PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 23:40:43 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 2, 2016 10:47:00 GMT -5
Day Two: Godzilla (1954)After only seeing the "Americanized" 1956 version, I've finally seen the original Japanese version of Godzilla. I gotta say, this was pretty awesome. Godzilla himself looks great and while the effects don't exactly hold up, they're still really neat. The large scale set-pieces, particularly Godzilla's attack on Tokyo, are really gripping, exciting, and well-executed. I also think the film's commentary on nuclear weapons is valid and strong. Unlike a lot of the nuclear paranoia seen in a lot of sci-fi from the 50s, there's a grim seriousness to the depiction here. I think in particular to scenes depicting the aftermath of Godzilla's destruction where we see citizens suffering in the wreckage and mourning their dead loved ones. Pretty powerful stuff. There's also the Dr. Serizawa character, who has created a weapon which can theoretically stop Godzilla, but is afraid of what humanity will come to use it for in the future. I don't want to give the impression that Godzilla is a perfect movie because it definitely isn't. The early reactions to a giant lizard destroying cities seem a lot more muted than they should be and the film can get a little preachy, but the good stuff here is really worth it. There are some awesome scenes underscored with a certain seriousness, an iconic creature, and one hell of a theme song. A-
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,780
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 9:04:01 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 2, 2016 17:22:08 GMT -5
IV is the most fun of the remaining ones, for the pure creativity of the kills. New Nightmare is best of the remaining. The Dream Master is a Renny Harlin movie, Doomsday HAS to watch it.
|
|
thebtskink
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jul 2000
It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again.
Posts: 19,462
Likes: 4,984
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 23:42:06 GMT -5
|
Post by thebtskink on Oct 2, 2016 17:54:24 GMT -5
IV is the most fun of the remaining ones, for the pure creativity of the kills. New Nightmare is best of the remaining. The Dream Master is a Renny Harlin movie, Doomsday HAS to watch it. I knew that when I posted it. It might be his best movie. It's awesome.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,780
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 9:04:01 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 2, 2016 18:19:33 GMT -5
The Dream Master is a Renny Harlin movie, Doomsday HAS to watch it. I knew that when I posted it. It might be his best movie. It's awesome. His best movie is Ford Fairlane the Rock n Roll Detective.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,103
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 3, 2016 5:46:22 GMT -5
Film Three: The Phantom of the Opera (1925)For the last eight years I’ve made a point of watching through one of my Universal Monsters Legacy collections but now I’ve finally watched through all of those but there is one Universal monster I do still want to explore: The Phantom of the Opera. They didn’t make a whole bunch of sequels to that and there isn’t a Legacy edition so I’ve decided that I will instead watch a handful of different adaptations of the story that various studios have attempted over the years starting with the first and most famous of them: the Lon Chaney version that Universal released in 1925. This version is almost certainly most famous for Chaney’s performance and the makeup used for the movie is rightfully iconic. The movie is famous for three really great scenes: the unmasking, the color Bal Masque sequence, and the climax where the phantom is being chased by a mob. Those great sequences are more than enough to build a legacy on but I do think there are better silent horror films out there, many of them made in Europe and specifically Germany and these movies generally have creepier tones. This one by contrast feels a bit Hollywood in sensibility and it has a couple of plot holes (which may well be because of the many, many, many versions of this that are out there and I admittedly watched the prettier but less complete 1929 re-issue version). Still, this is definitely a classic that has more than earned its way into film history. **** out of Five
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 23:40:43 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 3, 2016 9:27:25 GMT -5
Day Three: Jawsathon Part OneJawsJaws is so widely discussed and loved that I'm not gonna spend too much time explaining why it's awesome. Essentially, there are three general things that elevate Jaws well beyond a B-movie about a shark eating people. First, production value. In spite of the film's infamous troubles with the mechanical shark, there's obviously serious money behind Jaws and it does show on screen. Second, Steven Spielberg's general execution. The set-pieces here are not just fun shark attacks, but brilliantly constructed suspense sequences that would make Hitchcock proud. Finally, the characters here are excellent. Roy Scheider's Chief Brody, Robert Shaw's Quint, and Richard Dreyfuss' Hooper; I love these guys. Spielberg does an excellent job building each personality and by the time they venture off to kill the shark you really are invested in all of them. The end result is a film that transcends