SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,627
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 16:07:49 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Mar 26, 2018 0:17:10 GMT -5
One of the favorite pastimes of cinephiles around the world is to engage in the great debate of who the best directors of all time are and why. Generally beyond making superb films, the filmmakers' work embodies a general style that makes it uniquely them. Even those who scoff at auteur theory can't deny that the debate largely is intwined with the styles, methods, tropes that the most revered directors all bring to their respective works. While this style isn't always easy to describe or point out with some filmmakers, there are other cases where the films are so largely "theirs" that they essentially supersede the genre they're supposed to be working in. Sure, Django Unchained is a western, but it's much more a Tarantino film than a genre pic. Yes, Blue Velvet is a thriller of sorts, but it's far better simplistically described as David Lynch. One of the most recognizable contemporary directors style-wise is Wes Anderson, who has brought a unique, meticulous, and hilarious voice to film that's completely his own. While his style really came into its own with The Royal Tenenbaums, his debut feature Bottle Rocket displayed a great skill at the pragmatic but playful framing and obtuse dialogue between oddballs that would become his signatures. I can completely understand why Anderson's hipster-ode flicks aren't for everyone, but there's no denying that his meticulous vision for filling the frame isn't impressive or at the very least interesting. He's a filmmaker who tells stories by playing with so many cinematic devices, both paying homage and mocking them, that I find myself admiring the quirky aesthetics he throws in there rather than be turned off by them. Whether it's title cards or an omniscient narrator, Anderson's diverse use of the cinematic language is a lot of fun to see come together for sight gags and plot devices. For me, it's always been a treat to see Anderson playfully utilize mostly antiquated storytelling techniques in film and meshing them together with the energy that he does. Anderson has never been shy about exploring any and every element of film to inject into his own work, but even for him it was interesting when he made the leap to animation with the stop-motion film Fantastic Mr. Fox. The film was universally praised, and despite the move from live action lost none of Anderson's style and sharp humor. Much to the film world's delight was that Anderson's latest film, Isle of Dogs, would also be stop-motion animated while also arguably proving to be Anderson's most ambitious project yet. Isle of Dogs centers around a somewhat futuristic Japan that has banished all dogs to Trash Island, where they are to live out the rest of their days. The dogs have all contracted a dog flu, and the cat worshipping and corrupt Mayor Kobayashi (Kunichi Nomura) wants them completely removed from Japan. On Trash Island, the dogs must roam the dump for scraps while forlornly living out the rest of their days. We're soon introduced to a group of dogs containing Chief (Bryan Cranston), Rex (Edward Norton), Duke (Jeff Goldblum), and Boss (Bill Murray). Chief is the leader of the group, a hardened stray who is used to this harsh life of survival and holds a staunch grudge towards humans, called here "masters". After a comical encounter with another group of dogs, Chief and company witness an airplane crash onto the island. It's soon revealed to be the ward of Mayor Kobayashi, eleven-year-old Atari (Koyu Rankin), who has escaped to the island in order to find his banished dog, Spots (Liev Schriber). From here, Atari and the dogs embark on a quest filled with robot dogs, scientists attempting to cure the dog flu, student activists led by a foreign exchange student (Greta Gerwig), and lots of rumors from Duke. It's all as fun and ridiculous as it sounds, and while it feels overstuffed at times, Isle of Dogs is Anderson in full control of his craft and utilizes Japanese-inspired cinema and culture to create a unique experience even by his standards. The film, as is told in a disclaimer at the beginning, has everyone speaking in their native tongues other than the dogs, whose barks have been "translated" into English for us. The Japanese characters though speak in Japanese throughout the film with very few subtitles. It's a choice that works very well, especially since we're mostly following the dogs' point of views for most of the film, and leads to some very funny moments as a result. This does however lead to what I found was the film's biggest weakness in focusing too much on the humans in the film and not nearly enough on the dogs, especially near the film's end. Greta Gerwig's character didn't work for me in generating laughs or contributing anything to the plot. It seemed like everything going on with her attempting to uncover corruption that we as the viewer already know exists felt irrelevant, and Anderson oddly forgoes our main group of dogs besides Chief for Gerwig's character as the film progresses. Atari's story also dominates the second half of the film, and while he is the driving force of the plot, the struggle between he and his uncle aren't interesting or entertaining enough to replace the dogs on Trash Island. Like I am with a lot of Anderson's films, I don't feel that the plot unfolds as well as it could have, and a lot of that simply has to do with the numerous amount of characters the film juggles in a brisk running time. A character that could have benefited from having a lot more screen time was Nutmeg (Scarlett Johansson), a former