Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,788
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 12:00:25 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jun 14, 2018 3:12:35 GMT -5
Get ready for PG Cooper’s next video essay. If the Incredibles is about objectivism then Incredibles 2 is about personal accountability. I’ll let Riley from the Boondocks explain it. In the long awaited sequel, superheroism is still illegal but Bob Odenkirk wants to reverse that by using Elastic Girl as a role model for change. Plus, putting her fatass on display never hurt anyone, well, except it attracts the attention of Odenkirk’s lesbian sister whose angry that their parents died needlessly in hope of being rescued instead of taking action. This is the type of bitch who thinks teachers should carry weapons. But enough of that. Let’s talk about Mr. Incredible turning into Mr. Mom. Ha-Larry-us! Overall, it’s a pretty good movie. It’s not something that needed to take 14 years to make but let’s be glad it got made. I welcome more Incredibles and more Elastic Girl shaking that ass.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,788
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 12:00:25 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jun 15, 2018 16:18:05 GMT -5
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Jun 18, 2018 22:06:58 GMT -5
A lot has changed regarding the superhero genre landscape since The Incredibles debuted in theaters in 2004. When the original film came out, superhero films were still pretty murky aside from the occasional gems like the Sam Raimi Spider-Man films and the first couple of X-Men movies, and they were largely riddled with cliches, unoriginal, and despite big budgets pretty shoddy looking overall. The Incredibles is certainly a good film still and carries a lot of strengths that sets itself apart from the majority of the films that have flooded the market since, but it's pretty crazy to look back at how much the genre has changed and been elevated in the 14 years since. I mean hell, when The Incredibles was released we hadn't even seen Batman Begins yet let alone the Marvel Cinematic Universe. The stakes have been raised and the genre has gone from being mostly mediocre fare to the biggest critical and commercial successes of the last decade. So while it's not imperative that The Incredibles adapt to this changed landscape (which has largely occurred due to the efforts of its same parent company), it is curious to see what it'll bring to the table on its own merit. Coupled with the fact that, other than the Toy Story franchise, Pixar's sequels have never come close to living up to the originals, Incredibles 2 certainly has quite a lot to stack up against. Does it succeed? Yes and no. Incredibles 2 certainly is highly entertaining and hilarious and does hint at some interesting thematic ideas, but it also doesn't bring anything new to the table and does feel a little behind the times given the influx of superhero fare recently. Fourteen years to come up with a highly predictable, albeit fun, film doesn't help its case either, and while no one is going to be upset at what Brad Bird has delivered here a decade-and-a-half later, it's not exactly all that we could have hoped for either.
The film picks up essentially where the original left off, where despite the efforts of our titular superhero family, using superpowers is deemed illegal. This doesn't stop them though, as the opening sequence is a funny, thrilling reintroduction to the family as they battle The Underminer (very clever) and ultimately bring vast amounts of damage to the city. Despite their protests, Mr. Incredible (Craig T. Nelson) and Elastigirl (Holly Hunter) must return to a life of normalcy and surrender using their powers. That is until they're approached by a supportive entrepreneur, Winston Deavor (Bob Oedenkirk), and his tech-savvy sister, Evelyn (Catherine Keener). Winston is infatuated with superheroes, in part out of tribute to his late father who had interactions with the original superheroes and was their biggest advocate, and wants to not only get superheroes legalized but wants to entirely change the public perception surrounding them. How? Transparency in the form of body-cams (is Bird making a police officer parallel with this?) so that instead of just the destructive aftermaths of their bouts, the public is watching everything our heroes must go through and thus will gain an appreciation for them again. Much to Mr. Incredible's surprise, Winston wants Elastigirl to spearhead the initiative and be the one who the public reconnects with. This is a very nice twist on things, as Mr. Incredible is tasked with taking care of Violet (Sarah Vowell), Dash (Huck Milner), and baby Jack-Jack (Eli Fucile) and running the home front while Elastigirl handles the superhero work. All of this feels very organic, not a case of anyone pandering towards political correctness but rather a realistic portrayal of a shift in the times and one that I found worked very well, not just thematically but comedically as well. Soon after, a villain named the Screenslayer emerges, a villain who possesses the ability to hypnotize others, mostly through forms of media that seek to derail the efforts of Elastigirl, and begins building an army of mind controlled heroes. All of this, including the villain's identity, plays out in predictable fashion unfortunately, and a lot of the larger ideas and themes are mostly pushed aside in favor of comic book action in the film's climax, but Incredibles 2 proves itself to be a highly entertaining return despite these shortcomings.
