Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Dec 28, 2014 0:07:22 GMT -5
The Imitation Game (2014)
The long overdue WWII story has finally been told. This isn't a broad story about the Americans saving the day and winning WWII or a niche story about the Battle of the Bulge or the storming of Normandy, but a behind the scenes look at the code breakers who defeated the German Enigma machine. But this movie is not without context, and that's why I feel like it worked so well. In between the scenes of geeks and their machines and code breaking is a very real war going on that is demonstrated through scenes of hardship, actual news reels, and well-chosen voiceover dialogue. But the truth is, it's not difficult to sell the immediacy and importance of what they're doing. It's a story so great, epic, and accurate enough that the use of typical biopic and historical event storytelling doesn't hurt the film. If you're the kind of person who rolls their eyes at movies that end with subtitles that say what happens after the film, you might be a bit disappointed by this (you know who you are). But if not, you should have a wonderful time with the brilliant acting from Cumberbatch, a well told and paced story, and you'll be inspired by one of the biggest heroes that no one celebrates.
***.5/****
|
|
Batman
Gaffer
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 153
Likes: 34
Location:
Last Online Oct 4, 2014 18:54:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Batman on Jan 2, 2015 22:35:48 GMT -5
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,649
Likes: 4,066
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 22:17:18 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Jan 4, 2015 12:07:18 GMT -5
Every Oscar season brings a few major contenders which also happen to be shamelessly obvious Oscar-bait films. This year, those two films are The Theory of Everything and The Imitation Game. The former especially seemed to be solely designed to appeal to the Academy, but I did have some genuine interest in the latter. The film is based on the life of Alan Turing, who led a very interesting and dynamic life during very dramatic times. The casting of Benedict Cumberbatch and a strong collection of supporting actors was also very promising, and I had hopes that The Imitation Game would be able to transcend the Oscar-bait label and be a genuinely strong film on its own merits.
At the dawn of World War Two, British Intelligence assembles a series of communications experts with the goal of cracking the German’s Enigma code machine. Doing say will allow the British to access the German communications and give them a crucial advantage in the war effort. The most prominent of these experts is Alan Turing (Benedict Cumberbatch), a highly intelligent but socially awkward young man. Turing does not initially get along with his co-workers, but they came to respect his genius. Turing’s central idea is to build a machine which will cipher through German communications and crack the code. Another important element to the film is Turing’s relationship to co-worker Joan Clark (Keira Knightely) and is homosexuality, of which he faced discrimination for after the war.
The thing about Alan Turing that makes his life so ripe for exploring is the many layers of his life. He was crucial to the war effort, a victim of homosexual persecution, an eccentric and socially awkward individual, and the father of modern computers. Most biopics only have one really interesting/important detail, but Turing’s life brings a lot more to the screen. Sure enough, the film is able to look at a number of interesting aspects of the man’s life and I was particularly intrigued by the material relating to ethics in war. Unfortunately this becomes a double edged sword in that the film has so much it’s never able to focus or find its groove. The script jumps from so many different aspects and time periods that a viewer gets a decent impression of the various elements, but there is never any real depth or insight. It all just feels rushed, and by the end I’m not entirely sure what the ultimate point director Morten Tyldum really wanted to get across. Is this a film about ethics, persecution of minorities, humanity, the creation of computers? Well, it’s about all of those things, but it’s also not really about any of them. I can’t help but wonder how this would have ended in the hands of a real master. First and foremost, I think the film should have been restructured with its flashbacks and flash-forwards for smoother pacing. Additionally, there are flashbacks to Turing as a child which should have been cut completely since they ultimately add very little and give the film more of a generic biopic feel.
Much as I do think The Imitation Game is something of a mess, it is a very watchable one. The film moves quickly and is generally well-made. The production values are certainly respectable and the costumes are period appropriate. The film is also pretty well-shot and while some of the CGI during the war scenes seemed a bit off, it wasn’t really prevalent enough to be a distraction. The film also has a fair bit of humour and lighter moments, which make it very digestible for a wide audience. A lot of the humour is actually pretty witty too, although this too causes a problem as jokes will hit and then immediately followed by attempted moments of the horrors and responsibilities of war, and the attempted pathos doesn’t really work. Still, the film is very watchable and I imagine the film will be pretty successful with general audiences.
Probably the most discussed aspect of The Imitation Game is Benedict Cumberbatch’s work in the lead. Cumberbatch has been a rising star for a while thanks to both a passionate fandom and genuine acting chops. His work here is pretty good. Cumberbatch embodies the personality of Alan Turing pretty well. He has some great socially awkward mannerisms and he delivers the emotional moments pretty well. Thing is, I’m not quite convinced that this is a transformative or truly complex performance. The character is written a bit broadly and I can’t say I was ever blown away by Cumberbatch is work. Don’t get me wrong; watching him is indeed a highlight, but that more has to do with his natural skill as an actor than this performance in particular. He is very good, but given the attention and accolades he’s been receiving, I was a little underwhelmed. Additionally, I remember finding some of his anti-social, borderline autistic behaviour to be a little silly and over the top, and sure enough, research has revealed much of this wasn’t so. The real Turing may not have had major social skills, but he was much more well-adjusted than this depiction would lead you to believe. Keira Knightley has also been getting a lot of attention for her performance, and she too is pretty good bringing a natural charm, wit, as well as emotional delivery. However, like Cumberbatch, it isn’t an amazing or truly transcendent performance. It’s a very respectable piece of acting from a very talented actress though, and she does work well in the film.
