Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,307
Likes: 6,774
Location:
Last Online Nov 26, 2024 1:47:44 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Nov 14, 2019 14:33:06 GMT -5
The Irishman
It's funny how in the age of Avengers and Avatars a mob movie by a 76 year old director and boasting a cast of fellow septuagenarians is the film that has filmmakers, film critics and film fans alike talking about the state of the movie industry. The Irishman, despite its glowing reviews, has become infamous around town for its bloated budget and over-reliance on de-aging visual effects. The exploding costs resulted in the film being picked up by Netflix, making it the most prestigious and high-profile release from the streaming titan to date. Now we once again restart the conversation of how well the streaming services and theaters should get along. The Irishman is currently playing in very limited release in New York and Los Angeles and will disappear shortly before dropping on Netflix for people to watch on their televisions, laptops or smart phones. I'm sure Steven Spielberg would take issue with that but nowadays many people would prefer to watch from the comfort of their living rooms where they don't have to deal with people on their phones, talking to each other or quieting down the kids they brought into movies they have no business watching. So here we sit, being refused a presumably fantastic movie by one of the greatest filmmakers of all time while we wait for it to drop on Netflix despite the fact that millions of people would be willing to pay the premium price to watch despite the fact that it holds a 3 1/2 hour runtime. I'm sure we haven't heard the last of this conversation and both sides can make pretty good arguments. In the meantime though we'll just have to settle for talking about The Irishman. The reviews for The Irishman have made it sound like this is yet another Scorsese masterpiece and that's not an unfair statement. It has many classic Scorsese hallmarks that you can find in several of his other films making The Irishman fit nicely with the likes of Goodfellas and Casino. Much of the structure is familiar and welcome, from the narration to the oldies soundtrack to the build-up and eventual crumble of our less than perfect characters, but that could be interpreted in a couple different ways. The Irishman is definitely a return to the crime genre that Scorsese is perhaps best known for featuring old favorites like DeNiro and Pesci while finally introducing Al Pacino in one of his films. On the other hand it would also be easy to say that The Irishman feels more like Scorsese is making a Greatest Hits film, going back to something familiar without having to take any big risks. I guess it depends on how you want to approach a Scorsese movie and you wouldn't be wrong either way, however after giving it some thought I think there's more than enough in The Irishman to make it stand firmly on its own. Without going into too much detail, Robert DeNiro plays Frank 'the Irishman' Sheeran, a trucker who falls in with Russell Bufalino (Joe Pesci) who's a higher-up in the Pennsylvania mob. Sheeran, a hardened World War II veteran, starts with small-time tasks and eventually finds himself doing hits for the mob. After making a name for himself Sheeran begins working with Jimmy Hoffa (Pacino of course), the teamster leader who has ties with the mafia. Sheeran and Hoffa become close but over time Hoffa with his fiery demeanor begins drawing the ire of the mob, putting Sheeran's loyalties to the test. While the story itself is great, the acting from the three leads is the real standout. Pacino crushes his scenes and if he doesn't receive an Oscar nomination for his role as Hoffa I'll be amazed. DeNiro is also terrific while keeping his role more subdued. While he has his fair share of scenes shooting guys in the face he's also calm and calculating, showing a good amount of restraint. I was also pretty shocked to see Pesci given the amount of screen time that he has. I was expecting him to have a minor role somewhat similar to the one he had in The Good Shepard (remember that movie?). Nope, on the contrary he probably has more screen time than Pacino playing second only to DeNiro. Probably moreso than any other Scorsese movie, this one is propelled by the personal relationships between the characters. Not to say that his other movies don't have full, rich characters, but The Irishman is just as much about their relationships and loyalties as it is about gangsters doing their thing. What really makes The Irishman stand apart from the likes of Goodfellas and Casino is that you can tell that it's being made by an older, wiser director in that there's a lot of the third act dedicated to an old man reflecting on his life, his mistakes and the inevitability of death. The Irishman doesn't have a lot of that trademark raw edge. It's not that violent, there's not that much swearing or vice overall. It features what's needed to get the point across while putting it's focus on other themes. I can't help but imagine that the passage of time is something that Scorsese, a man with a deep Catholic background, has dwelled on at one time or another. Normally the movie would end with the mobsters getting their comeuppance (don't worry, we have that scene) but Scorsese dedicates almost a full half-hour to Sheeran as an old man, both as a prisoner in jail and then a prisoner as an old man in a nursing home, rejected by his family and separated from his mob associates whom have all since passed away. It brings that sense of mortality front and center for the audience and while each of us knows that our time will be up at one point or another it's not often that we really sit and consider it. The Irishman forces you to do that as you watch and that in itself is pretty powerful. In short, The Irishman is an extremely good film and I've been wavering as to whether I sit in the 'it's great all around' camp or 'it's good but we've seen this already' camp. I think comparing it to other Scorsese films would do it a disservice though and there's so much good stuff about the film that if my main criticism is that it has similarities to other movies then that means it's pretty damn great. A so says Doomsday, I always get hesitant when I find myself running with the rest of the crowd but it's as good as you've been hearing.
