Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 20, 2014 17:53:15 GMT -5
Identity is one of those really lame movies that ends with a bunch of bro's in the audience going, " duuuuuuude what a twist!". YES! I remember seeing Identity at the theater with my friend on a rainy Saturday afternoon, and when the movie was over, we turned to each other and said, "what the f--k?" Afterwards we went to Johnny Rockets to meet up with some other friends and we're like, "we just wasted 2 hours on a piece of s--t horror movie that takes place entirely in the mind of a retard. It was worth the 5 bucks."
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 22:27:20 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 20, 2014 19:00:54 GMT -5
Identity is one of those really lame movies that ends with a bunch of bro's in the audience going, " duuuuuuude what a twist!". Ha. Well put.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,102
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:42:21 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 21, 2014 2:54:31 GMT -5
"Film" Twenty: Telltale’s The Walking Dead (Season 2) Yes, this is a videogame rather than a movie, I did one last year so this isn’t unprecedented and the thread is called “31 Days of Halloween” rather than “31 Days of horror movies” so I think its fine. Anyway, for those who don’t know Telltale’s The Walking Dead is an episodically released videogame that started last year and has now released two five episode seasons (each episode is roughly two to three hours of gameplay). The game is actually not based on the AMC TV series and is actually a separate adaptation of the original comic book series that the show was based on. Also, it should not under any circumstances be mistaken for The Walking Dead: Survival Instinct, a first person shooter based on the TV show that is by all accounts terrible. The game is heavily story driven and does not really have what would conventionally be called gameplay. It’s almost more like a choose your own adventure story where you’re choosing responses in conversations and occasionally doing quicktime events. Your decisions effect the story and if you screw up there are dire consequences. If your character dies you’re allowed to continue, but if you get some of the people around you killed they stay dead permanently and that can be stressful. Season 1 of The Walking Dead was something of a sensation without Videogame circles. It was considered a Game of the Year contender and many viewed it as a breakthrough in narrative in gaming. I liked it a lot but I also thought it was maybe a little overhyped. Firstly, I kind of got the feeling at times that your choices didn’t have as much impact as the game was claiming they did. For instance, there’s a point in the first episode where you have to choose to save one of two characters. Seems like a big deal, but whoever you save, they’re going to end up disappearing from the story in episode three in more or less the same way even though they’re supposedly two separate characters. Also, the story is very good… but only really by video game standards. At its center is a friendship/surrogate parent relationship between your character (Lee) and a pre-adolescent girl named Clementine as they and a crew of other survivors make their way through a zombie infested Georgia. This central relationship is paramount to that first season because it forces you to make decisions not just for yourself but also to teach this child how to survive and maintain their humanity in this crazy universe. That all sounds pretty heavy, but on the surface this story probably wouldn’t be wildly impressive in many other medium and a similar story would be told better a year later in the game The Last of Us. Enter season 2. You’d think this second season would have been super anticipated based on how popular season 1 was, but the response to season 2 has been oddly muted in the video game community. Not overly negative, but muted. Why is that? Well, I think part of it might just be a matter of the novelty having worn off a little. The Walking Dead video game experience is more or less a known quantity at this point and more of the same just isn’t going to elicit the same reaction. What’s more there were some fairly reasonable reason to wonder what the game would be able to do without that important Lee/Clementine relationship, and it isn’t entirely clear until late in the game what is replacing it. As it turns out this is ultimately a story about three characters: Clementine, Kenny, and Jane. Kenny and Jane are a pair of opposites, and not the kind that attract. They’re constantly arguing and their worldviews seem completely incompatible and Clementine is often forced to try desperately to play peacemaker between the two. Zombie stories are often meant to be political allegories and I think the way that the game places the character in the frustrating position of having to be at the mercy of two irrational people who fight all the time is meant to make a comment on the political gridlock that’s been going on in Washington as of late. Beyond that I do think that this was better made than the first game, if more flawed in a number of ways. The series’ trademark tough decisions seemed tougher for me here, I felt that I’d more or less played through season 1 the “correct” way and didn’t regret many of my choices, but that definitely wasn’t the case in season 2. There are some brutal choices you have to make and I don’t think there’s any way to be truly satisfied