Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Feb 5, 2016 20:41:02 GMT -5
Wow, Ian REALLY hates Matthew Vaughn. Matthew Vaughn > Christopher Nolan
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Feb 5, 2016 21:14:18 GMT -5
Wow, Ian REALLY hates Matthew Vaughn. Matthew Vaughn > Christopher Nolan Troll be trollin'
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:10:40 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Feb 5, 2016 21:30:21 GMT -5
Wow, Ian REALLY hates Matthew Vaughn. Matthew Vaughn > Christopher Nolan
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Feb 5, 2016 21:36:02 GMT -5
Wow, Ian REALLY hates Matthew Vaughn. Matthew Vaughn > Christopher Nolan
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:10:40 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Feb 6, 2016 9:19:27 GMT -5
Best Score
I usually introduce this category by declaring that I’m not really an expert in movie music and that the musical score isn’t often the main thing I focus on when going to a movie, but I kind of feel like I don’t have to do that this year. For one thing Spotify has made it a lot easier to check back in on the year’s best scores to confirm what they’re all about and secondly there were just a whole lot of really good scores this year that jumped out and made their greatness apparent. Carol: Carter Burwell specializes in adding a sort of grandiosity to movies that are on their surface rather small-scale and human. That makes him the perfect choice to score a film like Carol where there are huge emotions going on right below the surface but the characters don’t necessarily act on them in overly obvious ways. This melancholic score is driven largely by piano and some strings and has a sort of Phillip Glass, existential angst feel to it, but never feels bombastic and definitely drives the emotional side of the movie home in a big way. The Hateful Eight: Quentin Tarantino has made no secret of the fact that he’s one of the biggest Ennio Morricone fan out there and has filled his previous movies with snippets of the legendary Italian composer’s back catalog, but with The Hateful Eight he was finally able to get the maestro to contribute an original score to one of his films. The irony of course is that although The Hateful Eight is a western, it’s not really a spaghetti western, so Morricone had to take another tact and instead drew from his experience scoring horror movies and specifically from his work composing for John Carpenter’s The Thing. The resulting score is a tense and menacing little score that really ratchets up the tension in the locked down cabin the film is set in. Inside Out: If there was an award for “best body of work from a composer in a single year” the winner would almost certainly be Michael Giacchino, who’s been on fire in 2015. He also put together some really stellar scores for Tomorrowland and Jupiter Ascending, two movies that frankly weren’t deserving of his talents, but the best of the bunch was probably his work on Pixar’s Inside Out, which is something of a follow-up to his Oscar winning score for the film Up. Like with that movie Giacchino has come up with a great little earwormy ten note theme and builds up a score from there, coming back to this piece with various forms of instrumentation. It’s probably the most traditionally orchestral of these scores and gets a bit more conventional in the second half of the film when the adventure narrative takes over but it has a great whimsy to it and fits perfectly with the film. Mad Max: Fury Road: The score for Mad Max was the brainchild of a Dutch composer who goes by the name Junkie XL. Mr. XL is a protégé of and frequent collaborator with Hans Zimmer and the influence definitely shows as this is not unlike the music Zimmer (and XL, in an uncredited capacity) composed for The Dark Knight films in many ways. This is a big and loud score for a big and loud movie, it’s very percussive and has some very really big orchestral hits but also incorporates some cool electronic elements. What really sets it over the top is a driving theme played on strings that seems to ratchet up in just the right moments during various actions scenes. Steve Jobs: Easily the most eclectic and experimental of the five nominees, this score by relative newcomer Daniel Pemberton has a lot going on in it. There’s a side of the score which has a number of electronic elements that fits with the fact that this is a movie about people who are immersed in technology, but there’s another part that is actually based in Opera music, which fits in with writer Aaron Sorkin’s aspirations to write Jobs as a sort of tragic figure. The first segment matches the former, the second segment matches the later, and the third segment is a sort of fusion of the two. It’s a score that keeps you guessing and also cannily acts as a sort of metronome during all the witty exchanges. And the Golden Stake goes to…
Steve Jobs
This was a tough choice and is quite the coup for Daniel Pemberton, who’s such a fresh face that his first major motion picture credit was for 2013’s The Counselor and here he Burwell, Giacchino, Morricone, and a Hans Zimmer proxy. To be fair it should be noted that I have a bit of a history of giving this award to people who are outside the traditional Hollywood composer establishment, especially when they come with scores that are as experimental and interesting as this one which manages to do all sorts of crazy things while really driving this movie which wouldn’t seem like the perfect musical showcase from the outside.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,492
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:37:07 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Feb 6, 2016 9:34:24 GMT -5
Interesting choice, to be sure.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Feb 6, 2016 12:37:04 GMT -5
I don't remember a thing about Steve Jobs' score. Now, Mad Max on the other hand...
