Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,106
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 19:16:37 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 16, 2017 6:33:21 GMT -5
Film Sixteen: Pumpkinhead (1988) This little cult horror film was actually directed by the great VFX artist Stan Winston, and sure enough the special effects are clearly the best thing in the movie. The plot focuses in on a weird situation where a child is killed in an accident and the perpetrator goes nuts because it could kill his parole and the father of the kid summoning a monster to stalk and kill this guy and his friends. The monster looks pretty cool, if a bit derivative of the xenomorph from Alien, but the human characters in this thing are pretty bad. They obviously went for some budget actors and the movie suffers from it, and the horror/stalking scenes are only alright. Really not a lot to say about this one, it passes the time well enough and it has a cool monster in it, whether that’s enough will vary by viewer. **1/2 out of Five
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,791
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 17:56:45 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 16, 2017 9:40:49 GMT -5
THE BELIEVERS (1987)This is the other Caribbean voodoo movie from the 80’s. But while Wes Craven took us to them, here, they come to us. Somehow that seems more racist. There’s a strong fear-of-foreigners vibe. Do people really think that immigrants from the Caribbean are gonna come to America and commit crimes using Black Magic? Whole thing’s silly! Then again... our President convinced a portion of voters that all Mexicans are rapists. So what the fuck do I all?
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Oct 16, 2017 12:05:18 GMT -5
It’s been fun so far, but it’s time to kick things up a notch, baby. Today SCHLOCKTOBER turns into… SHARKTOBERIt’s Shark Week here on my 31 Days of Halloween! For the next five days we’ll be either afraid to go in the water or wettin’ ourselves with laughter in its domain. Five Rifftrax shark films: some good, some bad (well...one good, and the rest laughably bad). Let’s make a splash, shall we? Day Sixteen - Sharktober Day One:Film Year: 1975 Director: Steven Speilberg Starring: Roy Scheider, Robert Shaw, Richard Dreyfuss, Lorraine Gary, Murray Hamilton Riff Year: 2009 Riffers: Michael J. Nelson, Kevin Murphy, Bill Corbett Selected Short: An Aquarium in Action Aquarium. Translated literally from the original Latin, it means "boredom box". Every day, thousands of aquariums are completely ignored by passersby in our nation's dentist offices and Chinese restaurants. They are also popular suicide destinations for little plastic scuba men. Aquariums are mainly known for making homes smell funny and, sooner or later, winding up empty out in the garage.
An Aquarium In Action seeks to change all that. A rallying point for aquarium owners, or aquarists*, the film demonstrates just how exciting these bacteria farms can be. It does so by simulating the experience of staring at an impressively ordinary grade school aquarium for an extended period of time. Shiver at the intense action as the children struggle to save baby guppies from certain death in the maws of their own parents. Then watch the children wonder why they bothered saving these ugly little things in the first place, when seeing them devoured would have been much more awesome.
Join Mike, Kevin and Bill as they see who can lick the most scum off the sides of An Aquarium In Action!
*Actual word Let’s start off by learning about fish that won’t swallow us whole and gnaw on our corpses, won’t we? An Aquarium in Action is, as promised, NON-STOP ACTION of a bunch of kids yammering by a fish tank. They talk about how to properly take care of fish so the youngsters watching can learn. Wee. So much action. The riffing mostly stays afloat, and is consistent enough to prevent the short from becoming boring. There’s a wide variety of references used, ranging from drugs to sex to mafia to cannibalism. But the short is such a snoozer that I’d really only recommend it to seasoned Rifftrax fans. And now our feature presentation... Just speak the word "jaws" to anyone and their pulse quickens, the hair on the back of their neck stands up as a dim memory rises to the surface of their consciousness - a memory of the first time they saw Murray Hamilton. Most likely it was in an episode of B.J. and the Bear, or perhaps The F.B.I with Efrem Zimbalist, Jr., but if not that, then his turn as the sartorially resplendent, gravelly voiced mayor of Amity in Jaws, the movie that made a generation of people afraid to go into the water (they were justifiably terrified of getting a skin disease from coming in contact with Quint's run-off.) Yes, long before blockbusters like Spider-Man 2, Shrek the Third, or Garden State there was Jaws, the story of small town mayor Larry Vaughn (played by the magnificent Murray Hamilton) and his quest to find the perfect jacket to wear while resisting the whining of Richard Dreyfuss. There is also a shark.