well beyond it's B-movie roots and into the stratosphere of the best films ever made. A+Jaws 2The original Jaws is an undisputed classic, but the sequels are so unanimously hated that I never felt the need to really bother. However all three are on Netflix right now and I thought, "fuck it, why not?" Jaws 2 is mostly just a shameless retread of the first film. A shark is attacking the beaches of Amity, town officials are resistant to act, and Chief Brody goes out to kill the thing. It's not a very inspired sequel and the execution is a lot weaker. The biggest problem is the characters. While Roy Scheider is back as Brody, Richard Dreyfuss did not return. Instead, the focus is split between Brody and a group of teenagers, one of which being Brody's son (who is apparently 17 now). These teens are really boring and eat up way too much screen time. Brody himself is still a strong character and I like watching Scheider, but he doesn't have any equals to play off of. The filmmaking is generally more competent than the film's reputation would suggest, but it still falls short of the original by a lot. The shark attacks are fun, but the execution is fairly pedestrian and director Jeannot Szwarc doesn't bring very many new ideas to these set-pieces. I did however like the way they killed off the shark at the end. Overall, this is the prototypical sequel people tend to complain about. It's basically the exact same movie as before, but a lot worse. Jaws 2 is certainly better than I expected it to be but it's still a lazy retread. CTo be concluded...
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,300
Likes: 6,767
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 5:31:09 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Oct 3, 2016 10:47:11 GMT -5
I haven't watched Jaws 2-4 since I was a little kid but I used to watch them all the time despite how bad I knew they were even when I was 9. Jaws The Revenge is just one of the worst movies put to film.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,780
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 9:04:01 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 3, 2016 13:24:23 GMT -5
I haven't watched Jaws 2-4 since I was a little kid but I used to watch them all the time despite how bad I knew they were even when I was 9. Jaws The Revenge is just one of the worst movies put to film. Jaws 2 used to air a lot on TBS, back in the 90's. I re-watched it a few years ago. The shark scenes are indeed fun and John Williams score is generally pretty good. But Jaws 3 and 4 are garbage.
|
|
Justin
Script Supervisor
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 739
Likes: 355
Location:
Last Online Oct 17, 2017 12:05:25 GMT -5
|
Post by Justin on Oct 3, 2016 13:39:17 GMT -5
I watch Jaws all the time honestly. Still amazing.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,780
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 9:04:01 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 3, 2016 15:00:24 GMT -5
31 DAYS OF HALLOWEENLA BETE (1975)People have to pay the bills. I can't fault the cast and crew. I can, however, question the motives of the producers and director. Making an "erotic French movie" about bestiality is daring, but telling a nonsensical story isn't. Why is there graphic footage of horses having sex? Why is there a black actor having unsimulated sex with a white actress and it having no importance to the plot whatsoever? Why is there a, werewolf -- I guess, with a comically large penis? Is this movie... about dicks? Is that what we're watching? How is any of this relevant to the story? The story, by the way, is about a woman marrying a half-man-half-beast but don't get too caught up in it because we gotta invest our time in horses having sex, actors having unsimulated sex and a werewolf-type-creature having sex with a woman in the middle of the woods. I really hope the cast and crew got paid well for this crap. Also let this be a lesson: don't let the Criterion Collection fool you, other countries make shit too. This movie is from France -- FRANCE. Wee wee monsieur, come watch our monster movie about penis envy. It's world cinema, so you know it must be good.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,494
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 9:00:06 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Oct 3, 2016 21:45:14 GMT -5
Wow.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,780
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 9:04:01 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 3, 2016 21:53:23 GMT -5
|
|
Justin
Script Supervisor
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 739
Likes: 355
Location:
Last Online Oct 17, 2017 12:05:25 GMT -5
|
Post by Justin on Oct 3, 2016 21:55:27 GMT -5
Right up Ian's alley.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,103
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 4, 2016 8:37:57 GMT -5