The Imitation Game is mostly an enjoyable watch, but it falls victim to a lot of the problems these prestige biopics tend to. Namely, the film trades in depth and complexity for more of an easily digestible recap of the subject’s life, and while the work is always respectable, it’s never truly powerful. In short, it’s very middlebrow, and I also think the film is kind of a mess. Still, it’s never a boring movie. It’s mostly well done, and I think Turing’s real life is so interesting that it be hard to make a movie about him that wasn’t a little bit interesting. Overall, I imagine wide audiences will probably respond to this, but this is ultimately a pretty average film that will be forgotten once this Oscar season has passed, even if it is relatively enjoyable in the moment.
C+
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,496
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 22:22:14 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Jan 11, 2015 10:49:56 GMT -5
The Imitation Game is a good movie hampered by some sizable problems and missteps. Benedict Cumberbatch as Alan Turing is pretty much playing the movie version of Sheldon Cooper, but his performance is the best part of the film and his anti-social behaviour immediately makes the film engaging. He continues to be an interesting character to follow, and the relationships he builds are satisfying as well, especially Kiera Knightley's Joan.
The story revolves around the struggle to break the Nazi's code machine and Turing's insistence on building a machine to counter it. Its a good story which gives a different perspective on the war than most other movies and is an important story to tell as well. I especially liked the payoff when they get the machine to work.
There are some glaring problems with the Imitation Game however which prevent the film from really rising high. The first is the editing and the decision to cut back between three different time periods. I can understand the flashback's to his childhood, as the story told there is a motivating factor for his actions in the main timeline. However, I did feel that it gives the film a more biopicy flavour (which I dislike). The timeline set after the war was what really made the movie feel cluttered and didn't really need to be intercut amongst the rest. It felt sloppy.
The other problem was how they tried to suddenly shoehorn in the idea of Turing being persecuted for his homosexuality. The entire focus of the movie for the majority was Turing's struggle to break the code and how his unique personality was crucial in his success. But all of the sudden the story changed its focus and tried to make some sort of political statement or... something. Either way, the treatment of it wasn't well done. If they wanted to make a movie about how this very important man was persecuted for being gay, then make the movie about that. Don't make a movie about something else and then try to throw in an aspect of the story which requires much more attention then what they could give it here.
So at the end, the movie basically suffers from an identity crisis, which is too bad. So right now it feels like a good movie with some rough edges that should have been smoothed before it was released. 7/10
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Jan 11, 2015 18:36:50 GMT -5
The other problem was how they tried to suddenly shoehorn in the idea of Turing being persecuted for his homosexuality. The entire focus of the movie for the majority was Turing's struggle to break the code and how his unique personality was crucial in his success. But all of the sudden the story changed its focus and tried to make some sort of political statement or... something. Either way, the treatment of it wasn't well done. If they wanted to make a movie about how this very important man was persecuted for being gay, then make the movie about that. Don't make a movie about something else and then try to throw in an aspect of the story which requires much more attention then what they could give it here. Dead on.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,496
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 22:22:14 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Jan 12, 2015 22:29:32 GMT -5
Thank you.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,529
Likes: 3,133
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 20:25:21 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jan 14, 2015 15:15:39 GMT -5
The second of this year's prestige biopics, The Imitation Game details the efforts of Alan Turing during World War II as he and a secret team of codebreakers attempt to crack the Nazis' means of communication, aided in large part by an invention of Turing's that would wind up being the world's first computer. Generally speaking, The Imitation Game, like The Theory of Everything, never veers too radically from the typical kind of storytelling trappings of biopics, but the difference between the two is that The Imitation Game is more successful at being a good -- not great -- movie.
Alan Turing's story is a very interesting one, but not one I'm read-up on in any way, so you won't see me getting too caught up in any historical inaccuracies the movie may have, like the majority of the film's detractors have already done. As presented on-screen, I found the story of The Imitation Game to be compelling enough to help warrant a recommendation. The acting is a contributing factor there as well. Benedict Cumberbatch portrays Turing effectively and turns in a performance that's subtle in an interesting way. Although, his interpretation also invites comparisons to the character of Sheldon Cooper from the TV show The Big Bang Theory. Indeed, I saw it with my Mom, and in the middle of an early scene that features Turing explaining his skills, we both leaned over and whispered, "He's Sheldon!" at the same time. But that doesn't detract any from the performance. Keira Knightley is also really good as one of the people recruited onto the team, and the rest of the cast is filled out solidly with actors like Matthew Goode and Mark Strong.
Near the end, though, the film takes a turn that just feels tacked on, where Turing is persecuted for being homosexual. This...almost just comes out of nowhere. Not that it wasn't already established earlier, but its relevance to the plot feels disjointed from the rest of the film, and the way it ends makes you go, "....Okay...." But all told, The Imitation Game is a good movie, but at the same time, the obligatory sort of British prestige film we get every year around this time.
***/****
|
|