Mike, Bill and Kevin cruise the movie like a large squalus grabbing it with their powerful—oh, what's the word for it...mandibles - then, a little shakin', a little tenderizin', and down it goes.We’re halfway through October, so we might as well peak and go all downhill from here. Jaws is probably my favorite film that I’ll be watching this marathon. I’ve been a fan since I was a little kid, watching this movie whenever it came on cable. It’s a wonderful film, starting out as a horror movie and evolving into a high seas adventure for it’s iconic climax. Jaws is about Sheriff Martin Brody, who is dead set on closing the beaches after a shark attack off the coast of Amity Island only to be shot down by the mayor of the town, insisting the beaches stay open for lucrative summer income. When the shark attacks continue, Brody is proven right and they hire a shark hunter named Quint to catch it. I’m not going to delve too much on this one, as it’s iconic stature has assured that almost every film fan has seen it. But even if the movie isn’t your cup of tea it’s hard to deny the pure craft behind it. A notoriously troubled production (there are several awesome documentaries on the blu-ray), Jaws stayed in production through pure ingenuity and improvisation. The blood, sweat, and tears paid off in the end and the film became an all-time classic, becoming known as “the first summer blockbuster,” two years before Star Wars would shatter its records. Everyone in 1975 had to see Jaws. It was that thing you needed to do that summer. Times change and certain things about it feel a bit dated today, which is why you’d assume Rifftrax would tackle it. Surprisingly enough there’s not many “fake shark” riffs to be had in Jaws. I strongly believe the reason the guys riffed this particular movie is Robert Shaw’s character Quint. They light up whenever he’s onscreen and let loose on his gruff, almost incoherent grumbling. Quint’s certainly the star of this riff. When Shaw is offscreen there’s not much inspiration. Jaws is funny in spurts. Occasionally there is a really funny line that hits at just the right moment, but it seemingly falls dead as the film doesn’t give them much to work with. It’s very unfortunate they chose to riff the original and not one of the numerous ripe sequels, especially since they take some digs at Jaws: The Revenge during this runtime yet we as an audience are left wondering why they didn’t riff that instead. By the way, the riff for this one actually runs longer than the movie, as they pad past the end credits with a song called “When a Man Loves a Shark,” performed by Kevin.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,649
Likes: 4,066
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 18:25:23 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 16, 2017 16:37:18 GMT -5
Missed a bunch. So, Days 12-16: A Bunch of StuffThe Black CatThe Black Cat was the first pairing of Boris Karloff and Bela Lugosi and the two icons are easily the best part of the film. Karloff plays a satanic cult leader and Lugosi plays a doctor seeking vengeance on Karloff. Cool enough premise, and it is indeed fun to watch these two at each other's throats. Both also give pretty strong performances. The film built around the two however, is not so engaging. It's clear this was a much cheaper and quicker project for Universal than something like Dracula or Frankenstein. Occasionally director Edgar G. Ulmer captures a cool visual, but for the most part the style is flat. The movie also focuses largely on a boring young couple and even ends on them rather than Karloff or Lugosi. All of this does serve to limit The Black Cat, but it is worth seeking out for old-school horror fans just for its leads. C+The Man from Planet XI first heard of The Man from Planet X doing research for a video essay on how Night of the Living Dead changed horror movie history and even incorporated some footage into the final product. So when I noticed TCM was screening the B-science-fiction film, I thought I'd give it a shot despite expecting a pretty bad movie. I basically got what I expected. This is dumb, unsophisticated sci-fi horror which was clearly made quickly and on the cheap. The production values are weak as all, the performances are lame, the dialogue blunt and corny, etc etc. There is some fun to be had here, but mostly of the "so bad it's good" type and even this is in short supply. DHouse of 1000 CorpsesHouse of 1000 Corpses is an undeniably weird movie to get a relatively wide release and it's also so sick and so perverse that there is something to be admired about the whole, but this is a very sloppy movie in a lot of ways. It's clear Rob Zombie had decent money to work with, but all the same the film is visually weak. The lighting feels cheap (even if it technically isn't) and the camera placement is not terribly inspired. Zombie also falls back on rapid-cutting of unrelated material way too much and it often isn't clear what exactly is the point. The whole thing is also a narrative mess, beginning off the rails and only moving further past until the climax goes completely bonkers. Again, there is something admirable about Zombie's disregard for conventional narrative structure, but what he's replaced it with isn't very inspiring. The other thing that really hurts the film are the completely loathsome characters. I'm not even talking about the psychopathic murder family either, I'm talking about the victims, who are some of the most unlikable little shits you'll ever see in a horror movie. All that to say I get why people hate this movie and I too think it's bad overall. And yet, there is something about it that earns some level of appreciation. If nothing else, this film genuinely gets under my skin because of it's sheer depravity, and I do think that's somewhat impressive. Does that make the shoddy filmmaking acceptable? Not really, but it is more tolerable than it would be in a less viscerally stirring film. D+Isle of the DeadVal Lewton reminds me a lot of Roger Corman. Both specialized in producing B-horror movies and both also helped bring a long directors who would go onto bigger things down the line. Corman's turnout is of course legendary, but Lewton worked with some strong directors early too, notably Robert Wise, Jacques Tourneur, and Isle of the Dead's director Mark Robeson, who would go on to direct Oscar-nominated work. Anyway, I bring this up because I don't have much to say about Isle of the Dead itself. The film has a lot of the ingredients of a solid horror movie, including Boris Karloff in a compelling turn, a set-up which is more psychological, and some decent atmosphere. Unfortunately, none of these elements over collate fully. The mystery fizzles, there's some weak acting from the supporting cast, it never really drums up the necessary suspense, and the ending is a bit of a wet noodle. Decent watch, but not something I'll remember. CThe Thing from Another WorldI've long wanted to catch-up with the original version of The Thing from Another World but now that I've caught up with it it's kind of hard to judge. For one, the film is certainly pretty well-made and feels a step above the kind of B-grade sci-fi/horror movies that the 1950s used to put out. The film also clearly influenced subsequent greats like Alien and John Carpenter's excellent remake. That legacy is a bit of a double-edged sword however as the films this one inspired kinda put this one to shame. Carpenter's remake in particular is able to take the good ideas here and really stew them to perfection while also having a more interesting cast and some top-notch practical effects. Still, this is a pretty solid genre movie with some rightfully iconic moments and it's certainly a fun watch. B
|
|
Wyldstaar
Producer
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,900
Likes: 1,267
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 7:55:31 GMT -5
|
Post by Wyldstaar on Oct 16, 2017 22:36:40 GMT -5
I just finished watching the original Universal Monsters Frankenstein. I hadn't seen it since I was a kid. It was pretty good. Very short, at only 70 minutes.
It didn't end the way I remembered at all. I think that perhaps the TV cut I saw back then left the original ending out, because it's the obviously tacked-on sort of happy ending used to make the prudes shut up. There are zero consequences for Dr. Frankenstein, and he gets to live happily ever after with his new bride.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,791
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 17:56:45 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 16, 2017 22:47:04 GMT -5
I just finished watching the original Universal Monsters Frankenstein. I hadn't seen it since I was a kid. It was pretty good. Very short, at only 70 minutes. It didn't end the way I remembered at all. I think that perhaps the TV cut I saw back then left the original ending out, because it's the obviously tacked-on sort of happy ending used to make the prudes shut up. There are zero consequences for Dr. Frankenstein, and he gets to live happily ever after with his new bride. Now watch Bride of Frankenstein.
