Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 6, 2014 20:20:30 GMT -5
The oldest surviving review thread at CS!
JULY 2003
TERMINATOR 3: RISE OF THE MACHINES (2003)
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 6, 2014 20:35:29 GMT -5
FEBRUARY 2004
THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST (2004)
FEBRUARY 2014
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 6, 2014 20:41:54 GMT -5
JUNE 2006
SUPERMAN RETURNS (2006)
APRIL 2011
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 6, 2014 20:46:05 GMT -5
JUNE 2007
LIVE FREE OR DIE HARD (2007)
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Oct 6, 2014 21:33:22 GMT -5
Wow, I really liked Die Hard 4 back then.
|
|
FShuttari
CS! Bronze
Join Date: Jan 2005
SPIDEY do! What SPIDEY DOES!
Posts: 14,031
Likes: 225
Location:
Last Online Nov 18, 2024 14:51:59 GMT -5
|
Post by FShuttari on Oct 6, 2014 23:59:27 GMT -5
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 9, 2014 6:06:55 GMT -5
With the recent success of Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol and the resurrection of Tom Cruise's career, it only seemed fitting to re-visit the series.
MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE (1996) I love Ghost Protocol. It's a great film and one of the best in 2011. However, I don't think it's the best in the series. That honor still belongs to the original. For starters, Brian De Palma was the right director for a big screen adaptation of Mission: Impossible. Anyone familiar with the TV series knows that the show was a thriller. And that's something De Palma sticked to despite having to juggle it with big action set pieces. The best scene in this movie, which is also arguably the best in the series, is Ethan Hunt breaking into a computer at the CIA. De Palma did a masterful job and the scene became one of the most iconic of the 1990s.
MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE II (2000) This movie gets a bad rap. I get it. John Woo is selling out. Tom Cruise is climbing mountains for no reason. The dude who ALMOST played Wolverine is in it. Post-Napster Metallica perform the title song. Limp Bizkit is also in the soundtrack. There's a lot to hate. But whatever, none of those things bothered me. I think the movie is pretty cool. I also think it's amusing that the story is basically two guys fighting over a girl. Yeah, there's this whole plot about a virus and what-not, but that's just the MacGuffin. Also: Sunglasses. Leather jackets. Motorcycles. You'd think you were watching The Matrix. I think it's safe to say that out of all the Mission: Impossible movies, this one has aged the most. Maybe that's why I find it so amusing and entertaining. But... I'll let Doomsday be the judge of that.
MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE III (2006) I have mixed feelings about this installment. The action scenes are great. Maggie Q is in it. But, J.J. Abrams and his writers (the notorious Alex Kurtzman and Robert Orci) try too hard. Having Ethan Hunt get married and have his wife get kidnapped fell flat. Tom Cruise had more chemistry with Thandie Newton in "M:I-2" than Michelle Monaghan. Then, there was that random backstory with Keri Russell. What the f--k was that all about? I think a simpler and more tradition film would have worked better. Plus, there was not enough Maggie Q.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 9, 2014 6:08:18 GMT -5
*cue the John Williams theme* AMC, or the Breaking Bad channel as kids call it these days, was airing a Jurassic Park marathon this week so I figured it was a good time to revisit the "trilogy" before the release of Jurassic World next year. JURASSIC PARK (1993)In the realm of special and visual effects, Jurassic Park is one of the groundbreaking films. Not only does it featuring cutting-edge CGI but also jawdropping animatronics by Stan Winston. But what about the story and characters? Does it measure up to the technology in the movie? The answer is... sort of. Based on the popular novel by Michael Crichton, the film has an interesting premise about a looney businessman who uses genetic engineering to bring dinosaurs back to life and feature them in a theme park. And all the scenes that reveal the theme park and the backstory behind it are fascinating to watch. However, once Jurassic Park turns into a horror movie, everything falls apart. The first mistake was with Wayne Knight's character. He plays a computer engineer who wants to steal dinosaur embryos and sell them to a corporate rival. In order to pull off his scheme, he shuts down the security system for the entire park. Does that make any sense? If he wants to access the embryo room, all he needs is a key card and to turn off the security cameras. The