SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Apr 20, 2016 0:06:22 GMT -5
Richard Linklater, to me, is one of the most innovative and unique contemporary filmmakers out there today. He's one of the few that consistently seek new ways to explore storytelling and character development, and while it doesn't always translate to success, in many ways I feel that Linklater is vastly underrated despite the critical acclaim he's garnered throughout his career. Coming off the heels of two widely praised films in Before Midnight and Boyhood, Linklater's followup was certain to find itself in a difficult position in attempting to match them. But Linklater, like the Coens, is not a filmmaker interested in trumping his latest work but instead continues to push himself as an artist and break new ground. Everybody Wants Some!! is essentially his spiritual successor to Dazed and Confused, so it's not exactly a Waking Life or Slacker in terms of a wholly unique experience from Linklater this time around, but despite its flaws, Linklater continues to entertain and display a maturity and depth through characters that on the surface appear to have none that furthers my opinion that he's one of the most unique voices in American cinema. Despite boasting a filmography of very different works that often seem to bear no resemblance to another, Linklater certainly has his particular filmmaking tropes. His characters, whether they're stoners or slackers or authors or jocks, often engage in philosophical musings on their current state of life, sometimes to the point of driving the narrative almost solely through dialogue like with the Before Trilogy and Waking Life. It's never so simple as being happy or sad or complacent, but asking the questions of why people arrive at these conclusions in the first place. Linklater has also been skilled in seamlessly bouncing from one character to another, such as in Slacker or Dazed and Confused, often showcasing several walks of life in order to arrive at similar conclusions that deep down we often carry the same desires and motives as one another even if on the surface we appear to be worlds apart. I'm simplifying Linklater's major themes down to this, but my point is that for one whose films appear to be nothing more than breezy fun, it's these complex ideas scattered amidst enjoyable buffoonery that keeps me coming back to his work. Everybody Wants Some!! contains these elements, though unfortunately really only scratches the surface. This film centers on Jake (Blake Jenner), a freshman pitcher who has made his way to college and is living in a house with his baseball teammates. What follows is essentially two hours of nonstop partying, drinking, sex, and guys trying to "out man" one another. It's very funny, and likely a very personal film for Linklater, but I was a bit disappointed in the film not evolving past, well, the surface. Sure, there are some interesting observations as the guys drift from one group to another, from disco bars to country bars to theater kid parties, all in search of getting laid. An idea of essentially conforming to whatever style suits the need to accomplish the objective, often times acting as someone that we aren't in order to appeal to others. In the end though, I kept thinking Linklater might have had something more up his sleeve by the end of the film, but it doesn't really happen. Dazed and Confused, for all the silly moments of the film that people fondly recall and recite, has a surprising amount of depth to it that would set the stage for his more stimulating work to come. Everybody Wants Some!! is at times hilarious and very enjoyable to watch, but like the characters themselves, maybe there just isn't as much to explore here as in Linklater's other works. The film does maintain an upbeat optimism that's infectious, and perhaps Linklater wanted to avoid the cliched melancholy of a bunch of guys realizing there's more to life than partying and baseball, because maybe that's what makes them happy. Even in Linklater's flawed works, you can't deny that they're almost always entertaining, and this movie is no exception. I guess the point I'm trying to get to with all my rambling about his style and growth as a filmmaker is that, while Everybody Wants Some!! is a good enough movie, it didn't have the meat on its bones that I was hoping for. So this was a really shitty review of the actual film and more of a shitty analysis on Richard Linklater as a filmmaker, but I did enjoy this movie. The cast does a great job playing essentially one-note characters that are really funny. The film has a great soundtrack, and everything brims with an authenticity that leads you to believe Linklater was drawing on a lot of his own experiences. But unlike the best of his work, I don't see any reason to return to this film again other than for breezy entertainment. Nothing wrong with that, I just expect more from Linklater because he's capable of more. A 2-hour party film, and a fun one at that, but sadly what's on the surface here is essentially what you get. 7/10
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Apr 20, 2016 1:01:53 GMT -5
You have Boyhood ranked above the Before trilogy?