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Oct 17, 2017 10:45:53 GMT -5
Day Seventeen - Sharktober Day TwoFilm Year: 2013 Director: Anthony C. Ferrante Starring: Ian Ziering, Tara Reid, John Heard Riff Year: 2014 Riffers: Michael J. Nelson, Kevin Murphy, Bill Corbett Featured Short: A Case of Spring Fever Finally, the acclaimed smash hit RiffTrax Live event of 2014 is now available to own! Considered by many critics to be one of the greatest movies ever made in the “Tornado full of sharks” genre, Sharknado debuted in 2013 to unprecedented buzz. Not since Snakes On A Plane had the internet been so excited about a movie, and not since the late 90s had anyone been so excited about anything starring Tara Reid.
From the moment it debuted, Sharknado was one of the most requested titles in RiffTrax history. It makes Jaws IV look like Jaws III, and Jaws III look like Jaws. Riffed LIVE from the State Theater in Minneapolis and broadcast to over 700 theaters across North America, this hilarious live event also features an all-new take on the Mystery Science Theater 3000 fan-favorite short A Case of Spring Fever starring Coily the Spring Sprite!
Look, why are you still reading this? It has chainsaws, helicopters dropping bombs, and the aforementioned TORNADO FULL OF SHARKS! Make this new classic a part of your RiffTrax Library today!This Live show was the first of Rifftrax’s then-unprecedented four Live show year of 2014, which also included Godzilla, Anaconda, and Santa Claus. It’s fairly clear from the show itself that this show was used by Asylum as a part of the big hype push for Sharknado 2: The Second One (yes, believe it or not there was a hype push), which debuted on SyFy not long after this show. Whatever the reason this Live show came about, Sharknado was probably the weakest Live event of that year. But it’s hard to compare in hindsight because Godzilla and Anaconda’s Live shows weren’t released on VOD or DVD (thanks Sony!). This show starts out with a reriff of the MST classic short A Case of Spring Fever. This infamous short is about a man who is sick of working on his couch, making the dreadful wish that he never see a spring again. Coily the Spring Sprite springs into action and grants his wish, creating a world without springs. Mildly irritated by mild inconveniences, he takes back his wish and lived his life with a newfound appreciation of springs. The original riffing on Mystery Science Theater was hysterical, this riff...not so much. Honestly I’d call this riff pretty much a complete bomb, because they tread so much of the same ground that they journeyed on when they initially riffed this short, only they do so with jokes that are less funny variations on what they’ve already said about it. I’d personally skip this one and jump straight into the feature. However there were a few un-riffed bonuses in this show. Asylum provided a preview scene from Sharknado 2, which is intact on this VOD version. What isn’t intact is that they also offered a preview of their Godzilla live show, which I distinctly remember because they had audio issues with the film footage they showed and they pretty much improvised a riff on the footage. It’s most likely they edited out this portion because they weren’t cleared to release Godzilla footage through their website, which is a shame because it was pretty funny. Moving on to the movie, which was the launching pad of what became the biggest “so-bad-it’s-good” sensation of our generation. Maybe even of all time, because it’s hard to really think of an exact comparison (unless the Transformers movies count). Even when a movie attains that sort of cult status, it usually is something of an underground cult where only certain people know what you’re talking about. Sharknado somehow branched out to mainstream attention, possibly based on the awesome absurdity of its title. Snakes on a Plane tried that, and it still flopped at the box office. Granted, Sharknado has lower ambitions, being a made for TV movie created by one of the most notorious low budget studios that has ever existed, but it worked. Ian Ziering stars as a man caught up in a massive storm moving in on Los Angeles, which is blowing sharks all over the plays. He and a few wacky sidekicks race to his ex-wife Tara Reid’s house to gather up his children and keep them safe from the looming tornadoes full of sharks. I actually haven’t seen Sharknado outside of this Live show, and I express just a tad bit of disappointment in it. The movie does have a charming spirit of “who cares what people think of us,” but while the spirit is commendable the apathy seems to bleed into the project as a whole. A movie like this needs to be fun, and outside of a few key moments Sharknado isn’t really as fun as it thinks it is. It’s humor often falls flat and it’s shark action is so poorly edited that it’s often hard to tell what the movie even implied happened. The project most likely started out as a title first, branched out into what action sequences they might be able to afford, then awkwardly writing some sort of story around that while casting the cheapest washed up former celebrities that will say yes. But something about Sharknado clicked. They’ve just released a fifth film in five years, after all. Not even Asylum’s Mega Shark series got that far (yet). And Ian Ziering and Tara Reid have starred in every single one, so they at the very least must be enjoying themselves. But I can’t help but shake this feeling that Sharknado was more fun to make than it is to watch. Unlike most Live shows, Sharknado doesn’t have a studio alternative to it, so you either go Live or you don’t get it at all. That’s no biggie for me, since I prefer the energy of the Live shows more often than not. I had concerns about Sharknado being too tongue-in-cheek for Rifftrax, because I feel the don’t really write around tongue-in-cheek very well. However I was impressed with 2013’s Starship Troopers Live show and was willing to give them a chance with this piece of silliness. Much like the movie itself they only have their moments. To be fair, I think I enjoyed this Live show a lot more seeing it for the first time in the theater. I remember a few patches that left me laughing really hard, such as the busty waitress being eaten by a shark and pulled out of it’s stomach still alive at the end of the movie. Moments like these still amuse but didn’t have the surprise factor anymore, so I have to turn to our three riffers. They do a lot to point out the implausibility of the film, but the film is kinda thriving on implausibility, ain't it? That’s pointing out the obvious. “Look out, gin! Tara’s home!” The boys light up the room when Tara Reid is on screen, and they are absolutely savage. They go anywhere and everywhere with her: booze hound, druggie, plastic surgery, airhead, unstable career...seriously the list is endless. Tara pretty much saves this Rifftrax Live by giving the boys something to work with that isn’t really intentional to the film. And for that alone I say give this one a watch, especially if you haven’t seen the movie. Some of the shock value of it enhances the experience, even though it loses something on repeat viewings.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,106
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 19:16:37 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 17, 2017 19:33:40 GMT -5
