PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,384
Likes: 3,056
Location:
Last Online Sept 17, 2024 0:23:19 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Nov 12, 2019 9:11:40 GMT -5
After adding it on my Roku, I had to do the whole "Forgot Password" rigamarole in order to get it going. Nice customer service, letting your customers figure it out for themselves. Did some browsing before coming into work, but it was running slow and spotty. Obviously, everyone's busy watching Mandalorian or whatever else.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,110
Likes: 8,519
Location:
Last Online Sept 20, 2024 9:14:05 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 12, 2019 9:47:31 GMT -5
After adding it on my Roku, I had to do the whole "Forgot Password" rigamarole in order to get it going. Nice customer service, letting your customers figure it out for themselves. Did some browsing before coming into work, but it was running slow and spotty. Obviously, everyone's busy watching Mandalorian or whatever else. I got it to work on Apple+. lol. Watched Mandalorian & Lady and the Tramp.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,384
Likes: 3,056
Location:
Last Online Sept 17, 2024 0:23:19 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Nov 12, 2019 9:57:43 GMT -5
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,471
Likes: 6,208
Location:
Last Online Sept 19, 2024 20:50:46 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Nov 12, 2019 10:28:14 GMT -5
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,110
Likes: 8,519
Location:
Last Online Sept 20, 2024 9:14:05 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 16, 2019 12:46:54 GMT -5
thebtskinkSo is Xoomers a thing now? Is PG Cooper a Xoomer?! Also, what is this nonsense that Boomers gave birth to Millennials? I guess that can apply to “elder Millennials” but wouldn’t the proper Millennials like PhantomKnight have Gen-Xers as parents? And didn’t Boomers technically give birth to Gen-Xers? Like, statistically, I’m willing to bet most Boomers gave to Gen-Xers. All those Boomers born in the 1940’s gave birth to Gen-Xers. None of our parents were born in the 1940’s. All our parents were born in the 1960’s. They’re either borderline Gen-Xers or straight up Gen-Xers.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,007
Likes: 5,669
Location:
Last Online Sept 20, 2024 10:55:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Nov 16, 2019 13:19:34 GMT -5
thebtskink So is Xoomers a thing now? Is PG Cooper a Xoomer?! Also, what is this nonsense that Boomers gave birth to Millennials? I guess that can apply to “elder Millennials” but wouldn’t the proper Millennials like PhantomKnight have Gen-Xers as parents? And didn’t Boomers technically give birth to Gen-Xers? Like, statistically, I’m willing to bet most Boomers gave to Gen-Xers. All those Boomers born in the 1940’s gave birth to Gen-Xers. None of our parents were born in the 1940’s. All our parents were born in the 1960’s. They’re either borderline Gen-Xers or straight up Gen-Xers. Roughly speaking Boomers were born from 1945 - 1965 (Barack Obama, born 1961, is technically a very young boomer) Gen Xers were born from 1965 -1985 (so, the babies born at Woodstock are Gen Xers) Millennials are roughly 1985 - 1995 You can move those ranges around a few years here and there, but they mostly line up. So basically the loose hippie boomers gave birth to Gen Xers but the ones who came home from Vietnam, went to college, and got jobs before they spawned gave birth to millennials.