Film Four: Cannibal Holocaust (1980)Ruggero Deodato’s Cannibal Holocaust came out in the waning days of the Italian Exploitation boom and is one of the most infamous movies of all time. The film is often cited to be the inventor of the “found footage” format but it doesn’t really play out the way that most modern “found footage” movies do. Rather than playing like a documentary from moment one the film actually plays out like a regular movie for its first half until the characters find the lost film reels of a group of people who went into the Amazon and never came back. From there the action moves to New York and the movie cuts between the “documentary footage” and conflicts between characters watching this footage and debating its merits. Outside of its format the film is almost certainly more famous for its rather extreme content including brutal violence, rape scenes, gratuitous nudity, and unstimulated animal killings. The film has some social commentary going on beneath all the chaos which it wields with all the subtlety of a sledgehammer and which frankly seems to mostly be there as a justification for the film’s more voyeuristic intensions. It should go without saying that the movie is wildly politically incorrect both by today’s standards and probably the standards of its day as well. It’s depiction of the Amazonian tribes is completely ridiculous and its interest in female objectification is shameless and undeniable and the multiple rape scenes are plainly exploitative and rather repugnant. One thing the movie very decidedly isn’t is scary or suspenseful and I while it’s been called a horror movie I don’t think that’s really a terribly appropriate label for it. Really there isn’t much the film could be classified as other than as a provocation and on that level I do have a sort of begrudging respect for it as it is clearly a movie that’s looking to press buttons like no movie before it and press those buttons it does. ** out of Five
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 23:40:43 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 4, 2016 9:19:10 GMT -5
Day Four: Jawsathon Part TwoJaws 3-DJaws 3-D is rightfully considered one of the worst sequels of all-time, but I wanna start talking about some things the film does right. I like that the film is tyring to do something different by moving the action away from Amity Island and to Sea World. That opens up the possibilities a bit. I also like Dennis Quaid as Brody's son more than whoever played the role in Jaws 2, though the character is still not very interesting. Anyway, that about ends my section on the positives because the rest of this film is pretty terrible. This probably goes without saying, but the 3-D effects here are laughably bad. The most infamous shot is that of the shark colliding with the glass, but none of the effects look good. The film also spends way too much time following the characters at Sea World before they are aware of the shark's presence. These characters aren't interesting and most of the things the film sets up are not paid off. There are also a lot of scenes dedicated to just showing the various acts and animals of Sea World perform. Finally in the third act, the Great White is unleashed at Sea World and you think the film might provide some schlocky fun, but that isn't really the case either. The film doesn't really do anything fun with the shark attacks and ends up squandering its setting. There is one cool moment where we see someone inside the shark's mouth trying to get out, but that's the only moment that delivers on its shark action. Most of the other attacks fizzle out. The film's final shot is also really dumb. I didn't expect Jaws 3-D to be good, but I did hope it would at least provide some dumb entertainment. That isn't the case. D-Jaws: The RevengeAs the title would expect, this film is all about vengeance. Specifically, a shark's vengeance on the Brody family, presumably for killing all of its shark buddies. The film opens with the youngest Brody son being mauled to death by a Great White. Brody widow Ellen moves to the Bahamas with her eldest son, a marine biologist. She is assured that sharks stay out of the waters in that part of the world as they are too warm. However just a few days later, the Great White has arrived in the Bahamas for Brody blood. That premise is obviously absurd and has been rightfully mocked by audiences since 1987. The fact that Jaws: The Revenge is a dumb movie isn't surprising, what is surprising is just how boring the film is. Instead of using it's ludicrous premise to go balls out and make some schlock, the filmmakers seem to still be under the impression they're making a serious film. Much of the screentime is spent simply observing the boring characters. Bringing Ellen Brody back as someone in grieving isn't a bad idea, but the execution is pretty weak. The dialogue she's given is pretty hokey and the whole idea is undercut by idiocy like the notion that Ellen and the shark have a psychic connection. Most everybody else is just boring and their character development doesn't really go anywhere. I don't care about any of these people. Michael Caine's natural charm is there but this was a well-documented paycheck film for Caine and that does show. I might have been able to overlook some of this if the film was more fun. Jaws: The Revenge should have gone full-on schlock, with a lot more shark attacks and bloodshed. That wouldn't have made for a good film, but at least it might have been entertaining. However there aren't many shark attacks here, and the few we get are very poor. Either they are a jumbled mess of editing where we get a bunch of quick close-ups of a shark mouth and then see the aftermath (such as the opening set-piece), or they have a crappy looking fake shark awkwardly slapping against a boat. Even the build-up to these sequences is terrible. Often times a character will just turn around and see the shark in a flat shot. Or we'll just see the shark's fin going through the water. There's never any suspense. I criticized the set-pieces in the other sequels, but they really hit a new low here. The big finale is equally bland while also featuring some poorly used-slow motion. All told, Jaws: The Revenge is terrible, but it's not the kind of mess that leaves you confounded and angry. In fact, that's actually kind of a problem. Much as I've bitched about movies like Batman and Robin or Alien: Resurrection, at least those films are interesting in their awfulness. Those are fascinating trainwrecks you can't look away from. Jaws: The Revenge is inept, but not hilariously so, and most scenes are just boring. F
