Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 21, 2024 11:10:58 GMT -5
Film Twenty-One: Lake Placid (1999) We’re finally getting into the territory of a work of Crocodellian Cinema that was released during my own personal memory and as an eleven year old I was very interested in the release of Lake Placid. The film looked like it might have been the next Anaconda, a film I very much enjoyed around the same time, but unlike that movie Lake Placid was rated R so I didn’t see it at the time and by the time I was old enough to do so my interest had disippated. This is actually the only real “major studio” movie I’m watching as part of this Crocodellian Cinema crash course having been produced by 20th Century Fox, who probably were inspired to greenlight this thing by the success of Anaconda (that year also gave us Deep Blue Sea). This made less than half what that movie did though for a couple of reasons. The aforementioned rating discrepancy probably had something to do with it also this movie’s cast is a lot less exciting: that movie had Jennifer Lopez, Ice Cube, Owen Wilson, and Jon Voight all potentially in danger of being eaten by a giant snake, this movie just has Bill Pullman, Bridget Fonda, Oliver Platt, and a fairly young Brendan Gleeson tangling with this giant crocodile, who are all talented actors in various ways but it’s a less diverse and youth friendly ensemble. On top of that this movie has a much less exotic location given that it focuses on a giant Saltwater Crocodile that has inexplicably shown up in a New England lake rather than the jungle location that Anaconda benefited from. The other reason this probably did worse than Anaconda is that, well, it’s just generally not as good of a movie. In fact I’d say for the first half of the movie when we’re stuck dealing with these boring characters instead of a predatory reptile the movie downright sucks. Things do pick up eventually though, especially when we’re introduced to the film’s most interesting cast member, Betty White, who plays a nutty and occasionally foul mouthed local. If you’ve ever wanted to hear a Golden Girl say the line “if I had a dick I’d tell you to suck it,” this is the movie for you. This is also chronologically the first crocodile movie I’m looking at that largely uses CGI rather than practical effects, which is ostensibly lamentable but I wouldn’t say that special effects are that big of a problem here. I wouldn’t say the crocodile here looks “real” per se, it’s noticeably CGI, but it doesn’t look terrible. Certainly better than late 90s mid-budget computer graphics could have looked like. The film also stages some moderately clever scenarios to put this crocodile into, like having it take a page from Jaws 2 and attack a seaplane. I’m not going to defend the movie too much, it’s ultimately very… B-movie-ish… but I did eventually find myself having fun with it. The movie didn’t do great at the box office and probably did curtail whatever interest Hollywood had in making creature features the next trend and form there the genre would increasingly head more into the direct-to-Syfy realm than to real theaters and in keeping with that patter this movie has a bunch of non-theatrical sequels but aside form that it doesn’t have that long of a legacy. **1/2 out of Five
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 21, 2024 12:02:11 GMT -5
Longlegs returning to theaters Oct 24-31. Doomsday, Longlegs/Beetlejuice double feature.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,492
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:37:07 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Oct 21, 2024 13:28:46 GMT -5
Longlegs returning to theaters Oct 24-31. Doomsday , Longlegs/Beetlejuice double feature. Longlegs kinda sucked though.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Oct 21, 2024 13:57:47 GMT -5
Longlegs returning to theaters Oct 24-31. Doomsday , Longlegs/Beetlejuice double feature. Longlegs kinda sucked though.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 21, 2024 14:23:31 GMT -5
Sucks is overstating it but I was definitely disappointed.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,492
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:37:07 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Oct 21, 2024 17:02:05 GMT -5
Sucks is overstating it but I was definitely disappointed. I said kinda sucks.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,492
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:37:07 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Oct 21, 2024 17:11:03 GMT -5
Oct 21 The Town that Dreaded Sundown 1976
At first I was ready to write up this movie about the real life murders of the Texarcana killer as a dull bore. But I don't think that's giving it enough credit; it does have some interesting things going on here. Where this movie is strong is in the actual murder/ attempted murder scenes. There's a particular realism to these scenes that is impressive and chilling (with one big exception involving a trombone). The way they are filmed really give the killer a dangerous yet real quality, and the predicament of the victims is quite strongly felt. There's a scene in a corn field, for example, that is very effective.
