Ramplate
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Apr 2005
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hamster
Posts: 30,425
Likes: 493
Location:
Last Online Oct 13, 2020 13:56:48 GMT -5
|
Post by Ramplate on May 5, 2016 0:46:43 GMT -5
Republican Superpac donors have spent $375 million on losing candidates compared to $1 million on the Democratic PAC side.
The money could have been better spent. I find it fascinating how these same people don't want to pay their fair share of taxes
|
|
Ramplate
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Apr 2005
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hamster
Posts: 30,425
Likes: 493
Location:
Last Online Oct 13, 2020 13:56:48 GMT -5
|
Post by Ramplate on May 7, 2016 7:09:17 GMT -5
Sanders says he's open to being Hillary's VEEP but for now he's in it to win or gain more influence on the administration.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,787
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Neverending on May 16, 2016 2:11:09 GMT -5
I'm watching CNN's The Sixties on Netflix and they put a great spotlight on the 1964 election. 1960 and 1968 get all the attention cause of Kennedy and Nixon, but 1964 was the REAL game changer. People forget that conservative democrats and liberal republicans was a thing before the 60's. LBJ and Barry Goldwater are the ones that changed that - they are the architects of modern politics. And it also raises the question: aren't we overdue for another political revolution? This year's elections are a farce! Democrats and republicans have run their course. We need to either restructure both parties or take a 3rd party and turn it into one of the two-parties. People forget that George Washington had no party and that John Adams was a Federalist. Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson were the ones that put Democrats, two different versions of them, on the map. Then their were the Whigs - created specifically as a "fuck you" to Jackson. After the Whigs lost steam, Abraham Lincoln and the Republicans, a different version from today's Republicans, rose to power. So political parties CAN and HAVE changed. It's time to do it again. I hope Donald Trump destroy's the Republican party and that the Bernie Sanders movement forces the Democrats to change - or for a 3rd party to continue the fight and eventually replace the Democrats.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,787
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Neverending on May 18, 2016 13:24:56 GMT -5
|
|
Ramplate
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Apr 2005
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hamster
Posts: 30,425
Likes: 493
Location:
Last Online Oct 13, 2020 13:56:48 GMT -5
|
Post by Ramplate on May 31, 2016 8:59:07 GMT -5
I just read that Stephen Hawking is baffled by the popularity of Donald Trump.
If the 10th smartest person in the world (160 IQ) is baffled by Trump, think that is a great indicator that he has no business being the most powerful leader of the free world.
|
|
Justin
Script Supervisor
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 739
Likes: 355
Location:
Last Online Oct 17, 2017 12:05:25 GMT -5
|
Post by Justin on May 31, 2016 12:25:26 GMT -5
Looks like Gary Johnson will be the Libertarian candidate, to the surprise of no one. But I've heard he's done good things in New Mexico, so if nothing else, it's an alternative to Clinton and Trump for those who are among the "NeverHillary/NeverTrump" camps.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,787
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Neverending on May 31, 2016 16:04:46 GMT -5
Looks like Gary Johnson will be the Libertarian candidate, to the surprise of no one. But I've heard he's done good things in New Mexico, so if nothing else, it's an alternative to Clinton and Trump for those who are among the "NeverHillary/NeverTrump" camps. Bernie Sanders is already being pressured to run as a 3rd party candidate if he doesn't get the nomination. I kinda hope it happens. If there was ever a year to destroy the democratic & republican parties, it's now.
|
|
Ramplate
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Apr 2005
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hamster
Posts: 30,425
Likes: 493
Location:
Last Online Oct 13, 2020 13:56:48 GMT -5
|
Post by Ramplate on Jun 1, 2016 2:24:39 GMT -5
North Korean Newspaper Endorses 'Wise' Donald Trump Over 'Dull' Hillary Clinton How's that for an endorsement go with the ones from Putin and the KKK?
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,787
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Neverending on Jun 7, 2016 5:47:48 GMT -5
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Jun 7, 2016 9:41:31 GMT -5
I already voted, and it was not for the orange skinned one.
|
|
Ramplate
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Apr 2005
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hamster
Posts: 30,425
Likes: 493
Location:
Last Online Oct 13, 2020 13:56:48 GMT -5
|
Post by Ramplate on Jun 7, 2016 9:58:01 GMT -5
I hate the fact that they're already counting the forecasted superdelegates votes for Clinton and saying she has the OK, "presumptive", nomination
Changes could happen. I already emailed my senator to tell him he shouldn't have promised his votes for anyone before he's seen the will of the people who vote him to represent us.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Jun 7, 2016 11:25:54 GMT -5
People are already reading that Clinton is the presumptive nominee. Casual Democrats are going to stay home which will be good for Clinton. I'm no psychic and I could be wrong but I don't see how she loses California. That and my original statement that Americans aren't going to elect a socialist.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,105
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on Jun 7, 2016 14:22:22 GMT -5
Sanders should have dropped out something like a month ago. We're dangerously close to letting a national disgrace become the president, now is not the time for the opposition party to be damaging itself with infighting. Clinton has had a legitimate claim to being the presumptive nominee for a very long time and I don't know what Sanders hopes to accomplish by dragging this out.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Jun 7, 2016 16:14:38 GMT -5
That's what's funny to me, all these people who say they'll never vote for Hillary and that they want Sanders to run third party. Every day that Sanders stays in the race the odds of Trump being president increase a little bit.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,105
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on Jun 7, 2016 20:54:53 GMT -5
That's what's funny to me, all these people who say they'll never vote for Hillary and that they want Sanders to run third party. Every day that Sanders stays in the race the odds of Trump being president increase a little bit. I blame social media. I'm sure there are exceptions but a lot of these Sanders voters live in such a social media bubble that they forget that there are kind of a lot of Republicans out there and that winning the election in November is not a sure thing. Also I think a lot of them are on the younger side and don't really remember how awful the Bush years were and how much damage could have been avoided if 100,000 Ralph Nadar voters in Florida hadn't stubbornly "voted their conscience."