with whatever you go with. On the downside, things seemed less focused this time around. One of the reasons I feel like the TV show has problems is that the zombie genre is kind of nihilistic and aimless. There are no real goals in the lives of the characters in zombie stories aside from survival. In a two hour movie that’s fine, but if you’re going to stay with characters for season after season you kind of need things to be going somewhere. I’ll also say that my experience differed from season 1 to season 2 in that I played through the first four episodes of season 1 over the course of a week and only needed to wait for episode 5. Here I had to wait a long damn time for each and every episode and the momentum of all your decisions tended to get lost in the wait. If there’s a season 3 I’m thinking I’ll just wait until every installment is available before I get started. So, what can I say? If season 1 was a little overrated, season 2 is a little underrated. It’s an interesting play either way and is a good example of what “interactive drama” can be like. ***1/2 out of Four
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,102
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:42:21 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 21, 2014 19:44:43 GMT -5
Film Twenty-One: Revenge of the Creature (1955)
The sequels to Universal horror movies outside of the Frankenstein series are almost all cheap cash-ins almost right from the get-go. Whether it’s Dracula’s Daughter or The Mummy’s Hand or The Invisible Man’s Return, they almost all take a rather immediate nosedive and then just sort of flatline from there. With that in mind, Revenge of the Creature was sort of a pleasant surprise to me in that it simply wasn’t horrible. This installment takes the Jaws 3/The Lost World approach of having the sequel bring the monster out of his element and placing him into an American setting. In the opening scene the “Gil-Man” is captured and is soon brought to an Oceanarium for study and display. Yeah, I think it’s pretty obvious how well that works; the thing totally escapes. However, he actually stays captured for longer than I expected and while he’s in captivity we meet the scientists of the Oceanarium, who are slightly less boring than I expected them to be. Of particular interest was the character of Helen, played by Lori Nelson, who is a female aspiring to be a scientist which is not something you always saw in 1955 and the movie doesn’t ignore the hardships she’s going to face trying to do it. Other than that it’s mostly just an above average B-movie. Also, one other fun fact. Early on in the movie there’s a four or five minute scene with an unnamed lab technician being played by a young actor making his screen debut at the age of twenty five, a fellow named Clint Eastwood. *** out of Four
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 0:15:09 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2014 20:55:51 GMT -5
Looks amazing.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 22:27:20 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 21, 2014 21:34:34 GMT -5
21. 1408The current trend in horror films is the haunted house genre and I've sort of gotten tired of it, mainly because most of them play the same tricks. 1408 however had some positive buzz and it looked unique from the majority of these types of movies. The movie focuses on a horror writer named Mike (John Cusack) who's novels detail the true details of haunted hotel rooms. He hears of one room which has had 56 deaths take place in it and decides to spend a night there for the last chapter of his newest book. Of course, the room turns out to really be haunted. This movie is very well paced. We spend a lot of time with Mike, learning his character and getting hints to his paced. The film is also careful to present everything in a very blunt and realistic fashion before moving into the supernatural room 1408. Once there, the scares are very effective. There's a gradual build, but the film doesn't wait too long before things start to get crazy. This isn't a case where a chair gently moves or a door shuts. We've got apparitions, various things in the room going off, hallucinations, and even attacks. There's some creative stuff going on with the haunted aspects and it's very effective at bringing scares. John Cusack gives a very strong performance and Sam Jackson's small role is fun too. As much as I like the scares, what really makes 1408 work is the emotional hook, with Mike being forced to confront his mistakes and regrets. This all comes to a very emotional climax which keeps the horror in tact while working as genuine drama. Unfortunately, there is a moment where the film sort of lost me in the third act. Without saying too much, there's a turn in the plot which sucks a lot of the horror out and while they do eventually swing back, they're never quite able to reach the same level of anxiety again. Overall, 1408 is a very effective and engaging horror film. I don't think it's exceptional and it doesn't reinvent the wheel either, but it keeps the scares going while genuinely resonating on an emotional level. B+
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 22, 2014 9:11:45 GMT -5
