Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Dec 31, 2019 9:40:22 GMT -5
That's truly nowhere near the list I would have assumed. He posted his worst-of list by mistake
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 22:27:20 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Dec 31, 2019 11:22:31 GMT -5
Good picks from both of you so far. I haven't seen They Shall Not Grow Old, but I have seen everything else and can get behind a lot of choices. Nebraska hasn't really stuck with me, but in general I don't think it's been a very good decade for Alexander Payne.
Much as I've been one of the most vocal fans of Drive around these parts, I don't know if it'll make my top ten.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 22:27:20 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Dec 31, 2019 11:26:06 GMT -5
Avengers: EndgameSome preferred Infinity War (I would have Thor: Ragnarok as my 2nd favourite MCU movie) but I found the final battle in that to be boring I found the final battle in Endgame boring. I much would have preferred to just see Cap, Thor, and Tony square off against Thanos rather than yet another big battle. Comparatively, the Infinity War battle feels like more of a story, with ebbs and flows in the battle of Wakanda along with the cross-cutting to attempts to save Vision, Thor building his godkiller, and Tony's failed effort against Thanos.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,493
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:08:59 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Dec 31, 2019 11:36:17 GMT -5
Yeah, the Endgame battle was a bit of overload. They got too caught up with giving everyone their due.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Dec 31, 2019 11:40:15 GMT -5
So...would it be redundant now for there to be a separate Best of the Decade thread?
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,493
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:08:59 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Dec 31, 2019 11:40:45 GMT -5
You have some good choices in there Dooms. I like that you give Revenent its due. And The Witch; creepy movie.
Nebraska won me over with "that's not my air compressor"
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 22:27:20 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Dec 31, 2019 11:46:15 GMT -5
So...would it be redundant now for there to be a separate Best of the Decade thread? Naw. Do it.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Dec 31, 2019 11:49:47 GMT -5
Avengers: EndgameSome preferred Infinity War (I would have Thor: Ragnarok as my 2nd favourite MCU movie) but I found the final battle in that to be boring I found the final battle in Endgame boring. I much would have preferred to just see Cap, Thor, and Tony square off against Thanos rather than yet another big battle. Comparatively, the Infinity War battle feels like more of a story, with ebbs and flows in the battle of Wakanda along with the cross-cutting to attempts to save Vision, Thor building his godkiller, and Tony's failed effort against Thanos. There are definitely forgettable elements in the Endgame battle too - and the IW Thor entrance was awesome - but the battle between Cap/IM/Thor and Thanos prior to the portal moment was great, and giving everybody their moment kinda had to happen. Not to mention Tony's sign-off. While the EG lows equalled IW's lows, the highs were much higher. I guess I should've said "less enjoyable" rather than "boring", which sounds harsher than it should.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Dec 31, 2019 11:55:07 GMT -5
I'll hold fire on my top10 if somebody's going to create an offish CS! thread for the occasion.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Dec 31, 2019 12:19:53 GMT -5
Currently putting together the final order for my list. Get ready for a slightly more ambitious list than just ten, folks.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,299
Likes: 6,764
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 1:57:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Dec 31, 2019 12:21:09 GMT -5
So...would it be redundant now for there to be a separate Best of the Decade thread? Do it. These were my ‘favorites,’ not what I thought were the ‘best.’
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,299
Likes: 6,764
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 1:57:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Dec 31, 2019 12:21:30 GMT -5
You have some good choices in there Dooms. I like that you give Revenent its due. And The Witch; creepy movie. Nebraska won me over with "that's not my air compressor" ‘We liked to screw.’
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Dec 31, 2019 12:23:17 GMT -5
So...would it be redundant now for there to be a separate Best of the Decade thread? Do it. These were my ‘favorites,’ not what I thought were the ‘best.’ Can't all our own lists be considered our "favorites"? At least, that's how I'm looking at it.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Dec 31, 2019 12:26:45 GMT -5
Same.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,299
Likes: 6,764
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 1:57:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Jan 30, 2020 17:09:46 GMT -5
Little Women
Every once in a while a movie comes out that's met with a great reception. People love it, even people who you would guess might turn their nose up at it. The performances, direction, editing, it's all on point. It's given awards consideration and makes you eager to finally sit down and watch it. You carve out the time, you get yourself in that mindset and open yourself up to watching a good, quality film. Then the credits roll and you think 'That's it? Did I watch the right movie?' That was me while watching Little Women. Naturally the first reaction of anybody reading this will be 'you let the hype get to you' which is the reaction whenever an opinion falls below where everyone else normally is. That's certainly not the case as we all seek out movies that have good word of mouth and oftentimes enjoy them as much as anyone. Little Women though didn't feel like it didn't meet it's potential, it was everything that it was trying to be. Unfortunately I thought the end result was pretty good, just pretty good.