|
|
donny
CS! Bronze
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,632
Likes: 1,332
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 23:13:53 GMT -5
|
Post by donny on Nov 15, 2019 10:41:38 GMT -5
A couple of thoughts on this. As a Scorsese fan (I know opinions of him can vary on this site), I was pretty skeptical regarding this picture (as Marty likes to call them) mainly because the main leads were going to be digitally de-aged to tell a 40 plus year story. Something also didn't feel right about it being picked up by Netflix. Despite it ultimately being a limited release, I had my doubts. It felt to me that this was a movie that was being made 10-15 years too late.
Good thing it was not.
I loved this movie, and it seems clear this was the time to make The Irishman. Now that they are all older, this feels like a commentary on the group's previous work in the gangster genre, mainly Scorsese and De Niro. When you have a group of people responsible for Goodfellas, The Godfather 1&2, Casino, Scarface and The Departed, it seems appropriate that they all have something to say. As a result, this is a much more reflective, somewhat somber outing.
This is essentially the same kind of story as something like Goodfellas, just told through a different perspective on life. It has a lot of the usual Scorsese tricks or flares, but we are watching something starting at the end as opposed to the beginning.
To be clear, there are certain things that I wasn't sure of that I'll be curious to see how they play out a second time around. The de-aging can be a bit jarring at first, especially as you watch a 75 year old De Niro move around with a 30 some year old face. It's a bit weird. Some of the character relationships in this, particularly with Frank and his daughter, I'm not entirely sure it worked, but I do get what Scorsese is going for here.
Honestly though, this was a movie where I left feeling very overwhelmed on an emotional level, and it's something where the many positives clearly outweigh some of the negative/questionable aspects. The performances from everyone involved were spot on, and this goes beyond Pesci, De Niro and Pacino. But were here for the main 3, and boy do they deliver. This is De Niro's best performance, in what, 25 years? It blows his David O. Russell performances out of the water. The crazy thing for me, is of those 3 actors, his performance was my least favorite. While it's clear this is his movie, and he is fantastic, Pesci and Pacino are even better. I love watching them perform, and as Hoffa, Pacino is magnetic. Yes he is usual Pacino and gets a bit over the top, but there is more to his role than I thought, and he has more screen time than I anticipated. He's wonderful.
As for Pesci, I was so happy to see him back on screen that it didn't matter what he was doing. He could have literally painted houses in this, and I would be thrilled. But he plays against type from his typical gangster roles and he was fantastic.
Obviously this is a long movie, but it moves pretty seamlessly. It may be a drag at times to some, but I was hooked the instant this thing started. I've seen a ton of flicks in theaters the last few years, and I can say this is one of the few where I never looked down from the screen. Also, a lot happens in this movie to the point that you might not pick up on every single thing that happens, but you'll get the gist.
I alluded earlier to how this is looking at a similar genre of movies, but just through a different perspective, but it's interesting comparing this so some of Scorsese's other classics. In Goodfellas and Raging Bull, you have these characters who, at the end of their morally conflicted journeys, are still relatively young, and by all accounts have a lot of life left. This is not that. You are dealing with people now at the end of their life wondering what this all means and if anything matters. This is a movie that could not have been made without the likes of Goodfellas and Casino, and could have not been made without getting older and growing as a filmmaker or actor.
Self-reflection is often necessary in life, and in story telling, it's no different, no matter how painful it may be. Martin Scorsese may not have all the answers to what he's asking, and neither does The Irishman, but that does not make this any less compelling.