But I can't actually declare that this movie is good. Those scenes are good, but the movie itself is pretty weak. There's a narration that runs throughout that is just bloody awful. There's also three particular moments of comic relief that are so tonally out of left field for what this movie is; a scene where two cops are undercover as a teenage couple being the weirdest of these. And the ending is also pretty lame, as the murders are still unsolved (Zodiac deals with this much, much much better). So its pretty weak, but not without value.
5/10
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 21, 2024 18:57:30 GMT -5
Day Twenty-One: Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1941)Given the presence of major movie stars like Spencer Tracy, Ingrid Bergman, and Lana Turner, I was expecting this 1941 version of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde to be a bit classier in execution, which is sort of true but sort of isn't. The film certainly places a lot of emphasis on the romantic triangle and the class dimensions behind it and Tracy's Hyde uses a lot less make-up than John Barrymore or Fredric March did. On the other hand, this movie has some real perverse stuff like a dream sequence of Mr. Hyde whipping Bergman and Turner who transform into horses. I also like the idea of not using make-up to distinguish Jekyll, letting Tracy's performance speak for itself and making a point that the monster comes directly out of the supposedly good and kind Dr. Jekyll. Of course, as the film goes on the make-up is emphasized a lot more so that idea sort of disappears. Still, I enjoyed this adaptation. It's very well made, the performances are strong, and I especially liked seeing Bergman in such a bawdy and less mannered role. B
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 21, 2024 19:02:45 GMT -5
Film Twenty-One: Flesh for Frankenstein (1973) Flesh for Frankenstein has at various points been released under the title “Andy Warhol’s Frankenstein” though Warhol only served as a producer on the film and I don’t know that he had any direct influence over it. It’s also a little more conventional and straightforward than the unformed experimentation that you generally associate with “Andy Warhol movie” but it is still all kinds of nutty all the same. The film is set in Serbia (seemingly so all the actors can have questionable vaguely European accents without most people being able to question it) and stars Udo Kier as a Dr. Frankenstein who is trying to build a male monster and a female monster out of body parts in order to have them mate and create a race of monsters he can control. The film was rated X when it came out in 1973 and does indeed feature a whole lot of nudity and “abhorrent” sexuality, but I wouldn’t really call it pornographic as most of this is meant to provoke and mess with taboos rather than really arouse anyone. It was also originally in 3D because… why not. The movie is pretty nuts, it has Udo Keir going completely over the top at all times and a lot of the blood and gore is indeed really in your face (literally, given the 3D) and interesting to look at. The movie isn’t scary at all and probably never was but people looking for camp insanity will most certainly find it. ***1/2 out of Five NOTE: Dracula posting this on October 21st, 2018 and me now posting on October 21, 2024 is 100% a coincidence. Although, if y'all wanna play the lottery tonight, be my guest. Just be sure to give Dracula and I a small cut if you win. FLESH FOR FRANKENSTEIN (1973) / BLOOD FOR DRACULA (1974) The 1970's were wild, man. You could openly be a pervert, and no one cared. Maybe it is time for PG Cooper to step away from YouTube stardom and put his doctorate to good use. I have read that Zoomers aren't having sex and dislike seeing romance depicted on film and television. I do not know how accurate these reports are, but that is where you come in. As an educator, you are in a position to test if these claims are true or not. Without warning, play Flesh for Frankenstein for your students and let us know how it goes. Sure, you might get fired, but