PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,532
Likes: 3,135
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jun 7, 2021 20:12:54 GMT -5
After seeing Cruella, an interesting little observation occurred to me. If you put this film and the live-action Aladdin in front of somebody after wiping their memories of knowledge of each, told them that Guy Ritchie directed one of them and asked them to pick out which, something tells me that more people would pick Cruella. Why? Because this film has a distinct British crime caper feel that certainly feels influenced in a few ways by Ritchie's own British gangster movies almost, so the fact that this is NOT the live-action Disney movie he directed seems kind of surprising. But you know what? It's a tone that the movie's actual director, Craig Gillespie, taps into and is able to maintain really quite well. Plus, it helps lend the movie a lot of its personality and unique flair, especially in comparison to a lot of these other live-action Disney remakes. In terms of those films over the past few years, I can think of really only two that have stood out to me as enjoyable -- Aladdin and Beauty and the Beast -- while the rest, I've either been sort of ambivalent over or I've just not liked them. But I think I can add Cruella onto the shortlist of the ones that I legitimately like, mainly because it's able to forge its own unique identity and feel different enough from its peers to work surprisingly well. Most of the time. In true live-action Disney remake fashion, this movie just can't avoid doing certain things that are eyeroll-worthy and undercut the intended point attempting to be made with the story. I think this one should be kind of obvious, but even though this is a film about a villain, it's still a Disney film, so obviously they feel the need to pull their punches by the end and go, "Yeah, she's bad...but is she, though?" Uh, we're talking about a woman who plots to murder and skin puppies in the original source material. Yes. She IS bad. The Third Act of this movie is pretty much a cop out in that respect, then again, what should you expect from the House of Mouse? It's especially kind of frustrating because a lot of the rest of the film leading up to that Third Act really was legitimately entertaining. Now, I wouldn't say it's enough to derail the movie, but still, you can't help but go, "Oh, that Disney..." But again, apart from that, the rest of Cruella is still so entertaining, that I can't not recommend it. Because when it's tapping into the British crime movie feel, with a splash of Devil Wears Prada thrown in, it really is quite fun. And of course, Emma Stone just crushes it in the title role. You can tell she's having a blast sinking her teeth into this character, and we have just as much of a blast watching her. She also has really good chemistry with Joel Fry and Paul Walter Hauser, who play Jasper and Horace, as well as Emma Thompson, who's really the film's "true" villain. It's when the film is focused on the main character's transformation into Cruella and all of the schemes and anarchy she gets up to where it truly shines, and fortunately that's most of the runtime. Not to mention the film sports a killer soundtrack/tons of effective needle drops, which only add to the whole vibe. So, yes, I recommend Cruella. Of all the live-action Disney remakes so far (though this is more of a prequel), it's quite easily one of the ones with the most personality and a unique flair, and isn't really a scene-for-scene recreation like the other ones. By positioning itself as a sort of British crime/heist style of film, it gets a leg up and -- Third Act pivot and CGI dalmatians aside -- provides a good time. ***/****
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,106
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 22:45:58 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Jun 7, 2021 20:50:08 GMT -5
Not to mention the film sports a killer soundtrack/tons of effective needle drops, which only add to the whole vibe.
I liked the basic idea of having a classic rock soundtrack but to me the final product was way too much of a good thing. The movie is just wall to wall music, it never stops, the sheer quantity detracts from the ones that should have worked and stood out.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,532
Likes: 3,135
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jun 9, 2021 12:42:02 GMT -5
Not to mention the film sports a killer soundtrack/tons of effective needle drops, which only add to the whole vibe.
I liked the basic idea of having a classic rock soundtrack but to me the final product was way too much of a good thing. The movie is just wall to wall music, it never stops, the sheer quantity detracts from the ones that should have worked and stood out. It didn't really detract from anything for me, personally.
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,947
Likes: 2,017
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 22:21:29 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Jun 9, 2021 13:47:38 GMT -5
Paul houser is unrecognizable as he completely disappears into the role of Horace. His accent is stellar from start to finish, his mannerisms damn near perfect from the original character... If only he was allowed to smoke a pipe.
I liked this more than I had assumed I would, the roomie was gung ho and thought this was gonna be pretty amazing but it turned out about where I thought it would be. I'm with drac that the soundtrack was jarring and took me out of it, the first half hour after Emma stone shows up moves very quickly though and is an excellent quick intro to the characters.
Of all the Disney live action movies... This is the only one I've ever seen so it stands atop the heap.
Gonna be tough to make a sequel though and not go all out evil and still please fans but best of luck mouse!
6/10 - prob won't revisit but it was pretty and colorful enough that I might stop if it's on cable
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,106
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 22:45:58 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Jun 12, 2021 10:48:47 GMT -5
Cruella(6/6/2021) The “Live-Action Disney Remake” has been one of the more creatively bankrupt endeavors in modern Hollywood (which is saying a lot) and I’ve ignored a lot of them, but every once in a while one comes along which looks like it might have a prayer of being more interesting and their latest movie Cruella might just be the first one to actually be at least somewhat worth the trouble. It’s sort of meant to act as a prequel to 101 Dalmations explaining how Cruella De Vil became the over-the-top campy villainess that she was while also sort of turning her into something resembling more of an anti-hero than a true villain. That is perhaps easier said than done given that her animated counterpart is an attempted puppy killer whose very name is a play on “cruel devil” but screenwriters Dana Fox and Tony McNamara do a fairly serviceable job with the wacky assignment they were given. In this reboot Cruella is made out to be misfit in the 1960s who finds herself an orphan on the street who becomes a protégé of a very evil fashion designer called The Baroness and hatches a plot to usurp her through a series of heists, pranks, and double-crosses. At the end of the day that’s kind of a silly movie to be making but director Craig Gillespie has a lot of fun with it and brings a degree of vision and inventiveness to the movie’s style. Sometimes he provides a bit too much of a good thing, the film is longer than it probably should be and it really overdoes it with the 60s needle drops, which are nonstop throughout the movie and are occasionally chosen in ways that border on being hilariously on the nose (guess which Beatles song, well a cover of one, is used on the soundtrack when one of the heists starts to… come together. Guess which Rolling Stones song plays when you’re supposed to be sympathetic to this devilish woman.). At the end of the day this is not really a movie with much to say beyond some rather misapplied pop-feminism about how outsiders can become total girlbosses and I’m not sure it quite has it in itself to truly make its title character take the full heel turn she’s supposed to, but it’s a pretty fun ride along the way and is pretty much the best case scenario for one of these goofy Disney live-action reboots. ***1/2 out of Five
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Jun 12, 2021 19:11:03 GMT -5
Stupid, but charismatic. I liked it.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,791
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 17:56:45 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 8, 2021 0:28:21 GMT -5
After seeing Cruella, an interesting little observation occurred to me. If you put this film and the live-action Aladdin in front of somebody after wiping their memories of knowledge of each, told them that Guy Ritchie directed one of them and asked them to pick out which, something tells me that more people would pick Cruella. I don’t know. This felt like a Tim Burton movie if Tim Burton were a 90’s indie director instead of an eccentric 80’s director. Instead of channeling Glenn Close, Emma Stone went full mode Tim Burton heroine. Paul houser is unrecognizable as he completely disappears into the role of Horace. His accent is stellar from start to finish, his mannerisms damn near perfect from the original character... If only he was allowed to smoke a pipe. lol. I look forward to thebtskink’s In the Heights/Cruella double feature.
|
|