PG COOPER WILL BE DISAPPOINTED...Enough slacking off. Let's get this ball rolling. Halloween is next week. THE VAMPIRE LOVERS (1970)If you thought Dracula should be a lesbian, then this is the movie for you. It's about a young woman who's dying after being bitten by a lesbian vampire too many times and her father seeks the help of an expert to help save her life. So, I wasn't joking. It's literally the lesbian version of Dracula. But before you start pumping your fists in the air and cursing out this film in rage, it should be noted that it's based on a novella titled Carmilla that predates Dracula by 26 years. That's right. Bram Stoker was a rip-off artist. But... it's too late to get upset about that and The Vampire Lovers suffers because of it. Although it's not the first movie to be based on Carmilla, it's the only high-profile version that's faithful to the novella, and it results in a very tiresome story. The saving grace is that it depicts violence and sexuality without diving too deep into exploitation. Plus, aesthetically, it's very much a classic Hammer horror film. So, fans of the genre will get some joy out of it while everyone else will probably be bored by it. BFASCINATION (1979)Jean Rollin is the French master of lesbian horror movies and here's one of his more celebrated works. It's about a thief in 1905 who's running away from some people he upset and ends up hiding in a chateau where a group of women gather at midnight to drink the blood of unsuspecting young men. It starts off very awkwardly put-together and then turns into softcore pornography - excuse me - eroticism. Most people will dislike these early portions. I can almost guarantee it. But for those of you who decide to stick with it, you'll be rewarded. Once it becomes a horror film, it gets very entertaining. So if you're patient, I think you'll end up having a good time. CPASSION (2012)Love Crime is a 2010 French movie about two competitive businesswomen whose relationship turns deadly. It has an interesting concept but the execution is too conservative and not engaging enough. If you agree with me, you might prefer Brian De Palma's remake. It tells the same exact story, but the execution is a lot more stylized and surrealistic. What I admire the most is that it starts off very normal and then transitions into pure De Palma when the characters descend into madness. The ending, in particular, is orgasmic. If you're a fan of De Palma, you're gonna love every second of it. It's a shame the whole movie wasn't that way. If there's one big flaw it's that De Palma remained too loyal to the original film. He should have ignored it and made the remake 100% his own. Other than that, it's an exceptionally well-made movie. A-
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 22:27:20 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 22, 2014 10:03:42 GMT -5
I sort of dismissed Passion as VOD trash a few years back. Surprised to hear it's actually pretty good.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 22, 2014 14:57:29 GMT -5
I sort of dismissed Passion as VOD trash a few years back. Surprised to hear it's actually pretty good. That's understandable. Compared to De Palma's most famous works, it's very low-budget and European. But it's definitely a standout of his more recent output.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 22:27:20 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 22, 2014 20:56:50 GMT -5
22. House on Haunted HillI wanted to watch a short horror film and this Vincent Price movie seemed a good choice. In the film, Price plays a millionaire who brings together a collection of people to stay one night in a supposedly haunted house. If they make it through the night, they each get ten grand. At 75 minutes, House on Haunted Hill wastes no time jumping into things. We're quickly given a glimpse of the house's history, meet all of our characters, they are brought to the house, and right away supernatural events begin to occur. There are a lot of horror set-pieces and while its rarely scary due to the age and low budget, most of these tricks are very fun. A scheme is eventually unravelled which may have been decently clever, but it also sort of took away from the spooky atmosphere. Also, while the low-budget can be charming, it gets a little to ridiculous at the end. The effects are very silly and the explanation is even sillier. It may not be a good film, but it is good fun if you're in the right mood. C+
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 22, 2014 21:19:51 GMT -5
22. House on Haunted HillI wanted to watch a short horror film and this Vincent Price movie seemed a good choice. In the film, Price plays a millionaire who brings together a collection of people to stay one night in a supposedly haunted house. If they make it through the night, they each get ten grand. At 75 minutes, House on Haunted Hill wastes no time jumping into things. We're quickly given a glimpse of the house's history, meet all of our characters, they are brought to the house, and right away supernatural events begin to occur. There are a lot of horror set-pieces and while its rarely scary due to the age and low budget, most of these tricks are very fun. A scheme is eventually unravelled which may have been decently clever, but it also sort of took away from the spooky atmosphere. Also, while the low-budget can be charming, it gets a little to ridiculous at the end. The effects are very silly and the explanation is even sillier. It may not be a good film, but it is good fun if you're in the right mood. C+ William Castle was ahead of his time. His movies don't work at home because they weren't intended for television. He was all about finding new gimmicks for keep people in the cinema. We could sure use him in 2014. But yeah... you're totally right about the movie. It's so dated and ridiculous that you can't help but laugh.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 23, 2014 16:27:43 GMT -5