show dog who serves as the love interest of Chief. She's introduced briefly, has a scene with Chief, and then is cast aside until the end of the film. I'm not sure why Anderson didn't divulge more time to the dogs themselves and rewarded running time to these largely uninteresting human characters, but it's not a decision that I feel worked as well as it could have. Despite these minor issues though, Isle of Dogs marks another incredibly impressive entry in Anderson's filmography. The animation is incredible, with the dogs' fur gently moving in the wind, or the seamless blending of hand drawn work incorporated with the puppets, it's all marvelously put together and more ambitious than the stellar work on Fantastic Mr. Fox. It's a medium that has proved to serve Anderson's patient, meticulous style well. There are also wonderfully clever nods to Japanese cinema throughout the film. The use of title cards and subtitles, the tatami mat shots, and deep focus framing all work incredibly well and help to play up Anderson's most absurd examinations of the culture in tasteful fashion. Like Anderson's previous films, Isle of Dogs is loaded with an onslaught of jokes coming in every form imaginable. Even those who are generally iffy about Anderson's comedy in live action will find a lot to enjoy here, especially thanks to the film's incredible voice cast which truly give each character an identity. Jeff Goldblum's Duke continually drops "rumors" throughout the film, Edward Norton's Rex combats Chief at every turn, Bill Murray's Boss longs for the days of being a baseball team's mascot. Though I again decry Anderson's decision to mostly forget about these characters later in the film, they are hilariously utilized while they are onscreen together. In a way I almost don't know what else there is for me to talk about without spoiling anything. You know Anderson's game at this point; the whip pans, the smooth tracking shots, the silly sight gags in the background, the narrator, the quirky characters, the chapters, the title cards, everything. If you aren't enthralled with Anderson, Isle of Dogs is unlikely to change your opinion as it may in some ways be his most, well, Wes Anderson yet. And yet Isle of Dogs also feels like one of his most accessible films, where the humor being delivered by dog puppets doesn't feel as snarky as when it's coming from Jason Schwartzman in live action. Isle of Dogs isn't without its issues as a result of Anderson overstuffing the movie, and it's not likely to convert any Anderson detractors, but for those who are like me and delight in seeing the bold style and pragmatic detail that he brings to each of his works, Isle of Dogs is exactly the dose of Wes Anderson that we've been missing for the last four years. 8/10
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,105
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on Apr 5, 2018 15:18:48 GMT -5
Isle of Dogs(3/28/2018) Over the years I’ve made it known in various reviews of family movies that I kind of hate children. However, it should probably be known that my grumpiness does not end there, I also hate dogs! In fact I hate dogs way more than I dislike children, who will at least grow up to be something less annoying one day while dogs will always be dogs. I’ve never owned a dog even while I was younger and everything about owning one seems like a pain in the ass. You have to walk them everywhere, clean up all their shit, and listen to them bark all the time. I have no desire to own a cat either but that seems like a much more reasonable prospects as they can pretty much take care of themselves outside of feedings and litterbox cleaning. But really what annoys me about dogs is the way they seem to turn their owners into crazy people. The way some of these “dog lovers” talk they seem completely delusional about how much these animals care about them. They’ve got it in their heads that these creatures actually “love” them rather than that they’re doing what they’ve been trained to do over the centuries in order to get food from humans. All this is to say that when I learned that director Wes Anderson was going to follow up The Grand Budapest Hotel with a stop-motion animated movie about an island full of talking dogs I found myself groaning a little as I could easily picture how easily that could turn into cutesy nonsense, but Wes Anderson has made groan-inducing ideas work before so I was willing to give it a shot.
Wes Anderson’s films generally don’t take place in realistic universes even when he has regular actors in them but when he goes for animation he really goes all out and this is not an exception. The film takes place in an imagined near-future Japan where the dog population had become so out of control and afflicted by diseases that the mayor (Kunichi Nomura) signed an order to have all the dogs removed and sent to an uninhabited island filled with garbage and the first dog to go is his own family dog Spots (Liev Schreiber). From there we flash-forward and start following a group of dogs consisting of Rex (Edward Norton), King (Bob Balaban), Duke (Jeff Goldblum), Boss (Bill Murray), and Chief (Bryan Cranston). Of those five Chief is kind of the odd ma… dog out as he was a stray dog before ending up on the island and has always rejected the notion that dogs should be obedient servants to humans. The action really kicks off when a twelve year old boy named Atari Kobayashi (Koyu Rankin), the adopted son of the aforementioned mayor Kobayashi, flies a small airplane to the Isle of Dogs in search of his beloved Spots and meets up with the film’s main group of canines who decide to help him out on his quest, which of course proves to be more dangerous than they expect.