Admittedly I've never read Little Women, I've never seen any films based on the book and seeing Greta Gerwig's take was my first experience with the story. It was a nice albeit predictable story about four sisters growing up in the 1860s, how they each pursue their dreams, loves, and deal with heartache and tragedy along the way. It's a sweet tale that doesn't wander too far in either direction and has a nice balance of drama and heartfelt charm. From the setup though it didn't feel like anything really unique or original and that's part of the reason why it didn't hook me. Again having never read the books I'm not sure how it's laid out narratively but the the time jumps were used sometimes to great effect yet other times felt distracting and clunky, almost feeling like the sentiment that's building is being brought to a halt. The acting, probably the most notable thing about the movie, was great at times, not so much at others. While Saoirse Ronan gives us another reason to consider her one of the best actresses of her generation (shove it Jennifer Lawrence) there's also the likes of Laura Dern who often feels miscast here. Timothy Chalamet is a good actor as well but his character felt like an accessory when I don't think he was meant to be. So much happened because of him but at the same time he didn't feel like he was all that important. Don't get me wrong, Little Women is a good movie. It's well acted for the most part, it has great shots and at least the main characters are standout and bring a good balance to the movie. Had I watched this movie six months ago though there's no way I ever would have thought 'this is a Best Picture nominee right here.' It's a nice, well-made family movie that's a feather in the cap for Greta Gerwig. People are putting her on a pedestal at the moment which I think is premature as I found Lady Bird to be a very okay movie. While this movie is considerably better it still doesn't feel like a movie that stands apart. It feels like something all too familiar and predictable and while it has a good heart to it I never found myself getting too invested. It doesn't have many missteps but at the same time there's not a whole lot that I felt really stood out.
B so says Doomsday
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jan 30, 2020 17:48:20 GMT -5
Sexist
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,299
Likes: 6,764
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 1:57:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Jan 30, 2020 18:11:51 GMT -5
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Jan 31, 2020 13:02:24 GMT -5
Little Women
Every once in a while a movie comes out that's met with a great reception. People love it, even people who you would guess might turn their nose up at it. The performances, direction, editing, it's all on point. It's given awards consideration and makes you eager to finally sit down and watch it. You carve out the time, you get yourself in that mindset and open yourself up to watching a good, quality film. Then the credits roll and you think 'That's it? Did I watch the right movie?' That was me while watching Little Women. Naturally the first reaction of anybody reading this will be 'you let the hype get to you' which is the reaction whenever an opinion falls below where everyone else normally is. That's certainly not the case as we all seek out movies that have good word of mouth and oftentimes enjoy them as much as anyone. Little Women though didn't feel like it didn't meet it's potential, it was everything that it was trying to be. Unfortunately I thought the end result was pretty good, just pretty good. Admittedly I've never read Little Women, I've never seen any films based on the book and seeing Greta Gerwig's take was my first experience with the story. It was a nice albeit predictable story about four sisters growing up in the 1860s, how they each pursue their dreams, loves, and deal with heartache and tragedy along the way. It's a sweet tale that doesn't wander too far in either direction and has a nice balance of drama and heartfelt charm. From the setup though it didn't feel like anything really unique or original and that's part of the reason why it didn't hook me. Again having never read the books I'm not sure how it's laid out narratively but the the time jumps were used sometimes to great effect yet other times felt distracting and clunky, almost feeling like the sentiment that's building is being brought to a halt. The acting, probably the most notable thing about the movie, was great at times, not so much at others. While Saoirse Ronan gives us another reason to consider her one of the best actresses of her generation (shove it Jennifer Lawrence) there's also the likes of Laura Dern who often feels miscast here. Timothy Chalamet is a good actor as well but his character felt like an accessory when I don't think he was meant to be. So much happened because of him but at the same time he didn't feel like he was all that important. Don't get me wrong, Little Women is a good movie. It's well acted for the most part, it has great shots and at least the main characters are standout and bring a good balance to the movie. Had I watched this movie six months ago though there's no way I ever would have thought 'this is a Best Picture nominee right here.' It's a nice, well-made family movie that's a feather in the cap for Greta Gerwig. People are putting her on a pedestal at the moment which I think is premature as I found Lady Bird to be a very okay movie. While this movie is considerably better it still doesn't feel like a movie that stands apart. It feels like something all too familiar and predictable and while it has a good heart to it I never found myself getting too invested. It doesn't have many missteps but at the same time there's not a whole lot that I felt really stood out. B so says Doomsday 100% agree.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jan 31, 2020 15:28:25 GMT -5
Sexist
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Jan 31, 2020 20:32:12 GMT -5
Let's see what the women of CS! think!