So no, Incredibles 2 is not a game changer, nor does it adapt itself entirely well after fourteen years to bring us a story that feels as fresh as the original, but fortunately it has an incredible charm and witty humor that will make most audiences not care. The movie is filled with one hilarious comedic scenario after another, the constant highlight being anytime Jack-Jack is on screen. To say the character is a scene stealer is an understatement, and a moment in particular where he unleashes the full extent of his powers against a raccoon is sure to make any viewer laugh with delight. Pixar is the only company that makes family entertainment that I regularly seek out because they truly offer something for everyone with their films, and Incredibles 2 is certainly no exception. Any parent can relate to Mr. Incredible struggling with late night math homework sessions, teenage daughters dealing with boys, or even the gender dynamic of dealing with his wife being the bread winner. There's a lot of humor and genuine family moments throughout the film, and while again I harp on the film not exploring these ideas with enough vigor, you can't deny the film of having its heart in the right place. The film never takes the risks it should, nor does it feel like the bigger sequel (the original actually has a lot more scope to it overall) and seems content to wade through predictability, but Incredibles 2 will easily skate by for most viewers enamored with the long overdue return to the big screen for these characters and the onslaught of hilarious scenarios. Incredibles 2 hasn't adapted strongly enough to this new superhero world it finds itself in, but it's certainly a cut above any Pixar sequel not named Toy Story and solidifies itself as a worthy enough successor to the original.
7/10
|
|
FShuttari
CS! Bronze
Join Date: Jan 2005
SPIDEY do! What SPIDEY DOES!
Posts: 14,031
Likes: 225
Location:
Last Online Nov 18, 2024 14:51:59 GMT -5
|
Post by FShuttari on Jun 18, 2018 22:34:19 GMT -5
Might be my favorite Pixar movie in a while.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,788
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 12:00:25 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jun 19, 2018 2:05:40 GMT -5
SnoBorderZero and those hyperboles! Aside from Infinity War, the superhero genre is incredibly generic these days. You've seen one Marvel movie, you’ve seen them all. You’ve seen one DC movie, you’ve seen them all. At least the superhero movies of the 2000’s had DIRECTORS attached to them. Sam Raimi. Bryan Singer. Ang Lee. Guillermo Del Toro. Even when the movies weren’t good at least they were different and interesting. There was variety.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Jun 19, 2018 14:05:56 GMT -5
SnoBorderZero and those hyperboles! Aside from Infinity War, the superhero genre is incredibly generic these days. You've seen one Marvel movie, you’ve seen them all. You’ve seen one DC movie, you’ve seen them all. At least the superhero movies of the 2000’s had DIRECTORS attached to them. Sam Raimi. Bryan Singer. Ang Lee. Guillermo Del Toro. Even when the movies weren’t good at least they were different and interesting. There was variety. I didn't say that the superhero genre doesn't still pump out fairly generic material, what I was saying is that the landscape has changed drastically since 2004, hence why I mentioned Batman Begins and the MCU hadn't even come out at that point. Those movies might not be game changers narrative wise, but they certainly have a lot more up their sleeves than anything Incredibles 2 presented. I liked the film, but its predictability and lack of sizable scope feels even more glaring after we've been subjected to as many superhero films as we have since the original's release.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,529
Likes: 3,133
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 0:56:23 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jun 21, 2018 16:47:01 GMT -5
It's lacking a little in the emotional department in comparison to the first one, but I still enjoyed the hell out of this movie.