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,780
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 9:04:01 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 4, 2016 14:00:32 GMT -5
31 DAYS OF HALLOWEENTHE HOUSE ON SORORITY ROW (1983)Slasher films are the most formulaic of all the genres, but when it does well, it doesn't matter. Think of buddy cop movies. You know what you're gonna get. There will be two cops from opposite sides who hate each other, but over the course of their investigation, they become the best of friends. Whether or not the movie is good will come down to whether or not the two actors have great chemistry. In slasher films, it's a similar scenario. You know you're gonna watch a group of teenagers getting murdered one-by-one until the bad guy is defeated by the most virginal character. The success of the movie will come down to the situation the characters are put through. Case in point: The House on Sorority Row. It has everything, and I mean everything, you associate with the genre. And yet, it feels fresh because the characters are put through different obstacles. Do you remember I Know What You Did Last Summer? It was about teens who kill a guy, bury the body and a year later the guy returns to seek revenge. Well, imagine that, but instead of a year later, the characters are getting killed while in the process of disposing the body. It's actually a really clever premise. You can apply it to almost any genre. Characters are being murdered while in the process of committing a crime. It's genius - really. Imagine in Psycho when Norman is in the middle of disposing Marion's body he gets killed. That's the level of entertainment you get with The House on Sorority Row.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 23:40:43 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 4, 2016 17:43:40 GMT -5
31 DAYS OF HALLOWEENTHE HOUSE ON SORORITY ROW (1983)Slasher films are the most formulaic of all the genres, but when it does well, it doesn't matter. Think of buddy cop movies. You know what you're gonna get. There will be two cops from opposite sides who hate each other, but over the course of their investigation, they become the best of friends. Whether or not the movie is good will come down to whether or not the two actors have great chemistry. In slasher films, it's a similar scenario. You know you're gonna watch a group of teenagers getting murdered one-by-one until the bad guy is defeated by the most virginal character. The success of the movie will come down to the situation the characters are put through. Case in point: The House on Sorority Row. It has everything, and I mean everything, you associate with the genre. And yet, it feels fresh because the characters are put through different obstacles. Do you remember I Know What You Did Last Summer? It was about teens who kill a guy, bury the body and a year later the guy returns to seek revenge. Well, imagine that, but instead of a year later, the characters are getting killed while in the process of disposing the body. It's actually a really clever premise. You can apply it to almost any genre. Characters are being murdered while in the process of committing a crime. It's genius - really. Imagine in Psycho when Norman is in the middle of disposing Marion's body he gets killed. That's the level of entertainment you get with The House on Sorority Row. So far the only movie you've discussed that I've heard of is Frankenhooker.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,624
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 23:30:05 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Oct 4, 2016 17:47:32 GMT -5
You've heard of Frankenhooker? I figure Neverending is scouring the bargain bin VHS tapes at a Wyoming Walmart to dig up these gems. I haven't heard of any of these.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,103
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 4, 2016 17:52:56 GMT -5
You've heard of Frankenhooker? I figure Neverending is scouring the bargain bin VHS tapes at a Wyoming Walmart to dig up these gems. I haven't heard of any of these. The guy who directed that one does have something of a following with genre/exploitation aficionados.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,624
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 23:30:05 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Oct 4, 2016 17:54:49 GMT -5