fact that this is how the plot is set in motion is laughable. They should have come up with something more creative. The second mistake was sidelining Jeff Goldblum halfway through the story. He plays Dr. Ian Malcolm, the only character who questions everything about the theme park and the people in charge of it. He's important because he keeps everything in perspective. With him gone, you kind-of root for the dinosaurs. And the third mistake was David Koepp's lazy screenplay. For example, there's a scene where Samuel L. Jackson's character, the only other computer engineer at the theme park, gets eaten by a dinosaur and suddenly the most useless character in the entire film - who's also an annoying child - is given computer skills so she can save the day. If that doesn't make you roll your eyes, then I don't know what will. Maybe the sequels. THE LOST WORLD: JURASSIC PARK (1997)4 years after almost being eaten by a T-Rex, Dr. Ian Malcolm returns to Jurassic Park - actually the Island next to Jurassic Park - so he can stop a group of people from kidnapping a dinosaur and taking it to the United States for an exhibition. Basically, Steven Spielberg made an unofficial remake of King Kong. But while King Kong is a classic film because "the monster" has a personality, The Lost World: Jurassic Park is another movie where Jeff Goldblum does nothing while people get eaten by dinosaurs. To say this is a disappointing sequel is an understatement. But there is ONE redeeming value. Spielberg allows a T-Rex to roam around San Diego (Burbank in reality) and cause all sorts of mayhem. It's the closest we've gotten to a successful American version of Godzilla. JURASSIC PARK III (2001)There's The Lost World: Jurassic Park and Jurassic World, so the fact that this movie is simply called Jurassic Park III tells you everything you need to know. I've never seen a lazier sequel in a billion dollar franchise. The whole movie is about a rescue mission. That's it. A boy with the worst parents ever gets stuck in the island and needs to get rescued. That's it. Come waste 93 minutes of your life. Jurassic Park: B+The Lost World: BJurassic Park III: C-
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 9, 2014 6:10:05 GMT -5
Today is the 30th anniversary of Romancing the Stone. For the 5 people who post at CS! on a daily basis that doesn't mean anything, but for Back to the Future fans it's a big deal because the success of this movie allowed Robert Zemeckis the opportunity to make his masterpiece. Also, love it or hate it, Romancing the Stone does have a very charming story about a novelist (Kathleen Turner) who writes romantic-adventure books and then gets to experience her own fantasies when she ends up in Colombia with a swashbuckling smuggler named Jack Colton (Michael Douglas). The screenplay was written by Diane Thomas, a waitress who befriended Michael Douglas and sold him the script. She was killed by a drunk driver a year after the film was released and was never able to fully benefit from her newfound success. Steven Spielberg, who she was collaborating with on screenplays for Always and "Indiana Jones 3", participated in a writers program named after her at UCLA. Meanwhile, impressed by the success of Romancing the Stone, 20th Century Fox commissioned a sequel. Released the following year, The Jewel of the Nile is a very straight-forward adventure story. It has none of the relatable elements that made the original connect with audiences. However, it is fun to watch as an Indiana Jones type movie. It also gave co-star Danny DeVito a lot to do. In the original, he had a small comedic role, but in the sequel, he's practically the third lead and is at the center of many standout moments. DeVito returned the favor by directing Michael Douglas and Kathleen Turner in the 1989 black comedy, The War of the Roses. The War of the Roses concludes a trilogy of films starring Douglas, Turner and DeVito and it's arguably the best of the trio. It's also gonna be celebrating its 25th anniversary in December. The movie is about a rich married couple who go through a comically violent divorce. DeVito directs with highly-stylized visuals and lots of wacky situations but he also allows Douglas and Turner the opportunity to deliver great dramatic performances that get the audience invested in the story. It's definitely worth checking out, even if you're not a fan of Romancing the Stone and The Jewel of the Nile.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 9, 2014 6:15:51 GMT -5
Everyone is excited for today's release of Fast Five. That surprises me since I was under the impression that everybody hated these movies. So... I decided to give the series a second chance. Maybe I was too harsh before.
