PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,649
Likes: 4,066
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 0:10:25 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 19, 2015 12:11:03 GMT -5
The horror genre has been going through something of a renaissance over the last year and a half. The Babadook took its craft seriously, added levels of interpretive detail, and was intelligently written by and for adults. Meanwhile, this year’s It Follows may have been a little less sophisticated than The Babadook, but it made up for that with lots of style and a clever high concept. Now, Crimson Peak has entered the fray. Unlike the aforementioned films, which were made by relative newcomers, Peak comes from genre expert Guillermo del Toro, and sees his return to the genre he build his reputation on. Set in the early 1900s, Crimson Peak follows Edith Cushing (Mia Wasikowska), an aspiring horror story writer and the daughter of a wealthy American industrialist Carter Cushing (Jim Beaver). Carter is approached by Thomas Sharpe (Tom Hiddleston), a British inventor seeking funding for a project. Carter refuses, but Thomas takes a liking to Edith. The two begin a courtship and quickly marry. Thomas takes Edith to live in his decaying mansion in England, along with Thomas’ sister Lucille (Jessica Chastain). Not only is the house in a decrypt state, but Edith is certain she keeps seeing unknown figures walking through the halls. These figures quickly reveal themselves to be ghosts and begin to more directly plague Edith. Fearful, she turns to Thomas and Lucille who both dismiss her claims. This, in conjunction with Thomas’ late night disappearances, cause Edith to question the siblings’ motives. While Guillermo del Toro is well-versed in horror trappings, I do think this is something of a leap for him. Movies like The Devil’s Backbone or Pan’s Labyrinth used horror iconography to tell intimate dramas, while his Hellboy series used similar visuals as a spring broad for action. With Crimson Peak though, del Toro has fully jumped into horror. The film is basically a haunted house movie, one which also deals with madness and also features some very graphic violence. What’s exciting about all of this is how much del Toro embraces the horror elements. The director has said he wanted to return to more “grand” horror films in the vein of The Exorcist and The Shining. The film is full of ghosts, monsters, a haunted mansion, blood, bugs, and full moons. It’s a horror film that clearly loves horror and at a time where most films of the genre have tended towards the minimalist, it’s refreshing to see a horror film go big. Crimson Peak may be full of conventional horror elements, but the execution makes these things feel fresh. Guillermo del Toro is known for his great visual sensibilities and he brings that to play here. Particularly impressive are his creature designs, which are excellent. The ghosts here are covered in blood and move as if all of the bones within the body are broken. The designs are truly frightening. I also really loved the design of Thomas and Lucile’s mansion. You can see where it used to be very beautiful before it started to fall apart. Not only is the place in decay, but the walls also ooze with clay (which looks like blood) and there is a giant hole in the ceiling which snow and leaves often drift through. It’s a great design and the house’s construction is very detailed. The costumes are also excellent and the cinematography is very strong. Visually, Crimson Peak is really awesome, but that isn’t really surprising for del Toro. His films usually look great and if they do falter it’s narratively. Well, Crimson Peak’s story is pretty engaging but it does have some problems. I won’t get into spoilers, but essentially the audience is led to believe things will play out in a certain way and they end up going another. Not that the film has some crazy twist, but the focus shifts in a way I wasn’t expecting. I like the idea of the narrative shift, but I don’t think it fully works. Something about the turn feels a little disappointing. The film does still find its way again and ends on a pretty intense climax. I also wasn’t crazy about the film’s supporting cast. The principle leads are all fine. Tom Hiddleston is well-cast as a charming aristocrat with suspicious intent, and Jessica Chastain really shines as his sister. But with much of the supporting cast, it’s very apparent one is watching an actor dressed up in period clothes, not a real character. Nowhere is this more apparent than Charlie Hunman’s character. I don’t get why Del Toro keeps casting this guy. I’ve heard Hunman is good in Sons of Anarchy, but his collaborations with Del Toro haven’t worked out really worked out at all. Overall, Crimson Peak is a lot of fun and is probably a perfect film to see in October. It’s spooky and atmospheric, but it also delivers the goods one expects in a quick and entertaining fashion. I do think it could have been tighter in a few spots, and I do hope Del Toro eventually returns to telling genuinely powerful works like The Devil’s Backbone, but that isn’t really fair to bring to Crimson Peak. This isn’t meant to be a powerful drama or thematically complex work; this is escapist genre filmmaking. On that level, Crimson Peak works quite well. B+
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 23:26:18 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Oct 19, 2015 16:38:02 GMT -5
Going to see this in the next few days, really amped for it.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 6,769
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 23:26:18 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Oct 21, 2015 12:36:19 GMT -5
Crimson Peak
Crimson Peak is Guillermo del Toro’s latest horror(?) story sits pretty well alongside Devil’s Backbone and Pan’s Labyrinth. It’s a story about a New York woman who is given dire warnings by the ghost of her mother and years later finds herself married to a struggling English entrepreneur who brings her to Allerdale Hall, his family estate in England. While there she is visited by more ghosts who reveal the dark secrets and sinister plot of her husband and his equally creepy sister.