One of the best of the year. Go see this.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,792
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 26, 2024 1:12:58 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 18, 2019 23:48:08 GMT -5
Doomsday donnyListen, cocksucker. Some people. Not me. Some people are saying I took a nap during the Irishman. I wanna know which scenes they claimed I slept through and the context of those scenes. If you could do that for me, it’d be a great sign of respect.
|
|
donny
CS! Bronze
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,632
Likes: 1,332
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 23:13:53 GMT -5
|
Post by donny on Nov 19, 2019 9:48:31 GMT -5
When the film approaches the late 80's-early 90's timeline, Pacino and Pesci spend a lot of time in the Chicago suburbs. They become very acquainted with area, maybe even fall in love with it. Naturally they begin to look for work and start a painting company, and as the title suggests begin to start painting houses.
During the Christmas season one year, Pesci begins working on one of his newest clients homes, the McCallister family. With the McCallister's away on vacation, Pesci, who has become very infatuated with this home, seeks an opportunity to claim it as his own. There's just one problem.
It's all a very long winded setup to Home Alone.
Oh, Pesci and Pacino get married.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,792
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 26, 2024 1:12:58 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 19, 2019 11:10:20 GMT -5
Speaking of Pacino & Pesci, why was Pesci obsessed with De Niro's daughter? Did that lead to anything? The movie almost implies Pacino was killed cause the daughter favored him over Pesci. I was literally, like, "how long was I asleep for?" When did the daughter turn into Anna Paquin? Why does Anna Pacquin look 50?
Speaking of which... why they spend $200 million on de-aging... when all they did was make De Niro look 60 in the first half, 80 throughout most of the second half and 100 at the end? Joe Pesci called him Kid throughout the movie. Shit, I hope they're calling me Kid when I'm in the retirement home. Then they cast old-ass Anna Paquin as the daughter.
The youngest person in this movie is Ray Romano and he's like 50.
|
|
donny
CS! Bronze
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,632
Likes: 1,332
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 23:13:53 GMT -5
|
Post by donny on Nov 19, 2019 12:33:45 GMT -5
Pesci mentions fairly early on, in the bowling scene, that he loves kids, but he and his wife were unable to have any of their own. Obviously he and Frank are boys, so that would explain why he took a shine to her in particular.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,307
Likes: 6,774
Location:
Last Online Nov 26, 2024 1:47:44 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Nov 19, 2019 12:36:03 GMT -5
Better question, why are Anna Paquin and Jesse Plemons in this movie and there's only about 3 lines between both of them? You would think actors with their reputations would have bigger parts to play.
|
|
donny
CS! Bronze
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,632
Likes: 1,332
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 23:13:53 GMT -5
|
Post by donny on Nov 19, 2019 12:43:52 GMT -5
That was definitely odd.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,792
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 26, 2024 1:12:58 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 19, 2019 14:32:11 GMT -5
Pesci mentions fairly early on, in the bowling scene, that he loves kids, but he and his wife were unable to have any of their own. Obviously he and Frank are boys, so that would explain why he took a shine to her in particular. De Niro had 4 daughters but they fixated on one of them. She's, like, 10-years-old for a bulk of the movie and then suddenly she's 50-year-old Anna Paquin. I thought that was Pacino's wife, for a moment. Better question, why are Anna Paquin and Jesse Plemons in this movie and there's only about 3 lines between both of them? You would think actors with their reputations would have bigger parts to play. Meth Damon plays the same character in everything I've seen him in. And he was supposed to be Pacino's son or something? Did I get that right? Meth Damon? Really?
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,307
Likes: 6,774
Location:
Last Online Nov 26, 2024 1:47:44 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Nov 19, 2019 14:57:34 GMT -5
He was his step-son. I think they put him in solely because he was with Hoffa shortly before he disappeared. He doesn't serve any purpose in the film otherwise.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,792
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 26, 2024 1:12:58 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 19, 2019 15:10:50 GMT -5
He was his step-son. I think they put him in solely because he was with Hoffa shortly before he disappeared. He doesn't serve any purpose in the film otherwise. There's no evidence of that. Hoffa's last whereabouts was using a payphone at 4pm, outside a restaurant. Every mobster has a different version of how he died and all of them were disproven. Meth Damon is just there to pad the runtime with a Family Guy style gag about a fish.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,650
Likes: 4,067
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 21:43:34 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Nov 23, 2019 18:11:07 GMT -5
So yeah, I liked it a lot. The film the whole is enthralling and made with a lot of care, but it's that final act which is just devastating. Not to be melodramatic, but the ending really effected me and I'm not sure I've quite processed it all emotionally yet. The film is inevitably going to invite comparisons to Goodfellas (along with Casino and Mean Streets) and while that isn't unwarranted, The Irishman is a pretty different movie. It isn't an intoxicating expose into the mafia lifestyle so much as a sad reflection on a life full of wrong choices that never seemed to matter anyway. If there's any movie it really resembles, it's Once Upon a Time in America, and not just because of connections with Jimmy Hoffa and teamsters.