Doomsday will get you a job at LucasFilm if that is the case. You could be the LucasFilm archivist and finally fulfill your dream of living in the United States and being miserable like the rest of us. So what is so bad about Flesh for Frankenstein? Well, the premise is as follows. Frankenstein is creating a male and female monster to mate and procreate. Meanwhile, one of his employees is going around and having sex with every female in sight. It's just a movie about people fornicating with the occasional gore to remind you that it is a "horror film." This was a common sub-genre in the 70's, but Flesh for Frankenstein swung for the fences. If there is a line that shouldn't be crossed, Flesh for Frankenstein jumped over it and kept running. If this movie is shocking in 2024, people must have lost their minds in 1973. But... whereas Flesh for Frankenstein was an experience, Blood for Dracula is a legitimate film. It's made by the same people and also pushes boundaries, but it has a story and actual characters. Also be on the lookout for a cameo from Roman Polanski. Dracula is in a weakened state and needs virgin blood to survive. He meets a nice family with young daughters, but unfortunately for him, the daughters aren't as innocent as they seem. The movie offers a different take on Dracula, which I found interesting and amusing. Dracula is basically a pathetic loser, and if his diet ain't right, he won't survive. You almost feel bad for Dracula and "the victims" almost come across as the villains. The gore is fun. The music is really good. This is a surprisingly good film, and I wouldn't hesitate to recommend it. Flesh for Frankenstein? Not so much.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 21, 2024 19:56:06 GMT -5
MAY (2002) Initially, I wasn't sure what to think of this movie. Angela Bettis (2002 Carrie NBC TV Remake) plays this demented young woman that goes off the deep end after bad dates with Jeremy Sisto and Anna Faris. It's super awkward and uncomfortable to watch. Rian Johnson (Last Jedi) was apparently one of the editors. I knew that dude had skeletons in the closet. But as I've let the film marinate in my head, it's actually kinda funny. I think I dig it. Not sure I'd watch it again. But I like it in theory.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Oct 22, 2024 11:11:58 GMT -5
Day Twenty-Two: Phantom of the Paradise (1974)
I really wasn't quite sure what to expect from Phantom of the Paradise, other than that it was Brian De Palma's adaptation/reinterpretation of Phantom of the Opera, and that the titular character certainly looked weird. What I got was a strange, more-than-likely-drug-induced revenge dark musical comedy horror-ish film that is certainly unique and which got more and more intriguing and entertaining as it went on. Because, I'll be honest: at first, I wasn't quite sure what to make of this. But once the film gets into the weeds of what it's about and the various elements it's playing with, Brian De Palma is able to unleash a cacophony of music, striking visuals, specific tonal flourishes and Faustian undertones that really started to pull me in. The second half of this film, especially, pretty much pulsates with a wild and steadily building energy that gradualy pulls back the curtain to reveal just how many toys De Palma is playing with here, and by the time the film started to head into its Third Act, I was all in. Granted, the specific brand of madness that Phantom of the Paradise can take a little getting used to at first, and that was certainly the case for me. Plus, the film's story ultimately isn't one of the more interesting out there and I'm not quite so sure that I bought into the central romance as much as the movie wanted me to, and the songs themselves may not be the most memorable. But this is clearly a film driven pretty exclusively by its style, and man, what a style it becomes. To the point where I was never entirely sure what flourishes it would employ next, but they continually held my interest. Phantom of the Paradise sure does become a wild ride by the end, one that I'm glad to have gotten on.