Never fear, PG Cooper. 31 DAYS OF HALLOWEEN CONTINUES...THE RAVEN (2012)During the final days of Edgar Allan Poe's life, a serial killer haunts the streets of Baltimore with a series of gruesome murders inspired by the works of Poe. Then, when Poe's lover is kidnapped, he must assist the police in their search for her while satisfying the demands of his tormentor by writing a new story based on this ordeal. The Raven is directed by James McTeigue (V for Vendetta, Ninja Assassin) and he does an excellent job from a technical standpoint. The movie looks and feels amazing, and he manages to make John Cusack's Poe a memorable character. But the script is very pedestrian and isn't worth of having Edgar Allan Poe's name and legacy attached to it. They should have just used a fictional character instead. B-TWIXT (2011)Twixt is about a C-list author named Hall Baltimore (Val Kilmer) who's mostly known for writing horror novels about witches. Then, after the tragic death of his daughter, he loses all his motivation even though he's broke and being pressured by his wife to get back to writing. And during this turbulent time, he ends up in a small town for a book signing and meets a bible thumping sheriff named Bobby LaGrange (Bruce Dern) who wants to collaborate with him on a book inspired by a series of grisly murders that have plagued the town for many years. Hall Baltimore rejects him at first but changes his mind after having vivid dreams where Edgar Allan Poe helps him solve the murders AND write his new book. That may all seem very strange, but the movie is just a metaphor for the writing process. It's very similar to the Coen brother's Barton Fink from two decades earlier. That film survived thanks to heavier commentary and good humor, but Twixt by Francis Ford Coppola, is a bit more straight-forward and not very interesting except for the dream sequences. At this point, it shouldn't be a surprise that Coppola has lost his mojo but I'll give him credit for at least trying to entertain mass audiences again. CHANSEL & GRETEL: WITCH HUNTERS (2013)We all know the tale of Hansel & Gretel. They're abandoned by their father in the woods and end up at a gingerbread house where an old witch lives and she tries to eat them. But this movie tells the other story. You know, the one where they grow up to be famed witch hunters played by Jeremy Renner and Gemma Arterton. As you can imagine, this film that's produced by Will Ferrell and Adam McKay is a farce. It's a horror-action-comedy inspired by the early works of Sam Raimi and Peter Jackson. It has top-notch production values and is loads of fun to watch. There are some issues, however. The decision to make the characters American is bad and I'm not entirely sold on Renner in what should have been a Bruce Campbell type role. Nonetheless, fans of the genre will have a good time and people who want to watch a lighter horror movie will enjoy it too. B+
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 22:27:20 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 23, 2014 16:42:12 GMT -5
23. The Legend of Hell HouseAfter 1408 and House on Haunted Hill, I seem to be having an unofficial haunted house marathon. This time the film is The Legend of Hell House, a film which follows a group of paranormal experts investigating the titular house. It's not long after they arrive that they begin to have paranormal experiences. The visuals here are probably the highlight. The film makes great use of colour and the camera angles are carried and interesting. Even the opening scene where the protagonist is hired for a job is really interesting and slightly unnerving due to the cinematography. The film also has some really creepy imagery, a strong atmosphere, and a handful of memorable scenes. Unfortunately, everything else about the film is lacking. Despite some decent actors, these characters are very bland and most of the time they seem bored. Because of this, the film isn't really involving. Even when supernatural things occur, everyone reacts so dryly that it's hard to care. Occasionally a set-piece might build some momentum, but as soon as the characters start talking it all slips away. The film also features a really lame ending. There's enough good stuff here I suppose, but the end result is pretty mediocre. C+
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,493
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:08:59 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Oct 23, 2014 20:53:21 GMT -5
Friday the 13th
Another classic of the horror genre, however this one is a little less refined than the other "big ones". And yet I enjoyed it, at least at first. The setting of the abandoned summer camp was a good idea. It would have been nice to have had more of a geography of the place established, but the overall camp tone was present. I also liked how the killing scenes were filmed, through the perspective of the killer, with that low clicking music and the slight shaky cam. The story certainly lost steam by the last act however. The fights with the killer were poorly staged and went on for way too long. It just dragged as the last girl left went from one location, was found, fought off, then another location, repeat process. Not a great finish. 6/10
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 23, 2014 23:49:12 GMT -5