Film Four: Cannibal Holocaust (1980)Ruggero Deodato’s Cannibal Holocaust came out in the waning days of the Italian Exploitation boom and is one of the most infamous movies of all time. The film is often cited to be the inventor of the “found footage” format but it doesn’t really play out the way that most modern “found footage” movies do. Rather than playing like a documentary from moment one the film actually plays out like a regular movie for its first half until the characters find the lost film reels of a group of people who went into the Amazon and never came back. From there the action moves to New York and the movie cuts between the “documentary footage” and conflicts between characters watching this footage and debating its merits. Outside of its format the film is almost certainly more famous for its rather extreme content including brutal violence, rape scenes, gratuitous nudity, and unstimulated animal killings. The film has some social commentary going on beneath all the chaos which it wields with all the subtlety of a sledgehammer and which frankly seems to mostly be there as a justification for the film’s more voyeuristic intensions. It should go without saying that the movie is wildly politically incorrect both by today’s standards and probably the standards of its day as well. It’s depiction of the Amazonian tribes is completely ridiculous and its interest in female objectification is shameless and undeniable and the multiple rape scenes are plainly exploitative and rather repugnant. One thing the movie very decidedly isn’t is scary or suspenseful and I while it’s been called a horror movie I don’t think that’s really a terribly appropriate label for it. Really there isn’t much the film could be classified as other than as a provocation and on that level I do have a sort of begrudging respect for it as it is clearly a movie that’s looking to press buttons like no movie before it and press those buttons it does. ** out of Five
I can't disagree with anything you wrote, but I actually like Cannibal Holocaust a lot more than I normally would a film like that. It's disturbing and effective at being so, and for such a grindhouse production the technical effects are very impressive and the story was much more well put together than I thought it would be especially since it introduced the found footage angle that's so played out today. I don't condone the film in any way, and the acting is awful, but of the 3,000+ films I've seen in my life it's one that absolutely stands out and has its strengths despite being disgustingly gratuitous in every way imaginable.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,624
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 23:30:05 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Oct 4, 2016 17:56:26 GMT -5
You've heard of Frankenhooker? I figure Neverending is scouring the bargain bin VHS tapes at a Wyoming Walmart to dig up these gems. I haven't heard of any of these. The guy who directed that one does have something of a following with genre/exploitation aficionados. So basically you're telling me there's a legion of Neverendings out there. Good to know.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 23:40:43 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 5, 2016 11:01:23 GMT -5
Day Five: The City of the DeadThe City of the Dead (also known as Horror Hotel) is a neat little horror gem. The plot involves a student of witchcraft who travels to the small town of Whitewood to study their history, but soon learns witchcraft may not be ancient history for the town. The film has a very effective first half which initially follows the student's journey. Despite an obvious low-budget, the film creates a really strong atmosphere with a ton of fog and some really dark cinematography. There's some really creepy stuff in the first half and it culminates with a pretty awesome scene. However from there the film shifts focus to some other characters investigating the events thus far. This stuff is pretty dull. It lacks the atmosphere of the first half and it also suffers from the fact that the audience is way ahead of the characters at this point so there's nothing new to learn. The film does eventually return to the spooky imagery of the first half, but it never truly recovers from the middle lag and a lot of this section feels repetitious. However the final five minutes manage to deliver one final awesome visual which helps it end strong. Overall, The City of the Dead is no horror classic, but it's a neat little film and I'm glad I saw it. The story isn't the best and it isn't always compelling, but you watch it for it's chilling atmosphere and spooky visuals. Also, Christopher Lee is in the film and while he isn't used as much as you might hope, his presence automatically makes things a little better. B-
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,103
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 5, 2016 12:02:36 GMT -5
Film Five: Hellbound: Hellraiser II (1988)I never really liked the original Hellraiser that much, but there were some interesting ideas in it and for whatever reason I was curious to see more even though very few people seem to like the sequels. Hellraiser II is… well it’s certainly flawed but it was better than I expected it to be, I might have even liked it a little better than the first movie if only because it gets to the point faster. The movie certainly has more of that signature Hellraiser blood, gore, and weird sadomasochism but also adds a touch of Lovecraftian weirdness as the characters actually go into hell or whatever alternate dimension the cenobites come from. The movie’s fatal flaw (outside of its budgetary limits) is that the rules of the supernatural goings on in this movie and probably in the series as a whole makes very little sense and seems largely inconsistent. I don’t know, I’ve long thought that the Hellraiser franchise would be a good candidate for a Hollywood reboot because there are clearly ideas to be mined from it that could be executed a lot better. ** out of Five