I re-visited The Fast and The Furious. And I saw 2 Fast 2 Furious for the first time. I'll get to Tokyo Drift and Fast & Furious within the next few days.
THE FAST AND THE FURIOUS (2001) This movie ripped off Point Break. There's just no way around that. It bothered me 10 years ago and it bothers me now. The script is just so... lazy. I enjoyed the car races, the car chases, the action scenes, and Ja Rule's small role. But that's it. This is one of those flicks that if you own on DVD you'll just watch certain scenes and that's it. I can't imagine anyone re-watching it from beginning to end. Even those who "claim" that they enjoy it.
2 FAST 2 FURIOUS (2003) I hate to say it... but I liked this sequel. It improves on the original in many ways. Tyrese is WAY better than Vin Diesel. I never understood the appeal of Vin Diesel as an action star. He's boring. That's why I want The Rock to beat his ass in the new flick. Show him how it's done, damn it. The chemistry and relationship between Paul Walker and Tyrese is also WAY better. I like that there's a REAL villain. I like that the cops seem more involved. I love Miami as a location. Eva Mendes is WAY hotter than Jordana Brewster. Seriously... this movie is better in every shape and form. I'm shocked that people aren't bigger fans of it. The only thing that bothered me about this flick is that Paul Walker dresses like a 15-year-old. Damn it, man. Go shop at a grown up store!
Tokyo Drift is on TBS right now and... WTF? Bow Wow living in Japan? Brad Taylor from Home Improvement drag racing? Strange movie.
THE FAST AND THE FURIOUS: TOKYO DRIFT (2006) I should probably re-watch this movie because it was mostly in the background as I did other things. But I watched enough to get a good impression of it. And... it's okay, I guess. It's more like the original in the sense that it's an urban drama with a few drag races and action scenes here and there. After the awesome thrill ride that was 2 Fast 2 Furious, I found this one a little boring. Although, I found it amusing that Brad Taylor from Home Improvement and Lil' Bow Wow are in it.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 10, 2014 2:10:48 GMT -5
MAY 2014 THOUGHTS/OBSERVATIONS ABOUT JASON AND THE ARGONAUTS (1963)There's never gonna be another Ray Harryhausen. I'm not saying that because of his talents. Our generation, raised on videos games and the Internet, hasn't produced anyone with the patience to create art that's so painstakingly time consuming. Stop-motion animation is annoying by itself but I can't even begin to imagine what it must have been like to combine it with real people in action and fight scenes. (And now we wait for Dracula to break holes into this theory). People who complain about the Pirates of the Caribbean sequels will hate this movie. If they don't, they're hypocrites. There's so many stories, characters and creatures squeezed into a running time of 104 minutes that the film doesn't really have any breathing room. At least the Pirates sequels are two movies to tell one story. Or three if you wanna count the last one. (And now we wait for Doomsday, Franklin and MovieBuff). Speaking of things not changing 50 years later, regardless of whether you believe this film deserves to be called a classic or not, there's no denying that Harryhausen's animation and special effects are amazing. There's definitely a lot of great locations, cinematography, actors and concepts but the movie never truly puts you at the edge of your seat till Harryhausen takes over. All of his scenes are incredibly entertaining, even the silly ones. It reminds me of the summer blockbusters that rely on thrills and "movie magic" to bring joy to the world. Sometimes it works (Star Wars, Jurassic Park, Marvel Cinematic Universe) and other times it doesn't (Star Wars prequels, Transformers, Man of Steel). But Hollywood has certainly never stopped trying to catch lightening in a bottle every year. (And now we wait for JBond's sarcastic comment). THOUGHTS/OBSERVATIONS ABOUT RAY HARRYHAUSEN'S SINBAD TRILOGYIf I win, show me your boobs.THE 7TH VOYAGE OF SINBAD (1958)Dracula said what?! The 7th voyage? Where's the first 6? Bernard Herrmann's score is fantastic. (You can thank me later, Deexan). The Cyclops is introduced within the first 5 minutes. This movie is not interested in wasting your time, folks. Sinbad comes across as a Dad in a funny costume. I'm not saying that's a bad thing but it's definitely amusing and