Film Seventeen: Resident Evil: Afterlife (2010) I keep forgetting just how bad these movies are, and man are they really really bad. Think of pretty much any bad horror series or any bad action series and this one is probably worse. Now if we’re going to rank crap, this actually is slightly better than the last couple of Resident Evil movies. This was Paul W.S. Anderson’s return to the director’s chair after sticking to producing for two movies, and as awful as he is as a filmmaker the other jobbers he found were even worse. Wesker has entered the picture and makes a slightly better villain than what came before and a couple of the action scenes towards the end are slightly less bad than what this series normally gives us. But even the best Resident Evil movie is still a piece of shit. This franchise is like what happens when the people who should be making dreadful direct to DVD movies somehow get real budgets but then just use them to add slightly better special effects to artless Direct to DVD movies. * out of Five
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,649
Likes: 4,066
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 18:25:23 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 17, 2017 20:44:34 GMT -5
Day Seventeen: Dreams in DarknessCarnival of SoulsCarnival of Souls may not be perfect, but it's a film that is a lot better than it probably should be. That this was made in a low-budget with amateur actors is fairly apparent, but director Herk Harvey so skillfully creates a dreadful mood through some creepy visuals and eerie music. The movie definitely plays more in the realm of atmosphere than logic, but that atmosphere is effective and the film's third act is particularly strong. I can see a couple of places where the film could have been more ambiguous or thematically rich, but Carnival of Souls remains very satisfying in terms of style and it's also fun to spot the film's influence. A-EraserheadIt's funny, I've been held at an arms length from David Lynch for a while now, but upon my first viewing I've completely fallen in love with Eraserhead, Lynch's debut feature and one steeped in surrealism and stylistic diversions that would continue throughout his work. Indeed, this does almost feel like a thesis statement of sorts for the rest of Lynch's career, but it works better for me. Why is that? Well for starters, for all of the insane and abstract storytelling on display and for how off the rails the film gets in the third act, there is a solid foundation to work with. Henry got his girlfriend pregnant and is not prepared for fatherhood. Pretty much every surreal visual or bizarre performance or weird piece of dialogue can in some ways be traced to that core idea. That makes the story quite relatable. Even if you aren't a would be father, the general anxiety from an increase in responsibility is a common part of the human experience. The other thing really works here is simply how the audio and visuals made me feel. I've heard some debate against calling Eraserhead a horror movie and I can see why, but I do find the film to be horrific and highly unnerving. The baby in particular is really something out of a nightmare and the general oppressive tone turns Henry's apartment into a truly terrifying place. Hell, just the opening, which sees Henry walking through a bleak industrial environment sets an immediate tone of dread, which is heightened as Lynch delves further into surrealism. Complimenting the film's dark tone is some really great pitch-black humour. I wouldn't necessarily call Eraserhead funny, but there is something comedic about it. The film as a whole still seems wholly unique and as bleak and gross as it is I can't wait to watch it again. A+
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,106
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 19:16:37 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 18, 2017 6:29:38 GMT -5
Film Eighteen: Faust (1926) I remember the first time seeing this movie I was a freshman in college and I was taking a literature course called “European Masters.” It was going pretty well. I’d gotten through “Don Quioxte” without too much trouble despite the length, learned a lot from “Candide,” and had minimal problems with “The Metamorphosis” and “The Death of Ivan Illyich”… but then I had to read Goethe’s “Faust.” Goethe’s Faust is an epic poem in the form of a closet drama, it’s dense with philosophy and obscure allusions to classical texts. It’s fucking hard to read, and the professor didn’t really seem to get how much we were all struggling just to read and comprehend the thing. Desperate I looked to Spark’s Notes and also went ahead and rented the one major film version at the time: the 1926 F.W. Murnau directed version. If nothing else good came out of that reading assignment it was seeing that movie. It didn’t really help me understand the book that much better, in part because the movie only covers Part 1 of the book which is the less confusing part, but it did give me my first exposure to a German Expressionist classic. Faust was the last movie that Murnau made in Germany before going to Hollywood to make Sunrise and he really pulled out all the stops when making it. It and Metropolis represent the pinnacle of Germany’s production design and scale during the era and is filled with interesting effects and sets. Oddly though, this has generally had a lower profile than a lot of other German Expressionist films like the aforementioned Metropolis or The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari or Murnau’s own Nosferatu. I think this might be because Emil Jannings’ Mephisto is a less striking figure than Maria the android or the somnambulist, or Count Orlock. Additionally, the film fits less neatly into any one genre and consequently it doesn’t get to be held up as the first great horror movie like Nosferatu does or as the granddaddy of science fiction like Metropolis does. That is unfortunate because it really is an amazing piece of work that just about as accomplished as the rest of them. ***** out of Five
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Oct 18, 2017 12:13:18 GMT -5
Day Eighteen - Sharktober Day ThreeFilm Year: 1981 Director: Enzo G. Castellari Starring: James Franciscus, Vic Morrow Riff Year: 2016 Riffers: Michael J. Nelson, Kevin Murphy, Bill Corbett Selected Short: Aqua Frolics If you were told you were about to see a film that contained turtles bigger than men, cliff-diving Mexicans and a family that eats Thanksgiving dinner underwater, you'd probably complain "But I don't like David Lynch!" Wrong you would be! You'd actually be all set to watch the 100 percent Lynch-free Aqua Frolics, a short from the 1950's whose message is clear: here is a partial list of things you can do that involve a proximity to and/or immersion in water.
No doubt a response to the Land Council's propaganda film "Dryness: Stay On Land to Achieve It", Aqua Frolics will have you itching to strap on a life preserver and tuck into a drumstick in your neighbors swimming pool. Known frolickers Mike, Kevin and Bill are on hand for their dampest riffing session yet.Ever wonder what you could do in water when you’re not being eaten by a great white shark? Well here are about fifty or so, including skiing, swimming, and eating underwater (?). This frantic and silly short is one of those reels they’d show way back when as if to say to they audience member “look what you aren’t doing since your lazy ass is in a theater.” The riffing keeps pace, as they mostly play up the safe gag of putting words in the narrator's mouth. The short is consistently funny and amusing, though it’s not very memorable. Except that dinner scene underwater. Seriously, WTF? Mamma mia! Some Italian filmmakers decided to rip off Jaws! The Last Shark doesn’t have the acting talent or music score budget of the original, but it does have a substantially higher percentage of actors with mustaches!