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,873
Likes: 1,981
Location:
Last Online Sept 20, 2024 11:00:55 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Nov 16, 2019 13:31:48 GMT -5
Parents are boomers. Am og millenial. And my brother is as well and he was born early 80s and hates being called a millenial. So I make sure to buy all things that label him a millenial for Xmas/bdays/etc.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,110
Likes: 8,519
Location:
Last Online Sept 20, 2024 9:14:05 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 16, 2019 14:02:41 GMT -5
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,007
Likes: 5,669
Location:
Last Online Sept 20, 2024 10:55:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Nov 16, 2019 14:54:06 GMT -5
I've been saying for years that John Hughes movies aren't as universal as people make them out to be and that they won't stand the test of time... and that prediction seems to be bearing fruit.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,110
Likes: 8,519
Location:
Last Online Sept 20, 2024 9:14:05 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 16, 2019 18:44:04 GMT -5
thebtskink So is Xoomers a thing now? Is PG Cooper a Xoomer?! Also, what is this nonsense that Boomers gave birth to Millennials? I guess that can apply to “elder Millennials” but wouldn’t the proper Millennials like PhantomKnight have Gen-Xers as parents? And didn’t Boomers technically give birth to Gen-Xers? Like, statistically, I’m willing to bet most Boomers gave to Gen-Xers. All those Boomers born in the 1940’s gave birth to Gen-Xers. None of our parents were born in the 1940’s. All our parents were born in the 1960’s. They’re either borderline Gen-Xers or straight up Gen-Xers. Roughly speaking Boomers were born from 1945 - 1965 (Barack Obama, born 1961, is technically a very young boomer) Gen Xers were born from 1965 -1985 (so, the babies born at Woodstock are Gen Xers) Millennials are roughly 1985 - 1995 You can move those ranges around a few years here and there, but they mostly line up. So basically the loose hippie boomers gave birth to Gen Xers but the ones who came home from Vietnam, went to college, and got jobs before they spawned gave birth to millennials. I don’t know why Boomers cover a 20-year range. To me, the term Boomer always meant those people born in the 1940’s after WWII, when soldiers returned from the war and started fucking anything that moved. Yeah - soldiers did take advantage of the G.I. Bill and went to college, got well-paying jobs and moved to Suburbia. That’s why I’m fine extending Boomers to the 1950’s. But the 1960’s to me is Gen-Xer territory. I’ve always acknowledged Gen-X as the MTV Generation. If you were young when MTV came of age, you’re a Gen-Xer. Calling Obama a Boomer sounds ridiculous. That would be like in 1992 saying that Bill Clinton was the same Generation as George Bush and Ross Perot. When it comes to Millennials and Xoomers, I feel like we hopped over a Generation. Anyone born in the 1980’s should have their own term. We grew up analog, went digital in our teens and inherited Gen-X’s economy/job-market/housing-collapse. Xoomers instigating Boomer vs Millennial War are just dumb. The only Boomers that fucked shit up are the ultra-rich that control everything. Most Boomers (the 1940’s/1950’s babies) are elderly people who aren’t really contributing anything to society. They’re in retirement age. It’s Gen-X (the 1960’s-1970’s babies) who are running the show right now. They’re the “Middle Management” between the ultra-rich Boomer and the working class Millennial. It’s Gen-X, the “Chad’s” and “Karen’s” of the world that we deal with on a daily basis. And yet, they’re getting away scots free.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,007
Likes: 5,669
Location:
Last Online Sept 20, 2024 10:55:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Nov 16, 2019 19:16:35 GMT -5
Roughly speaking Boomers were born from 1945 - 1965 (Barack Obama, born 1961, is technically a very young boomer) Gen Xers were born from 1965 -1985 (so, the babies born at Woodstock are Gen Xers) Millennials are roughly 1985 - 1995 You can move those ranges around a few years here and there, but they mostly line up. So basically the loose hippie boomers gave birth to Gen Xers but the ones who came home from Vietnam, went to college, and got jobs before they spawned gave birth to millennials. I don’t know why Boomers cover a 20-year range. To me, the term Boomer always meant those people born in the 1940’s after WWII, when soldiers returned from the war and started fucking anything that moved. Yeah - soldiers did take advantage of the G.I. Bill and went to college, got well-paying jobs and moved to Suburbia. That’s why I’m fine extending Boomers to the 1950’s. But the 1960’s to me is Gen-Xer territory. I’ve always acknowledged Gen-X as the MTV Generation. If you were young when MTV came of age, you’re a Gen-Xer. Calling Obama a Boomer sounds ridiculous. That would be like in 1992 saying that