Wes Anderson’s previous film to use stop-motion animation was of course his 2009 film Fantastic Mr. Fox, a movie that was generally liked by critics but was a box office disappointment. I think where the studio went wrong marketing that movie was that they hoped that it was going to cross over to the traditional family film market more than it did, which was probably a mistake because the central joke of that movie, showing animals talking and acting like yuppies, was kind of going to go over the heads of most young people. Personally, I liked that movie for the most part but that one joke it goes for over and over again did start to wear on me after a while and I ultimately think it’s a lesser Wes Anderson because of it. This follow-up also has some of that “animals talk like human hipsters” joke as well, especially when Chief interacts with a lady dog named Nutmeg (Scarlett Johansson), but there is a bit more going on in this one on top of that. The movie is a lot more interested in the ways that animals interact with humans than Fantastic Mr. Fox did, likely owing to the fact that this is about domestic rather than wild animals and it also comes up with more fantastical world-building owing to the fact that it’s set in this odd sort of dystopian Japan.
The Japan depicted in the film is of course a rather fantastical version of the country, in much the way that The Grand Budapest Hotel was set in a sort of pastiche of pre-war Europe rather than the actual nation of Hungary. I don’t think there’s necessarily anything intrinsically Japanese baked into this story about dogs being sent to islands, but Anderson’s fascination with the country clearly gives the movie a lot of its flavor. Some of the film’s logic about all of this is a bit inconsistent. A title card early on suggests that the film’s Japanese characters will speak entirely in their native language without subtitles unless translated by a third party, which is interesting but the movie so frequently finds exceptions to this rule that I kind of wonder why they bothered. It’s also a bit odd that Anderson chose to make all his dog characters into essentially American characters by giving them names like Spots and Duke and having them voiced by Americans even though they’re theoretically supposed to be Japanese dogs. The film also plays a bit fast and loose with how able certain characters, especially Atari are able to interact with these dogs and understand the human-like intelligence that Anderson has opted to give them.
I do wonder to some extent what Anderson is trying to say with this movie, if anything. If you look at it sideways you could see something of an allegory in it to the Trump era in that mayor Kobayashi is essentially deporting these dogs and claiming to be doing so for some semi-sensible reasons while actually just being prejudiced against them because of his association with an ancient cat-loving samurai clan. A lot of that is a bit in the background though and its foreground stories are a little more curious, namely Chief’s arc in which he rejects humanity only to then allow himself to become a servant to Atari in Spots’ place. I would think that if Anderson was trying to afford human-like intelligence and dignity to these dogs that this story of a dog coming to accept this role as a servant to a human. Maybe that’s supposed to be an allegory for “settling down” but the power dynamics of such a relationship is a bit different… or maybe that’s just the dog hater in me not finding this as cute as a normal person would.
Ultimately my final verdict on this comes down more to form than to message. I generally like Wes Anderson’s early films like Rushmore and The Royal Tenenbaums the best, which are different from some of his later movies in that his style came more from film grammar, music selection, and acting choices than from elaborate set decoration and world-building and the more successful he gets the more he’s been enabled to make these heavily constructed films like The Life Aquatic and The Grand Budapest Hotel which feel increasingly detached from the real world. Now don’t get me wrong, I do still like those movies and admire their audacity but I do still kind of miss that other Wes Anderson that we haven’t really seen since Moonrise Kingdom. These stop-motion films are like that problem but turned up to eleven and are even further removed from the Wes Anderson I want. But I would probably be doing myself a disservice by pining for Wes Anderson to deliver what I want from him rather than enjoying what he’s actually interested in delivering and there’s plenty to enjoy in Isle of Dogs.
***1/2 out of Five
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,306
Likes: 6,770
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 15:57:39 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Apr 9, 2018 23:32:38 GMT -5
Two posts by two of the best reviewers on this forum and neither of you mention the Seven Samurai score that's heavily featured?
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,105
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on Apr 10, 2018 6:00:25 GMT -5
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,947
Likes: 2,017
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 14:15:22 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Apr 13, 2018 8:18:26 GMT -5
Solid not great. Enjoyable to watch and overall quite cute. Some weird decisions though. The use of Japanese cultural generalizations was kinda off putting at times if I'm honest.
Ain't the best but I feel like we have already seen peak Anderson and everything from here on out is kind of a rehash.