The town’s annual windsurfing regatta is threatened by the presence of a killer shark, and rather than do the sensible thing, cancel it and refund both the tickets they’ve sold, the town presses onward. The result: extremely hilarious shark attack special effects! Tell Mrs. Kintner to stop mourning and get her slappin' hand ready, it’s The Last Shark!For the most part I tried to keep this marathon full of recognizable titles, or at the very least trashy sequels to recognizable titles. This is the one exception I made, mostly because I needed one more film to pad out my Shark Week. There are more recognizable movies I could have done (in fact, dropping a few in favor of others was pretty heartbreaking), but I was pretty dead set on this shark theme since I conceived of this marathon. The Last Shark originated in Italy as Great White, a film that blatantly and shamelessly rips off Jaws. I guess the argument is that it’s difficult to do a movie about a killer shark that doesn’t overlap Jaws a little bit (though Sharknado certainly found a way), Universal successfully had the film pulled from American theaters and essentially banned. Lately it’s kind of bled it’s way back over here, with a DVD release and this Rifftrax VOD, so it’s likely Universal doesn’t care about the film anymore. But the movie is totally different from Jaws. For one, the government official denying the beach has a shark problem is a governor and not a mayor. Totally different. Also the main character’s daughter is attacked by the shark and not his son. Apples and oranges. And finally the film has a scene where the shark pulls a helicopter into the water. That’s a scene lifted from Jaws 2, not Jaws. The film stars Beneath the Planet of the Apes star James Franciscus as a novelist and the ill-fated Vic Morrow (one year before his horrific death on the set of Twilight Zone: The Movie) as a shark hunter who both try to convince people there is a hungry Great White shark off the coast. When proven correct they go out shark hunting, but stupid civilians keep putting themselves out in the water as fish food. The film is about a half hour shorter than Jaws but somehow feels longer. It’s pretty drawn out with stock footage of actual sharks interjected into the film to hopefully bring suspense to the piece, but it feels so removed from the film that it never works. Like Jaws several fake sharks are used, and all are hilarious. I love the motionless rubber shark they haul underwater to show the shark doing the absurd things the script needs it to. And the head prop that eats people is so bloated you’d just want to tell him to lay off the people and lose a couple pound. And yet, it’s still better than Jaws: The Revenge. I’d say the riffing is better than the previous films in my Shark Week. It’s not perfect, as their tendency to scream “SHARK! I’m sorry, I was just screaming something entirely unrelated” grows tiresome. But there are some good quips at the expense of this doofy movie. The shark scenes are so silly and fake looking that they can’t help but be given enough energy to make this movie fun.
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Oct 18, 2017 22:48:08 GMT -5
Film Eighteen: Faust (1926) I remember the first time seeing this movie I was a freshman in college and I was taking a literature course called “European Masters.” It was going pretty well. I’d gotten through “Don Quioxte” without too much trouble despite the length, learned a lot from “Candide,” and had minimal problems with “The Metamorphosis” and “The Death of Ivan Illyich”… but then I had to read Goethe’s “Faust.” Goethe’s Faust is an epic poem in the form of a closet drama, it’s dense with philosophy and obscure allusions to classical texts. It’s fucking hard to read, and the professor didn’t really seem to get how much we were all struggling just to read and comprehend the thing. Desperate I looked to Spark’s Notes and also went ahead and rented the one major film version at the time: the 1926 F.W. Murnau directed version. If nothing else good came out of that reading assignment it was seeing that movie. It didn’t really help me understand the book that much better, in part because the movie only covers Part 1 of the book which is the less confusing part, but it did give me my first exposure to a German Expressionist classic. Faust was the last movie that Murnau made in Germany before going to Hollywood to make Sunrise and he really pulled out all the stops when making it. It and Metropolis represent the pinnacle of Germany’s production design and scale during the era and is filled with interesting effects and sets. Oddly though, this has generally had a lower profile than a lot of other German Expressionist films like the aforementioned Metropolis or The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari or Murnau’s own Nosferatu. I think this might be because Emil Jannings’ Mephisto is a less striking figure than Maria the android or the somnambulist, or Count Orlock. Additionally, the film fits less neatly into any one genre and consequently it doesn’t get to be held up as the first great horror movie like Nosferatu does or as the granddaddy of science fiction like Metropolis does. That is unfortunate because it really is an amazing piece of work that just about as accomplished as the rest of them. ***** out of FiveI'm always on the lookout for silent films that are worth a watch. This one looks great, so onto the list it goes!
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,791
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 17:56:45 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 19, 2017 1:49:00 GMT -5
QUINTET (1979)Is it possible to be so full of shit as a filmmaker, you don't realize you're making schlock? The answer is yes. Robert Altman's Quintet might be one of cinema's great practical jokes or the most unfortunate movie in the post Star Wars boom. It's possibly the latter since Altman made much worse films without any irony. Paul Newman stars as some guy in the future, living in a new ice age, whose pregnant wife is randomly murdered. He investigates and finds out that a group of people are so bored living in an ice age that they've created a game in which they kill or be killed. It's the Hunger Games but with adults and less logic. Quintet was a giant critical and financial failure upon release. The consensus is that it's too slow and depressing, plus the whole thing is shot like if someone forgot to clean the lense. I won't dispute that, but it also feels like a work of spite. Altman made four movies in a row for 20th Century Fox in the late 1970's and never again collaborated with the studio. Someone must have pissed him off, right? If we can't believe that, we have to accept that Altman's head was so far up his ass towards the end of his heyday, that he made schlock as if it were a prestige film and the results are hilariously bad. And you thought Popeye was embarrassing!
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Oct 19, 2017 12:45:05 GMT -5
Day Nineteen - Sharktober Day Four:Film Year: 1983 Director: Joe Alves Starring: Dennis Quaid, Bess Armstrong, Louis Gossett Jr., Lea Thompson Riff Year: 2010 Riffers: Janet Varney, Cole Stratton (featuring Michael J. Nelson as Quint) Selected Short: Cooking Terms and What They Mean (riffed by Michael J. Nelson, Kevin Murphy, and Bill Corbett) Mario Batali. Emeril Lagasse. Thomas Keller. What do they all have in common? Besides having seen Julia Child naked? That's right, they are all masters of Cooking Terms! Cooking Terms are the first step toward becoming a master chef. Because how can one properly prepare Duck Foie Gras with a Confiture of Meiwa Kumquats and a Balsamic Glaze if you don't know what "boiling" means.