Bill Clinton was the same Generation as George Bush and Ross Perot. When it comes to Millennials and Xoomers, I feel like we hopped over a Generation. Anyone born in the 1980’s should have their own term. We grew up analog, went digital in our teens and inherited Gen-X’s economy/job-market/housing-collapse. Xoomers instigating Boomer vs Millennial War are just dumb. The only Boomers that fucked shit up are the ultra-rich that control everything. Most Boomers (the 1940’s/1950’s babies) are elderly people who aren’t really contributing anything to society. They’re in retirement age. It’s Gen-X (the 1960’s-1970’s babies) who are running the show right now. They’re the “Middle Management” between the ultra-rich Boomer and the working class Millennial. It’s Gen-X, the “Chad’s” and “Karen’s” of the world that we deal with on a daily basis. And yet, they’re getting away scots free. A generation is basically supposed to be births within an eighteen-year span, and yeah drawing hard arbitrary lines is a little silly and there is always going to be a little weirdness surrounding people at the extreme ends of these periods but they generally are drawn that way for a reason. Just look at your examples: Bill Clinton (born 1946) is definitionally of a different generation than George H.W. Bush (born 1918) whose son is not coincidentally exactly the same age as Clinton. Obama would have been about 20 when MTV first debuted, 30 by the time It Smells like Teen Spirit came out, and nearly 35 by the time Reality Bites came out, so he doesn't exactly fit with Gen X. Generation X is incidentally something of a strange forgotten generation, there are considerably fewer of them than there are Boomers or Millenials. As for the whole generational war thing... I think it's mostly justified. You say Generation X is running things now but I'm not sure how true that is. There's never been a Gen X president, the asshole in the White House right now is everything wrong with the Boomers, and he was voted in by a bunch of fuddy-duddys in their 60s and 70s who watch Fox News all day. They have disproportionate power because there are a lot of them, they vote, and they grew up in a time when education and housing were both cheap and they then voted out all the advantages they had the second they had the money that could be taxed. They've clung to power for dear life and feel completely entitled to it and have never done a damn thing to help future generations and they will probably continue to do so until they fucking die off and by then it will be too late.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,110
Likes: 8,519
Location:
Last Online Sept 20, 2024 9:14:05 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 16, 2019 21:36:54 GMT -5
I don’t know why Boomers cover a 20-year range. To me, the term Boomer always meant those people born in the 1940’s after WWII, when soldiers returned from the war and started fucking anything that moved. Yeah - soldiers did take advantage of the G.I. Bill and went to college, got well-paying jobs and moved to Suburbia. That’s why I’m fine extending Boomers to the 1950’s. But the 1960’s to me is Gen-Xer territory. I’ve always acknowledged Gen-X as the MTV Generation. If you were young when MTV came of age, you’re a Gen-Xer. Calling Obama a Boomer sounds ridiculous. That would be like in 1992 saying that Bill Clinton was the same Generation as George Bush and Ross Perot. When it comes to Millennials and Xoomers, I feel like we hopped over a Generation. Anyone born in the 1980’s should have their own term. We grew up analog, went digital in our teens and inherited Gen-X’s economy/job-market/housing-collapse. Xoomers instigating Boomer vs Millennial War are just dumb. The only Boomers that fucked shit up are the ultra-rich that control everything. Most Boomers (the 1940’s/1950’s babies) are elderly people who aren’t really contributing anything to society. They’re in retirement age. It’s Gen-X (the 1960’s-1970’s babies) who are running the show right now. They’re the “Middle Management” between the ultra-rich Boomer and the working class Millennial. It’s Gen-X, the “Chad’s” and “Karen’s” of the world that we deal with on a daily basis. And yet, they’re getting away scots free. A generation is basically supposed to be births within an eighteen-year span, and yeah drawing hard arbitrary lines is a little silly and there is always going to be a little weirdness surrounding people at the extreme ends of these periods but they generally are drawn that way for a reason. Just look at your examples: Bill Clinton (born 1946) is definitionally of a different generation than George H.W. Bush (born 1918) whose son is not coincidentally exactly the same age as Clinton. Obama would have been about 20 when MTV first debuted, 30 by the time It Smells like Teen Spirit came out, and nearly 35 by the time Reality Bites came out, so he doesn't exactly fit with Gen X. Generation X is incidentally something of a strange forgotten generation, there are considerably fewer of them than there