Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Jan 23, 2018 17:43:40 GMT -5
That'd be a fun list. Best last movies. Actors and directors can apply.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jan 23, 2018 18:24:20 GMT -5
That'd be a fun list. Best last movies. Actors and directors can apply. Dr. Parnases fucked over Heath Ledger.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,295
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 1:33:13 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Jan 23, 2018 18:31:33 GMT -5
Don't forget Sean Connery's final gem The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. And if we're counting final 'acting' films then Clint Eastwood's would be Trouble With The Curve. Did anyone even watch that? It would have been much more fitting for his final acting turn to have been Gran Torino.
As for John Wayne, like Drac said he had been on his way out for a while. He had a lung taken out close to a decade earlier which took its toll on him physically ever since. He constantly had to take breaks between takes, often using an oxygen tank when shooting on location. Even his stature was affected which is why he used lifts as he got older. Not sure to what extent his stomach cancer was present or known about but by the time he was on The Shootist he had been in ill health for quite a while.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,645
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 8:19:34 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Jan 23, 2018 19:47:54 GMT -5
That'd be a fun list. Best last movies. Actors and directors can apply. Kubrick ending on Eyes Wide Shit feels fitting.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Mar 24, 2018 20:27:24 GMT -5
Obviously you were never a ten year old girl ADVENTURES IN BABYSITTING (1987) / DON'T TELL MOM THE BABYSITTER'S DEAD (1991)Growing up, with TBS in the background, these two damn movies were on way too much. Both are awful. The Kelly Bundy one is unarguably the biggest offender because it never lived up to its premise. Yeah, the babysitter dies but then Kelly Bundy goes to work for a fashion company and the movie becomes Devil Wears Prada. Really? REALLY? She doesn't even wear sexy outfits. How do you put Kelly Bundy on the big screen and give her MORE clothes to put on? That doesn't make sense. Now we have Emilia Clarke doing the same thing. Are we in Bizarro World? Adventures in Babysitting is the clear champ between the two but it's more of a technicality and not a knockout. Marty McFly's girlfriend takes a group of kids into the city - including the one Kevin Spacey raped - and they get into all sorts of shenanigans. It's like Home Alone 2 but with no charm or humor whatsoever. "They run into car jackers and the mob AND THOR. Isn't the city craaazy?" There's also a silly subplot where Marty McFly's girlfriend is confused for a Playboy centerfold. If you're not gonna have her naked in the movie, why even bother? So you're telling me there's TWO movies about blonde babysitters and neither one of them takes their clothes off? Waste of time. This is why Kevin Spacey was raping male children. He never saw babysitter boobs to slap the gay pedophile out of him. Lives could have been saved. Yeah - there was American Beauty but it was too late by then. He was already committed to the lifestyle. There was no turning back. Anyway, what were we talking about? Oh, right. Shitty babysitter movies. Not a fan.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Mar 24, 2018 20:33:09 GMT -5
Thor being involved was weird.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Mar 24, 2018 20:57:51 GMT -5
Thor being involved was weird. Still better than Hemsworth
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Mar 25, 2018 0:14:13 GMT -5
¡Blasfemo!