Cooking Terms And What They Mean follows a newlywed named Margie through her first day of housewifery. Margie evidently spent her childhood in a vegetative coma, because she somehow made it to her wedding day without knowing what "bake" means. We observe Margie as she learns the terms she will need to prepare the Culinary Institute of America's four basic dishes: Meat, Cake, Jelly and Scalloped Cauliflower. Will she successfully cook her husband a delicious meal? Or will her spiral of failure expand so rapidly that it consumes our entire known universe?
Mike, Kevin and Bill now understand the difference between braising and blanching, and as a result their Hungry Man frozen dinners have never tasted better.Well, at least she can cook. Oh wait, no she can’t. Cooking Terms and What They Mean seems to be a home economics educational film that depicts a housewife who is determined to bake a cake for her husband while he’s at work, but she doesn’t understand what the terms in her cookbook mean. It takes a narrator explaining to her everything she needs to know before she succeeds. They guys have a ball with this one. They are very much amused by the narrator, who examines terms they feel should be self evident (“Should someone who doesn’t know what ‘boil' means be allowed near an open flame?”). So of course they let loose with the condescending narrator riffs, over explaining every aspect of everything. They also get a lot of mileage in mocking our poor dingbat of a main character. “Remember ladies, there are no truly bad cooks…” “Only younger, prettier women!” Perhaps the shark from today’s movie would like some cooking pointers as well. I mean eating raw humans must get tiring, after all... Et Tu, 3-D? What was once a fairly harmless novelty now seems to have taken over multiplexes across the country. Flying houses, animated dragons, Ga’hool Owls and unleashed Krakens are spilling off the screen, fatiguing our eyes and migraining our headaches. Waaaay back in 1983, audiences experienced a whole new kind of headache with the third installment in the should-never-have-been-a-franchise Jaws film series, in which a baby shark and its pissed-off momma spend more than one afternoon in SeaWorld and thus start eating people (I think we can all relate). If the effects department can’t stop them (and they try), then Dennis “Crap…I’m in this?” Quaid, Lea “Thank goodness Back to the Future is just around the corner” Thompson, and Louis “I JUST won an Oscar and chose to do this next” Gossett, Jr. will. And, yes, it’s all in eye-poppin’ THHHHHREEEEEEE DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD! Except…that it’s not. Not on your home DVD. But shhhhhhhhhh…it still thinks it is!
Waiting ‘til it’s safe to go back in the water are frequent RiffTrax Presenters Cole Stratton and Janet Varney, who are going to need a much bigger boat to get through this not-so-great-great-white-flick that makes them long for the days of shirtless Patrick Swayze and dancin’ Kevin Bacon. I’m not one of those annoying fans who claims that “The ONLY people who were ever funny in HISTORY were the guys on Mystery Science Theater. No one else who exists, ever existed, or ever will exist will ever be funny. Ever.” Personally I feel bad that I’m not delving deeper into the Rifftrax Presents catalogue for the various riffers they feature, which include Matthew J. Elliott, Doug “Nostalgia Critic” Walker, and old MST favorites Mary Jo Pehl and Bridget Nelson. There are a few more that I would have loved to have featured, especially by Janet Varney and Cole Stratton who often pick the type of films I think Rifftrax should aim for above all else: Ghost, Flatliners, The Lost Boys, ect. If I decide to do this again next year I guarantee you I’ll dive deeper into more diverse riffing groups. Until then, here we have Janet and Cole’s take on Jaws III, which is hands down the funnier of the Jaws riffs. We get off on a fun foot with a very funny intro in which Rifftrax regular Mike Nelson plays Quint, from the original Jaws, haunting these two guest riffers. Mostly he just spouts out variations of famous Quint lines, and they end the riff by singing “Show Me the Way to Go Home” together, but it’s seriously fun. “Riffers go into the booth...booth goes into the movie… shark’s in the movie…” This latest entry in the Jaws saga stars Dennis Quaid as Mike Brody, the eldest son of the Brody clan from the first two movies, now all grown up and working at Seaworld. His brother comes and pays him a visit, and so does a man-eating shark by total coincidence. Mike and his girlfriend capture the shark and attempt to keep it in captivity, only to have it die from spending an entire afternoon with people gawking at it. Soon enough they discover that this shark was actually a baby and the mother is about to rampage on the park (why she waited so long in doing so, who cares?). Jaws III is one ugly movie, but then again most 3D films from the 80s are in general. I don’t know what crappy 3D film stock they were using back then, but the image looks washed out as all hell. This is one of those rare instances where the more definition the film format gets, the worse the film looks. I’ve followed this movie from VHS to DVD to blu-ray and each seems to be a bigger eyesore than the last. I can only imagine what the 4K Ultra disc is going to look like. But it feels somewhat clear that it’s not put together well either. Director Joe Alves was actually the production designer on the first two movies, and he is flung into a special effects movie with a lacking eye for special effects. Everything looks flat and green screened to shit. This is especially bad during certain 3D effects, which look pretty hilarious. The shark itself is pretty bulky and practically immobile, but the thing is supposed to be a massive 35 feet long. Was this shark supposed to fight King Kong? In the end, people get sucked into it’s mouth and just lie there waiting to die. The riffing is in fun spirits from the get go. Janet and Cole bat this movie around like a kitten with a ball of yarn. But if there’s one flaw it’s that as funny as the movie itself can be, it does have a tendency to drag, and man does it take forever to get going. Janet and Cole seem to work more magic when action is onscreen, and Jaws III doesn’t quite have enough of it. But that’s not to slight Janet and Cole during the film’s dullest moments, as they tend to get creative to keep the experience from getting boring. One of my favorite things they do is that when a character is on the telephone they mock a phony conversation with them. Louis Gossett Jr. has a very funny one at the beginning of the third act. Note: This riff was originally recorded using the DVD edition, with many riffs taking aim at the lack of 3D. Since then the film has been released on blu-ray with a 3D option, which is the version I used. The movie and riff sync fine, however the one discrepancy I have to note is that the riffers react to the title being “Jaws III” whereas the blu-ray features the original title of “Jaws 3-D.” Other than that the riff will play well with this newer disc.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,497
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 19:03:05 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Oct 19, 2017 13:54:57 GMT -5
Day the Blobiest The Blob (1958)
A group of teenagers in their thirties investigate a giant blob that is attacking people in their town. Its very much a basic monster movie with some strong special effects. The acting ain't so great (though par for the course for movies in this vein), but I do appreciate how the writers try to make these characters more than just stereotypes. I was disappointed that the ending wasn't going to deal with the discovery of the creature's weakness, but then it turned around and did just that. And also, potential global warning message with last line?