|
|
Wyldstaar
Producer
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,900
Likes: 1,267
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 7:55:31 GMT -5
|
Post by Wyldstaar on Jun 24, 2018 0:42:21 GMT -5
Great movie, as expected. There were some weird Easter Eggs in there. Judging by the credits, I missed a couple. Some were obvious, but there were a couple that were hard to spot. I caught the "Quest" name on one of the buildings being in the exact same font as Jonny Quest. This occurrence is completely independent of the clip from said cartoon used in the film. The sound effect the Incred-ibile made just before it went into the bay was taken straight from the Batmobile in Batman '66.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,649
Likes: 4,066
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 11:13:25 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Jun 29, 2018 11:33:44 GMT -5
After 14 years and a slew of superhero movies since, Brad Bird has finally brought the world's favourite superhero family to the big-screen with Incredibles 2. The results are pretty good on the whole, but I also can't shake the moderate taste of disappointment. Starting with the good, the classic characters still really pop. It took me a bit to get used to the fact that Craig T. Nelson's voice has very clearly aged since the original (substantial given this takes place immediately after The Incredibles ends), but he remains an endearing character and Holly Hunter's Elastigirl is given a real chance to shine here. The action sequences are also, by and large, excellent. It's telling that in an era where we get multiple superhero movies every year that Bird and the folks at Pixar can still deliver set-pieces that leave most of their competition in the dust. Not only does animation allow for a greater degree of fluidity and speed, but the filmmakers are also very creative with the scenarios and the usage of powers, particularly Elastigirl's stretching abilities. The movie also has a pretty good sense of humour for the most part. At least I laughed a fair bit.
So what doesn't work? Well, I wouldn't call anything here straight-up bad, but there are definitely some weak points. The most obvious is almost certainly sheer predictability. As soon as the plot kicks in, it's abundantly clear who the villain is, what they want, and generally, how things are gonna play out. Things were so obvious in fact, that I kept hoping this was all a red-herring and Bird had something special up his sleeve, but no, things are exactly what you think they are. To Bird's credit, the villain's motivation does work, but I wish they had something a bit more special planned. This leads into what is probably the film's biggest flaw; on a narrative level, it's just another superhero movie. For all the film's creative action and likable characters, the actual storyline is largely a by the numbers superhero tale that most comic-book readers have likely seen dozens of variations on. It's not a bad telling exactly, but it is very ordinary. It's especially disappointing considering how fresh and new the original Incredibles felt, merging family drama, Watchmen, and even James Bondian espionage and intrigue into one tight package.
There are other things about the film that irked me. At one point, a new team of younger superheroes are introduced and their design looked like it came from a different movie. These clowns looked like a Dreamsworks rip-off of The Incredibles rather than characters in a full-fledged sequel. To the film's credit they are somewhat meant to be a scrappier and inexperienced team, but the look the filmmakers went with is ultimately too jarring. I also found the filmmakers went a bit too far with the comedy involving Jack-Jack. This is likely a personal point as my theater was filled with laughter when he was on screen, but the film goes to such ridiculous extremes when Jack-Jack's on screen and the schtick eventually wore thin.
So overall, what is there to say about Incredibles 2. Well, it is a very entertaining movie, with lots of humour, strong characters, and enough creative action to give audiences their money's worth. It's also a film I've hardly thought about since seeing it less than a week ago. This compared to the original Incredibles, which is still imprinted deep in my brain. Maybe it's a case of the sequel having to unfairly live up to its predecessor and this will grow on me in time, but as of now, Incredibles 2 is pretty firmly in the good but not great camp.
B
|
|
Pbar
Camera Operator
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 269
Likes: 137
Location:
Last Online May 24, 2020 23:12:18 GMT -5
|
Post by Pbar on Jun 29, 2018 21:08:55 GMT -5
This might be my favorite superhero franchise.
|
|
Frizzo the Clown
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2001
Whats That Smell?
