Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,782
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 12:18:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jun 30, 2023 21:10:18 GMT -5
Fuck you, Doomsday. They did it. They fucking did it. Aliens or time travel? Pick your poison. It’s okay. Action scenes are good. Characters are fun. It means well. But… it’s also complete garbage. Indiana Jones was a great trilogy of movies in the 1980’s. Let’s leave it at that.
|
|
Wyldstaar
Producer
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,900
Likes: 1,267
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 13:46:29 GMT -5
|
Post by Wyldstaar on Jul 1, 2023 7:31:48 GMT -5
I'd say that considering they were trying to make an action movie starring an 80 year old man, they did a decent job. Dial of Destiny is definitely better than Crystal Skull, but that's an incredibly low bar to clear. I don't think I ever need to watch either film again, though. The above video that played before the movie was the most entertaining part of the evening. I think I'll watch the proper Indy Trilogy this weekend.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 20:52:31 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Jul 1, 2023 8:19:56 GMT -5
I was going to see it on Thursday but my wife got some virus, now it's all up in the air. An omen perhaps? I've kept my eye on the showtimes though and yeah, still plenty of good seats available at pretty much all showings.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,782
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 12:18:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 1, 2023 10:21:45 GMT -5
I've kept my eye on the showtimes though and yeah, still plenty of good seats available at pretty much all showings. Everyone just waiting for Mission: Impossible at this point.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 20:52:31 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Jul 2, 2023 15:13:07 GMT -5
Non-spoiler version:
I agree with the reviews that say as a stand alone adventure movie it's fine, it's just not a very good Indiana Jones movie. At the same time though it's not nearly as bad as the youtube army would have you believe. It doesn't offer much but it's at least better than Crystal Skull. That said, there's no reason this really needed to be made. Indy is a sad sack who spends almost the entire movie complaining. It's one thing to be an old man who recognizes that he's not the man he used to be, it's quite another to make him a crotchety bag of bones whose dialogue is primarily telling his goddaughter 'I can't believe you did that!' Phoebe Waller Bridge is unlikeable as an actress as is her character Helena and although she's co-headlining and Indiana Jones movie I can't imagine this is going to increase her standing among moviegoers, in fact I expect quite the opposite. Assuming the Helena TV show is still shitcanned it's for the best for all parties involved. I think a lot of the problems here are more sins of omission in that nothing really happens. There's no Raiders 'truck' scene or Last Crusade 'tank' scene or, well the last 30 minutes of Temple of Doom scene or even cartoon jungle chase scene from KotCS. Dial of Destiny is a collection of mild chase scenes, that's it. I don't even think Indy punches anyone except for the opening WWII scene. Speaking of, that's the best part of the movie and is actually quite fun even though the de-aging is very hit and miss. We as a society need to get together and decide that this is not the way to go, at least as far as Star Wars/Indy are concerned. The visual effects are very hit and miss too. There is little to no improvement from the obvious as hell blue screen scenes you saw in the trailer but other bits work better.
All in all, an improvement over the last installment but still suffers from some clear missteps. I'll take it over KotCS though so let's count our blessings.
B- so says Doomsday
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,782
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 12:18:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 2, 2023 15:55:39 GMT -5
I don’t even recognize you anymore.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Jul 2, 2023 15:57:14 GMT -5
I don’t even recognize you anymore.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,782
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 12:18:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 2, 2023 16:05:46 GMT -5
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 20:52:31 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Jul 2, 2023 17:39:03 GMT -5
I don’t even recognize you anymore. Too generous?
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,782
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 12:18:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 2, 2023 17:52:27 GMT -5
Maybe. I think this movie has the same issue as Crystal Skull. Wrong genre. Indiana Jones is supposed to be action-adventure with a dose of the supernatural. Temple of Doom was too off-balance for some, but still felt right. Crystal Skull and Dial of Destiny are straight up science-fiction and that’s just not right. This is no different than John McClane turning into a superhero in the Die Hard series, and you absolutely hated those movies. So if anyone was to hardcore critique this movie it’s you.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,529
Likes: 3,132
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 20:25:21 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jul 2, 2023 19:41:47 GMT -5
I enjoyed it. Which is a lot more than I can say for Crystal Skull. Unlike that movie, it felt like everybody involved here actually cared and was putting in effort, and it mostly captured that Indiana Jones spirit -- again, unlike Crystal Skull, which mostly just felt flat and dull. This movie, by contrast, actually felt fun, if overblown in certain areas. The last half hour...yeah, it's easy to see that it goes too far with what these movies are supposed to be, but y'know...I guess it just comes down to the fact that I felt this one sold it better than Crystal Skull did, even if I did roll my eyes. It's about what I thought it would be: serviceable and fun, better by miles than Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, but has not a chance n hell of even touching the first three. And that's perfectly fine. I'd probably watch it again.