are Boomers or Millenials. As for the whole generational war thing... I think it's mostly justified. You say Generation X is running things now but I'm not sure how true that is. There's never been a Gen X president, the asshole in the White House right now is everything wrong with the Boomers, and he was voted in by a bunch of fuddy-duddys in their 60s and 70s who watch Fox News all day. They have disproportionate power because there are a lot of them, they vote, and they grew up in a time when education and housing were both cheap and they then voted out all the advantages they had the second they had the money that could be taxed. They've clung to power for dear life and feel completely entitled to it and have never done a damn thing to help future generations and they will probably continue to do so until they fucking die off and by then it will be too late. Millennials lack of voting is something I’ve addressed numerous times in the last decade. Frankly, they have no one to blame but themselves.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Nov 17, 2019 0:31:12 GMT -5
I don’t know why Boomers cover a 20-year range. To me, the term Boomer always meant those people born in the 1940’s after WWII, when soldiers returned from the war and started fucking anything that moved. Yeah - soldiers did take advantage of the G.I. Bill and went to college, got well-paying jobs and moved to Suburbia. That’s why I’m fine extending Boomers to the 1950’s. But the 1960’s to me is Gen-Xer territory. I’ve always acknowledged Gen-X as the MTV Generation. If you were young when MTV came of age, you’re a Gen-Xer. Calling Obama a Boomer sounds ridiculous. That would be like in 1992 saying that Bill Clinton was the same Generation as George Bush and Ross Perot. When it comes to Millennials and Xoomers, I feel like we hopped over a Generation. Anyone born in the 1980’s should have their own term. We grew up analog, went digital in our teens and inherited Gen-X’s economy/job-market/housing-collapse. Xoomers instigating Boomer vs Millennial War are just dumb. The only Boomers that fucked shit up are the ultra-rich that control everything. Most Boomers (the 1940’s/1950’s babies) are elderly people who aren’t really contributing anything to society. They’re in retirement age. It’s Gen-X (the 1960’s-1970’s babies) who are running the show right now. They’re the “Middle Management” between the ultra-rich Boomer and the working class Millennial. It’s Gen-X, the “Chad’s” and “Karen’s” of the world that we deal with on a daily basis. And yet, they’re getting away scots free. generation generation Gen X. Generation X generation generational Generation X Gen X generations
|
|
Nilade
Director
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,687
Likes: 426
Location:
Last Online Aug 28, 2024 15:46:12 GMT -5
|
Post by Nilade on Nov 17, 2019 1:48:51 GMT -5
A generation is basically supposed to be births within an eighteen-year span, and yeah drawing hard arbitrary lines is a little silly and there is always going to be a little weirdness surrounding people at the extreme ends of these periods but they generally are drawn that way for a reason. Just look at your examples: Bill Clinton (born 1946) is definitionally of a different generation than George H.W. Bush (born 1918) whose son is not coincidentally exactly the same age as Clinton. Obama would have been about 20 when MTV first debuted, 30 by the time It Smells like Teen Spirit came out, and nearly 35 by the time Reality Bites came out, so he doesn't exactly fit with Gen X. Generation X is incidentally something of a strange forgotten generation, there are considerably fewer of them than there are Boomers or Millenials. As for the whole generational war thing... I think it's mostly justified. You say Generation X is running things now but I'm not sure how true that is. There's never been a Gen X president, the asshole in the White House right now is everything wrong with the Boomers, and he was voted in by a bunch of fuddy-duddys in their 60s and 70s who watch Fox News all day. They have disproportionate power because there are a lot of them, they vote, and they grew up in a time when education and housing were both cheap and they then voted out all the advantages they had the second they had the money that could be taxed. They've clung to power for dear life and feel completely entitled to it and have never done a damn thing to help future generations and they will probably continue to do so until they fucking die off and by then it will be too late. Millennials lack of voting is something I’ve addressed numerous times in the last decade. Frankly, they have no one to blame but themselves. I can't agree with you more. Things really didn't have to be like this if only more would've come out to vote. Hopefully these last 3 years were a big wake up call, because iff this happens again next year, we're hopeless.
|
|
thebtskink
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jul 2000
It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again.