Posts: 37,930
Likes: 586
Location:
Last Online Nov 11, 2024 7:10:31 GMT -5
|
Post by Frizzo the Clown on Jul 1, 2018 19:20:22 GMT -5
I was sitting in the theater with my family today watching this movie, when I realized just how young I was when I saw the first one. I was 26, and now I'm a month shy from 40. I felt so old.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,105
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on Jul 2, 2018 22:53:08 GMT -5
The Incredibles 2(7/1/2018)
The Incredibles is certainly not the best Pixar movie but it’s almost certainly one of their most important ones. It’s the first movie where the studio was willing to work with human characters in earnest and it was also the movie where they started to expand their scope and aim their sights on slightly older audiences. That movie still resonates but it was released way back in 2004, which in the world of animated movies is kind of an eternity. That’s fourteen years, meaning that a kid who saw it in its original release at ten years old would be twenty-four now, and yet in this whole timespan Pixar never saw fit to make a sequel, which is odd given that it seemed more suited for one than a lot of the other movies they seemed to have no qualms about mining for additional installments. After all, the first film ended on something of a teaser for future installments and given the film’s debt to comic books, which are an inherently serialized medium made The Incredibles seem like perfect franchise material. Part of the delay might simply be the aversion that Pixar once had to unnecessary sequels, but that certainly hasn’t been part of their philosophy in a good ten years. It also might have simply been a matter of working around director Brad Bird’s schedule as he branched out into live action filmmaking with varying degrees of success. Really though I think a big part of why there was a delay is that the first movie benefited greatly from coming out before Hollywood was regularly making high quality superhero movies and they were waiting in vain for the superhero genre to die down a bit in Hollywood, but that clearly wasn’t happening anytime soon so they decided to finally give it ago with this year’s The Incredibles 2.
This sequel picks up almost instantly from where the original film left off, with the moleman-like supervillain The Underminer (John Ratzenberger) emerging from the ground and trying to rob a bank, leading The Incredibles along with Frozone (Samuel L Jackson) to launch an attack despite the laws against masked vigilantism still being on the books. While they do stop the attack the fight does leave a lot of the same collateral damage that got “supers” banned in the first place. However, one person is not outraged by this and that’s a billionaire named Winston Deavor (Bob Odenkirk) who has been a superhero enthusiast since the death of his father years ago. He calls Mr. Incredible (Craig T. Nelson) and Elastigirl (Holly Hunter) and offers to let them stay in one of his mansions if they work with him on a lobbying campaign to bring back costumed heroes. The catch, he wants this campaign to start slow and just have Elastigirl do the crime fighting at first given that he has less of a history of destructive fighting. That means Mr. Incredible is the one tasked with staying home and watching Violet (Sarah Vowell), Dash (Huck Milner), and baby Jack-Jack (Eli Fucile) whose powers are just starting to come into full bloom. Mr. Incredible says he’s game to do this, but in reality he kind of resents this turn of events and doesn’t really know how to cope with the domestic life. Of course he is self-aware enough not to complain about this to Elastigirl, who finds she has her hands full when a mysterious villain called The Screenslaver emerges and begins wrecking-havoc.
Ever since the release of the original The Incredibles people have been debating whether the message as its center about what society owes to the exceptional people among them ultimately boils down to a sort of junior version of Randian Objectivism. This sequel doesn’t exactly continue down that path but it doesn’t exactly shy away from material that could be viewed as political. For instance there’s a story the Bob Odenkirk character tells at one point about someone who’s killed by an intruder as he calls for a superhero instead of dealing with the problem himself, which is disturbingly similar to the NRA propaganda about the dangers of relying on police instead of personal gun ownership. On the other side of the spectrum there’s some talk about the “supers” in the family having to hide their true selves, which could be seen as something of an allegory for gay or trans identity. But the plotline that most overtly and extensively deals with ongoing modern debates is the Mr. Incredible’s ennui at the process of being a sort of stay at home dad while his wife wears the pants… I mean costume… and Elastigirl’s own anxiety about trying to “have it all” instead of maintaining more of a work/life balance. This is a storyline that I suspect will annoy people who sit on both sides of the feminist divide. On one hand the movie certainly ultimately falls on the side of Elastigirl being perfectly capable of pursuing a career on her own and of not guilting her for her decision to do so, but on the other hand it feels kind of lame and regressive that we’re still doing the whole Mr. Mom thing in 2018 and the fact that Mr. Incredible proves to be this incompetent at keeping a house in order without the help of a woman does kind of reinforce the gender norm at play.