But what the fuck -- this movie had no business costing $295 million to make.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 20:52:31 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Jul 2, 2023 20:33:25 GMT -5
Maybe. I think this movie has the same issue as Crystal Skull. Wrong genre. Indiana Jones is supposed to be action-adventure with a dose of the supernatural. Temple of Doom was too off-balance for some, but still felt right. Crystal Skull and Dial of Destiny are straight up science-fiction and that’s just not right. This is no different than John McClane turning into a superhero in the Die Hard series, and you absolutely hated those movies. So if anyone was to hardcore critique this movie it’s you. To me this tried to feel more grounded than Crystal Skull and attempted to fix a lot of its problems but didn't really offer any alternatives. It goes out of its way to remind us 'it's not supernatural, it's mathematics' which is fine and we aren't seeing any monkey swinging or cars landing on rubber trees or nuclear fridges. It didn't piss me off like KotCS did and still does. But it played it too safe and in doing so doesn't really stand out in any way. At least people talk about KotCS, I don't think people will have much of anything to say about DoD in the future. I can't fault it for not being offensively stupid although there are some dumb parts but it succeeds at being a pretty okay movie. I might be soft on this movie because it's not Crystal Skull. It makes me wonder how we would all be reacting to it if it came after Last Crusade instead.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,782
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 12:18:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 3, 2023 0:36:03 GMT -5
The last half hour...yeah, it's easy to see that it goes too far with what these movies are supposed to be, but y'know...I guess it just comes down to the fact that I felt this one sold it better than Crystal Skull did, even if I did roll my eyes. it played it too safe and in doing so doesn't really stand out in any way. At least people talk about KotCS, I don't think people will have much of anything to say about DoD in the future. I can't fault it for not being offensively stupid although there are some dumb parts but it succeeds at being a pretty okay movie. If Dial of Destiny taught us anything, it’s to appreciate Last Crusade. Temple of Doom has its critics but it is the only film in the series to take risks. Last Crusade is safe. Just like Dial of Destiny is “safe.” But the difference is that Last Crusade has a hook. The relationship between Harrison Ford and Sean Connery is what rescues that movie. We buy into the story and the characters. What is there to Dial of Destiny? Nothing. The story it is trying to sell has no balls. If you’re gonna kill off Shia LaBeouf off screen, why even bother? Why make the theme about regret? Why go for the silly time travel? There’s no emotional stakes. Instead of starting the film with a de-aged Harrison Ford running around 1944, start with Indy and Mutt on an adventure in which Mutt gets killed and then the rest of the story is Indy trying to go back in time but ultimately learning to come to terms with Mutt’s death. But then again, why even go this route? This is really how they wanna conclude the story of Indiana Jones? They went from Indy riding off into the sunset in Last Crusade to this? No. Just no. Objectively, the movie is fine, but as the concluding chapter in the Indiana Jones series, it is complete garbage. Disney managed to kill both Star Wars and Indiana Jones. Incredible.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,782
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 12:18:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 3, 2023 2:05:04 GMT -5
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 20:52:31 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Jul 3, 2023 18:01:08 GMT -5
They're dead on about the humor, it's very odd. I thought the same thing during the protest scene. Why is he...agreeing with them? Is this supposed to help somehow? What's he doing?