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,106
Likes: 5,732
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 19:16:37 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 19, 2017 21:20:35 GMT -5
Film Nineteen: Dracula's Daughter (1936) While there are several films that bear his name, Dracula’s Daughter is in fact the only true sequel that was ever made to the 1931 classic Dracula, and even it only barely counts. The only returning cast member is the guy who played Van Helsing, who is being put on trial for murdering Dracula (who the authorities don’t believe is a vampire) in the first film. That’s a plotline that has potential but the movie never really makes the most of it and mostly focuses on the titular daughter, Countess Marya Zaleska, who is indeed the offspring of the famous Count and is also afflicted with vampirism. Unlike her father though, Zaleska is conflicted about being a creature of the night and is trying to find a cure (but isn’t above feeding on people until she finds one). This dithering on the part of the villainess kind of robs the movie of that sense of dread and evil it needs and the movie is consequently not very well remembered as a horror movie. It is however very well remembered for possibly having some coded lesbianism going on. Zaleska bites her female victims with much the same sexual overtones that Dracula did and there’s definitely some longing you can sense in her. These overtones were intentional by all accounts (less out of a legitimate interest in lesbianism and more because it was potentially titillating) but it was also mild enough to get past censors. Overall this isn’t much of a movie, but there are definitely worse Universal Horror sequels out there and this one held up a little better than I remembered. **1/2 out of Five
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,497
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 19:03:05 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Oct 19, 2017 21:23:29 GMT -5
Texas Chain Saw Massacre
I've wanted to see this movie for quite a while, considering it is a horror classic. Long ago, this was never a movie I was interested in. However, the more praise I heard it getting as a fundamental film of the genre, often talked about on the same level as a film like Halloween, the more interested I became. Finally I managed to track it down, but instead of getting a top notch horror movie as I expected, I got something else, more akin to the type of movie I thought it was earlier in my life when I cared not to see it. This movie is ugly and vile. I hated it. I really have nothing more to say.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,791
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 17:56:45 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 19, 2017 21:27:46 GMT -5
Texas Chain Saw Massacre
I've wanted to see this movie for quite a while, considering it is a horror classic. Long ago, this was never a movie I was interested in. However, the more praise I heard it getting as a fundamental film of the genre, often talked about on the same level as a film like Halloween, the more interestedt I became. Finally I managed to track it down, but instead of getting top notch horror movie as I expected, I got something else, more akin to the type of movie I thought it was earlier in my life when I cared not to see it. This movie is ugly and vile. I hated it. I really have nothing more to say. Where’s PG Cooper and his pitchfork.
|
|
thebtskink
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jul 2000
It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again.
Posts: 19,462
Likes: 4,984
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 18:41:41 GMT -5
|
Post by thebtskink on Oct 19, 2017 21:53:44 GMT -5
Ian, my man. What are we going to do with you?
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Oct 19, 2017 21:55:53 GMT -5
Ian, my man. What are we going to do with you? Show him Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation?
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,791
Likes: 8,649
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 17:56:45 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 19, 2017 22:00:49 GMT -5
Ian, my man. What are we going to do with you? Show him Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation? Be patient, my love.
|
|
Wyldstaar
Producer
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,900
Likes: 1,267
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 7:55:31 GMT -5
|
Post by Wyldstaar on Oct 19, 2017 23:14:49 GMT -5
Day the Blobiest The Blob (1958)
A group of teenagers in their thirties investigate a giant blob that is attacking people in their town. Its very much a basic monster movie with some strong special effects. The acting ain't so great (though par for the course for movies in this vein), but I do appreciate how the writers try to make these characters more than just stereotypes. I was disappointed that the ending wasn't going to deal with the discovery of how the creature's weakness, but then it turned around and did just that. And also, potential global warning message with last line? Don't forget that one of those "teens" was Steve McQueen. He was actually 27 when he made The Blob, but that guy lived a seriously hard life before becoming an actor. He certainly looked thirty-something.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,307
Likes: 6,772
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 19:02:49 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Oct 20, 2017 0:42:15 GMT -5
One of my favorite McQueen stories is how he used to demand tons of razors, jeans and clothes on set to the point that people thought he was overly demanding and irritating. It was only years later that people discovered he would donate it to the boys shelter where he spent a good portion of his childhood.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,649
Likes: 4,066
Location:
Last Online Nov 25, 2024 18:25:23 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 20, 2017 10:21:10 GMT -5
Texas Chain Saw Massacre
I've wanted to see this movie for quite a while, considering it is a horror classic. Long ago, this was never a movie I was interested in. However, the more praise I heard it getting as a fundamental film of the genre, often talked about on the same level as a film like Halloween, the more interestedt I became. Finally I managed to track it down, but instead of getting top notch horror movie as I expected, I got something else, more akin to the type of movie I thought it was earlier in my life when I cared not to see it. This movie is ugly and vile. I hated it. I really have nothing more to say. Where’s PG Cooper and his pitchfork. Sorry, this week's been really busy, hence my absence from this thread. Anyway, I don't exactly disagree with Ian. Texas Chainsaw is vile and ugly, and that's why it works so well. It's a raw piece of horror filmmaking that doesn't feel adapted for the screen so much as it does a genuine piece of terror which found its way to cinemas.