worth pointing out. It reminds me of George Reeves as Superman. I like how Sinbad is basically on his own. Sure, he gets the occasional help, but throughout most of the story he has no one he can trust and rely on. Sokurah is only interested in recovering the genie's lamp and will do whatever it takes to get it back. And the sailors are mostly criminals that Sinbad was forced to use and they never follow his orders unless their life depends on it. So that gives the movie a lot of drama and suspense and makes the action scenes very exciting because Sinbad has too many obstacles to overcome. The sailors eat a newborn bird. This movie ain't f---ing around. It's funny how the Princess doesn't care that she was transformed into a tiny human. She's having a little too much fun with it. Two kingdoms are about to go to war over this sorcery and she's having the time of her life. Quest for a magic lamp. The villain manipulates the King. The Princess hooks up with - essentially - a peasant. The Genie wants to be free. Add Robin Williams and Alan Menken songs and you have Disney's Aladdin. Am I right? The skeleton fight here is way better than in the other Harryhausen films. Am I right? And now we know where Danny Elfman got his musical ideas from. THE GOLDEN VOYAGE OF SINBAD (1973)We're totally not white people. Doctor Who plays the bad guy.I like how every time Doctor Who uses Black Magic it takes away some of his life force. It's very... masochistic. That's not something you expect to see in a Ray Harryhausen movie.Caroline Munro! "The 7th Voyage of Sinbad" is a superior movie. It has a better story and greater entertainment value. However, "The Golden Voyage of Sinbad" is more interesting. The characters are more memorable, the film has a darker tone and a more grown-up feeling to it, and I like how it doesn't rely on Ray Harryhausen's stop-motion animation to help it stand-out. It tries to be a good movie outside of the Harryhausen effects and it succeeds.SINBAD AND THE EYE OF THE TIGER (1977)It's the thrill of the fight. The editor watched Orson Welles' F for Fake and thought to himself, "that's how we should edit this movie." To be fair, that only applies to the first 20 minutes or so. This is the longest Sinbad movie, so I'm assuming that an executive at Columbia Pictures told the director to make it shorter. And instead of removing scenes, the director asked the editor to speed things up in the beginning. Unfortunately, when the movie finally gets its s--t together, the audience doesn't care anymore. Or at least that was my reaction. I didn't care about the story and characters, and I was only mildly amused by the Harryhausen effects. Why is Sinbad played by a Bee Gee? Actually, Sinbad is played by John Wayne's son, Patrick, and he's the blandest Sinbad in cinematic history. However, I did enjoy the Prince who got turned into a monkey and was at risk of remaining that way if a cure wasn't found in time. Although, he was more of a background character so his dilemma didn't improve the overall movie. Jane Seymour is gorgeous, but that blonde girl that hooks up with the Prince, is hotter than her. By the way, it's amusing that Jane Seymour was in a crappy James Bond movie and a disappointing Sinbad movie while Caroline Munro was in CLASSIC James Bond and Sinbad movies. There's actual nudity in this movie. It's not legendary nudity like in Clash of the Titans but it definitely keeps you awake. And if you pause at the right moment, you can see Jane Seymour's nipples.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 10, 2014 2:15:54 GMT -5
THOUGHTS/OBSERVATIONS ABOUT THE LONGEST DAY (1962) People don't really talk about this movie anymore, but I remember it was a big deal till Saving Private Ryan s--t all over it. I'm too lazy to do the research, so I'm not sure if the film is historically accurate, but it seems pretty legit. Casting all those Hollywood legends is a distraction. Then again, I'm not sure this movie was interested in realism. It's obviously a tribute to all the heroes who fought in World War II. Having almost every single character played by a famous actor made sense in 1962. The veterans were probably thrilled to be represented on the big screen by Hollywood superstars. James Bond and Goldfinger are in this film. How cool is that? I saw this movie for the first time in middle school and I thought it would be cool if Hollywood made a remake with Clint Eastwood in the John Wayne role.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,492