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 23, 2018 2:26:12 GMT -5
Deexan DraculaNotorious (2009) / All Eyez On Me (2017)All Eyez on Me is actually... really good. Tupac was full of shit, but if you wanna make a biopic and license the music, you gotta go with the persona. Same happened with Straight Outta Compton. The actor playing Pac is also REALLY good. Maybe even great. Now that Notorious movie is fucking awful. The actor is just... awful. The plot is just... awful. No one needed a Biggie biopic. But I guess the girl playing Lil Kim has nice titties.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on Apr 23, 2018 6:24:01 GMT -5
What's really funny about those two movies is that they got the same guy to play Biggie in All Eyez on Me. The dude was already a little too old for the part in 2009 and he was way too old in 2017. Quality-wise I think both movies are decidedly average but I agree that AEOM is better than it was given credit for. It has something like 15% on Rotten Tomatoes, which doesn't make sense to me given that there's a really solid performance at the center and which does about as well as a mainstream film is going to in covering all those details about the man's life.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 9, 2019 5:01:31 GMT -5
DEATH WARRANT (1990) / DOUBLE IMPACT (1991)Sorry to disappoint. I know y’all wanted a Double Impact / Double Team Double Feature but Double Team is worthy of having the spotlight all to itself. In Death Warrant, Van Damme plays a French Canadian cop (they had to explain the accent) who goes undercover in a prison to solve a murder. It’s surprisingly atmospheric for a Van Damme flick, and stands out because of that, and arguably has the most memorable villain he faced. It’s a tight competition between him and the bulky Asian dude that also fought Bruce Lee in Enter the Dragon. However, they cheaped out on the music and it’s a major buzzkill. This coulda been a classic. Double Impact has double the Van Damme and resulted in the highest box office of his pre-studio era. You know, the Hard Target/Street Fighter/Timecop/Sudden Death era. Bloodsport to maybe Universal Soldier is the martial arts/low-budget action film Van Damme. I’d call that the good Van Damme but Hard Target and Timecop are legit classics. Anyway, in Double Impact, Van Damme plays twins avenging the death of their parents. It has a plot but no story whatsoever. The movie survives purely on the charm of Van Damme... which is quite impressive. It’s thoroughly entertaining when it has no right to be. It’s what I’d call a very well-made bad movie. Imagine if they actually had a script!
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on May 7, 2019 15:55:37 GMT -5
George of the Jungle (1997) / The Mummy (1999)Doomsday has been talking mad shit about the new Mummy but that's only cause he has mad love for the 1999 one starring Brendan Fraser. It's a teenhood favorite. But before we get to The Mummy, let's talk about George of the Jungle. If you still haven't decided on a wedding gift for Mr and Mrs Doomsday, a VHS copy of this Disney classic will have more significance than a toaster oven. It's about a cute white girl searching the jungles of Africa for Tarzan but settling for Encino Man in a loincloth and a pair of Air Jordan's. There isn't a better representation of their relationship. The movie, I'm thrilled to report, is still awesome and will continue to be awesome when Doomsday watches it with his kids. Great cartoon humor. Great effects and stunts. Brendan Fraser is charming and a goofball. Only a cold hearted bastard like PG Cooper will find reasons to hate on it. Now for The Mummy. There's good indication of how the Tom Cruise one will turn out. Lots of action. Lots of stunts. End of world spectacle. The usual. Brendan Fraser's Mummy represents what summer blockbusters should be and what they used to be. Epic. Hollywood romanticism. Lots of humor. A roller coaster ride of action set pieces. Re-watching this movie is a reminder of how much fun going to the theaters can be. It always isn't that way these days. So yeah, the Tom Cruise one has a lot to live up to.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on May 18, 2019 23:23:37 GMT -5
George of the Jungle (1997) / The Mummy (1999)Doomsday has been talking mad shit about the new Mummy but that's only cause he has mad love for the 1999 one starring Brendan Fraser. It's a teenhood favorite. But before we get to The Mummy, let's talk about George of the Jungle. If you still haven't decided on a wedding gift for Mr and Mrs Doomsday, a VHS copy of this Disney classic will have more significance than a toaster oven. It's about a cute white girl searching the jungles of Africa for Tarzan but settling for Encino Man in a loincloth and a pair of Air Jordan's. There isn't a better representation of their relationship. The movie, I'm thrilled to report, is still awesome and will continue to be awesome when Doomsday watches it with his kids. Great cartoon humor. Great effects and stunts. Brendan Fraser is charming and a goofball. Only a cold hearted bastard like PG Cooper will find reasons to hate on it. Now for The Mummy. There's good indication of how the Tom Cruise one will turn out. Lots of action. Lots of stunts. End of world spectacle. The usual. Brendan Fraser's Mummy represents what summer blockbusters should be and what they used to be. Epic. Hollywood romanticism. Lots of humor. A roller coaster ride of action set pieces. Re-watching this movie is a reminder of how much fun going to the theaters can be. It always isn't that way these days. So yeah, the Tom Cruise one has a lot to live up to. Judd Apatow is a very understanding husband