The story certainly lost steam by the last act however. The fights with the killer were poorly staged and went on for way too long. It just dragged as the last girl left went from one location, was found, fought off, then another location, repeat process. Not a great finish. Part 2 fixes that. And if you want a meatier story, Parts 4 and 5 are the ones for you.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,102
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:42:21 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 24, 2014 8:52:30 GMT -5
Film Twenty-Two: Nosferatu (1922)
This film is widely considered to be the absolute granddaddy of horror cinema and it’s important to remember just how old it is. 1922 is early even by silent movie standards. When this came out Birth of a Nation was only seven years old. What surprised me while watching it this time is just how wildly bold and experimental this movie could be at times. Murnau was fearless in his use of under-cranking to give certain moments an eerie otherworldly speed and there was even a scene where he used a negative image. I was also fascinated by the fact that this is a fairly unconventional adaptation of Stoker’s Dracula in that the whole third act has been completely cut out. The focus is almost all on Harker’s Transylvania trip, Dracula’s boat ride, and the lasting effects of said boat trip on Renfield. By the time Orlok finally reaches London (or Berlin, or wherever) the movie only has about fifteen minutes left to go. But what a fifteen minutes those are. The scene where Orlok sneaks up to the woman’s room is one of the most iconic uses of shadow for a reason and is one of the all-time great German expressionist moments. All of this looks incredibly crisp on the new Kino blu-ray which lovingly restores the film and gives it one of the best presentation its ever had. **** out of Four
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 22:27:20 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 24, 2014 14:46:26 GMT -5
24. Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978)Believe it or not, there was a time when horror movie remakes weren't looked at with disdain. Sometimes they had the potential to be pretty good, and the 1978 version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers is indeed, pretty good. Like the original, the film depicts an alien invasion where the creatures create duplicate bodies to insidiously overtake the planet. There are some major changes though notably that this film is set in the 70s rather than the 50s. Because of this, the film taps more into post-Watergate conspiracies than Cold War paranoia. It's an interesting choice, but not really as effective a subtext as the original. Where the remake does improve is by moving the setting from a rural setting to an urban one. This allows the film to give a better sense of how this invasion would play out on a global scale. On that note, the film does a great job gradually building from minor suspicion to full on insanity, with a small group of humans fleeing from alien duplicates. The film also has a strong cast and there's some cool effects involving the alien pods. Overall, while this film doesn't carry the same sense of importance as the original, it is a very entertaining movie and probably the more well-made of the two. B+
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Oct 24, 2014 15:10:39 GMT -5
DAY TWENTY-FOUR: THE EXORCIST (1973)
Up until now, William Friedkin's The Exorcist has been one of my biggest "movie blind spots." On average, I'm not THAT into the horror genre, and this film has a reputation of "the scariest film of all-time." I guess you could say I've been intimidated by it for the longest time, especially with my younger self being very creeped out by the brief glimpses of it I'd seen here and there. But now, I've gotten more horror under my belt and have become more accustomed, more or less, to the tricks of the trade when it comes to the genre, so I finally decided to plunge into this heavily-hailed classic.
Would I call The Exorcist "scary", per say? Not really, but it IS still incredibly creepy and atmospheric, to the point where throughout its 2-hour running time, I couldn't tear my eyes away from the screen. This is owed to the skillful direction by William Friedkin, along with the gripping screenplay by William Peter Blatty, adapted from his own novel. Together, these two build up a sense of dread that becomes more and more pronounced with every passing scene, but at the same time, they also use the build-up to properly establish the main characters and ensure that they feel like real people rather than pawns on a chessboard. By the time Regan's possession fully takes over, along with her mother finally committing to the idea of an exorcism, there's a real vested interest we have in these characters, and it makes the film all the more gripping. Friedkin's style is also a factor there, because while I personally was never outright scared by the film, there were still many scenes and aspects that nonetheless managed to get under my skin and unsettle me. The scenes that center on Regan's possession are especially that way, and there's a certain frankness in the way Friedkin presents it all that adds to the effectiveness. Of course, the acting from Linda Blair, Ellen Burstyn, Jason Miller and Max von Sydow is excellent, and again, it's their sense of realism that lends the film a lot of its power.
I'm extremely glad I finally saw The Exorcist, and I can indeed agree with its place as one of the best horror films ever.