There are a few little things that are still nagging at me. As amazing as the digital effects are, the body language does sometimes betray that these are in fact very old men. The narrative is also not always totally clear and certain aspects feel a bit rushed, but on the other hand, by the time you get to the end of the film, it seems like that may have been the point. Choices made in an instant and their long-lasting consequences seems to be something of a theme.
In any event, while I'm not 100% sure where exactly I'll come down on The Irishman, it's probably safe to say I loved it. Though I've been emotionally effected by a lot of movies this year, I don't know if anything touched me as profoundly as this did. Additionally, the film is quite simply a rich and engaging story which kept my eyes glued to the screen. I can honestly say the three and a half hour runtime didn't bother me one bit. Yes, there's things they could have cut, but this is a film which really benefits from its length. And less I make The Irishman sound all doom and gloom, it's also quite funny at points and is generally very entertaining.
I'll write a more organized review at a later time, but for now I'll leave it at that.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,792
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 26, 2024 1:12:58 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 23, 2019 18:21:36 GMT -5
So yeah, I liked it a lot. The film the whole is enthralling and made with a lot of care, but it's that final act which is just devastating. Not to be melodramatic, but the ending really effected me and I'm not sure I've quite processed it all emotionally yet. The film is inevitably going to invite comparisons to Goodfellas (along with Casino and Mean Streets) and while that isn't unwarranted, The Irishman is a pretty different movie. It isn't an intoxicating expose into the mafia lifestyle so much as a sad reflection on a life full of wrong choices that never seemed to matter anyway. If there's any movie it really resembles, it's Once Upon a Time in America, and not just because of connections with Jimmy Hoffa and teamsters. There are a few little things that are still nagging at me. As amazing as the digital effects are, the body language does sometimes betray that these are in fact very old men. The narrative is also not always totally clear and certain aspects feel a bit rushed, but on the other hand, by the time you get to the end of the film, it seems like that may have been the point. Choices made in an instant and their long-lasting consequences seems to be something of a theme. In any event, while I'm not 100% sure where exactly I'll come down on The Irishman, it's probably safe to say I loved it. Though I've been emotionally effected by a lot of movies this year, I don't know if anything touched me as profoundly as this did. Additionally, the film is quite simply a rich and engaging story which kept my eyes glued to the screen. I can honestly say the three and a half hour runtime didn't bother me one bit. Yes, there's things they could have cut, but this is a film which really benefits from its length. And less I make The Irishman sound all doom and gloom, it's also quite funny at points and is generally very entertaining. I'll write a more organized review at a later time, but for now I'll leave it at that. Joker > Irishman
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Nov 23, 2019 18:27:57 GMT -5
So yeah, I liked it a lot. The film the whole is enthralling and made with a lot of care, but it's that final act which is just devastating. Not to be melodramatic, but the ending really effected me and I'm not sure I've quite processed it all emotionally yet. The film is inevitably going to invite comparisons to Goodfellas (along with Casino and Mean Streets) and while that isn't unwarranted, The Irishman is a pretty different movie. It isn't an intoxicating expose into the mafia lifestyle so much as a sad reflection on a life full of wrong choices that never seemed to matter anyway. If there's any movie it really resembles, it's Once Upon a Time in America, and not just because of connections with Jimmy Hoffa and teamsters. There are a few little things that are still nagging at me. As amazing as the digital effects are, the body language does sometimes betray that these are in fact very old men. The narrative is also not always totally clear and certain aspects feel a bit rushed, but on the other hand, by the time you get to the end of the film, it seems like that may have been the point. Choices made in an instant and their long-lasting consequences seems to be something of a theme. In any event, while I'm not 100% sure where exactly I'll come down on The Irishman, it's probably safe to say I loved it. Though I've been emotionally effected by a lot of movies this year, I don't know if anything touched me as profoundly as this did. Additionally, the film is quite simply a rich and engaging story which kept my eyes glued to the screen. I can honestly say the three and a half hour runtime didn't bother me one bit. Yes, there's things they could have cut, but this is a film which really benefits from its length. And less I make The Irishman sound all doom and gloom, it's also quite funny at points and is generally very entertaining. I'll write a more organized review at a later time, but for now I'll leave it at that. Joker > Irishman Amen, brother.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,106
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Last Online Nov 26, 2024 6:26:18 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Nov 23, 2019 19:23:07 GMT -5
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,650
Likes: 4,067
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 21:43:34 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Nov 23, 2019 19:43:13 GMT -5
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,307
Likes: 6,774
Location:
Last Online Nov 26, 2024 1:47:44 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Nov 25, 2019 18:29:49 GMT -5
Here's a great interview with Scorsese about The Irishman and film in general.