Crimson Peak has its share of scares, startles and jumps. Several times it’s successful in shocking an audience. It’s a very beautiful movie to look at and once again del Toro delivers on giving us stylish and horrific sets and demons. I just couldn’t really get behind the story. It’s a movie that hits the same beats as other del Toro films and borrows heavily from them with many of those beats dragging much longer than they need to. If you were to watch Devil’s Backbone and Crimson Peak back to back you would notice that the themes and even ending are exactly the same. It makes me wonder what del Toro’s motivation was for making the movie. It’s not like it’s a story that he was desperate to tell, he’s already told it. The movie comes off as a ‘Greatest Hits’ mashup of Guillermo del Toro movies and while that isn’t necessarily a bad thing it doesn’t do anything to distinguish itself.
B so says Doomsday
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,105
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 29, 2015 20:10:46 GMT -5
Crimson Peak(10/25/2015)
There are a lot of directors who rise to the occasion once their labeled as geniuses and then use the greater resources that their higher profiles give them, then there are other who maybe get a little too wrapped up in their own hype and fail to deliver because of it and I’m becoming increasingly worried that Guillermo del Toro is going down that second path. Del Toro is a genre director who, for a while, pretty effectively played the “one for them, one for me” game. He would provide his distinctive flair and love of genre to Hollywood blockbusters like Blade II and then go off to Mexico or Spain in order to make slightly more sophisticated fare like Pan’s Labyrinth. In fact Pan’s Labyrinth is a big part of why Del Toro is so highly thought of, it’s easily the director’s best movie and it was bookended by his Hellboy movies, which were easily the best showcase for how his style could be applied to large scale entertainments. That one, two, three punch made us forget some of the more questionable elements in his earlier films like Mimic. Unfortunately after a long five year wait for his follow-up to Hellboy II: The Golden Army all we got was the movie Pacific Rim. That movie had some of that Del Toro creativity going for it which made it watchable, but it was still a pretty massive disappointment. It was, at its heart, a rather dumb movie with a lot of the same sloppy mistakes hurt some of his lesser efforts. That was something I could get over though because his next movie, Crimson Peak, looked like it would be a return to the kind of movie that Del Toro should have been making all along: smarter, smaller scale, more literary genre films in the vein of Pan’s Labyrinth and The Devil’s Backbone.
Crimson Peak is a gothic horror film set around the turn of the century and focusing on a bookish young woman named Edith Cushing (Mia Wasikowska) who is the daughter of a wealthy American industrialist named Carter Cushing (Jim Beaver). Edith dreams of becoming a writer rather than a housewife but her plans are put somewhat to the test when a dashing, if somewhat suspicious Englishman named Thomas Sharpe (Tom Hiddleston) arrives in New York to present a business proposal to her father. Sharpe and his sister Lucille (Jessica Chastain) belong to a lineage that has seen better days. Most of their money has been lost, their old mansion is in disarray, and the clay mines that once made their family a fortune are no longer in use. Carter Cushing comes to dislike the Sharpes but in spite of his objections his daughter soon falls for Tomas and after a tragedy makes her reconsider her options she runs away with him back to England, but soon she will find that Sharpe’s dilapidated home has a number of dark secrets that are waiting for her.