Posts: 19,417
Likes: 4,954
Location:
Last Online Sept 18, 2024 14:57:10 GMT -5
|
Post by thebtskink on Nov 17, 2019 8:28:46 GMT -5
And even here, we are letting Gen Y off the hook. Those born in 1990 were 26 for Trump's election. 1998 were 18. Go check their voting turnout. The older people of that range aren't exactly Zoomers, and they definitely aren't Millenials. That analog at birth, digital in teens distinction is important, Neverending.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Nov 17, 2019 9:07:54 GMT -5
Imagine being Gen L.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,110
Likes: 8,519
Location:
Last Online Sept 20, 2024 9:14:05 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 17, 2019 9:57:32 GMT -5
I don’t know why Boomers cover a 20-year range. To me, the term Boomer always meant those people born in the 1940’s after WWII, when soldiers returned from the war and started fucking anything that moved. Yeah - soldiers did take advantage of the G.I. Bill and went to college, got well-paying jobs and moved to Suburbia. That’s why I’m fine extending Boomers to the 1950’s. But the 1960’s to me is Gen-Xer territory. I’ve always acknowledged Gen-X as the MTV Generation. If you were young when MTV came of age, you’re a Gen-Xer. Calling Obama a Boomer sounds ridiculous. That would be like in 1992 saying that Bill Clinton was the same Generation as George Bush and Ross Perot. When it comes to Millennials and Xoomers, I feel like we hopped over a Generation. Anyone born in the 1980’s should have their own term. We grew up analog, went digital in our teens and inherited Gen-X’s economy/job-market/housing-collapse. Xoomers instigating Boomer vs Millennial War are just dumb. The only Boomers that fucked shit up are the ultra-rich that control everything. Most Boomers (the 1940’s/1950’s babies) are elderly people who aren’t really contributing anything to society. They’re in retirement age. It’s Gen-X (the 1960’s-1970’s babies) who are running the show right now. They’re the “Middle Management” between the ultra-rich Boomer and the working class Millennial. It’s Gen-X, the “Chad’s” and “Karen’s” of the world that we deal with on a daily basis. And yet, they’re getting away scots free. A generation is basically supposed to be births within an eighteen-year span, and yeah drawing hard arbitrary lines is a little silly and there is always going to be a little weirdness surrounding people at the extreme ends of these periods but they generally are drawn that way for a reason. Just look at your examples: Bill Clinton (born 1946) is definitionally of a different generation than George H.W. Bush (born 1918) whose son is not coincidentally exactly the same age as Clinton. Obama would have been about 20 when MTV first debuted, 30 by the time It Smells like Teen Spirit came out, and nearly 35 by the time Reality Bites came out, so he doesn't exactly fit with Gen X. Generation X is incidentally something of a strange forgotten generation, there are considerably fewer of them than there are Boomers or Millenials. As for the whole generational war thing... I think it's mostly justified. You say Generation X is running things now but I'm not sure how true that is. There's never been a Gen X president, the asshole in the White House right now is everything wrong with the Boomers, and he was voted in by a bunch of fuddy-duddys in their 60s and 70s who watch Fox News all day. They have disproportionate power because there are a lot of them, they vote, and they grew up in a time when education and housing were both cheap and they then voted out all the advantages they had the second they had the money that could be taxed. They've clung to power for dear life and feel completely entitled to it and have never done a damn thing to help future generations and they will probably continue to do so until they fucking die off and by then it will be too late. Using an 18-year span to classify a generation is silly. Let's say the last member of your generation was born on your 18th birthday. That person will turn 18 when you're 36 years old. Saying a kid in high school is the same generation as someone in their late 30's is preposterous. I think generations, from a social-economical standpoint, should be defined within a decade and/or based on world events. If you have no consciousness of the world before 9/11, you shouldn't be the same generation as me. If you weren't in the workforce when the economy crashed in 2008, you shouldn't be in the same generation as me. If you had a smartphone in high school, you shouldn't be the same generation as me. Ultimately, we're all products of our culture and that can change dramatically within 5 years. Just look how much shit has changed in the time Trump's been President. Xoomers are pitting Millennials against Boomers but people who grew up with Obama and people who grew up with Trump are gonna hate each other. 2009, as crazy as it may seem, was a vastly different world. If you were 16 in 2009, joining the workforce for the first time, owning your first vehicle, maybe starting your first serious relationship, your experience is totally different from someone who is 16 right now in 2019. How are these two groups gonna determine if the Assistant Principal in Breakfast Club is the villain or hero of the story?