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,529
Likes: 3,132
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 20:25:21 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jul 3, 2023 18:21:32 GMT -5
The last half hour...yeah, it's easy to see that it goes too far with what these movies are supposed to be, but y'know...I guess it just comes down to the fact that I felt this one sold it better than Crystal Skull did, even if I did roll my eyes. it played it too safe and in doing so doesn't really stand out in any way. At least people talk about KotCS, I don't think people will have much of anything to say about DoD in the future. I can't fault it for not being offensively stupid although there are some dumb parts but it succeeds at being a pretty okay movie. If Dial of Destiny taught us anything, it’s to appreciate Last Crusade. Temple of Doom has its critics but it is the only film in the series to take risks. Last Crusade is safe. Just like Dial of Destiny is “safe.” But the difference is that Last Crusade has a hook. The relationship between Harrison Ford and Sean Connery is what rescues that movie. We buy into the story and the characters. What is there to Dial of Destiny? Nothing. The story it is trying to sell has no balls. If you’re gonna kill off Shia LaBeouf off screen, why even bother? Why make the theme about regret? Why go for the silly time travel? There’s no emotional stakes. Instead of starting the film with a de-aged Harrison Ford running around 1944, start with Indy and Mutt on an adventure in which Mutt gets killed and then the rest of the story is Indy trying to go back in time but ultimately learning to come to terms with Mutt’s death. But then again, why even go this route? This is really how they wanna conclude the story of Indiana Jones? They went from Indy riding off into the sunset in Last Crusade to this? No. Just no. Objectively, the movie is fine, but as the concluding chapter in the Indiana Jones series, it is complete garbage. Disney managed to kill both Star Wars and Indiana Jones. Incredible. Just look at this movie as one of those outlandish Indiana Jones novels from the 90's like Indiana Jones and the Unicorn's Legacy or Indiana Jones and the Philosopher's Stone or Indiana Jones and the Dinosaur Eggs. They're along the same lines of outlandishness. And oh yes, I read some of those in middle school.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 20:52:31 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Jul 3, 2023 20:44:30 GMT -5
I remember reading this one as a young pup.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,782
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 12:18:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 3, 2023 22:13:54 GMT -5
Just look at this movie as one of those outlandish Indiana Jones novels from the 90's like Indiana Jones and the Unicorn's Legacy or Indiana Jones and the Philosopher's Stone or Indiana Jones and the Dinosaur Eggs. They're along the same lines of outlandishness. And oh yes, I read some of those in middle school. I remember reading this one as a young pup. Ew. No. This the only 90’s Indiana Jones I accept.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Jul 4, 2023 15:45:17 GMT -5
It was fine, I guess. Like, it was very ordinary, but with much fewer terrible scenes than Crystal Skull.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Jul 6, 2023 14:50:37 GMT -5
Dial of Destiny doesn't really work as a proper sendoff for Harrison Ford as Indiana Jones, choosing to be middle-of-the-road and ordinarily safe (par for the course for all Kathleen Kennedy produced Lucasfilm entities these days) instead of attempting to shake things up too much and operating clearly with the not so fond memories of Kingdom of the Crystal Skull in everyone's present minds. At the same time it doesn't quite overdo the callbacks and cameos (though the two that are there are wholly irrelevant and unnecessary) and despite a pretty wild jump in the third act keeps things relatively grounded and avoids the eye rolls and ridicule of Crystal Skull. I suppose that's the sentiment for Dial of Destiny; it's overly safe and sometimes even a bit dull (the second act of Morocco really needed to be entirely restructured) but it won't offend the senses either. It's content with being the fourth best Indiana Jones movie, knowing it can't possibly compete with the first three but doesn't want to be on the same dreaded level with Crystal Skull.
Instead of honing in on some of the intriguing themes it presents of Indiana Jones not feeling at place with the current world and would rather be lost among the history and artifacts that he covets (an idea they bring about in the film's climax that doesn't feel earned), James Mangold and team are content with laying out surface level story beats to get him back into the hat on another rollicking adventure and not much else. Phoebe Waller-Bridge is a great pairing with Ford, serving as the witty foil to his grumpy cynicism and provides much of the film's energy. I never really bought her character as either the morale less opportunist or the budding archaeologist but she's the only one outside of Ford with much to work with and provides the film's only levity amongst the bad guys and chase scenes.
One of the more disappointing elements of Dial of Destiny is the relative lack of scope and scale in the movie. While we do have the globetrotting escapades one expects from the franchise, it all feels scaled down and never miraculous. We're locked in tight in a hotel, alleyways, classrooms, boats, planes, etc. and there just isn't a sense of exploration or discovery in any of it. They're all just used to get us to our next chase sequence and little of it is very fun. The second act really doesn't need to be in the film at all, which is too bad because the film picks up a bit when it takes its huge leap in the third act and finally rouses interest again. The second act just has too many subplots and minor characters that have no impact at all, and you end up reflecting on it wishing the set pieces had been more innovative and the story beats more daring.
Mads Mikkelsen, per usual, is an absolute presence as the antagonist. But he too doesn't have a lot to work with. When his character's motivations for claiming the dial are revealed, it felt like a lost opportunity to not expand on his and Indy's similar through lines of wanting to belong to the past and the temptations that the dial presents them. Would that have shaken things up too much? For the Kathleen Kennedy regime, I guess so. But what a theme that could have been explored to really bookend Ford's titular character after all of these years. But that's where Dial of Destiny squarely lies; a film that plays it safe and isn't going to test its audience in any fashion out of fear of backlash and indignation for Ford's final turn as Indiana Jones. Mangold and Kennedy seem to be tip-toeing through the whole picture, checking over their shoulders to make sure the audience is still along for the ride even as tepid as the ride is. Is it better than Kingdom of the Crystal Skull? Yeah, marginally. For all of that film's faults it's more memorable than this one and at least Spielberg and Lucas swung for the fences with it even if they whiffed pretty hard in the process. Dial of Destiny on the other hand is the least memorable of the adventures by a mile, resting safely in its comfy confines of being bland and ordinary while being able to quietly boast that it's not the worst of the series. It seems like that was the goal all along, and as long as Kathleen Kennedy is in charge of Lucasfilm this is what we can expect and nothing more.