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,645
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 8:19:34 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on May 29, 2019 9:28:41 GMT -5
McQ (1974) / Brannigan (1975)Remember when John Wayne tried to be Clint Eastwood? How embarrassing! McQThe thought of John Wayne desperately trying to stay relevant in the mid-70s and shamelessly ripping off Dirty Harry sounded interesting enough, hence why I threw McQ on my PVR. But shockingly, I the film was actually better than I expected. Which is to say, it was a mostly average 70s crime film. "Mostly average" is not exactly a ringing endorsement, but hey, it could have been worse. The central point of interest is also the central flaw of McQ: John Wayne. Truth be told, as an actor, he does an okay job playing a gritty 70s cop, but the dude is so clearly an old man that the whole thing loses any credibility. It's just hard for the intensity of the story to really land when the main character looks like Grandpa Simpson. Otherwise though, the film works pretty well, mostly thanks to John Sturgess. The veteran filmmaker puts together a handful of solid little action scenes, culminating on a genuinely great car chase on the beach which evolves into a shoot-out. Most of the set-pieces were solid, but that final chase really was kind of awesome, and really elevated the film in my eyes. McQ is blatant in its efforts to replicate the likes of Bullitt, The French Connection, and of course, Dirty Harry. It's not just that the action scenes, visual style, and narrative crib the aforementioned, but McQ also shares the amoral policeman who repeatedly crosses ethical lines to solve the case. The film is certainly less self-critical than The French Connection or even Dirty Harry, but if you can look past the film's problematic politics, you're left with a fairly decent crime movie. That final car chase alone is probably worth a look, but the film on the whole achieves the whole 70s crime aesthetic fairly well. If nothing else, Wayne's desperate effort to remain relevant could have been way more embarrassing. C+
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 3, 2019 0:14:09 GMT -5
Homecoming (2017) vs Far From Home (2019)We see Peter Parker go from the overly eager superhero desperate to become an Avenger to a kid that just wants a summer vacation. StructureHomecoming takes “neighborhood Spider-Man” very literally and gives us the closest thing Marvel will give us to Kick-Ass. It’s cute, very cute but I think most people wanna see Spider-Man be Spider-Man. That’s where Far From Home comes in - sort of. The whole movie revolves on Peter Parker going on a school trip to Europe and it gives us a more visually interesting story and more opportunities for Spider-Man to do Spider-Man stuff but since Peter Parker is a reluctant hero this time, that’s kept to a minimum. ActionIf action is what you seek, Homecoming is your movie. Peter’s desperate to be a major league superhero and gets into more situations that lead to action scenes. Far From Home is more comedic and more character driven. CharactersMichael Keaton as The Vulture is waaayyy better than Jake Gyllenhaal as Mysterio. Once we can openly discuss spoilers we’ll get into the nitty gritty. Other than that, I felt the characters in Far From Home were more fleshed out and played a more integral to the story. ConclusionI can see people choosing Homecoming. It explores a teenage superhero (in a less campy way than Sky High) and pits him against a villain that’s a strong MCU-centric villain. But, as I said, people wanna see Spider-Man be Spider-Man and Far From Home gives us more of that. You get a Peter that’s struggling to juggle his personal life & hero life and he gets to be a big-time hero. So for me, personally, I go with Far From Home but I get it if you’re more into Homecoming.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 12, 2019 21:15:21 GMT -5
That movie was dogshit but I couldn't tell you why since I don't remember a single thing about it apart from the horrible CGI Scorpion King at the end. It's hard to put a finger on what differentiates the two, something about the sequel just sucked the fun out of the formula, the pacing was off, and there just wasn't more story to tell. And yeah that CGI Scorpion King is like something out of a nightmare for all the wrong reasons.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 6, 2019 0:14:07 GMT -5