To make Crimson Peak del Toro has restrained a lot of his humor and his habit of recklessly throwing cool comic-con approved genre elements at the wall and hoping it all sticks. Instead he’s adjusted his style to actually work quite well with the film’s period elements. Buffalo New York and the high society thereof is quite well rendered here and Del Toro mines the time period for interesting little details. When the film transitions to Brittan del Toro gives us a real haunted house for the ages, complete with the brilliant touch of having it be built on red clay which makes it look like it’s drenched in blood. The film also has a really good cast that seems like it would be a perfect fit for a less macabre costume drama. The classically trained Tom Hiddleston could probably do a part like this in his sleep, Mia Wasikowska shows that she’s aging into adult roles quite ably, Jessica Chastain continues to prove that she can do pretty much anything, and even Charlie Hunnam (who was boring as hell in Pacific Rim) is mostly able in his role here.
So why isn’t this movie great? Surprisingly, it’s the horror elements. I’m kind of surprised to be saying this, but I’m beginning to think Guillermo del Toro doesn’t really understand horror cinema. Let me qualify that statement. Del Toro definitely loves monsters passionately and has a long history of rendering them onscreen brilliantly and his knowledge of horror literature and tropes, however, I’m not sure he’s really the master of ratcheting on screen suspense that people thinks he is. While he’s made a number of horror-tinged action movies in the last decade I don’t think del Toro has made something that was actually trying to scare anyone since 2001’s The Devil’s Backbone, and as stylish and interesting as that film was it shared a fatal flaw with Crimson Peak: a lack of patience. Rather than slowly teasing his monsters and ghosts here, del Toro has them show up in full view very quickly, which diminishes them of a lot of impact by eliminating their mystery. It also doesn’t help that these ghosts look very fake and CGI-ish, and even on a design level they seem a bit uninspired as far as Guillermo del Toro creations go. They have that same “matter floating in water” effect that was used previously in The Devil’s Backbone but this makes less sense given that they weren’t supposed to be drowning victims, and in general they look more or less like what you’d expect a ghost to look like.
On top all that, the film’s script has a couple of clear issues as well, mainly related to the main character’s motivations. This is a character who, in the first scene of the movie, is visited by the ghost of her dead mother and warned to “beware Crimson Peak” and is then given yet another warning by this dead mother to “beware Crimson Peak” and yet she still finds herself doing a very bad job of being wary of Crimson Peak. Even without that spectral warning it seems like there are a lot of warning signs that this character seems oddly oblivious to, especially given that she’s supposed to be this intelligent young woman. Why does she just accept that this horribly dilapidated house is an acceptable living quarters? That all the plainly creepy stuff that’s going on is something to be shrugged off? That the man she’s decided to marry seems really shady? The answer of course is that if she did act rationally and flee this situation there wouldn’t be a movie. To some degree these are just genre conventions that you just need to go along with, and I’m not going to act like they were complete deal breakers, but there were things that Del Toro could have done to mitigate some of these concerns.
Crimson Peak’s other major problem is just that it isn’t a particularly original work, which is in part owed to the fact that Del Toro has opted to borrow heavily from similar works of gothic fiction like “The Turn of the Screw” and “The Fall of the House of Usher” and to fit his work very much in that lineage. There is, however, a point at which you have to diverge from your sources of inspiration and add your own twist and I don’t think Del Toro did enough to make his film stand out. Frankly, I kind of felt like it was a story I had already seen before. And yet, there was a lot about the execution here I did admire. The film does have the skeleton of a great horror movie, the actors do sell the material, and Del Toro does adjust his style nicely to better suit his material. Once all the cards are on the table the film does end pretty well and some of its gorier images are effectively disturbing and do feel somewhat unique when placed against a more upscale backdrop. There’s the skeleton of a great horror film here, and I can’t help but think that with a little more finesse in the writing and a little more restraint with the ghosts this could have really been something. As it stands it’s a pretty flawed film that is still entertaining in spite of itself.
*** out of Four
|
|