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,110
Likes: 8,519
Location:
Last Online Sept 20, 2024 9:14:05 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 17, 2019 14:52:11 GMT -5
|
|
thebtskink
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jul 2000
It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again.
Posts: 19,417
Likes: 4,954
Location:
Last Online Sept 18, 2024 14:57:10 GMT -5
|
Post by thebtskink on Nov 17, 2019 15:48:30 GMT -5
Why the hell is Chicago so high?
Were they really that popular?
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,110
Likes: 8,519
Location:
Last Online Sept 20, 2024 9:14:05 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 17, 2019 17:23:12 GMT -5
Why the hell is Chicago so high? Were they really that popular? They had 20 singles in the Top 10 and 5 albums peak at #1. Compare that to The Eagles who had 10 singles in the Top 10 and 6 albums peak at #1 (only of which is the top-selling album of the 20th century). So... yeah... I’d say Chicago was popular.
|
|
thebtskink
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jul 2000
It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again.
Posts: 19,417
Likes: 4,954
Location:
Last Online Sept 18, 2024 14:57:10 GMT -5
|
Post by thebtskink on Nov 17, 2019 18:39:36 GMT -5
Why the hell is Chicago so high? Were they really that popular? They had 20 singles in the Top 10 and 5 albums peak at #1. Compare that to The Eagles who had 10 singles in the Top 10 and 6 albums peak at #1 (only of which is the top-selling album of the 20th century). So... yeah... I’d say Chicago was popular. Jesus. "25 or 6 to 4" is fucking awesome, but I couldnt name another song of theirs. Oh wait, "You're the Inspiration". How many of these are their soft rock stage?
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Nov 17, 2019 18:53:44 GMT -5
Taylor Swift is the 8th greatest musical artist of all time. I think we're done here.
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,873
Likes: 1,981
Location:
Last Online Sept 20, 2024 11:00:55 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Nov 17, 2019 19:12:56 GMT -5
And climbing. Drake gonna be in the top ten shortly.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,096
Likes: 6,651
Location:
Last Online Sept 20, 2024 11:06:16 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Nov 18, 2019 0:08:45 GMT -5
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,110
Likes: 8,519
Location:
Last Online Sept 20, 2024 9:14:05 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 18, 2019 3:10:03 GMT -5
They had 20 singles in the Top 10 and 5 albums peak at #1. Compare that to The Eagles who had 10 singles in the Top 10 and 6 albums peak at #1 (only of which is the top-selling album of the 20th century). So... yeah... I’d say Chicago was popular. Jesus. "25 or 6 to 4" is fucking awesome, but I couldnt name another song of theirs. Oh wait, "You're the Inspiration". How many of these are their soft rock stage? Their big singles 1. Hard to Say I'm Sorry (1982); peaked at #1 2. Look Away (1988); peaked at #1 3. If You Leave Me Now (1976); peaked at #1 4. Hard Habit to Break (1984); peaked at #3 5. Will You Still Love Me (1987); peaked at #3 6. You're the Inspiration (1985); peaked at #3 7. I Don't Wanna Live Without Your Love (1988); peaked at #3 8. Saturday in the Park (1972); peaked at #3 9. 25 or 6 to 4 (1970); peaked at #4 10. Just You n Me (1973); peaked at #4 11. Baby, What a Big Surprise (1977); peaked at #4 12. What Kind of Man Would I Be (1990); peaked at #5 13. Old Days (1975); peaked at #5 14. Call on Me (1974); peaked at #6 15. Beginnings (1971); peaked at #7 16. Does Anybody Really Know What Time It Is (1971); peaked at #7 17. Searching So Long (1974); peaked at #9 18. Make Me Smile (1970); peaked at #9 19. You're Not Alone (1989); peaked at #10 20. Feeling Stronger Everyday (1973); peaked at #10
|
|