***/****
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 22, 2024 11:48:42 GMT -5
Film Twenty-Two: Count Dracula (1970) This Dracula movie stars Christopher Lee but was not one of his Hammer movies and instead featured him playing Dracula for Jesús Franco, a Spaniard who made movies more or less in the same trans-European style as the Italian B-movie directors of the time with everyone speaking different languages on set and being dubbed later. By and large Franco is known for making movies that were essentially soft-core porn disguised as horror movies but this one is an exception in which he was trying to go a bit more legit. The hook here was ostensibly supposed to be that this was more faithful to the Bram Stoker novel than previous adaptations, which is I guess ostensibly true but this is still a 97 minute movie that has a lot of trims and makes a lot of the same changes that the other adaptations tend to make. Most notably the film has Dracula sporting a mustache, which is book accurate but also looks lame, and it incorporates the mechanic where Dracula becomes younger as he sucks blood. The film also features Klaus Kinski as Renfield, which is decent casting but the film also kind of seems to feel obligated to give us more of the character than we need because of it. I don’t know, it’s not a bad Dracula movie necessarily but it’s a pretty inessential one, especially now that we’ve gotten other “faithful” adaptations like Coppola’s. *** out of Five
Bonus Film: Salem’s Lot (2024) It’s not hard to guess why this new version of Salem’s Lot was greenlit. The It movies made a lot of money and it seemed natural to give the big screen treatment to another Stephen King novel that had heretofore only been given the TV miniseries treatment and “Salem’s Lot” was selected. Unfortunately this didn’t get anything like the same success that movie did, in fact it basically sat on the shelf for a long time before being sent directly to MAX instead of put in theaters. You’d think this would have to be pretty embarrassing to be given that fate, and it really isn’t, but it’s also not particularly great either. In fact this is kind of one of those movies that’s so aggressively “mid” that you almost wish it were worse so that it could be notable for something. Unlike It this hasn’t gotten the “split across two movies” treatment, which is probably the right move given that this doesn't have a clear first or second half but it means that the story feels rather abridged compared to the 70s miniseries people remember and that kind of means it has less of a reason to exist. The characters here are really boring in general and it didn’t make me care that much about any of them. That said, once the vampires finally start attacking things do pick up with the movie. There are some decent vampire imagery to be found along the way and the filmmaking found here is usually competent to above-average but rarely exceptional. Watching it you kind of realize why Warner didn’t really feel like putting it in theaters but it’s also not bad enough that it lives up to the usual “direct to streaming” stigma. I don’t know, they really probably should have just made this 90 minutes longer and made it a miniseries again because it probably would have felt like it had more of a reason to exist in that format but even then it probably still would have felt inferior to the similarly themed Midnight Mass on Netflix, which was always kind of an unofficial Salem’s Lot remake to begin with. **1/2 out of Five
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 22, 2024 12:25:41 GMT -5
the songs themselves may not be the most memorable. The Hell of It is in heavy rotation in October and is also in my 70's movie soundtrack playlist. But yes, in spite of Doomsday, Rocky Horror Picture Show is the better soundtrack.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Oct 22, 2024 12:29:28 GMT -5
the songs themselves may not be the most memorable. The Hell of It is in heavy rotation in October. Never knew what it was before now.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 22, 2024 12:35:19 GMT -5
The Hell of It is in heavy rotation in October. Never knew what it was before now. I meant my heavy rotation. Most people don't know this movie exists. But Rocky Horror? A classic.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 22, 2024 12:43:13 GMT -5
the songs themselves may not be the most memorable. The Hell of It is in heavy rotation in October and is also in my 70's movie soundtrack playlist. But yes, in spite of Doomsday, Rocky Horror Picture Show is the better soundtrack. Phantom of the Paradise is superior to Rocky Horror in every conceivable way, including and especially soundtrack. Fuck Time Warp, gimme Somebody Super Like You.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 22, 2024 14:02:41 GMT -5
Phantom of the Paradise is superior to Rocky Horror in every conceivable way, including and especially soundtrack. Let's agree Xanadu is better than both.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 22, 2024 14:04:01 GMT -5
Phantom of the Paradise is superior to Rocky Horror in every conceivable way, including and especially soundtrack. Let's agree Xanadu is better than both. Hell yeah brother.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 22, 2024 14:14:07 GMT -5
Damn. Jeff Lyne really is a thief.
|
|
thebtskink
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jul 2000
It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again.
Posts: 19,462
Likes: 4,984
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:57:17 GMT -5
|
Post by thebtskink on Oct 22, 2024 14:17:05 GMT -5
Let's agree Xanadu is better than both. Hell yeah brother. Seeing Primus cover this album in full remains one of my favorite concert experiences.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,298
Likes: 6,762
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Oct 22, 2024 14:51:18 GMT -5
And now, Doomsday continues his ongoing series of watching horror movies he's never seen before for Halloween......