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Oct 20, 2017 12:55:05 GMT -5
Day Twenty - Sharktober Day FiveFilm Year: 2014 Director: Anthony C. Ferrante Starring: Ian Ziering, Tara Reid, Vivica A. Fox, Kari Wuhrer, Judd Hirsch Riff Year: 2015 Riffers: Michael J. Nelson, Kevin Murphy, Bill Corbett Featured Short: Parents: Who Needs Them? Sharknado 2! Our smash hit summer live show is now available for download and streaming! Including the delightfully bizarre puppet-and-invisible-boy short, Parents: Who Needs Them?, which raises all kinds of important questions regarding parents and the needing of them.
When you heard about the first Sharknado in 2013 you thought, “A movie about a tornado filled with sharks? It’s too good to be true!” But it was true (and you may have even seen us riff it) and then the next year when you heard they were making another you thought, “A second movie about a tornado filled with sharks? It, too, is too good to be true!”
Guess what, it’s true! Internal shark chainsawer Ian Ziering is back, along with Tara Reid as his ex-wife who kind of likes him now, ever since her douche-y boyfriend got eaten by a shark in their living room.
This time the titular weather event hits the city of New York, right as all the gruff and busy inhabitants are trying to walk, over here! And no famous landmark is safe from their wrath, including perennially grumpy New Yorker Judd Hirsch. And there’s a fun cameo from a certain sandwich spokesman who you probably won’t be seeing in too many more movies, if we had to guess!
Live audiences loved it and now you can too, forever and ever in digital form. Join Mike, Kevin, and Bill as they button up their raincoats and dive headlong into Sharknado 2: The Second One!The boys at Rifftrax have a history of rejecting sequels to bad movies that become too self aware for their own good, having been offered a chance to riff both Hobgoblins 2 and Birdemic 2: The Resurrection. The fact that they chose to do Sharknado 2: The Second One is a bit of a surprise. The original was also tongue in cheek, but this movie dials it up to eleven. Would it really lend itself to riffing? As I began rewatching this Live show I struggled to remember, because the biggest thing I remember from the theatrical experience was that my theater screwed up the broadcast and our audience missed a good chunk of the mid portion. This is the first time I’ve seen the show in its entirety (unless my digital download is fucked up too). Sharknado 2 was a part of a line-up of Live shows that Rifftrax dubbed “The Crappening,” which also included The Room, Miami Connection, and Santa and the Ice Cream Bunny. Like the original’s live show the previous year, Sharknado 2’s might have been the weakest. However overall it’s a much funnier show than the first Sharknado. A better short starts us off. Here we have Parents: Who Needs Them?, a typical short about an ungrateful brat who learns just how much his parents do for him by being turned invisible by a possessed puppet. All things considered, Mystery Science Theater’s Appreciating Your Parents is better, both as a short and as a riffing target. However this is a fun one, with a lot of the short’s creepy atmosphere under fire. I also laughed pretty hard at their comparing the mother to Thelma from Scooby Doo. In between the short and the movie they offer up a look at their next Live show, Miami Connection, with an insane trailer that pretty accurately shows off what that movie is. There’s also a sneak preview of Sharknado 3: Oh Hell No!, which I think many of us assumed was going to be riffed in 2016. But for better or for worse that never happened. But what to say about Sharknado 2? Well, the subtitle doesn’t lie. It’s the second one. This is indisputable. It’s pretty much the first film again, except it takes place in New York City instead of Los Angeles. Also it’s a bit jokier and it looks like it might have had a few more pennies on its still low budget. This time Ian Ziering and Tara Reid are now patching things up due to the romantic events of the previous Sharknado when a new Sharknado erupts. They run around in New York looking for Ziering’s sister’s family and are aided by one of his ex-girlfriends in putting a stop to the storm. Judge not lest ye be judged. If you liked the first one then you’ll probably like this one too. I can’t argue with that. Personally this one tries a little too hard to recreate those silly “fuck yeah” moments from the first. Ian Ziering chainsaws through quite a few sharks this time around, reminding us of that one scene we thought was hilarious in the first. There’s a scene where Tara Reid’s hand is bitten off and then pulled out of a shark’s mouth (and funnily enough tossed away like garbage), bringing back memories of my favorite moment from the original: the waitress being swallowed whole and pulled out in the climax. The one new thing this one does it Ziering riding a shark through the air and impaling it on the top of the Empire State Building. That’s pretty new. But is it worth it for one new crazy scene in a movie that is pretty much the same, just with a few celebrity cameos? I gotta say, I love bad cinema, but Sharknado has yet to truly win me over with it’s badness. Bad cinema usually works best when it has a passion behind it, like Ed Wood or Paul WS Anderson. Sharknado seems to be a concept that’s fun and a behind the scenes crew that is just going through the motions. It feels more often than not these movies were made with an indifferent shrug and a “why not?” other than any actual desire to make them. But watching this movie I find myself sympathizing with Ian Ziering, not his character but the actor himself. It’s a self-aware dumb movie that is a trap for washed up actors who need a quick paycheck. However, this seems to be a little bit more for him. He does so many action poses and such crazy shit in this movie that you’d have to wonder if he’s doing it because when the hell else is he going to jump through a shark with a chainsaw? Some might wonder why he sticks around to star in every single one of this movies, but I don’t. He clearly loves it. The riffing still takes aim at the logistics at play, though to a somewhat lesser effect than the original. I find this riff to be a bit more colorful than Sharknado. I partially think it’s because there are more name faces in this movie as cameos, which gives them something familiar to draw upon when coming up with a joke at their expense. They don’t seem entirely reliant on the movie’s absurdity for whatever the reason, and it comes off a bit better for it. One thing I noticed while watching this Live show is that normally these shows usually have windows that pop up with Mike, Kevin, and Bill on the right hand side of the screen. This one minimizes that to the the barest minimum I’ve seen from these shows. Most of the time the screen is just the movie. I don’t know if there’s a reason for that (maybe Asylum wanted the movie to be the star), but it makes the show feel less Live and more like a normal Rifftrax. And thus Sharktober comes to an end. We now return you to our regularly scheduled…SCHLOCKTOBER!
|
|