|
|
donny
CS! Bronze
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,632
Likes: 1,332
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 23:13:53 GMT -5
|
Post by donny on Nov 27, 2019 10:45:19 GMT -5
On Netflix today.
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,947
Likes: 2,017
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 22:21:29 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Nov 29, 2019 10:33:30 GMT -5
Was okay. Can cgi their top lip off their bodies all you want young deniro still walks around with the tightness of an old ass man and it doesn't look great.
Not as compelling as peak Scorsese. Glad he's putting mobster movies to bed though, he's more interesting than these characters.
Give it a 7/10 and I'll prob never watch it again.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,792
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 26, 2024 1:12:58 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 29, 2019 12:23:42 GMT -5
Can cgi their top lip off their bodies all you want young deniro still walks around with the tightness of an old ass man and it doesn't look great. Yeah. Ultimately, a giant waste of money.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,650
Likes: 4,067
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 21:43:34 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Dec 1, 2019 16:05:53 GMT -5
It really is staggering how good late-period Martin Scorsese has been. In the last decade, Scorsese has made a stylish horror-noir (Shutter Island), a lavish love letter to cinema and art (Hugo), a hysterically funny crime-comedy (The Wolf of Wall Street), and a probing spiritual epic (Silence). Not all of these films are equal achievements, but each was an achievement, and I'd argue the latter two are among Scorsese's best movies. How Scorsese continues to be so impressive and forward thinking a filmmaker well into his 70s I do not know, but that it's still so exciting when new Scorsese opens is a treat. Sure enough, he's closing out the 2010s with yet another masterpiece in The Irishman.
The Irishman in question is Frank Sheeran (Robert De Niro), a mafia hitman who, in his old age, reflects on his life and crimes, particularly his friendship with crime boss Russell Bufalino (Joe Pesci) and union leader Jimmy Hoffa (Al Pacino).
The fact that it's Scorsese and this cast returning to the mob movie immediately conjures certain expectations which in some ways The Irishman plays into, and in some ways it doesn't. The film can certainly be outlined as a rise and fall story and the sense of fatalism which informs most crime movies is indeed present here. But there are also some crucial deviations which distinguish The Irishman within Scorsese's body of work. Gone is the intoxicating level of detail and relish of the mob lifestyle found in Goodfellas and Casino. Instead, Frank's transition to mafia hitman is so blunt and matter-of-fact that it feels inevitable. This isn't the seduction of Henry Hill or even Jordan Belfort, but something inevitable and haunting. We see Frank quickly become enamored in a world of crime and murder, but without the charm which makes mob movies so often fun. Moreover, while The Irishman has several violent set-pieces, Scorsese's approach is far more morbid. The camera will often hauntingly track through the spaces of violence, leaving the acts itself just on the outside of the frame. When violence is shown, it is presented with a brutal efficiency which is shocking and unpleasant. Most of the violence happens in a quick flash, the major exception being an extended beating witnessed by Frank's daughter, a first sin which will haunt the character and the film moving forward.
Despite Scorsese's own lineage of gangster movies, the film The Irishman feels most akin to is Once Upon a Time in America. And like Sergio Leone's final masterpiece, Scorsese does not celebrate the power and glamour of the American gangster, but reflects on a lifetime of sin and destruction. Also like Leone, Scorsese is largely interested in the moments surrounding violence than with the acts of violence itself. In his later Westerns, Leone would often spend large amounts of time clearly building to an act of violence which would only last a few seconds, and then would linger on the aftermath. Scorsese takes this idea to a new extreme in The Irishman's central set-piece. As it becomes increasingly clear that Frank will need to assassinate Jimmy Hoffa, the film spends an inordinate amount of time following Frank as he prepares, flying out to Detroit, meeting with associates, meeting with Hoffa, and luring Hoffa to his death. Then the killing is over in less than a second. We linger in the room with the body, and then follow Frank try to return as if nothing happened. This scene is at the heart of The Irishman, not only because Frank's friendship with Jimmy is so real and vividly drawn, and not only because Jimmy's murder will haunt Frank until the film's devastating final frame. Rather, this scene is a microcosm of Frank's story. An unwavering commitment to flashes of violence which destroy Frank's life before he can even register what he's done.