There can only be one ... and yet we got two. It’s a kind of magic. HIGHLANDER (1986)Now that the Terminator franchise lost its head, maybe Doomsday can seek out the rights holder of Highlander and make his low-budget remake. It’s essentially the same movie. A man from a different time has to defeat a big dude and have sex with a blonde woman. Maybe you can get Sean Connery out of retirement to reprise his role of the flamboyant Spaniard who was born in Egypt but has a Scottish accent. Highlander is an odd little movie that works in spite of its inherently poor concept. It’s just a few guys swordfighting and a series of flashbacks that feel like a different movie. It succeeds because of its impressive cinematography, MTV style editing, bizarre characters and kickass soundtrack by Queen. These are all things Doomsday can recreate cause the original wasn’t an example of lightning in a bottle. HIGHLANDER II (1991): THE 2004 CUTAs with SnoBorderZero’s Blade Runner, there’s a kazillion different versions of this movie. I went with the 2004 Cut as opposed to the Renegade Cut just to piss off 1godzillafan. And just as Blade Runner sucks in all its incarnations, Highlander II is incomprehensible regardless of how you watch it. The movie completely disregards everything that happened in the original - just because. It switches genre & style & tone - just because. And the story is bonkers - just because. If you thought a movie in which a Spaniard has a Scottish accent and a Scotsman has a French accent (and can barely speak English) was stupid, then brace yourself, cause this manages to top that. Really, the only good thing about this movie is Sean Connery hamming it up and its weird Luc Besson/GoldenEye aesthetic.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 5, 2020 20:10:31 GMT -5
SnoBorderZero PG CooperDANGEROUS LIAISONS (1988) vs VALMONT (1989) Both movies are based on the 1782 French novel. It's the story of two mischievous aristocrats. Merteuil learns that her virginal teenage cousin Cecile will wed her lover, and so to get revenge, asks playboy Valmont to deflower Cecile before the marriage. Valmont does so but for his own personal reasons. He's fallen in love with Tourvel but Cecile's mother has warned Tourvel to not fall for his charms. Dangerous Liaisons stars Glen Close as Merteuil, John Malkovich as Valmont, Michelle Pfeiffer as Tourvel and a barely legal Uma Thurman as Cecile (in one of her iconic nude roles). The movie is straight-up deprived. If you enjoy watching rich people being assholes to each other, like in PhantomKnight's The Favorite (2018), you'll love this version of the story. Close and Malkovich are devilish in their roles and eat up the scenery. My only quarrel is with Keanu Reeves. Motherfucker has no business being here. You thought he was bad in Bram Stoker's Dracula? He's worse here. Valmont, in spite of the title, has very little to do with Valmont. Malkovich is the star of Dangerous Liaisons. A young Colin Firth, who plays the role here, takes a backseat to Annette Bening as Merteuil. This adaptation is more... juvenile. The characters here come across as schoolyard children letting their hormones get the best of them. Firth and Bening are good. Meg Tilly is good too as Tourvel. But the standout here is Fairuza Balk as Cecile. She's phenomenal in the role, on par with Close and Malkovich, although she wouldn't have been suitable for that movie at all. She's perfectly suited for this one because she was 15-years-old and captured the essence of what the filmmakers were going for. The champ here is Dangerous Liaisons. It's really no competition. It's far and away the superior one. But, Valmont is definitely worth checking out for Fairuza Balk. Girl should have won an Oscar. Annette Bening is really good too, and frankly, the most attractive she's been in anything I've seen her. She's not unattractive in her other roles. She's just glowing here. But of course, naked 18-year-old Uma Thurman takes the cake here. Only reason 1godzillafan will even watch it.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 9, 2020 14:48:09 GMT -5
WHAT WOMEN WANT (2000) / WHAT MEN WANT (2019) Mel Gibson’s turn of the century romantic-comedy is still as charming as ever. He plays a chauvinistic advertising executive trying to get in touch with his feminine side. After a freak accident, he gets the ability to hear women’s thoughts and comedy ensues. In spite of it falling into some romantic-comedy tropes, Gibson is on top of his game and the movie succeeds because of it. Nearly 20 years later, a gender bending remake was released with Taraji P. Henson in the role. She’s really good and the movie is actually really funny, but ultimately does nothing with the concept. Gibson takes the crown.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 12, 2020 9:32:31 GMT -5