6/10
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,782
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 12:18:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 6, 2023 15:10:32 GMT -5
Instead of honing in on some of the intriguing themes it presents of Indiana Jones not feeling at place with the current world and would rather be lost among the history and artifacts that he covets (an idea they bring about in the film's climax that doesn't feel earned), James Mangold and team are content with laying out surface level story beats Here’s the issue, sir. That’s basically what Last Crusade was about. Sean Connery was obsessed with the cup to the detriment of his relationship with son. Then at the end, when Indiana Jones risks his life for it, Connery grabs on to him and says, “let it go.” Then they ride off into the sunset. Dial of Destiny isn’t telling us anything that Last Crusade didn’t already tell us. Only difference is that Indy is a disgruntled old man instead of the weirdly passionate museum curator. As I said before, the plot of this movie should have been centered on Mutt. Indiana Jones trying to bring back Mutt but accepting mortality would have been dark but at least it makes sense as a final chapter for Indiana Jones. They couldn’t let the man ride off into the sunset, so this is the alternative, I guess.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 20:52:31 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Jul 6, 2023 15:11:45 GMT -5
What's sad is that Indy flat out tells Sallah 'nah, I don't need you, I just needed a ride to the airport.' But why couldn't Sallah have been the guy with the boat? Why did we need a new character? Why couldn't Sallah have been the one to fly the plane at the end? They definitely had opportunities to include him instead of shoehorning in a pointless cameo.
I also enjoyed how Sallah walks into Indy's apartment, does nothing and immediately walks out. Didn't have to be there at all, he does nothing except sing the song off screen that he was singing in Raiders. Remember Raiders?
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,782
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 12:18:02 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 6, 2023 15:13:25 GMT -5
I also enjoyed how Sallah walks into Indy's apartment, does nothing and immediately walks out. Didn't have to be there at all, he does nothing except sing the song off screen that he was singing in Raiders. Remember Raiders? He was there to take the kids for ice cream.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Jul 6, 2023 15:28:31 GMT -5
Here’s the issue, sir. That’s basically what Last Crusade was about. Sean Connery was obsessed with the cup to the detriment of his relationship with son. Then at the end, when Indiana Jones risks his life for it, Connery grabs on to him and says, “let it go.” Then they ride off into the sunset. Dial of Destiny isn’t telling us anything that Last Crusade didn’t already tell us. Only difference is that Indy is a disgruntled old man instead of the weirdly passionate museum curator. As I said before, the plot of this movie should have been centered on Mutt. Indiana Jones trying to bring back Mutt but accepting mortality would have been dark but at least it makes sense as a final chapter for Indiana Jones. They couldn’t let the man ride off into the sunset, so this is the alternative, I guess. Good point. It would have been a retread of Last Crusade's themes no doubt. But...isn't that okay? In this film, what does Indy have other than his love of artifacts and history? Nothing. So the idea that the allure of the dial is to bring some meaning back into his life and jolt him into a final adventure worth chasing is far, far more than any theme this film offers if it even does have one. I'd rather us sitting here talking about how the movie was pretty good even if it's a diet Last Crusade than us saying how it's middling and only slightly better than Crystal Skull.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Jul 6, 2023 15:31:01 GMT -5
What's sad is that Indy flat out tells Sallah 'nah, I don't need you, I just needed a ride to the airport.' But why couldn't Sallah have been the guy with the boat? Why did we need a new character? Why couldn't Sallah have been the one to fly the plane at the end? They definitely had opportunities to include him instead of shoehorning in a pointless cameo. I also enjoyed how Sallah walks into Indy's apartment, does nothing and immediately walks out. Didn't have to be there at all, he does nothing except sing the song off screen that he was singing in Raiders. Remember Raiders? Exactly, and such an easy change to make. Why have Antonio Banderas in the film at all? Literally make Sallah that character and everything that unfolds after has actual impact and meaning. Guilt for Indy for pushing his friend into one last rodeo and the results that happen. I don't mind cameos and callbacks for these sort of films, but make them meaningful. Give those characters more to do than enter camera right to light applause.
|
|