|
|
Ramplate
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Apr 2005
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hamster
Posts: 30,425
Likes: 493
Location:
Last Online Oct 13, 2020 13:56:48 GMT -5
|
Post by Ramplate on Jun 8, 2016 6:20:53 GMT -5
I think that enough voters will come to the conclusion that anyone other than tRUMP is the better choice. Once the convention is over Sanders wouldn't be dumb enough to split the Democratic vote.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,787
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Neverending on Jun 8, 2016 8:05:44 GMT -5
When California didn't vote for Sanders
Bernie Sanders running 3rd party would be sweet, but he would need the media coverage and a spot on the debates.
|
|
Ramplate
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Apr 2005
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hamster
Posts: 30,425
Likes: 493
Location:
Last Online Oct 13, 2020 13:56:48 GMT -5
|
Post by Ramplate on Jun 8, 2016 9:44:36 GMT -5
If he didn't get more popular votes than Clinton, why would he try as an independent? That would split the vote
|
|
Ramplate
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Apr 2005
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hamster
Posts: 30,425
Likes: 493
Location:
Last Online Oct 13, 2020 13:56:48 GMT -5
|
Post by Ramplate on Jun 8, 2016 10:08:17 GMT -5
I didn't catch who it was, but just heard a Republican say, Prejudice and bigotry have no place in the party of Lincoln.
Well, that's effectively what their plans accomplish in one way or another. Their policies are made to promote the rich, Christian, white (for the most part), straight and male. tRUMP just says it out loud lol.
They don't like to admit that it isn't like the party Lincoln joined anymore.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,787
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Neverending on Jun 8, 2016 10:54:03 GMT -5
If he didn't get more popular votes than Clinton, why would he try as an independent? That would split the vote For a guy who was largely ignored in the media, Sanders did pretty good. If you put him in the debates, the way Ross Perot was in the 1992 debates with Bush & Clinton, it could be a game changer. He already beat Clinton in the Democrat debates and would annihilate Trump in any debate. The question is, CAN he get on a debates. Ross Perot was a billionaire and that was 24 years ago. If he has no chance, then yeah, fuck it. Pull the white flag.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,105
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on Jun 8, 2016 12:05:57 GMT -5
I didn't catch who it was, but just heard a Republican say, Prejudice and bigotry have no place in the party of Lincoln. Well, that's effectively what their plans accomplish in one way or another. Their policies are made to promote the rich, Christian, white (for the most part), straight and male. tRUMP just says it out loud lol. They don't like to admit that it isn't like the party Lincoln joined anymore. It was Paul Ryan, and yes it's hilarious that they're still trying to play the Lincoln card given what they've become. Talk about "what have you done for me lately." If he didn't get more popular votes than Clinton, why would he try as an independent? That would split the vote For a guy who was largely ignored in the media, Sanders did pretty good. If you put him in the debates, the way Ross Perot was in the 1992 debates with Bush & Clinton, it could be a game changer. He already beat Clinton in the Democrat debates and would annihilate Trump in any debate. The question is, CAN he get on a debates. Ross Perot was a billionaire and that was 24 years ago. If he has no chance, then yeah, fuck it. Pull the white flag. You know Ross Perot accomplished nothing except to give Bill Clinton the win, right?
|
|
Justin
Script Supervisor
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 739
Likes: 355
Location:
Last Online Oct 17, 2017 12:05:25 GMT -5
|
Post by Justin on Jun 8, 2016 12:15:31 GMT -5
|
|
Wyldstaar
Producer
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,900
Likes: 1,267
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 7:55:31 GMT -5
|
Post by Wyldstaar on Jun 8, 2016 12:48:32 GMT -5
You know Ross Perot accomplished nothing except to give Bill Clinton the win, right? The Perot campaign's biggest problem was that Perot made the colossal mistake of withdrawing from his campaign, and then changing his mind and going back in. It destroyed his momentum and made him look like a flake. His campaign never recovered from that blunder. If he hadn't done that, he might have had a slim chance.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,787
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Neverending on Jun 8, 2016 14:04:42 GMT -5
Dracula WyldstaarThat's debatable. Clinton got 44 million votes, Bush got 39 and Perot got 19. Compare that to 2000 where Al Gore WON the popular vote and Nader only got 2 million votes. Perot wasn't a spoiler, he was a legitimate candidate.
|
|
Ramplate
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Apr 2005
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hamster
Posts: 30,425
Likes: 493
Location:
Last Online Oct 13, 2020 13:56:48 GMT -5
|
Post by Ramplate on Jun 8, 2016 14:57:02 GMT -5
Ross Perot should have stayed in, but he shouldn't have picked Stockdale as a runningmate
Stockdale opened the debate by saying, "Who am I? Why am I here?", when responding to a request for an opening statement from debate moderator, Hal Bruno, the political director of ABC News.[22][23] Initially, the rhetorical questions drew applause from the audience. However, his unfocused style for the rest of the debate (including asking the moderator to repeat one question because he didn't have his hearing aid turned on) made him appear confused and almost disoriented. An unflattering recreation of the moment on Saturday Night Live later that week, with Phil Hartman as Stockdale, cemented a public perception of Stockdale as slow-witted. He was also often parodied for his repeated use of the term "gridlock" to describe slow governmental policy. -wiki
Sanders has enough public support at this point that Clinton has to acknowledge that in her administration in a large way. But right now an independent run would only split the vote.
I would have liked to have seen a debate too, Sanders (and in fact either Democratic candidate) would tear him a new one.
|
|