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Feb 6, 2016 18:25:57 GMT -5
Deexan PhantomKnightI don't remember a thing about Steve Jobs' score. Now, Mad Max on the other hand... You mean Star Wars
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:10:40 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Feb 6, 2016 18:46:58 GMT -5
Deexan PhantomKnightI don't remember a thing about Steve Jobs' score. Now, Mad Max on the other hand... You mean Star Wars Easily the best score... of 1977.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Feb 6, 2016 19:23:03 GMT -5
Deexan PhantomKnightI don't remember a thing about Steve Jobs' score. Now, Mad Max on the other hand... You mean Star Wars I mean Mad Motherfucking Max.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Feb 6, 2016 19:52:49 GMT -5
I mean Mad Motherfucking Max. That's not how you spell Ben "Kylo Ren" Solo.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Feb 6, 2016 20:21:53 GMT -5
I mean Mad Motherfucking Max. That's not how you spell Ben "Kylo Ren" Solo.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Feb 6, 2016 20:45:44 GMT -5
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:10:40 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Feb 6, 2016 22:08:11 GMT -5
Best Editing
Editing is not necessarily a terribly difficult thing to judge but it’s definitely a difficult thing to judge from memory. If I could take another look at some of these movies side by side and really get to the heart of how they’re cut together, but as it is I’m kind of stuck nominating movies that happen to have memorable little tricks in the way they’re cut which makes them kind of jump out to me. Bridge of Spies: Scene to scene the editing in Bridge of Spies seems competent but not wildly amazing, but it does feature a number of scene transitions that really stand out. For example there’s a moment when a judge tells everyone in the court to rise and it immediately cuts to kids standing up to give the pledge of allegiance in a classroom. There are a bunch of moments like that and they’re all pretty cool. Creed: One of the fight scenes in this movie is notable for being devoid of editing, but the other ones are notable for having a lot of really cool editing. Coogler and his editing team really knows how to make these fight scenes flow both in terms of making the punches land excitingly and also in terms of condensing the fights for time. Outside of the ring he also handles the series tradition of the training montage like gangbusters. Mad Max: Fury Road: Action movies have long been catnip for editing awards and that would bode well for this fourth Mad Max movie. Much has been made recently for the need to make action scene “coherent” and the action here would certainly count as that. The movie quite effectively manages to cut right on time when, say, a War Boy vaults from one car to the next and the film then focuses in on the vehicle he landed on. Son of Saul: Son of Saul is not a movie that claims to be in a single shot but it could almost be mistaken for something like that because the edits are in plain sight but the way they feel like they’re almost invisible. This never feels like some kind of gimmick either, rather it’s a strategy to make the film feel like this relentless nightmare that it’s protagonist can’t wake up from. Steve Jobs: The fine art of cutting in a dialogue scene is often overlooked but it is an important part of cinema and few writers provide more opportunities for finely cut dialogue than Aaron Sorkin. This particular movie’s cutting is actually fairly restrained compared to some of director Danny Boyle’s other movies but there are still some bravura sequences like a mid-film conversation between Jobs and Scully which cuts between two different eras. And the Golden Stake Goes to…
Mad Max: Fury Road
Really having trouble coming up with an alternative to this one. I’d like to give this award to something a little more interesting than an action movie once in a while, but they tend to be the movies where the editing just tends to feel extremely important and is the most memorable. This being the big scale action movie that most astutely handles a huge number of moving elements it becomes pretty hard to deny this film the award.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:10:40 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Feb 7, 2016 12:58:06 GMT -5
Best Soundtrack