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,783
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 23:39:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 20, 2016 1:22:40 GMT -5
You said it, and yet, you missed the point. Linklater is like the Coens. He goes back & forth between drama and comedy. This was never gonna be more than a silly movie. Linklater directed the remake of The Bad News Bears. He isn't always a snob.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,783
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 23:39:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Apr 20, 2016 1:24:30 GMT -5
Also , fuck you. Fast Food Nation is awesome.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Apr 20, 2016 9:46:51 GMT -5
You have Boyhood ranked above the Before trilogy? Yeah, slightly. The Before Trilogy has more depth to it, but I was very impressed by Boyhood. They're all "A's" for me.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Apr 20, 2016 9:50:26 GMT -5
You said it, and yet, you missed the point. Linklater is like the Coens. He goes back & forth between drama and comedy. This was never gonna be more than a silly movie. Linklater directed the remake of The Bad News Bears. He isn't always a snob. I know that, but even when he's making silly movies what sets them above the pretenders is that he offers a lot more insight on his characters and their lives. This movie was a lot of fun, hence why I gave it a positive score, but it's not much beyond that. Maybe you're right, he wasn't trying to make anything more than a fun movie, and that's fine, the Coens did that earlier this year with Hail, Caesar! which I also liked enough but won't be ranking it among their top work either. And really, The Bad News Bears and Fast Food Nation? Those movies sucked, bro. Fast Food Nation was so tonally off and told us nothing about the fast food industry we didn't already know from vastly superior docs. I've seen all of Linklater's work, and those two movies you mentioned are easily his weakest movies.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,649
Likes: 4,066
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 0:10:25 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Apr 20, 2016 15:14:41 GMT -5
This movie is already a win for me given that I can't look at the title without getting Van Halen stuck in my head.
"You can't get romantic on a subway line Conductor don't like it, says you're wastin' your time But everybody wants some!! I want some too"
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Apr 20, 2016 15:53:24 GMT -5
This movie is already a win for me given that I can't look at the title without getting Van Halen stuck in my head. "You can't get romantic on a subway line Conductor don't like it, says you're wastin' your time But everybody wants some!! I want some too" They talk about them in the movie too, the stoner pitcher from California that's a "high brow" music aficionado talks about how people who like them are sheep. No doubt Linklater poking fun at people who often times take things too seriously and can't appreciate music in all its forms.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,105
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on May 1, 2016 23:12:35 GMT -5
Belated review:
Everybody Wants Some!!(4/9/2016)
Generally speaking, directorial careers have ebbs and flows. There were of course some masters who released big long streaks of amazing movies but more often than not directors can only have so much success before they put out a… shall we say “lesser effort.” That’s certainly what you expect from a director like Richard Linklater, who rarely ever makes movies that are outright “bad” but who has clearly made a number of films that can be called “inessential.” For every Before Sunrise or Slacker that that guy makes he makes two or three SubUrbias or Fast Food Nations. Again, those aren’t bad movies per se, but they aren’t the kind of films that would lead you to believe that he’s one of the best directors working today. That track record didn’t necessarily bode well for his latest movie given that he’s coming off of two career high triumphs in Before Midnight and Boyhood, so he definitely seemed to be due for a minor effort. And yet, there was still reason to hope because his newest movie was said to be a “spiritual sequel” to one of his most popular films, Dazed and Confused, and Linklater is nothing if not capable of making sequels that don’t disappoint given how well his “Before” series is working out.
While Dazed and Confused was about the last day before summer vacation for high school students in 1976, this spiritual sequel is about the first days before college starts for a group of similar group of young people in 1980. Being as Everybody Wants Some!! is a spiritual rather than literal sequel (and this having been made over twenty years after that movie) this is a completely different cast of characters. Our main protagonist is a guy named Jake (Blake Jenner), who is the new pitcher for the baseball team at an unnamed Texas University and the film starts as he’s moving into the team’s off campus housing. There he gets to know the rest of the team and spends the next three days before classes begin adjusting to the college life of partying and picking up women.
Everybody Wants Some!! has been called “Dazed and Confused but in the 80s,” which is technically true but it should be remembered that the film is set in the year 1980, which is only four years after Dazed and Confused and early enough in that next decade that it doesn’t really feel like the 80s yet. Linklater maintains the obsessive historical accuracy that characterized that earlier film here and it really is kind of uncanny how successful he is at recreating the era he’s chosen down to the last poster and pinball machine. A big part of his ability to do that both here and in Dazed has to do with the fact that their casts have primarily been composed of relative unknowns. Most of the films’ young cast have backgrounds on teen televisions shows that I’m not familiar with and that definitely helped create the illusion that these were actually people living in the 1980 rather than millennial actors playing dress-up. Don’t underestimate the cast for their lack of star power; under Linklater’s direction they have great chemistry and rapport.
Like Dazed and Confused this is very much a “hangout movie” where you watch the episodic escapades of the films’ characters as they go through a couple of days that don’t seem very eventful to them at the time but which you get the impression will stick with the characters for a while after the fact, in part because you get the distinct impression that Linklater (who did play baseball at Sam Houston State University) is drawing liberally from his own experiences as he frequently does in his best films. There is however a key difference between the hanging out in Dazed and the hanging out here in that high school social interactions are way more high stakes than social interactions in college… or at least it seems that way to the people going through them. In Dazed and Confused the younger characters are on edge because they’re worried about what their role will be in High School while the older characters are trying to navigate whether to move towards adulthood or continue indulging in the travails of youth. It’s all right there in the title. Here, not so much. Jake is almost immediately accepted into his new group of friends and the movie gives very little indication that his college experience will be anything short of a totally awesome four year party.