If anything separates The Irishman from Once Upon a Time in America, it's that the characters in The Irishman are actually likable. Where Leone saw grotesque monstrosity in the American gangster, Scorsese sees tragedy. The film never shies away from the violent consequences of the characters' actions, nor does it suggest they are deserving of forgiveness (that Peggy and Frank never reconcile is crucial), but it does treat them with empathy. Despite all the violence and suffering, the friendships between Frank, Russell, and Jimmy are genuine and heartfelt. And this leads into the films gut-wrenching final act, as those friendships fall away and Frank's lifetime of crime and abuse all catch up to him. All of the choices made easily and without hesitation suddenly come crashing down, as the film spends its final act painfully exploring the end of a life full of poor choices, none of which seemed to matter much anyway. The Irishman (and the gangster genre more generally) is imbued with death, but it's in the film's final moments that the weight of human life becomes inescapably apparent, culminating in a final image that shook me to my core.
This exploration of aging and reflecting on life certainly takes on a meta quality considering Scorsese is himself an old master reflecting on his own legacy, as is much of his cast. And in a lifetime of amazing performances from De Niro, Pacino, and Pesci, all three do some of their best work here. Pesci's performance is perhaps the most clearly remarkable, with his Russell Bellafino defined by a calmness, an even gentle quality. Russell's power is clearly conveyed, there's a quiet dignity to Pesci's performance that is worlds removed from his other collaborations with Scorsese. Pacino's performance is perhaps more in-line with what we expect from the man, but his large personality and bravado fit Jimmy Hoffa perfectly and is generally enthralling to watch. And at the center of it all is Robert De Niro, the actor who more than any other defines Scorsese's body of work. Frank Sheeran is perhaps the most unremarkable character the two have ever created together. He's really little more than a mafia thug, and that makes De Niro's work harder to appreciate. This isn't really a flashy role, but De Niro really disappears into the role. Furthermore, consider how much emotion De Niro is able to convey with the simplest of looks. Frank is not a particularly well-spoken character, but so much is articulated through De Niro's performance. These becomes all the more profound as the movie goes on and Frank weighs greater emotional pains he can't mask. The quiet sadness De Niro emanates in the film's final act is frankly staggering.
The Irishman is a Shakespearean tragedy where the fundamental flaws of a person lead to their undoing; a weighty exploration of a life full of regret and sin that was both long and yet over in an instant. Less a paint a totally joyless affair however, I must also stressed that the film is made with exceptional skill and care. Just as a story, The Irishman is deeply engaging and honestly just a lot of fun to watch. From Scorsese's stylish push-ins, to Thelma Schoonmaker's precise editing, to the dozens and dozens of tiny performance details from the film's impeccable cast, I can honestly say I was hooked the whole way through and while the film feels long in as much as it paints a full portrait of a man's life, it never drags. In classic Martin Scorsese form, the film is a deep and rewarding thematic exploration of guilt and violence wrapped in a vivid character study that is also one of the most entertaining films of the year. We're lucky to have this.
A+
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,792
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 26, 2024 1:12:58 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Dec 1, 2019 17:09:01 GMT -5
It really is staggering how good late-period Martin Scorsese has been. In the last decade, Scorsese has made a stylish horror-noir (Shutter Island), a lavish love letter to cinema and art (Hugo), a hysterically funny crime-comedy (The Wolf of Wall Street), and a probing spiritual epic (Silence). Not all of these films are equal achievements, but each was an achievement, and I'd argue the latter two are among Scorsese's best movies. How Scorsese continues to be so impressive and forward thinking a filmmaker well into his 70s I do not know, but that it's still so exciting when new Scorsese opens is a treat. Sure enough, he's closing out the 2010s with yet another masterpiece in The Irishman. Shutter Island is technically 2009. The release date was postponed to February 2010 cause Paramount didn’t want to spend money on a Oscar campaign. I guess it was in Marty’s contract, so they self-sabotaged the movie. You can argue that Shutter Island wraps up the Age of Leo for Scorsese. Gangs of New York. The Aviator. The Departed. Shutter Island. He only made one Leo movie in the 2010’s: Wolf of Wall Street. Hugo, Silence and Irishman are more representative of this decade. I think Marty is salty he can’t get a movie made without Leo. He’s been open about Hollywood not wanting to make Irishman. He had to settle for Netflix and people watching Irishman on their phone. But the money speaks for itself. The Aviator, The Departed, Shutter Island and Wolf of Wall Street each grossed over $100 million domestically. Hugo was a low grossing 3D movie at the height of 3D and Silence was a monumental flop. “You wanna spend $200 million making 80-year-old Robert De Niro look 60-years-old? Hard pass.”