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,780
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 24, 2024 9:04:01 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 5, 2016 12:30:26 GMT -5
31 DAYS OF HALLOWEENSLEEPAWAY CAMP (1983)Towards the late 1980's and into the 1990's, as slasher films began to lose steam, the genre turned to comedy. Freddy Krueger. Chucky. The Leprechaun. Those are some examples. None, however, ever reached the brilliance of a movie released back when the genre was supposed to be taken seriously. Sleepaway Camp, intentionally or unintentionally, is the best deconstruction and satire of the genre. It's what Scream wanted to be. It takes Friday the 13th, the poster boy for 80's slasher films, and brings out the absurdity without ever winking at the audience. From beginning to end, it's a serious and legitimate horror movie, but the details are hilarious. A girl's father is killed in a boating accident at a summer camp. Years later, her aunt sends her to summer camp. The girl is of course traumatized and doesn't talk to anyone or participate in any activities. In real life, she would just sit in the corner and be ignored. Here, of course, she gets bullied and then her bullies get killed. Is she the murderer or is someone murdering for her? It doesn't matter. What matters are the details. The characters are straight out of Meatballs. The deaths are ridiculous -- there is literally a scene where someone gets killed while taking a shit. And the twist, oh the twist, is just insane. You probably already know the twist, but rest assured, it's even better in context. The twist, really, represents the spirit of Sleepaway Camp. The modern slasher film began with Psycho. You can give credit to Black Christmas or Halloween or whatever, but really, Psycho is where the template comes from. The genre is built on twists. It could be a twist ending or just a concept twist. Point is, there can't just be a killer on the loose. There has to be some sort of angle. Sleepaway Camp takes the twist and mocks it. It mocks the whole genre. Some may dispute this. Some may say it's a happy accident, everything was unintentional, but how can you watch that ending and not think to yourself, "they're fucking with us. This HAS to be a joke." There's nothing serious about that ending. It's pure comedy. And you can make that argument for the entire movie. SLEEPAWAY CAMP II (1988)A camp counselor, played by Bruce Springsteen's sister, kills everybody. That's it. That's the movie. Goodnight, everybody. Seriously, though, it's actually really good. Sleepaway Camp II cuts to the chase. There's no build up. There's no twist. There's not even a survivor except for one random girl who leaves camp early. It gives you exactly what you want: a funny villain, gory deaths and tits. Take it or leave it. SLEEPAWAY CAMP III (1989) Sometimes, we take slasher films for granted. They seem too easy to make. You get a group of teenagers, throw them in the woods and then kill them in over-the-top ways. But really, you need good characters. Sleepaway Camp II and III are perfect examples. Both are the same, but one works and one doesn't. The difference? The characters. In Sleepaway Camp II you get characters that feel like real people. In Sleepaway Camp III they feel like stereotypes. It makes a difference because you need a way to get invested beyond the nudity and violence. There has to be a human level. The closest thing we get here is Bruce Springsteen's sister returning as the killer. She's funny. She's charming. She's believable. She's the reason you watch the movie without pressing the fast-forward button. But, ultimately, it's not enough to take Sleepaway Camp III beyond mediocrity.
|
|
thebtskink
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jul 2000
It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again.
Posts: 19,462
Likes: 4,984
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 23:42:06 GMT -5
|
Post by thebtskink on Oct 5, 2016 20:52:07 GMT -5
Film Five: Hellbound: Hellraiser II (1988)I never really liked the original Hellraiser that much, but there were some interesting ideas in it and for whatever reason I was curious to see more even though very few people seem to like the sequels. Hellraiser II is… well it’s certainly flawed but it was better than I expected it to be, I might have even liked it a little better than the first movie if only because it gets to the point faster. The movie certainly has more of that signature Hellraiser blood, gore, and weird sadomasochism but also adds a touch of Lovecraftian weirdness as the characters actually go into hell or whatever alternate dimension the cenobites come from. The movie’s fatal flaw (outside of its budgetary limits) is that the rules of the supernatural goings on in this movie and probably in the series as a whole makes very little sense and seems largely inconsistent. I don’t know, I’ve long thought that the Hellraiser franchise would be a good candidate for a Hollywood reboot because there are clearly ideas to be mined from it that could be executed a lot better. ** out of Five
For the love of god, don't go any further to try reviewing any of the films in this series after II. They're mostly crap, besides two weird mystery films that each have Pinhead for a collective 10 minutes. III has a lot to mock, if you're into that sort of thing.
|
|