That Linklater depicts the transition into college life as being easier than the transition into high school, at least for characters like these, he isn’t being simplistic so much as he’s being observational. College is kind of awesome and college students are generally a lot better adjusted than high school students. However, I do think Linklater might have let his nostalgia get the best of him a little this time out. Dazed and Confused ends with Pink saying “if I ever start referring to these as the best years of my life - remind me to kill myself” but I get the impression from Everybody Wants Some!! that Linklater doesn’t see a similar tragedy in college being the peak of one’s life experiences even though it isn’t that much later or that much more meaningful. Also, while it’s easy to admit that college life is more easygoing than high school life… it usually isn’t this much better. Not everyone who goes to college is able to immediately fit into a new group of friends, become the life of every party you go to, and meet the girl of your dreams within hours of arriving on campus and get into her good graces a couple days later over the course of an idyllic evening. Maybe the first few days of college really were this awesome for Linklater but I think he does have his rose colored glasses on here and that the film could have benefited more if it had at least hinted at some of the downsides of the college experience or perhaps done a little more to signal that these characters are eventually going to find themselves ejected from this little oasis in four years and will have to face greater challenges.
That little observation should not be viewed as some kind of damning indictment of the film however, because overall I really enjoyed it. Hangout scene for hangout scene this may actually be a more consistently amusing and watchable film than Dazed and Confused was. It still has a great soundtrack, great attention to detail, and all sorts of fun conversations and character interactions. As a simple, albeit slightly unconventional, entertainment the film is highly recommended and in its own odd little way it may just be one of the greatest college-set comedies ever made. However, its episodic “hangout” nature is a little bit of a weakness for me. That same “hangout” nature was also kind of a weakness for Dazed and Confused , and for all the praise I’ve given that film while comparing it to this one, I would say that was also a movie that ultimately lands in the “very good but not great camp” for me and the fact that this movie has even fewer emotional stakes for its characters does kind of exacerbate my reluctance about this format. Still, like the college experience that it’s painting, this is a really fun little ride while it lasts.
**** out of Five
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,649
Likes: 4,066
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 0:10:25 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on May 2, 2016 12:36:04 GMT -5
I think it would be fair to say that Boyhood was a pretty big deal when it was released in 2014. The film was one of the most acclaimed and discussed films of the year, being placed in many year-end lists and being nominated for a slew of awards. The film also represented a certain artistic peak for director Richard Linklater. While I don’t think it’s his best film, Boyhood was certainly a highly ambitious project and a great film, one which, in many ways represented the culmination of Linklater’s style and themes. I was very curious how Linklater was going to follow-up such an achievement and the answer is Everybody Wants Some!!. Though the film is a lot more low-key than the aforementioned Boyhood, Everybody Wants Some!! does fit well within Linklater’s ability to tell humble stories about relatable characters in an entertaining and insightful way.
The film opens in the fall of 1980 with college freshman Jake (Blake Jenner) moving into his home for the school year the Friday before classes begin. In addition to being a student, Jake is also a pitcher for the school’s baseball team and will be sharing the home with his fellow team mates. Quickly, Jake meets many of these team mates, including older students like Finnegan (Glen Powell), McReynolds (Tyler Hoechlin), Roper (Ryan Guzman), Dale (Quinton Johnson), Jay (Juston Street), and Willoughby (Wyatt Russell), along with fellow freshmen “Beuter” (Will Britain), Plummer (Temple Baker), and Brumley (Tanner Kalina). The group engage in a weekend of social bonding, drinking, partying, baseball, competition, and trying to pick up girls as the beginning of the semester counts down.
It’s probably very clear that Everybody Wants Some!! is not a film driven by plot. Rather, the film is a return to the “hangout vibe” found in Linklater’s beloved 1993 film Dazed and Confused where the appeal is basically just spending time with the characters. As such, the cast is really essential and thankfully the one assembled here is great. Linklater opted for a group of relatively unknown actors and that does help provide a sense of authenticity. Really though, the real magic is just how much fun these young actors are to watch and how well they work together. I wouldn’t necessarily say any one performance stands out, but basically every actor here commits to their role and delivers a very good performance. A sense of camaraderie is developed very quickly and it’s very rewarding to just watch the cast interact. Scenes often play out comically, but there are more nuanced things going on too. I was very impressed by the way the actors and Linklater’s screenplay created characters who were fairly complex even in small rules. Characters who initially seem unlikable are also given moments of relatability and likewise the characters who seem likable and cool are also shown to be selfish. The point is these characters are not good or bad guys, just young people, some of which you like more than others. Additionally, despite the large cast, Linklater does a good job developing everyone sufficiently.