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,628
Likes: 3,184
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 21:44:13 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Dec 4, 2019 21:37:12 GMT -5
Anyone that's a passionate follower of film has long heard the old adage that 1970s Hollywood was the true golden era of cinema, and in many ways that's probably true. Most of this is credited to Hollywood producers finally eschewing the old hat musicals and melodramas that the American people grew weary of in the 1960s, feeling that these hammy productions were out of touch with the radically shifting ideologies and people of the period, and as a result hired young, bold filmmakers tasked with making American cinema relevant again. Many filmmakers came out of this time, but the most notable were certainly Steven Spielberg, George Lucas, Francis Ford Coppola, Brian DePalma, and Martin Scorsese. All of them had perhaps their greatest stretch of critical and commercial successes in the 1970s, but of this group only Spielberg and Scorsese continue to make impactful cinema today, and even then contemporary Spielberg is a solid but far cry from his best work. Yes, at seventy-seven years old, Martin Scorsese is still standing tall above his peers, directing bold films with his infectious characters and wildly kinetic camera movements and editing like he's in his twenties. Sometimes I don't feel like audiences appreciate Scorsese as much as they should, often ignorantly relegating him to a director of gangster pictures as if he hasn't had one of the most diverse careers of any filmmaker ever. It's no small feat to be as commercially accessible yet artistically audacious as Scorsese has been throughout his long filmography, as the venerable student of cinema has consistently balanced the two while continuing to expand his own style. Few filmmakers can boast the deep knowledge of film that Scorsese can, and it's so refreshing to see a master of his craft refusing to rest on his laurels and drub out the greatest hits that so many filmmakers in their later years often do. And yet Scorsese's latest, The Irishman, is a sort of return to the comfort zone of what he's known for: a gangster picture. And to complete this reunion, Scorsese has brought along Robert De Niro, Joe Pesci, and Harvey Keitel as if we're being transported to the eras of Mean Streets, GoodFellas, and Casino in contemporary time. While it's certainly a nostalgic choice all around for Scorsese, once again the master director has pulled no punches and brings his incredible energy and vision to a fascinating slow burn thriller that feels like familiar territory but greatly expands on the themes and characters that he made for himself portraying decades ago.
The Irishman is Frank Sheeran (Robert De Niro), a ruthless hitman operating mostly for the head of the Bufalino crime family, Russell Bufalino (Joe Pesci). The story takes place over several decades and largely deals with Frank's interactions with union boss and famed disappearing act Jimmy Hoffa (Al Pacino), who Frank strikes up a brotherly bond with and becomes the sort of calming presence in Hoffa's ear. This is important since Hoffa is an extremely boisterous and stubborn man, a combination that's both prosperous since his big personality has endeared him to many and gotten him to the high seat of power he sits in but also dangerous since he's now garnered unwarranted attention from competing mob men, notably Tony Provenzano (Stephen Graham). Pacino is a wonderful casting choice as Hoffa, working here with Scorsese in what is astoundingly the first time, playing the character for the big theatrics Pacino is known for and adding much needed humor to the film since De Niro and notably Pesci are playing their characters mostly straight. Hoffa's disappearance is still one of the most fascinating cold cases in American history, and Pacino's portrayal lends a lot of insight into how he became such a marked man. From his hatred to the Kennedys to his refusal to play ball with the mob who would rather see the dubious dolt who proceeded Hoffa in power, Hoffa was a man who ascended by his loud words and died by them as well, and Pacino nails the character.
