Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Mar 9, 2015 10:18:39 GMT -5
Dredd is one example of a type of action movie; it's hardly "hard" science-fiction. Futurama is more challenging than Dredd. The Stallone Dredd is more sci-fi than the new Dredd.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,492
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:37:07 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Mar 9, 2015 19:22:02 GMT -5
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 12, 2015 22:49:29 GMT -5
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Apr 13, 2015 20:03:51 GMT -5
Cool. Great to see Brazil so high.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 9:16:00 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2015 20:10:40 GMT -5
It's a little surprising to see Blade Runner at number eight.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,645
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Apr 13, 2015 21:58:31 GMT -5
I swear I commented on this. I'm shocked to see Fantastic Voyage so high given the extensive plot holes.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 9:16:00 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2015 22:14:41 GMT -5
Keep in mind these are scientists, not film critics. They were probably examining the science behind it, not the technical perfection.
|
|
Fanible
Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2002
I peered into the vastness and saw nothing. Felt nothing.
Posts: 19,184
Likes: 788
Location:
Last Online Nov 6, 2024 0:31:29 GMT -5
|
Post by Fanible on Apr 14, 2015 13:54:41 GMT -5
I would say the opposite. While I would enjoy that kind of list, where they picked the movies for their grounds in science (and would probably have more meaning in this case), this looks more like a simple favorites list, where those who picked them just happened to be scientists.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,645
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Apr 14, 2015 17:44:26 GMT -5
Keep in mind these are scientists, not film critics. They were probably examining the science behind it, not the technical perfection. But a lot of the plot holes are rooted in science. Isaac Asimov did the novelization and had to change a bunch of details for it to tighten everything up.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,492
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:37:07 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Apr 14, 2015 19:37:05 GMT -5
Fantastic Voyage is surprising. The scientist in me reeled a lot at that movie.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 14, 2015 20:02:36 GMT -5
Fantastic Voyage is shit, but it inspired countless spoofs.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Apr 14, 2015 20:54:53 GMT -5
I'll admit, it's kind of stupid by today's standards.
Fantastic premise though. There's a reason everyone parodies it.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 16, 2015 15:45:26 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 9:16:00 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 16, 2015 16:31:15 GMT -5
"Alice's kinky adventures in Wonderland"
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 16, 2015 17:40:23 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 9:16:00 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 16, 2015 19:38:57 GMT -5
Keep in mind these are scientists, not film critics. They were probably examining the science behind it, not the technical perfection. But a lot of the plot holes are rooted in science. Isaac Asimov did the novelization and had to change a bunch of details for it to tighten everything up. Even then--to note another movie with a gaping plot-hole--if The Matrix were looked at more closely, you would also notice that the whole idea of the "human battery" is ridiculous and pretty unscientific. It's done for dramatic effect.
|
|
Fanible
Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2002
I peered into the vastness and saw nothing. Felt nothing.
Posts: 19,184
Likes: 788
Location:
Last Online Nov 6, 2024 0:31:29 GMT -5
|
Post by Fanible on Apr 16, 2015 20:40:21 GMT -5
That was kinda my point. These movies seem more like their favorites, and not necessarily because of their science.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,492
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:37:07 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Apr 17, 2015 7:57:50 GMT -5
So what is Sting? Man myth or monster?
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on May 3, 2015 20:11:28 GMT -5
CYBORG (1989)For those of us who grew up with Van Damme in the late 80's and 1990's, Cyborg was his strangest movie. People don't associate Van Damme with post-apocalyptic sci-fi movies featuring a cyborg. And the weirdest part of all is the scene where he's crucified. Seriously! Doomsday SnoBorderZero PG CooperBut I have to admit that Cyborg has its charm. It's about Van Damme having to rescue a cyborg from an over-the-top villain and then taking the cyborg to a place where its information can save the world. The movie's budget is only $500,000 but the filmmakers found ways to make it work. The action and fight scenes are simple and well-done. The effects are cheesy but effective. The locations are mostly open spaces but they fit the story. And there's a lot of flashbacks to shift the focus away from the expensive ideas. Cyborg is not a good movie, and lots of people are gonna trash it, but it's respectable considering the circumstances. CCYBORG 2 (1993)I don't know how or why, but there's a Cyborg 2 that stars a naked Angelina Jolie who may or may not have been legal at the time of production. You can do your own detective work. This time, the story is about an American tech company that's trying to eliminate a Japanese tech company by sending a cyborg to kill their board of directors. That cyborg is played by Angelina Jolie. But instead of doing as programmed, she runs away with a man and tries to live happily ever after. It's an interesting premise but it's not well-executed. Nothing interesting happens in the story except the pornographic stuff. It's obvious this movie was made for late night television even though it was released in theaters and has a decent budget. Compared to the original Cyborg, this sequel looks and feels expensive. But I guess there's a lesson to be learned here. It doesn't matter how much money a movie costs. What matters is if the story is engaging and entertaining. The original Cyborg is cheap... but fun. But the sequel has money falling from the ceiling - at least in comparison to the original - and it's boring. So if you're a young and independent filmmaker and reading this, watch the two Cyborg movies and use them as inspiration. No idea is too expensive if your heart is in the right place. D
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,621
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 19, 2024 19:49:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on May 4, 2015 10:18:10 GMT -5
She's naked in this? Damn, I bet she regrets that one. Or maybe not, I don't know. The Van Damme original sounds like a cheesy good time, I'd watch it.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on May 4, 2015 11:09:52 GMT -5
She's naked in this? Damn, I bet she regrets that one. Or maybe not, I don't know. The Van Damme original sounds like a cheesy good time, I'd watch it. She said in an interview that the first time she saw the movie she went home and vomited.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,621
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 19, 2024 19:49:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on May 4, 2015 11:37:54 GMT -5
Hahaha! Maybe that was in preparation for her role as Gia ZING!
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on May 10, 2015 0:54:25 GMT -5
I went home and vomited too.
From my third eye.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jun 10, 2015 15:30:39 GMT -5
SnoBorderZero , is this a Criterion movie? THE LAND BEFORE TIME (1988)Before Steven Spielberg used groundbreaking special effects to bring dinosaurs to the real world, he collaborated with George Lucas and Don Bluth on an animated film about a group of kid dinosaurs who must work together to survive the aftermath of an earthquake. It's an interesting premise that's loaded with important themes like nature and friendship and death, but the execution is very vanilla. There's a reason why this movie is commonly referred to as a prehistoric Bambi. It comes across as a rehash of other animated films except it has dinosaurs instead of modern day animals. Kids might be intrigued by it - especially the really young ones - but adults will probably be indifferent. C says Doomsday
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,621
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 19, 2024 19:49:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Jun 10, 2015 16:16:51 GMT -5
This isn't a Criterion film, but all the DTV sequels definitely are.
|
|