THE BIRDCAGE (1996)This is Doomsday's favorite Gene Hackman in drag movie. It's surprisingly restrained considering the subject matter of Robin Williams and Nathan Lane as two gay parents pretending to be straight. I think I laughed once in the whole 2-hour runtime but the story and characters are very well-executed. It's respectful towards its themes... but maybe too respectful? It seemed afraid to offend which holds back the comedy. And the son at the center of the story is very unlikable and easily the worst actor/character in the whole movie. He came across as a self-centered asshole and it makes you wonder why Williams and Lane would go through the whole charade of being straight to impress his in-laws. It's a very good movie but some poor decisions hold it back from being great. GODS AND MONSTERS (1998)This is a weird movie. It's a reimagining of James Whales' final days. You know. James Whales. The director of 1930's Frankenstein. This is a real dude with a real life and here comes a totally fictional story about him as an old pervert with World War I PTSD who wants to rape Brendan Fraser. This would be like SnoBorderZero dying, after a successful career in Coming to America sequels, and Bill Condon making a movie about him locking Florence Pugh in the basement. Why we slandering dead people? Although I'm sure Ian McKellan will kill it in the role.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,645
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 8:19:34 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Apr 12, 2020 21:27:40 GMT -5
GODS AND MONSTERS (1998)This is a weird movie. It's a reimagining of James Whales' final days. You know. James Whales. The director of 1930's Frankenstein. This is a real dude with a real life and here comes a totally fictional story about him as an old pervert with World War I PTSD who wants to rape Brendan Fraser. This would be like SnoBorderZero dying, after a successful career in Coming to America sequels, and Bill Condon making a movie about him locking Florence Pugh in the basement. Why we slandering dead people? Although I'm sure Ian McKellan will kill it in the role. I watched this about a week ago. From Letterboxd: Let's get the obvious out of the way: Ian McKellen is excellent here. The man plays James Whale with intelligence and charm while never overemphasizing the darkness of the man's life. It's an incredibly fun performance that I wish was in a better movie because Gods and Monsters fucking sucks. The whole thing is full of awkward directorial choices which don't really work and it's also worth stressing that Brandon Fraser is awful here. I'm not really sure to blame Fraser or Bill Condon, but the resulting performance is just brutal. And then of course there's the awful script, which culminates on a moment between the main characters that's really quite sickening as a creative liberty. It's a testament to McKellen's skills that the film is in any way watchable. D
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 12, 2020 22:23:38 GMT -5
GODS AND MONSTERS (1998)This is a weird movie. It's a reimagining of James Whales' final days. You know. James Whales. The director of 1930's Frankenstein. This is a real dude with a real life and here comes a totally fictional story about him as an old pervert with World War I PTSD who wants to rape Brendan Fraser. This would be like SnoBorderZero dying, after a successful career in Coming to America sequels, and Bill Condon making a movie about him locking Florence Pugh in the basement. Why we slandering dead people? Although I'm sure Ian McKellan will kill it in the role. I watched this about a week ago. From Letterboxd: Let's get the obvious out of the way: Ian McKellen is excellent here. The man plays James Whale with intelligence and charm while never overemphasizing the darkness of the man's life. It's an incredibly fun performance that I wish was in a better movie because Gods and Monsters fucking sucks. The whole thing is full of awkward directorial choices which don't really work and it's also worth stressing that Brandon Fraser is awful here. I'm not really sure to blame Fraser or Bill Condon, but the resulting performance is just brutal. And then of course there's the awful script, which culminates on a moment between the main characters that's really quite sickening as a creative liberty. It's a testament to McKellen's skills that the film is in any way watchable. D
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,621
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 19, 2024 19:49:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Apr 13, 2020 16:07:10 GMT -5
I liked Gods and Monsters, but it's not anything I'd go to bat for either. There's a really interesting movie there, but Condon isn't able to bring it to light.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 13, 2020 16:16:11 GMT -5
I liked Gods and Monsters, but it's not anything I'd go to bat for either. There's a really interesting movie there, but Condon isn't able to bring it to light. 1998 was the year of Ian McKellen making weirdo movies. There was this and Apt Pupil.
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Apr 13, 2020 18:15:57 GMT -5
I like Gods and Monsters, goddammit.
|
|