Though Everybody Wants Some!! shares an affinity with Dazed and Confused (and has even been described as a spiritual successor), there are some key differences separating the two films. For starters, Everybody Wants Some!! is set over the course of a few days, rather than “one crazy” night and the film is also more specifically focused on a main character rather than the sprawling ensemble of Dazed and Confused. While the supporting cast are certainly essential to Everybody Wants Some!!, the film is clearly Jake’s story and the whole thing is told through his perspective. However perhaps the biggest change is that Dazed and Confused was set at the end of high school, with many of the characters contemplating their uncertain future. It was a film that was clearly nostalgic for the time period depicted, but there was a certain melancholy present too. Everybody Wants Some!! on the other hand is set at the beginning of a college semester (through the eyes of a freshman no less) and as such has a greater sense of optimism and hopeful energy.
Everybody Wants Some!! is certainly a very entertaining film which is consistently fun to watch. It’s a funny film with a great cast, a series of strong scenes which flow together well, and an eclectic soundtrack of punk, disco, country, and most importantly, rock which captures the time period and the various situations the cast find themselves in. However if the film is lacking anything, it’s a certain lack of weight. While Linklater’s Before trilogy and Boyhood used their humble style to mine some really poignant and emotionally powerful stories, Everybody Wants Some!! is much more content to simply be a fun watch. There’s nothing wrong with that necessarily, but it does make the film feel a little light. Granted, I don’t want to give the impression that this film is entirely frivolous. There is some stuff here about identity, particularly in how the crew bounce from disco bar, to country bar, to punk show, in a quest for good time and to meet girls. There are also some pseudo-philosophical discussions pertaining to college, romance, and life, but these largely seem secondary and have been explored more adequately in other Linklater films.
I think a lot of people are going to see Everybody Wants Some!! as something of an artistic comedown after the back-to-back triumphs of Before Midnight and Boyhood. I don’t necessarily disagree, but I also think it would be a mistake to overlook this film and the many things it does right. The film does an amazing job capturing a certain mood, creates some great characters, and is consistently entertaining scene after scene. These aren’t easy things to do, and it also isn’t an easy to make a film so sparse on plot so engrossing. Beyond that, I simply can’t deny how much fun I had watching Everybody Wants Some!!. From the acting, to the writing, to the soundtrack, to the way Linklater puts it all together, the film is simply a joy to watch from beginning to end and hardly hits a false note along the way.
A-
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on May 16, 2016 17:49:26 GMT -5
Damn, I loved this movie even more than I expected to. I immediately wanted to watch it again after it finished. I don't think I've had that feeling since I was a teenager...
I see top ten potential here.
9.5/10
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Jul 27, 2016 11:28:47 GMT -5
I'm about half an hour into this movie and, I dunno. It just feels like it's a step backward for Richard Linklater almost like he wants to tell us 'remember Dazed and Confused? I can still do stuff like that!' Considering the high praise this movie received it doesn't seem like it's anything I haven't seen a hundred times before.
|
|
Justin
Script Supervisor
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 739
Likes: 355
Location:
Last Online Oct 17, 2017 12:05:25 GMT -5
|
Post by Justin on Jul 27, 2016 12:56:55 GMT -5
A That 70s Show movie?
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,783
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 23:39:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 27, 2016 13:33:42 GMT -5
I'm about half an hour into this movie and, I dunno. It just feels like it's a step backward for Richard Linklater almost like he wants to tell us 'remember Dazed and Confused? I can still do stuff like that!' Considering the high praise this movie received it doesn't seem like it's anything I haven't seen a hundred times before. Let's be honest. Linklater is as hit-or-miss as they come, but that's the nature of his career. The same guy who made Before Sunrise made School of Rock. He makes movies based on his mood. If he wants to relive his college days and make a run-of-the-mill teen film then so be it.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Jul 27, 2016 13:54:17 GMT -5
True, I guess I was just expecting more considering the praise it received.
School of Rock, I forgot about that movie, ha!
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,626
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Jul 27, 2016 14:32:08 GMT -5
What's wrong with School of Rock? It's a good movie. He's made much worse, like shitty ass Fast Food Nation.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Jul 27, 2016 14:42:54 GMT -5
I watched School of Rock when I was heavy into my AC/DC phase in the early 2000s. I enjoyed the 80 references to the band in the movie.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,783
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 23:39:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jul 27, 2016 19:03:36 GMT -5
What's wrong with School of Rock? Nothing. Before Sunrise is the one that sucks.
|
|