|
|
thebtskink
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jul 2000
It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again.
Posts: 19,462
Likes: 4,984
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 15:43:24 GMT -5
|
Post by thebtskink on Jan 31, 2020 20:42:55 GMT -5
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,299
Likes: 6,764
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 1:57:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Jan 31, 2020 20:45:21 GMT -5
Ohhh southern, we didn't even get to know each other.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,299
Likes: 6,764
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 1:57:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Feb 9, 2020 17:43:54 GMT -5
Richard Jewell
Back in the old days I used to be pretty fond of Clint Eastwood as a filmmaker. It wasn't difficult, in the 2000s he had a late career comeback making film after film praised by critics and moviegoers. Crime dramas, sports films, war movies, he knocked it out the park almost every time. But we all know that, you were there. You watched as his movies became more and more simple, more and more generic and on the nose and reminding you that you've seen all of this before. As a director who is often said to deliver ahead of schedule, under budget and it's rumored to prefer single takes of many of his scenes, it became evident to Clint Eastwood fans that maybe those aren't always good things. My admiration for Clint Eastwood never really went away, I still love his great movies that are now several years or decades old, I just got used to the idea that he's a filmmaker whose best years are far behind him. So when Richard Jewell came and went I didn't mind, I knew it probably wasn't a bad movie but I didn't expect much from it. To that end you can almost say that it exceeded my minimal expectations.
For all you young'uns amongst us, the 1996 Atlanta Olympics were a big deal as it always is when the Olympics comes to the States. What put it into a league of its own was the bombing that took place there. Even pre-9/11 it was a sensitive time. The Oklahoma City bombing was only a year and change earlier and at the time it was the most devastating terrorist attack on our soil. Richard Jewell very simply and non-controversially chronicles the man who found the bomb in Atlanta, helped get people to safety before detonation and was later the focus of an FBI investigation and media witch hunt that put him in the public spotlight. Like other Eastwood films of late, Sully being the one that sticks out in my mind the most, this once again feels like a story that maybe didn't need to be told. I remember seeing a commercial with Clint Eastwood saying to the camera 'We're telling the truth about what really happened.' That's great, but are there that many people who are clamoring to see this story unfold on the big screen? Apparently not because the movie flopped. Not to say that it's a bad film, in fact it's better than a lot of what Eastwood has produced as of late (Jersey Boys anyone?) but that still doesn't help it break out of being a movie that settles for being just fine. Again, much of the film falls into cliche like Olivia Wilde's totally over the top turn as reporter Kathy Scruggs, a portrayal that almost landed WB in court, and Jon Hamm playing 'Generic, Uninteresting, Paper-Thin FBI Agent(TM).' I've said it before and I'll say it again, if anyone can crack the code of how to turn a police officer in a crime movie into someone who's actually interesting to watch they'll be on easy street for the rest of their career. Michael Mann did it in Heat, why is it so hard for everyone else to do?
While I enjoy Eastwood films and try to watch them so long as they're tolerable, it's not a secret that a lot of critics put him on a pedestal and give him much more of a pass than other filmmakers. Maybe it's because he's been a Hollywood fixture for sixty years, maybe some people like me are secretly hoping that he has one more great movie in there somewhere, I'm not sure but I think of all the movies on this year's list Richard Jewell is the one I'd take off of AFI's Top 10 of the year. The fact that Sully made it on the same list for that year is laughable. Sully! But enough about Eastwood. He has his legacy and we have Richard Jewell, another perfectly fine movie that no one is going to care about in...well, I don't think anyone cared about it that much in the first place.