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 20:46:36 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Oct 11, 2014 11:27:59 GMT -5
I also had a lot of fun with 7th Voyage.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 11, 2014 15:12:00 GMT -5
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 11, 2014 15:23:53 GMT -5
JUNE 22, 2014 09:11 PM BODY SNATCHERS (1993) Every 10 or 20 years we get a new version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers. For those unfamiliar, it's about aliens killing humans and replacing them with exact duplicates. It's like The Stepford Wives but with aliens. And the version of the 1990's tried to shake things up by having the story take place almost exclusively in an army base. That's a clever plot because if aliens are gonna invade Earth, it makes sense for it eliminate its defenses first. But here's the problem. That's ALL that happens in the movie. It's literally just 2 hours of aliens taking over the army. There's no hero who's trying to stop it. There's no second-half where the army, now filled with alien duplicates, attacks the planet. Basically, nothing interesting or of importance happens in the movie. So, the only thing keeping the audience entertained is the hilariously bad acting, the cheesiness and the occasional nudity. D+ says Doomsday
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 11, 2014 15:38:13 GMT -5
LEAN, GREEN AND ON THE SCREEN. TEENAGE MUTANT NINJA TURTLES (1990) Before Christopher Nolan's first Batman movie in 2005, the superhero genre tended to be silly and over-the-top. Even Bryan Singer's serious X-Men films had plenty of self-aware humor and winks at the audience to remind them that they weren't watching The Godfather. So it is amusing to point out that the first superhero movie to be "grounded in reality" was released 15 years before Batman Begins and it's the one people least expect. That's right. Dust off your old VHS copy because I'm talking about the 1990 live-action adaptation of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Irish filmmaker Steve Barron is generally known for having directed a-ha's groundbreaking music video for their single, Take on Me. That's the one where a young woman is transported into a comic book. And in Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, he transports the cartoon-y heroes into the real world. Not literally, of course, but figuratively. The movie takes place in a very realistic New York City with characters who are fairly normal. The only outlandish element is the Ninja Turtles themselves and the rat they call a father. But thanks to Jim Henson and the performers, these characters blend into the "real world" by being highly developed and acting very human. Before Rocket and Groot, there was these mutated animals winning the hearts of audiences. The story is also down-to-Earth. Basically, a mysterious Japanese man known as Shredder has created a gang of teenagers who run around New York City and steal anything of value. The media calls it a silent crime wave and reporter April O'Neil (Judith Hoag) is so successful in her investigation that Shredder sends a few goons to silence her. Luckily for her, the Ninja Turtles are out on patrol and rescue her. This leads to a friendship between April O'Neil, the turtles and the rat called Splinter. They also befriend a hockey-masked vigilante named Casey Jones (Elias Koteas). But despite his low-key nature, Shredder is very dangerous and he sends his Foot Clan to kidnap Splinter and defeat the Ninja Turtles so badly that they spend half of the film in hiding. Some people, myself included, have issues with that aspect of the story because the Ninja Turtles go off into the woods and the movie turns into a low-budget drama with a random voice-over by April O'Neil. And on the topic of flaws in the story, Shredder is under-developed. Why does he need teenagers to steal things for him? What does he do with the stolen merchandise? Does he sell it in the United States or does he ship it to Japan and sell it there? And why did he choose this area of crime? Isn't there other things a former ninja could be doing? Ultimately, none of that matters in the long run. What makes Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles a beloved film is the characters. Everyone, even the minor characters, are fully developed and have an emotional arc. And since everything is "grounded in reality", you relate and care. You cheer when the Ninja Turtles and Splinter save the day. You smile when April O'Neil and Casey Jones finally kiss. You shed a tear when April's boss and his son are reunited. You give a thumps up when the disgraced police chief gets to solve the case. And you laugh at the sight of a young Sam Rockwell. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles is an emotional rollercoaster and lots of fun. To put it in simple words: it's great entertainment. Nuff said. A says DoomsdayGO NINJA. GO NINJA. GO! TEENAGE MUTANT NINJA TURTLES II: THE SECRET OF THE OOZE (1991)"OF COURSE I'LL FAKE SMILE WHEN ASKED ABOUT MEGAN FOX." For reasons I never fully understood, most people ignore the fact that the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles originated in 1984 as Frank Miller inspired characters in an independently-run comic book. For these people, TMNT will always be cartoon characters. So when the first movie became the most successful film of 1990 (seriously), their reaction wasn't to celebrate a victory for the superhero genre and comic book adaptations that took place less than a year after Tim Burton's Batman. Instead, they complained that the movie was inappropriate for children. As a result, we get a sequel that eliminates the grit, tones down the violence, replaces Casey Jones with Ernie Reyes Jr and has Vanilla Ice rapping during the climax. If the internet had been mainstream in 1991, everyone would have cursed out The Secret of the Ooze. Fortunately, 1991 was a more civilized era so we enjoyed this film for capturing the spirit of the original cartoon series. Unlike the original movie, The Secret of the Ooze has a more ambitious premise: Shredder wants to create an army of mutated animals, using the same ooze responsible for the Ninja Turtles. With a better director, this could have been a "bigger and better sequel" but instead we get a comedy where a bumbling Shredder gets defeated while college kids dance around him. It may sound like I hate The Secret of the Ooze but I really don't. It's an amusing film with some hilarious scenes. I appreciate that Donatello is given important things to do. And April O'Neil, now played by Paige Turco, is great eye-candy. But you can't ignore that this is a bad sequel to a great movie. B- on a good day. C+ on a bad day.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 11, 2014 17:18:54 GMT -5
JANUARY 2013 FELICITY (1998-2002)EPISODE 1: PILOT (SEPTEMBER 29, 1998) EPISODE 2: THE LAST STAND (OCTOBER 6, 1998) It's amusing to think that J.J. Abrams and Matt Reeves, who would go on to the realm of geekdom, got their start in a melodramatic teen show on The WB. Even more amusing is that it foreshadowed a lot of things. For starters, the series is executive produced by Ron Howard who worked with George Lucas in American Graffiti and Willow. Secondly, anyone who was a young adult at the time will remember the outcry when Keri Russell cut her famous hair. As crazy as it may sound, millions of teenage girls stopped watching Felicity and the show was cancelled. So, J.J. Abrams is very aware to NOT mess with iconic hair, and Star Wars definitely has its own famous hairdo. And lastly, John Cho, who plays Sulu in the Star Trek reboot, has a role in the show. So keep an open eye towards all these shows. Any of these people could show up in Star Wars VII. But anyway..... The first two episodes of Felicity are pretty good, maybe even great. The adorable Keri Russell plays the title character. As a guy, she's the main reason I watched the show. Not to mention that the freakin' Pink Ranger, another one of my boyhood crushes, plays her best friend. But re-watching these episodes for the first time in over a decade, I'm surprised by how relatable they are. Felicity spent all four years of high school following her parents plans, then, in a moment of impulse, she runs off on her own. That feeling of being independent for the first time in your life is captured very well by Abrams. Now granted, since this is a teen drama on The WB, there's a lot of nonsense thrown in like Felicity chasing after her high school crush (Scott Speedman) and the incredibly dorky Scott Foley. It's the only thing that prevents these two episodes from truly being a masterwork. Nonetheless, it's a very strong start for Abrams and Reeves. EPISODE 3: HOT OBJECTS (October 13, 1998) EPISODE 4: BOGGLED (OCTOBER 20, 1998) J.J. Abrams shakes things up a bit