6/10
|
|
daniel
Producer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,072
Likes: 245
Location:
Last Online Mar 13, 2022 22:49:30 GMT -5
|
Post by daniel on Apr 15, 2018 0:44:34 GMT -5
Some caucasian SJW Facebook acquaintances were very angered by this movie and said it was blatantly racist when depicting Japanese culture. Haven't seen it yet, so I don't know how valid that is.
|
|
Dhamon22
Studio Head
Join Date: Jan 2008
Upon Further Review...
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 45
Location:
Last Online Dec 27, 2021 10:13:04 GMT -5
|
Post by Dhamon22 on Apr 19, 2018 8:49:13 GMT -5
Its no Fantastic Mr. Fox but I enjoyed it quite a bit.
8/10
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,105
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on May 2, 2018 20:55:17 GMT -5
So, I only just recently had the play of words in the title of this thing pointed out to me... am I the only one who was missing that this whole time? Or was it truly that obvious?
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,649
Likes: 4,066
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 11:13:25 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on May 2, 2018 21:33:27 GMT -5
So, I only just recently had the play of words in the title of this thing pointed out to me... am I the only one who was missing that this whole time? Or was it truly that obvious? I didn't notice right away, but before seeing the movie I saw someone mention the title was a bit of wordplay and clued in.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,649
Likes: 4,066
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 11:13:25 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Feb 17, 2019 10:50:06 GMT -5
I like Wes Anderson a lot, but I tend to lean towards his more grounded efforts. The Royal Tenenbaums, Moonrise Kingdom, and Rushmore are easily my top three films in Anderson's filmography, and that's largely because for all their eccentric quirks, they're rooted in very relatable and flawed people trying to better themselves. These are the movies that I return to and that stick with me the most. That's not to say I don't also love his more constructed efforts like The Grand Budapest Hotel, which is fucking hilarious, but I found the more absurd Wes gets, the less meaningful his characters are. As such, while I was looking forward to Isle of Dogs, I didn't find myself brimming with anticipation.
Wes Anderson always builds his own worlds and Isle of Dogs pushes this ability even further. Set in a near future Japan, the film presents a hodge-podge city which draws from feudal Japan, modern Japan, and some vaguely sci-fi elements. Trash Island, meanwhile, is a desolate wasteland with some industrial elements, but much of this is underscored by certain Anderson whimsy. Indeed, the stop-motion is reminiscent of old Rankin and Bass shorts (albeit of much higher animation quality) and there's some amusing cartoony effects like clouds of smoke when the dogs scrap, though the film is also upfront about its violence. Its generally a joy to just explore the world Anderson has created. The actual logistics of things aren't really fleshed out, but the film is more about enjoying the unique vision and tone than it is the details. Furthermore, Anderson has populated his world with a wonderful collection of regulars. A lot of Anderson regulars like Bill Murray and Jeff Goldblum can be recognized, and the cast is indeed huge, but everyone here feels like a legit character. Even characters who only have one scene are given enough to make a unique impression.
In addition to the charming animation, the film also features an excellent score from Alexandre Desplat which goes a long way in bringing legitimacy to the adventure and the film's center. Kudos as well for the occasional uses of the Seven Samurai theme, which definitely brought a smile to my face. All of this inventive and charming filmmaking is in support of a story which, on paper, is merely serviceable, but ends up working pretty well. The basic journey wherein a stay dog who doesn't like humans and a twelve year old boy come to bond over their journey is the kind of set-up you might see in a conventional family movie, but it does feel genuine here. Bryan Cranston deserves a lot of credit for this, as his vocal work goes along way to endear us to Chief and his arc. This is also one of those cases where the style here adds to the substance. Though the basic storyline is standard, the sheer passion that Anderson and company bring to the filmmaking does add a sense of authenticity to the story. There's just so much heart to every frame of Isle of Dogs and that does extend to how the story is told. Simple, sure, but it does feel sincere.
Overall, I enjoyed Isle of Dogs a whole lot. It's a delightful movie that you're not likely to see from anyone else that demonstrates a clear love of cinema, both in its references to Kurosawa, but more generally, in the sheer craft that went into putting this together. But I feel I should circle back to my original comments about separating Anderson's more grounded films and his more extravagant. Ultimately, much as Isle of Dogs did rise above my expectations, I do still see it as lesser Anderson. For all its charms, nothing touched me as profoundly as some of Anderson's best and while it is quite funny, it's not the outright laugh riot that is The Grand Budapest Hotel. The subplot involving the foreign exchange student is a bit weak and while there's some interesting details to the story that echo real life terrors of governments using fear mongering to attack marginalized populations, that's all mostly background. Still, being second tier Wes Anderson is still pretty damn good, and a lot more interesting than you're likely to see from any other animated film for some time.
A-
|
|