B so says Doomsday
And there it is, the last of this year's AFT Top 10 Films of 2019. Hopefully one or two of you enjoyed going through some of these with me and frankly I think that 2019 was actually a pretty damn good year for movies in that there were several I really enjoyed which I can't say for previous years. Hopefully 2020 at least comes close.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jan 21, 2021 18:31:06 GMT -5
Miami Vice (2006)
Miami Vice is Michael Mann's film based on his television show from the 1980s. With this update gone are the flashy suits and signature 80s flare that Mann used to full effect in his projects of that time period. Now we're into the gritty digital era of filmmaking, one lacking any humor or emotion. If you want to see some cool shootouts and boats go really fast then this movie's for you. If you want something that might give you any sense of excitement, suspense or intrigue you might want to look elsewhere. Miami Vice stars Jamie Foxx as Ricardo Tubbs and Colin Farrell as Sonny Crockett. I had to look up the names to make sure because it was tough for me to remember just hours after finishing the movie. Mann has always walked that line of 'style over substance' and sometimes there's a great combination of both. Miami Vice is not it. It's totally devoid of any character development. It's sole focus is on these two cops who go undercover in order to infiltrate a drug ring. Sounds pretty simple right? Then why is the movie so convoluted? Throughout the movie it seemed to be almost trying to be as confusing as possible as if it made it more intelligent than it really is. At its core it's a movie where two cops go undercover until they eventually get betrayed by the guys they're trying to bring down. The movie is loaded with a ton of police jargon and terminology which usually adds to the effect of Mann's films however sometimes it can add to the confusion like it does here. It seems as if Mann wanted to make an 'adult' crime movie but someone convinced him that he can't have a clear-cut story or interesting characters, it has to play out like you know what's going on. One thing I've always admired about Mann movies for the most part is that they eschew any tired cinematic tropes and are as realistic as possible. Sometimes this is to the detriment of any character development especially with any female characters as I stated in earlier reviews. Miami Vice drops you right into the middle of things almost assuming that you know who these characters are. The reason it's so important however is because without anyone to care about on screen the tension is flat when it's finally presented. That's Miami Vice in a nutshell. There's a lot going on and there are even a few pretty cool action sequences but it doesn't mean anything when we know and care so little about anybody. Again I want to say to Michael Mann 'just because a character has sex with someone doesn't automatically equal chemistry.' What made Collateral and Heat so fresh and energetic weren't that they had cool shootouts, it's because they were cool characters who were in cool shootouts. It didn't take a whole ton of dialogue but we knew enough about Max that we were invested. Heat is all about characters and how their lives are connected. Miami Vice is textbook style over substance, something that could have been fun had it just followed some Filmmaking 101 basics and made people that we knew. I also have a personal gripe with Colin Farrell as Crockett. There was a time where I despised him more than just about anyone else making movies. My anger has tempered the past few years and I've seen him in some really good roles but here is one where they really should have cast something else. Jamie Foxx seems natural while you can tell Farrell is trying so, so hard. His scratchy, gruff voice is unnatural and his constant shouting of dialogue made me wonder if he even knew what the scenes were about some of the time. It's maybe the first time that I would say someone in a Michael Mann movie was really miscast. Miami Vice is another misfire for Michael Mann. It's strange after watching his movies again that although I still consider him one of my favorite filmmakers (I plan to do this with another filmmaker after finishing Blackhat) it's becoming more obvious that he has as many mediocre films as he does great and exciting ones. The guy is in his mid-seventies and makes a movie roughly once every five years or so. Lets hope that he has one or two more good ones in him before he hangs it up. I mean look at what George Miller just did at his age. Miami Vice may have been the worst movie of 2006. Miami Vice is bad, but The Keep is by far Mann's worst movie. That was a painful one to get through. Miami Vice is bad, but The Keep is by far Mann's worst movie. Worse than Blackhat? Get the fuck out. Worse than Blackhat? Get the fuck out. Blackhat is the only movie by him I haven't seen, but I would be shocked if that movie is worse than The Keep. The Keep made no sense, was boring, and totally laughable. I'm sure Blackhat is at least a competent movie, The Keep is a piece of shit. Someone had the balls to defend Miami Vice
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,622
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 21:31:20 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Jan 21, 2021 18:39:39 GMT -5
Why would anyone waste their time doing a deep dive into that movie?
|
|