with these two episodes. Felicity, the nerdy chick from high school, is finally starting to bloom by experiencing the usual teenage stuff. Meanwhile, Ben, the popular kid from high school, is struggling with everything. Plus, the dorky Scott Foley reveals he has a girlfriend after kissing Felicity. What a sleezebag! It's always fun when things are turned upside down. J.J. did a good job with these episodes. EPISODE 5: SPOOKED (October 27, 1998) This is the first episode not written by J.J. Abrams which explains why it has more humor than the first four. There's literally an entire gag revolving around Scott Speedman making out with "the Pink Ranger" at a Halloween party which is amusing because the actual Pink Ranger is a castmember on the show. And, of course, as you can see, Keri Russell and her infamous hair dressed up as the Bride of Frankenstein. It's a nice episode and a good change of pace. EPISODE 6: CHEATING (November 3, 1998) This episode made me laugh, but not intentionally. I was wondering how many episodes it would take before the show seemed dated and the answer is six. The plotline revolves around Ben getting caught cheating and the university being very upset because there's this new - thing - called the Internet and students are using it to cheat. There's one scene in particular that truly had me laughing out loud. Scott Foley reveals that he has a "webpage." I think the last time I heard the term "webpage" was in 1998.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 13, 2014 22:23:37 GMT -5
USED CARS (1980) A few weeks ago, I wrote a retrospective review on a trio of movies that Michael Douglas, Kathleen Turner and Danny Devito made in the 1980's. The only comment I received was from PG Cooper and he revealed that he had never heard of these films. I can understand if these were indie or foreign movies but these were Hollywood films that made good money at the box office. Any casual movie fan should be familiar with them. So, as a joke, I wanted to create a thread where I reviewed films that PG Cooper probably never heard of, even though their not obscure at all. The first movie I planned on reviewing was the 1980 cult comedy, Used Cars. It's a logical choice because it's directed by Robert Zemeckis, the man responsible for the Douglas-Turner-DeVito trilogy. It's also a film that PG Cooper has most likely never seen and probably never will. And then, I realized that you can apply that statement to almost everyone currently posting on this message board. So, that's one of the many reasons why I decided to abort that thread. I could smell the failure a mile away. Nonetheless, Used Cars is a great comedy and deserves to be acknowledged by - at least - the Google bots. The movie, which is produced by Steven Spielberg, is about an underdog salesman (Kurt Russell) who's doing everything at his disposable to keep his used car dealership from being taken over by a competitor (Jack Warden) that's located across the street. The film has Zemeckis' signature style where dark and disturbing themes are disguised by lighthearted comedy and adventure. If you're a fan of his work, you'll love Used Cars. Especially since it's an R-rated movie and he has only done two of those in his entire career as a director.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 13, 2014 22:25:26 GMT -5
TUCKER: THE MAN AND HIS DREAMS (1988) An R-rated comedy about used car salesmen might not be PG Cooper's cup-of-tea, even though it's made by Robert Zemeckis and Steven Spielberg who 5 years later gave us another car movie titled Back to the Future. So an alternate viewing option might be a period drama about "the car of tomorrow" that was made by the American Graffiti duo of Francis Ford Coppola and George Lucas. It's called Tucker: The Man and His Dreams and tells the real-life story of Preston Tucker, a 1940's car maker who runs into corporate and political trouble while manufacturing the best sedan in town. Jeff Bridges plays the leading role. Personally, I think this movie is average at best, but I understand the appeal of it. Coppola and Lucas try their best to re-create Frank Capra for a contemporary audience. They succeed when it comes to tone and style but fall short with the story and characters. Also, it's important to remember that even though it's 1988, Coppola and Lucas had already peaked. Coppola didn't survive the jungles of Apocalypse Now and Lucas was frozen in carbonite except for the Indiana Jones trilogy. So there is a cloud of sadness that hovers above the entire film. If they had made this movie in the 1970's, like originally intended, it might have actually been a classic. That's why I find it so fascinating to compare Tucker to Used Cars. Zemeckis and Spielberg made a cult comedy (that totally makes up for 1941) when their best work was ahead of them. And, Coppola and Lucas made a period drama when their best work was behind them. It definitely gives you a lot to think about.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 13, 2014 22:27:51 GMT -5