While many filmmakers prefer to use original scores to add a musical element to their films, some prefer to use pre-existing music. This award is for the best use of pre-existing songs over the course of a movie. Context is key here, I am not basing this on how these soundtracks come off as albums when removed from the movie and I’m also not particularly concerned with whether the music really fits my personal musical tastes so much as how the music fits in the movie. Carol: As I’ve pointed out elsewhere, Carol has a really good score by Carter Burwell, but it also makes great use of period appropriate popular music in order to fill its soundscape. This is a pre-rock era so most of this music is of the traditional pop crooner variety, which is not generally my thing. In fact I would have very little interest in any of this music out of the context of the movie but in context it does a great job of setting the tone of the given scenes. Dope: Out of all the soundtracks here this is the one that consists of music I’m actually rather fond of outside of its use in the movie. Though the film is set in the present day its characters are obsessed with 90s hip-hop (as well they should be, modern rap is not in a great place) and some of the best golden-age tracks are used throughout. Some of the selections are a bit obvious and I might have appreciated a few more deep cuts, but I like the tracks just the same. The Martian: When Mark Watney was left behind on Mars he was “lucky” have been left behind some items, including someone’s music collection. Unfortunately that somebody was his commanding officer who happens to primarily be a disco fan and Watney is decidedly in camp “Disco Sucks.” He proceeds to complain about having to listen to the likes of “Hot Stuff” and “Turn the Beat Around” but unbeknownst to him this music is doing a great job of giving the movie about his ordeal a lot of energy. Tangerine: The Tangerine soundtrack is interesting in that it basically collects a number of tracks but lesser known trap and dub-step artists which sort of gives the film the illusion that it has an original electronic score. The music is rather abrasive and not really my cup of tea outside of the movie, in fact when I tried listening to the soundtrack on Spotify I found I could barely listen for ten minutes without turning it off, but it all blends really well in the actual movie and really gives the film an energy. Youth: Paolo Sorrentino’s Youth probably has the most eclectic soundtrack of the nominees here but there’s still definitely a consistent aesthetic to the musical selections here. This is a movie about a classical composer and there is some classical music here but also some folky vaguely ambient leaning music courtesy of Mark Kozelek as well as some interesting songs by a group called The Retrosettes Sister Band, which are played live in the movie. And the Golden Stake goes to…
The Martian
The tactic of filling your science fiction movie with cheesey music from the 70s is not an entirely original tactic, in fact Guardians of the Galaxy did something similar last year, but it feels decidedly different here than it did there. Part of that might be because there’s a real story justification for why people are listening to this kitch in space (at least one that’s more believable than having a mother who obsessively makes mix tapes) and the main character also seems well aware of how absurd that condition is.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Feb 7, 2016 13:18:46 GMT -5
There's no way no one else brought music.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:10:40 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Feb 8, 2016 19:17:11 GMT -5
Best Cinematography
Cinematography is one of the more talked about categories of technical achievement and also one of the most visible to the untrained eye. New and weird things are also happening to the field as well. Digital is really truly starting to take over and some movies aren’t even being made with professional cameras. Beasts of No Nation: Conventional wisdom might have been to make a film about African child soldiers in a sort of grungy documentary-inspired way, but instead director Cary Joji Fukunaga opted to make give this film the same kind or resources that something like Saving Private Ryan or Letters From Iwo Jima would get and part of that was to give it this very slick and expensive look but one that did feel appropriate to this location. Mustang: This film about five Turkish sisters trapped under the increasingly repressive demands of their Uncle and Grandmother is immensely aided by its visuals which are both beautiful on their