frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,946
Likes: 2,017
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 21:34:40 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Apr 20, 2023 9:52:20 GMT -5
It's 93 minutes and seems breezy but there's a point about 65 minutes in that just about everyone checks their watch.
Nic cage shoulda been better I think. He's okay but I expected him to get some fun stuff - but it's all kinda wrote and been done before but better.
It also twists into this weird action movie kinda?
Burn an hour and a half on streaming but it's def not worth seeing in a theater.
Got me thinking though what's the last dracula movie to make money?
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,105
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 1:15:32 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Apr 20, 2023 11:20:03 GMT -5
Got me thinking though what's the last dracula movie to make money? Probably Hotel Transylvania, if you want to count that.
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,946
Likes: 2,017
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 21:34:40 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on May 10, 2023 13:15:47 GMT -5
There's a report out that nic cage permanently shaved his teeth down to fit the dracula dentures on.
I'm sure it's not as big of a deal as the report says (I'm sure cage has almost all different teeth already - nature of Hollywood) - but still pretty impressive for a pretty nothing burger movie.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,105
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 1:15:32 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Jul 11, 2023 19:13:28 GMT -5
Renfield(4/18/2023) After the “Dark Universe” fell apart Universal decided they were going to take a less… cynical… approach to monetizing their “monsters” asset and would make individual disconnected movies aimed at adults and relevant to the modern world out of these characters. Sounds like the right approach and their first effort in this venture, the Blumhouse co-produced 2020 version of The Invisible Man, was a pretty good example of how this could work. That movie was pretty serious minded but for their next attempt they seem to have gone in the other direction and made a rather splattery comedy from the perspective of a deep-cut character from Dracula named Renfield. Pretty much the second I saw the movie’s trailer I was pretty sure it would divide people: mass audiences would be alienated and stay away but that the movie was also likely to find something of a cult following that would dig it. On some level that seems to have happened and yet I also suspect that the advertising might have been a little too honest and what would have been an unexpected surprise has turned out to be a rather expected one. The film follows Renfield (Nicholas Hoult), a familiar for Dracula (Nicholas Cage) who’s been tasked with finding victims for his master in modern day New Orleans and is beginning to have a crisis of conscience about this. There’s definitely some clever stuff to be found here like a prologue that re-enacts some of the famous sequences from the 1931 Dracula and I quite enjoyed Akwafina as a city police officer trying to take down a brutal gang that eventually becomes involved in Dracula’s plan for world conquest. However there are other elements of the film that kind of feel like they were a bit out of date. Some of the film’s gory but comical violence might have come as more of a shock five to then years ago but such imagery is starting to feel commonplace in movies like this. I also think we’re getting a little done with Nicholas Cage’s shtick at this point, especially in movies like this which seem to be tailored around his over the top wackiness. Cage is better when it feels like his wilder instincts are kind of invading an otherwise unsuspecting movie, but movies like this where everything else seems to be just as over the top as him kind of just feel desperate. But I don’t want to be too negative here as I do think this has more going for it than the average Hollywood release and there is fun to be had with it, but it doesn’t live up to its full potential either. *** out of Five
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,529
Likes: 3,133
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 0:56:23 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jul 16, 2023 12:12:49 GMT -5
The prospect of a horror action comedy with Nicolas Cage playing Dracula is of course something very enticing...and yet, Renfield is here to just mostly squander that potential. Which is a shame, because this is clearly a movie where all of the potential is right there within arms' reach, but the movie continually reaches in the opposite direction. Starting at a basic script level, it feels like writer Ryan Ridley only does the bare minimum with the story, if even that. Also like it's mostly missing a Second Act, which also speaks to how some of the editing feels here at times. I have to wonder if the runtime was always meant to be 93 minutes? Anyway, it presents some ideas and scenarios ripe with potential, but always either rushes through them or goes to focus on something else. There's a subplot here that focuses on a cop played by Awkwafina who's trying to resist pressure to become dirty like the rest of her precinct, who are on the payroll of a mobster played by Ben Schwartz, that feels like it belongs in a different movie. And every time it cuts back to that, whatever momentum this movie may have is stopped in its tracks. By the way, Ben Schwartz being this movie's main villain...I know this is supposed to be a comedy, but I just ain't buying this dude as anything approaching a threat, but rather as a whiny little asshole who just needed to shut up. But back to the rest of the movie, Nicolas Cage as Dracula is undoubtedly the movie's biggest asset and best part, yet he feels severely underused. Whenever he's onscreen, the movie is at its most entertaining, and its best scene is actually one where Dracula confronts Renfield in a motel room, and it just becomes a scene highlighting Dracula's narcissism and their toxic relationship. Speaking of, Nicholas Hoult is also pretty decent as the title character and again, when the movie focuses on just these two guys, it's at its best and manages to find a pretty good rhythm. It's just when it needs to be a comically over-the-top gorefest and shoot-em-up action comedy where it feels like the movie loses its way and also goes on autopilot. During these scenes, there's not a whole lot on display that feels fresh or interesting, and unfortunately, that feeling pervades most of the film. It's not so much that Renfield is a lazy movie, because it does have its moments of inspiration, but those moments become lost in an underdeveloped script that lacks the bite that was needed to make this premise really work.
*1/2 /****
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,783
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 23:39:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 31, 2023 2:55:14 GMT -5
a deep-cut character from Dracula named Renfield. Bro. Everyone knows who Renfield is. Jonathan Harker and him are interchangeable as far as the public consciousness is concerned. Anyhoo, I liked it. It's fun. We need more action-horror films. I've also been meaning to rewatch Warm Bodies. Tom Cruise Jr is building quite the resume of horror-inspired flicks.
|
|