Here you go, Neverending . Beetlejuice Beetlejuice
I laughed out loud at this scene. I've posted this before but when I was much younger, I found out a girl I was in love with really liked Beetlejuice. I had my parents buy me the VHS and I spent months rewatching it, trying to make myself an expert on her favorite movie. Maybe I thought it would make her like me or create some psychic connection between us. As it turned out, none of that worked and I'm married to someone who has never seen Beetlejuice. Life comes at you fast. As much as I forced Beetlejuice onto myself though, I don't think I ever quite got it. It's a weird story, some of the jokes land but many of them don't, I think it's more about delving into Tim Burton's imagination more than anything. It's certainly a creative movie but a lot of other stuff is questionable. There had been a ton of speculation surrounding a possible sequel pretty much since the original came out. In fact, I even wrote a fake synopsis to a now defunct movie website claiming to be a studio insider which they published way back around 2001. When they finally got this into production I wondered if this was going to be a sequel we needed especially considering Hollywood's knack for giving us sequels to decades-old films that serve little to no purpose. Was this going to be a Blade Runner 2049? Or would it be a Bill & Ted 3? I'll say that while it definitely leaned on the original film almost to a fault, I did have a fun time watching it. Beetlejuice Beetlejuice brings back Winona Ryder, Catherine O'Hara, and Jeffrey Jones from the original film. Oh wait, not Jeffrey Jones, he's a pedophile now. Well the other two haven't molested anyone so they were safe to bring back to the Beetlejuice sequel, once again matching wits with Michael Keaton. I'm sure people have posted about it already but for an offbeat supernatural comedy, this movie had about 3-too many useless storylines. We could have had two and the movie would have been fine. It's a shame too because I loved the intro to Monica Bellucci's character, she just didn't do anything and served absolutely no purpose. It also recycles the 'Beetlejuice marrying Lydia' theme which didn't make much sense in the first one and is shoehorned into this, complete with the same costumes from the original. And my last gripe, why couldn't they have found a way to put Keaton and Danny DeVito on screen again? What a tease. But I would be lying if I said I wasn't entertained by this movie. There were a few funny moments, as expected Michael Keaton knocked it out of the park and everyone else was fun to watch, and this more or less felt like a Tim Burton movie again. While it felt like a Greatest Hits sequel similar to Bill & Ted 3 it did have some degree of creativity behind it. Was it a sequel we needed? Probably not but it's better than it deserved to be and you can tell people in front of and behind the camera had a good time making it. I haven't quite decided yet but this may be my final movie for this year. If so, happy early Halloween everyone!
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,945
Likes: 2,015
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 14:37:23 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Oct 22, 2024 15:29:31 GMT -5
Booo. Nostalgia strikes again. Boring useless money grab.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,622
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:45:46 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Oct 22, 2024 15:52:22 GMT -5
The Crazies (George Romero, 1973)- 6/10 Twilight Zone: The Movie (John Landis, Steven Spielberg, Joe Dante, and George Miller, 1983)- 5/10
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Oct 22, 2024 16:08:35 GMT -5
Booo. Nostalgia strikes again. Boring useless money grab. I've never felt closer to you than I do now.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 22, 2024 17:00:10 GMT -5
The Crazies (George Romero, 1973)- 6/10 Twilight Zone: The Movie (John Landis, Steven Spielberg, Joe Dante, and George Miller, 1983)- 5/10 Buddy, you can’t just drop Twilight Zone: The Movie in the midst of Doomsday watching Beetlejuice Beetlejuice. We’ll circle back to this. Let us have this moment first. I thought Halloween only came once a year. My lady friend my first semester of college was obsessed with Nightmare Before Christmas. Hot Topic Girl to the core. Her mugshot is on the Internet for domestic violence. I feel you. And yet, you were a fan of the cartoon in which Lydia and Beetlejuice are inexplicably best friends? I remember the Beetlejuice cartoon being my favorite show in the 3rd grade. Specifically the 3rd grade. Only me and one other kid watched the show. Our entire “friendship” was based on watching this show. I later found out his parents used to beat him. Wasn’t that you & Jibbs submitting fake stories to ComingSoon? See? Nothing to be scared of. Megalopolis and Joker 2 await you. Sleepaway Camp II and Phantasm II next year.
|
|