THOUGHTS/OBSERVATIONS ABOUT LAYER CAKE (2004)Q and James Bond: The Early Years Even though Layer Cake is labeled as a British crime drama, it's actually a Black Comedy. The movie is about a drug supplier (Daniel Craig) who's a know-it-all and is USUALLY one step ahead of everyone else. And yet, he still loses at the end because of a simple human error. It reminds me of that Bill Hicks joke where he's complaining about people who are obsessed with health food, exercise and clean living. He said something along the lines of, "being that obsessive about perfection isn't gonna stop you from getting run over by a car." Now let's address the elephant in the room. Layer Cake is infamously known as the movie that got Daniel Craig the role of James Bond. Before Casino Royale was released, there was no way to understand how that happened. And the reason for that is because in our minds we have an image of what James Bond should be - and Daniel Craig doesn't qualify. Daniel Craig is more Bruce Willis than Sean Connery. But now that we've seen his interpretation of James Bond in three films, you can look back at Layer Cake and understand the inspiration. But before I get to that, let me acknowledge Matthew Vaughn for a moment. This was his directorial debut and he has gone on to become a respectable filmmaker in my mind. Stardust, Kick-Ass and X-Men: First Class are movies I enjoyed tremendously. And if there is one thing that stands-out the most, it's his casting choices. There's a long list of actors who owe their career to Matthew Vaughn. Now, of course, there are people who argue that these actors were on the road to fame and Matthew Vaughn was just lucky enough to cast them before they arrived there. And while there is some truth to that, it also cannot be denied that you need more than luck. You need the right movies and the right roles that are gonna attract these future A-list actors. So going back to Daniel Craig, it's now obvious what the James Bond producers saw in him, and a lot of that goes back to the choices made by Matthew Vaughn. The main character in Layer Cake has a very tough exterior but is very weak on the inside. This is NOT an original concept but Daniel Craig and Matthew Vaughn approach it in a different way. The character never reveals his true colors. This is not Mel Gibson with a gun in his mouth or Christian Bale giving speeches. This is a character who is exposed by everyone else. He presents himself in one way and the other characters say, "no, you're someone else." And, I think that's what the James Bond producers were looking for in Casino Royale. They wanted a badass James Bond who's exposed as a teddy bear by the Bond girl. BUT, the actor can never become a teddy bear. He has to maintain his badass status even though the audience knows he's a softy on the inside. And, Daniel Craig is excellent at pulling that off.
|
|
John
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 33,858
Likes: 174
Location:
Last Online Aug 22, 2018 10:50:23 GMT -5
|
Post by John on Oct 16, 2014 16:45:47 GMT -5
That's a well-written final paragraph. I hadn't really thought of it that way, good job.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 17, 2014 17:38:56 GMT -5
THE SMALLVILLE PILOT
OCTOBER 2001
Next to the 9/11 thread, which JBond hasn't bothered to archive, this might be the oldest surviving content at ComingSoon.
Shoutout to SCREEN1983 for starting the thread in MAY OF 2001.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 18, 2014 18:54:33 GMT -5
NOVEMBER 23, 2008
DISNEY'S BOLT
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 18, 2014 19:58:19 GMT -5
NOVEMBER 22, 2009
PRECIOUS
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,765
Likes: 8,645
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 17:53:27 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Nov 18, 2014 21:20:39 GMT -5
SEPTEMBER 6, 2011
|
|