****/****
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 0:15:09 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2014 15:12:42 GMT -5
I think The Exorcist is just a really well-made movie above all. It's not scary. You're right; it's chiefly the atmosphere that makes it an engaging experience. There are several interesting characters who carry the film well, too.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Oct 24, 2014 15:57:05 GMT -5
Yeah, this is another case of something being built up a certain way in my head, only for it to turn out fairly different...but in a good way.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 22:27:20 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 24, 2014 16:10:19 GMT -5
Good review, chief.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 24, 2014 17:15:56 GMT -5
31 DAYS OF HALLOWEEN THE KEANU REEVES TRIPLE FEATURESPONSORED BY CONSTANTINE ON NBC AND JOHN WICK IN THEATERS NOW.RIVER'S EDGE (1986)Pop quiz, hot shot. Name a movie starring Keanu Reeves and Dennis Hopper that isn't Speed. If you said River's Edge then you're either old, watch too many movies or both. Inspired by real events and awarded Best Picture at the 3rd annual Independent Spirit Awards, River's Edge tells the story of a high school teenager who murders his girlfriend and then shows the corpse to all his friends. The movie then explores how this affects everyone involved and does a good job. However, there are some questionable decisions that hurt the overall quality of the movie. Crispin Glover plays one of the main roles and delivers a totally coked out performance. It works somewhat towards the end as his character emotionally falls apart, but for the most part, it's a major distraction and takes you out of the story. Then there's Dennis Hopper's character. It's obvious this movie needed a known actor - for 1986 - that could attract an audience but the screenplay does a poor job on integrating him into the main story and the way his actions "solves" things feel forced. Other than that, River's Edge is a respectable drama that handles its complex subject matter in a realistic and mature way.A-THE DEVIL'S ADVOCATE (1997)The Devil's Advocate is one of those movies that leave you asking yourself, "what the hell did I just watch?" It's about a Northern Florida lawyer, played by Keanu Reeves, who is so obsessed with winning every case that he'll defend child molesters and murderers. And he's so darn good at his job that a major New York law firm hires him and that's when things get supernatural. It turns out that the head of the firm, played beautifully by Al Pacino, is the devil and the father of this hot shot lawyer. And together, they're gonna launch the 21st century and the new millennium with a bang. To say the movie is stupid is an understatement. It's just flat out laughable. But man, Al Pacino goes all out and is a joy to watch. Everyone should watch this movie just to see the man at the peak of his over-acting.C+CONSTANTINE (2005)
Raise your hand if you watched or re-watched 2005's Constantine just in time for the NBC series. Now raise your hand if you fell asleep. The movie should have been awesome. It's based on a popular comic book about a Catholic man who commits suicide and is sent to hell, and then to pay off his sin and get into heaven, he roams Earth as a protector against demons and other supernatural bad guys. Unfortunately, the screenplay and the characters are so bland and generic that the movie ends up being very boring. During the two times that I've seen it, I didn't care about anything that was going on in the story. Even the great visual effects and the impressive look of the movie did nothing for me. If it weren't for the comic book and the TV show, I honestly would have forgotten that Constantine existed.
D
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,102
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:42:21 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 24, 2014 19:00:20 GMT -5
The Devil's Advocate... the movie about how providing a legal defence for the accused, thus upholding a basic tenent of the justice system and preserving a basic human right, makes you evil. Yeah, not a fan either.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,102
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:42:21 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 24, 2014 19:44:23 GMT -5
Film Twenty-Three: Freddy Vs. Jason (2003)
Holy shit. That was… good? I mean, it certainly wasn’t great, but it is way more competent than any Jason movie and probably more competent than most of the Freddy movies too. I’m kind of at a loss for words. Crossover movies are inherently silly, and this one is certainly no exception. The film has to retcon a good number of the rules of both franchises in order to make it work. Freddy was never troubled by having the townspeople forget about him before and Jason was not previously troubled by water before, but whatever. The movie certainly doesn’t pretend to be much of a horror film. The genuine attempts at suspense are minimal and they don’t even really bother with jump scares either. Instead this is somewhere between an action movie and a Scream-style parody. When Freddy and Jason do straight-up fight one another it almost dips into super-hero movie territory given that these are masked men with powers going after each other. Freddy probably has more screentime, which is probably natural given that he isn’t mute, and if I were to pick I’d probably say that this is closer to being a Nightmare movie with Jason than the reverse. Freddy is probably the film’s true villain and while Jason does kill plenty of innocents, he is almost made into a de-facto antihero. The movie does everything it can to remind you of just how much of a mean son of a bitch Freddy can be, while doing everything it can to try to make Jason into a semi-sympathetic figure (sort of a Frankenstein-like monster who doesn’t know what he’s doing). That’s a bit of an odd way of doing things, but it works. The movie is almost purely a work of fan-service, but effective fan service. It knows what people want out of this crossover and manages to deliver on it. That’s not to say it’s perfect by any means (the humans are still pretty dumb stereotypes, the exposition Freddy gives to the camera is awkward, and at the end of the day it’s still a dumb slasher movie) but still this is about as good as I could ever imagine a movie called “Freddy Vs. Jason” being. *** out of Four
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 0:15:09 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2014 19:47:50 GMT -5
It was fun in the theater.
|
|