surface but also manage to capture a certain child-like gracefulness. Here the camera has this amazing way of filming these girls at their level and seems to almost pick up on their energy. It might not look spectacular in still images (or maybe it does) but in motion it’s really something special. The Revenant: The fact that The Revenant was shot using natural light has been highly publicized, but that doesn’t really influence this nomination a whole lot. Firstly because it’s not a first for Emmanuel Lubezki (who pulled off the same trick to great effect in Terence Malick’s The New World) and secondly because I wouldn’t have thought any less of the film if it had been done with artificial light, but beautiful results are beautiful results and really it was the smooth but exciting camera movements in the action scenes that really made this work sing. Son of Saul: This is the only of the five nominees to have been shot on film and also the only one that wasn’t in widescreen. This shouldn’t mislead anyone into thinking that this is some kind of nostalgia piece though because it’s actually some incredibly forward thinking cinematography. The photography itself is, well it would seem inappropriate to call it beautiful given the subject matter but it’s very strong, and the fluid camera movements while having a subject in the foreground so often is really an amazing feat. Tangerine: Tangerine is not a film whose cinematography would be called “conventionally attractive” but in its own lo-fi punk indie way it has some of the most forward thinking looks in cinema this year. This movie was shot on a damn iPhone… a heavily modified iPhone, but an iPhone none the less. This would seem like a huge hinderence but it seems to free it up to have a sort of improvised mobility that a conventional film shoot. Additionally it has a cool way to accentuating the Los Angeles sun and give the sky this cool glow. I wouldn’t want every movie to look like this but it’s the perfect look for this one. And the Golden Stake goes to…
Son of Saul
Movies that employ a lot of “high concept” tricks like this can often come off as gimmicky, but here they really matter. In addition to the interesting long shots this film does some very interesting things with depth of field. The film often artfully keeps some really grizzly moments out of focus, but not in a way that feels like it’s deliberately doing so out of some kind of censorship and the film never clings to any one photographic dogma.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Feb 8, 2016 19:59:32 GMT -5
Dracula hates Sicario.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:10:40 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Feb 8, 2016 20:03:46 GMT -5
The film community needs to get off of Roger Deakins' dick, not every movie he shoots is god's gift to the moving image.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Feb 8, 2016 20:07:23 GMT -5
The film community needs to get off of Roger Deakins' dick, not every movie he shoots is god's gift to the moving image. SnoBorderZero
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,622
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:45:46 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Feb 9, 2016 10:37:55 GMT -5
I don't disagree with that at all. But he is awesome.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:10:40 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Feb 9, 2016 20:01:29 GMT -5
Best Villain
As much as people will tell you the love and empathize with heroes, the truth is some of the most memorable characters in cinema are the villains. The five villains here represent the best of the worst, the horrificly evil characters that made your skin crawl and make you question the human condition. As usual I should note that to qualify a villain must be an antagonist in the film in question and they must also be (more or less) human, so I won’t be nominating something like the bear from The Revenant or the ghost/demon thing from It Follows. The Commandant- Beasts of No Nation: The unnamed commandant in Beasts of No Nation is a sadly very plausible villain. I’ve read accounts of child soldier armies and the tactics they tend to use are very much like the ones seen in this movie. This character is, however, more than just a parroting of common African civil war figures, in the last third of the movie it becomes particularly clear that this character’s loyalty to whatever cause he was fighting for was minimal and that he’s ultimately driven by his own lust for power.
