Spider-Man: Homecoming (July 7, 2017)

I'd prefer they stick with Garfield because I think he has done a great job, but if a new actor is what it takes to get Spider-Man into the MCU then I won't complain.

And a new Wonder Woman, and a new Aquaman and a new Cyborg.

Yes and no. I do agree that it's silly for WB to work backwards from Marvel. But in relations to Spider-Man, it's a different story. Chris Nolan's Batman trilogy is done. Ben Affleck isn't stepping on Christian Bale. But replacing Andrew Garfield for no good reason is messed up. 

But they love Andrew Garfield & Emma Stone. Does it make sense to remove the two things that are actually working? Well... the ONE thing because they already got rid of Emma Stone.

Reboots seems to be a Spiderman and X-Men , And FF way of exisiting. Only really X-Men seems a mixed bag of crazy in figuring Reboots or just an alternate story line kinda like the new Star Trek.

Judging from those covers, I can kind of see why I never got into comics.

Spider-Man Cameo In ‘Captain America: Civil War’ A Done Deal—Report



By Tanya Diente | December 19, 2014 10:42 AM EST

The recent hack into Sony Pictures' servers revealed the studio's plans to collaborate with Marvel for a third sequel to "The Amazing Spider-Man." Likewise, it also detailed the possibility of the superhero making an appearance in "Captain America: Civil War." These plans may seem uncertain, but according to a latest report, studio execs are already planning a meeting to discuss the sequel.


A source told Screengonzo that Sony Pictures co-chairman Amy Pascal and Marvel Studios head Kevin Feige will meet in January to discuss the future of "The Amazing Spider-Man" in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, or MCU. The said meeting will reportedly take place at Pinewood Studios, where "Avengers: Age of Ultron" and "Captain America: Civil War" are believed to have been filming. No further details were provided, but sources said some "good news" will be revealed sometime in February. Likewise, Feige is said to be pleased with where his deal with Sony Pictures is headed.

How the superhero will be featured into the MCU remains uncertain. However, according to the source, one plan is for Spider-Man to make an appearance at the end-credits scene. According to Screengonzo, it would make sense if the character will be featured in "Captain America: Civil War," since the film is scheduled for filming sometime in February or March. It coincidentally links to the mentioned release of the good news in February.

HNGN also thought it's likely for the superhero to be introduced in "Civil War." The movie's directors, brothers Joe and Anthony Russo, will also reportedly helm the sequel. According to Screengonzo writer Josh Johnson, the directors will also "tackle a new Spider-Man trilogy, taking on directing and writing tasks." "They don't have anyone cast yet, but they certainly have a list of potentials they are going over once the deal is done," he said, adding that Marvel is already looking at a list of possible candidates to be the next Spider-Man.

However, it's still uncertain if "The Amazing Spider-Man" will really make an appearance in "Captain America: Civil War." Sony and Marvel have yet to confirm the reports. According to Johnson, the source is the same person who provided the confirmed details of Vision's look in "Avengers: Age of Ultron."

I think calling anything a done deal at this point is way too premature. I suspect something will happen because the Spider-Man franchise needs a boost, but everything is speculation at this point.

By the way, am I the only person who actually enjoyed both of the the ASM movies? I remember them not being all that well received, but I feel like they're getting far more hate now than they did upon their releases.

I liked the first one, but felt that it was not without it's problems.  The second one I found to be disappointing more than anything.  There were far too many plot lines being explored for a two hour movie to adequately handle.  The plot line involving Peter's parents in particular was a huge waste of time.  The set-up for the Sinister Six was out of place and distracting, and seems even worse in retrospect since it doesn't look like that movie is even going to happen now.

I liked the first one (better than the first Raimi film) and I REALLY liked the second one -- it's my 2nd favorite out of all five of the films so far -- so no, you're not alone.