It's a sprawling tale, and one that even bolstered by Scorsese's signature energy and cinematic flairs feels long at over two hundred minutes in running time, but The Irishman is also rich in depth in its exploration of the dynamic between power and the facade of dutiful loyalty that it feels justified. While these are certainly themes apparent in nearly every crime film, De Niro's Frank Sheeran is different from the bright-eyed protagonists generally featured in these movies in that he's a hitman whose moral compass is outweighed by his allegiance to the hierarchy of the mob. Sheeran is not a man of many positive qualities aside from his genuine friendships with Russell Bufalino and Hoffa, forgoing any attempts at relationships with his wife and daughters in favor of proving himself loyal to Russell's every need. He's not a man that's really even hell-bent on a quest for power or moving up in the ranks (those things come gifted to him though almost out of favors for his service), but is a man who has purpose solely through his allegiance to crime and has seen many men die due to their aspirations and wants to avoid stepping on toes at any cost. Sheeran himself isn't an overly fascinating character, but De Niro is at his acting best in the role, working his signature tough guy persona with mournful reflection and thus embodying the very themes at the heart of The Irishman. Pesci is also very strong as Bufalino, moving away from his flamboyant characters that made him famous in Raging Bull and GoodFellas for a much more subdued performance made powerful by the chilling calm that Russell carries while overseeing his crime empire. Seeing De Niro, Pacino, and Pesci exchange dialogue never loses its thrill, and it's such a fitting project for finally seeing all of them together under the watch of Scorsese. At times Scorsese lets the scenes play on for too long, especially in some exchanges between Sheeran and Hoffa that feel like Pacino is just riffing for the sake of stalling for better improvisation (this is most apparent in an odd scene where Hoffa apologizes to Sheeran for far too long), but it's also hard to justify halting the energy that the three of them bring to each moment, so I can understand why Scorsese and longtime editor Thelma Schoonmaker give the scenes more breathing room than they normally would.
For all of his merits, Scorsese would hardly be categorized as a filmmaker that utilized much in the way of visual effects despite helming the 3-D shot Hugo earlier this decade, but much of the hype surrounding The Irishman centered around just that. Instead of casting other actors to play the younger versions of Sheeran, Bufalino, and Hoffa, the film employs a sort of "de-aging" CGI that softens the actors' features and gives them a glossier, youthful look. I'll admit that this experiment is not an entirely successful one. The CGI is very noticeable while also not being entirely effective. Even when De Niro is a face full of CGI, I never felt that he was entirely younger looking. The actors do their best to attempt to alleviate the notion of their real ages in these earlier scenes, but the magic trick doesn't fully work. The closeups are glossy and obviously computerized, and the wide shots comprised of action (notably when Sheeran beats up a man on the street) betray the actors to show the physical movements of men in their seventies. Still, I think the idea to have the three actors play these characters throughout the entirety of the film was the correct one, and the performances are so fantastic that eventually you get used to everything and acclimate to the CGI. An interesting idea that down the road will work, but right now we aren't there technology wise to truly make this movie magic a total success.
The Irishman is yet another high achievement from Martin Scorsese, directing with the same vigor and craftsmanship that he always has. The film contains all of the signature trademarks of the venerable filmmaker from expressive camera moves, sharply designed characters, dense narrative, period soundtrack, and an incredible cast at the center of it all that add up to a fantastic cinematic experience. Despite working in a familiar genre, Scorsese has once again breathed life into the crime epic and this time around offers his most mature exploration of the cycle that violence and power culminate in yet. While it doesn't quite reach the heights of Scorsese's big three (Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, GoodFellas), it's also the director at his wisest and most reflective artistically, following in the footsteps of his previous (and under appreciated) feature, Silence. Scorsese has accomplished so much in his distinguished career and there are certainly even more films from him to come, but The Irishman may end up being his most fitting in his later years, working with the greatest overall cast he's ever assembled and returning to his gangster picture roots that somehow feels just as fresh as when Mean Streets burst onto the scene in 1973. Few filmmakers can claim that they were still making films in their seventies, let alone still putting out compelling work that shows not only no signs of slowing down, but still much more exciting projects to come. Martin Scorsese was once a filmmaker among peers, but it's clear that he's not only outlasted his contemporaries but is still one of the most important and fascinating voices in cinema today.
9/10
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,792
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 26, 2024 1:12:58 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Dec 6, 2019 10:48:39 GMT -5
17 million people watched Irishman in its first 5 days. If they had watched it in theatres it would have grossed $153 million .
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Dec 6, 2019 12:17:18 GMT -5
I don't think theatres do free trials.
|
|