Daisy Domergue- The Hateful Eight: Daisy Domergue is a strange sort of villain in that she never really personally kills anyone but is still kind of frightening in that you can see the gears working in her head as she plots and schemes and pulls the strings behind all the violence that enters the film in its second half . Jennifer Jason Leigh imbues the character with a sort of laughing devilishness that makes the character feel like a powder keg ready to go off. Immortan Joe- Mad Max: Fury Road: Immortan Joe is a really cool looking villain. His wild hair, see through chest piece, and his weird gas mask thing with human teeth on it makes him seem like this imposing steampunk Darth Vader and that alone probably could have earned him this nomination, but there is more going on with him. The character is also a canny dictator who rules over his cult-enclave through cult of personality and domination of resources in a way that has parallels to the real world. Old Nick- Room: What’s great about Old Nick is just how pathetic he is. It’s all too easy to build up villains like this into larger than life forces and to inadvertently end up glamorizing them, here they instead show just how weak and pathetic someone would have to be to want to do this out of some twisted desire for empowerment. The decision not to cast a name actor (like, say, Michael Shannon) was also a stroke of brilliance because it underscored how real and common this kind of horrible person really is. Kylo Ren- Star Wars: The Force Awakens: Kylo Ren is clearly meant to be the stand-in for Darth Vader in this new trilogy and he’s got big boots to fill, the fact that he succeeds as much as he does at that difficult challenge is pretty amazing. The guy has a really awesome Halloween costume… just, so awesome, but there is more to him than that. The big twist that he’s Han and Leia’s son is really cool, and I love that they cast Adam Driver to make him this messed up kid rather than a pure badass to give him that extra depth. And the Golden Stake goes to…
Room
It’s weird, if you look at their wrap sheets “Old Nick” would seem to be the least dastardly of all the nominees here. He didn’t blow up a solar system, he isn’t in charge of a death cult, he isn’t training children to kill, in fact he never even kills anyone in the entire duration of the film, and yet there’s no one in this set of nominees who seems more loathsome. This might be another case of the “one death is a tragedy a million deaths is a statistic” syndrome, but still no villain this year made me more angry than this bastard.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Feb 9, 2016 20:07:52 GMT -5
Total agreement in terms of your winner.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:10:40 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Feb 10, 2016 13:04:09 GMT -5
Best Cameo
At times this category has been used more for the traditional walk-on surprise cameo but this year I’m steering it more towards the “actor in a small part” definition of the role and some of these parts are dangerously close to not being small enough. Basically anyone who’s role is too limited to really fit nicely into the supporting categories, I go ahead and put them here if they leave a big enough impression that I think they deserve a shout-out. Julie Walters- Brooklyn: Julie Walters isn’t quiet up there with the “dames” of British cinema but she’s been a very reliable character actress for decades and in Brooklyn she’s ne of the year’s biggest scene stealers. Playing the matron of a boarding house for single Irish immigrants she is the epitimy of a certain old school conservative mindset, but also isn’t the small-minded stereotype you expect her to be given the heightened behavior that could have so easily rang false if not for Walters’ careful touch. Samuel L. Jackson- Chi-Raq: It’s easy to take Samuel L. Jackson for granted. The guy has a schtick that he doesn’t tend to stray too far from and he doesn’t really blend into parts, but man oh man is he fun to watch and he’s at his motherfucking best as the narrator/chorus of Spike Lee’s crazy riff on Aristophanes’ “Lysistrata.” Pretty much every word that comes out of Jackson’s mouth in this movie is a wonderful Jacksonism that the man plays to the nth degree. The Hateful Eight - Zoë Bell: Quentin Tarantino introduced audiences to the New Zealand stuntwoman Zoë Bell in his 2007 contribution to the Grindhouse project entitled “Death Proof” and she really stole the show there, but her career never really took off from there. Tarantino seems to have stayed loyal to her though and gave her a small surprise role in his latest film The Hateful Eight as Six-Horse Judy (named as such because she’s the only Judy you know who can operate a six horse stage coach). She’s on screen just long enough for you to instantly like her all over again, then immediately tears that down by quickly killing off her character.
Donald Glover- The Martian: A lot of people seem to really hate this performance… I’m not sure why. It’s probably the same reason people seem to think it’s outrageous that The Martian was considered a comedy for the Golden Globes and I don’t. Here Glover plays a sort of anti-social geeky scientist who still manages to save the day because of his outside the box and risky ways of thinking. It’s certainly the broadest performance in the movie but I thought it was amusing. Jane Fonda- Youth: There’s a plotline running through Youth where Harvey Keitel’s character talks on and on about this actress named Brenda Morel. He really builds her up to the point where she would have to be pretty interesting when she finally shows up in the third act to not disappoint, but screen icon Jane Fonda certainly manages to make the character interesting. I wouldn’t even call her acting good per se, she’s incredibly broad and theatrical, but she definitely sells this character as this larger than life figure that Keitel’s character would be enraptured by. And the Golden Stake goes to…
Youth
This was a tricky choice, all of these seemed like really strong nominees but none of them really seemed like a clear winner. This one certainly seemed to fit the category pretty clearly what with it being a famous actor in what is basically a one scene performance and she really leaves an impression with her short time on screen. I have reservations about the choice, but it seems like the best of the possible options.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Feb 10, 2016 13:21:05 GMT -5
|
|