Messaging aside, the way the film splits into a separate A story with Elastigirl tracking down the Screen Slaver and a B story with Mr. Incredible holding things down at home does lead to a bit of a clumsy and slightly TVish story structure for a lot of its runtime before things merge later on. What’s more each of these stories have their weakness. The Elastigirl story doesn’t have anything jarringly poor in it but it also feels a bit routine as far as these things go. The mystery about who the screenslaver is isn’t terribly compelling and the film doesn’t really do as much with the idea of a superhero going on a PR campaign as it could. The Mr. Incredible story by contrast feels a lot more unique in that you don’t exactly see every day but it did draw attention to one of the series bigger weaknesses: the Incredibles kids are not very well drawn out. Violet is a pretty cliché over-dramatic teenage girl and Dash is even more thinly drawn and doesn’t do much in the film besides get overly excited about stuff. He’s frankly kind of annoying. The movie also has slightly more clumsy animation than I was expecting from a new Pixar movie, possibly because the art style they devised back in 2004 was designed to work around the limitations of the technology of the time but which may be more of a stifling force today.
I’ve complained a lot but the movie is actually a lot better than I’ve probably let on. In fact I enjoyed it quite a bit while I was actually watching it and it’s more when I look back on it that if feels a bit more flawed and insubstantial. What probably saves it are its action set-pieces and its sense of humor. It’s no secret that in terms of powers and to some extent the overall concept The Incredibles are basically a ripoff of The Fantastic Four and it uses this set of powers a lot more creatively than any of the real adaptations of that property ever have and the animation medium makes all the fights seem a lot more loose and fun than a lot of the action scenes in “real” superhero movies do even if they don’t have quite the same sense of spectacle that you get from seeing these powers in more realistic settings. The film also has a generally amusing tone and some of the comic elements like Edna Mode remain strong. Watched with tempered expectations the film is quite fun but the fact that it’s a movie fourteen years in the making kind of makes you expect a bit more than the film is really able to deliver on. It certainly isn’t going to have the impact of the original movie but I suspect it will leave most audiences satisfied enough.
*** out of Five
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,496
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 7:41:09 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Jul 3, 2018 11:17:41 GMT -5
According to my nephew, this is scarier than the new jurassic park movie.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,105
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on Jul 3, 2018 12:20:13 GMT -5
According to my nephew, this is scarier than the new jurassic park movie. The short at the beginning is certainly more disturbing than anything in any Jurassic Park movie.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Jul 3, 2018 13:19:13 GMT -5
I loved that short film, thought it was fantastic.
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Jul 3, 2018 13:51:18 GMT -5
It made me hungry, that's for damn sure.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,105
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on Jul 3, 2018 14:10:02 GMT -5
I loved that short film, thought it was fantastic. Hated it, thought the characters in it all looked hideous and thought the basic high concept was weird and unpleasant.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Jul 3, 2018 14:12:06 GMT -5
Really? I thought it was a very interesting way to delve into a mother losing her son, only for him to later come to realize family is the most important thing and return home to rekindle his relationship with his mother.
Had a lot more to it than Incredibles 2 did, that's for sure.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,105
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on Jul 3, 2018 14:30:55 GMT -5
Really? I thought it was a very interesting way to delve into a mother losing her son, only for him to later come to realize family is the most important thing and return home to rekindle his relationship with his mother. Had a lot more to it than Incredibles 2 did, that's for sure. That was presumably the idea, but the dumpling child idea was such a non-starter for me that I kind of don't care.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Jul 3, 2018 14:48:00 GMT -5
Ha, well that's fair, I really liked the short but it was certainly out there.
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,947
Likes: 2,017
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 9:16:27 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Jul 3, 2018 15:29:50 GMT -5
Fantastic short. Decent movie. Enjoyable. 14 years in the making maybe raised my expectations.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,788
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 12:00:25 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 6, 2018 14:04:35 GMT -5
|
|