civil rights movement, activism, or American history in general. Would I recommend it to someone simply looking for great cinema… not necessarily. Still, the movie does too much right to be ignored and is Hollywood biopic filmmaking at its finest.
***1/2 out of Four
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,649
Likes: 4,066
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 22:17:18 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Jan 17, 2015 19:43:22 GMT -5
Good review. The only thing I really disagree with is Oyelowo, who I thought was excellent precisely because of how human he felt.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,529
Likes: 3,133
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 23:37:17 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jan 17, 2015 19:50:13 GMT -5
Good review. The only thing I really disagree with is Oyelow, who I thought was excellent precisely because of how human he felt. You do realize you keep leaving off the 'o' at the end of Oyelowo, right?
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,649
Likes: 4,066
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 22:17:18 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Jan 17, 2015 19:50:52 GMT -5
I spell it how I wanna spell it.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,783
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Neverending on Jan 17, 2015 19:56:13 GMT -5
Three reviews in a row. That's a record for the new CS.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 23:26:18 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Jan 18, 2015 11:30:36 GMT -5
Stupid Oprah. She's in maybe 3 scenes and people are labeling her as one of the main stars. Psh. But yeah, really good movie.
A- so says Doomsday
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,783
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Neverending on Jan 18, 2015 11:32:46 GMT -5
She's the producer, and unless I'm mistaken, just got nominated for Best Picture.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 23:26:18 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Jan 18, 2015 12:28:14 GMT -5
But she isn't one of the main stars. In fact she doesn't really do anything in the movie. They just wanted Oprah featured in it.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,105
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 22:57:55 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Jan 18, 2015 12:32:16 GMT -5
Stupid Oprah. She's in maybe 3 scenes and people are labeling her as one of the main stars. Psh. She's the producer, and unless I'm mistaken, just got nominated for Best Picture. But she isn't one of the main stars. In fact she doesn't really do anything in the movie. They just wanted Oprah featured in it.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,783
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Neverending on Jan 18, 2015 12:56:29 GMT -5
I will take Oprah over White Jesus.
|
|
daniel
Producer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,072
Likes: 245
Location:
Last Online Mar 13, 2022 22:49:30 GMT -5
|
Post by daniel on Jan 19, 2015 19:55:28 GMT -5
I have been trying to collect my thoughts on this one, but I stand a little ... confused. It was a very good movie and well-acted, but it didn't deliver much of a punch aside from some over-the-top, overly-indulgent slow-motion scenes of violence. I think they could have cut more on the editing floor to make the movie flow a little better, especially the out-of-place scene involving MLK admitting infidelity to his wife (was that necessary here?), or the sudden introduction of Malcolm X on-screen, only to have him killed off-screen later on.
I can't recall what, exactly, but something really took me out of the movie and had me checking the watch to see how much time had passed.
7/10
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,783
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Neverending on Jan 19, 2015 20:07:41 GMT -5
something really took me out of the movie and had me checking the watch to see how much time had passed. Did you watch this movie at work?
|
|
daniel
Producer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,072
Likes: 245
Location:
Last Online Mar 13, 2022 22:49:30 GMT -5
|
Post by daniel on Jan 20, 2015 17:34:47 GMT -5
Nope, I saw this in the theater.
|
|