Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,777
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 20:24:15 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 1, 2024 11:52:26 GMT -5
there's no way it could be worse than the movie I chose to start 2023's Halloween season, Hubie Halloween. I'm still sore about that piece of shit. Love at First Bite was there waiting for you.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 1, 2024 15:07:40 GMT -5
Let's start with a real banger. Day One: Resident Evil: ApocalypseNever before has a movie had so many characters and yet so few. Resident Evil: Apocalypse is constantly throwing new faces in front of the camera who suddenly take center stage and dominate screen time, and yet no one has a well-developed personality or motivation. The story is little more than "escape the city/kill zombies", even the rescue plot only introduced late in the story and resolved nearly immediately. Emphasis is clearly on the sensation of action and horror set-pieces, nearly incomprehensive in their frenzied cutting and lack of breathing room. Much of the film becomes white noise, made worse by the extremely bland empty city setting, lacking any of the personality or intrigue of the underground lab/office from the first movie. Apocalypse is an inferior sequel through and through, which is especially impressive given Resident Evil was already quite bad, but that film's glimpses of theme and interest are entirely absent here. Having said all that, this movie did give me a great burst of nostalgia. Apocalypse is the only Resident Evil movie I'd ever seen before, at the tender age of 11 with a bunch of kids at the local sitter's. The one memory I had from that viewing was a bit where Alice, held at gunpoint, dropped her gun, but when the goons lowered their guard, she dived down to catch her gun midfall and shoot the bad guys. I wasn't sure if that actually happened in the movie or if I imagined it, so when it happened in this viewing, I went nuts. I was hootin', I was hollerin', and a great time was had by all. D-
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,300
Likes: 6,767
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 19:57:56 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Oct 1, 2024 15:37:56 GMT -5
Never before has a movie had so many characters and yet so few.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,777
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 20:24:15 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 1, 2024 15:52:30 GMT -5
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,300
Likes: 6,767
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 19:57:56 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Oct 1, 2024 17:29:41 GMT -5
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice is 100% a movie that I didn't need to see in theaters but would like to watch at some point. I'll check it out when it drops.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,103
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 22:17:55 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 1, 2024 18:53:15 GMT -5
Film One: The Dark Half (1993) The Dark Half was George A. Romero’s second foray into making a Stephen King adaptation since he collaborated with the author on Creepshow. This one is a more straightforward feature length novel adaptation and was one of Romero’s last attempts to make a studio film before his series of late career zombie movies. The book he was adapting is not one of King’s most famous works by any mean but it’s decently well respected within his canon and is also one of his more self-referential works. It was inspired by King’s habit of writing some particularly violent books under the pseudonym Richard Bachman and he started to think about Richard Bachman as a sort of evil twin that he used to get out his darkest ideas and he eventually spun that into this book about an author who also writes under a pseudonym and starts to hear about a series of murders that are being carried out by his alter ego and we eventually learn that this has something to with the author having had a parasitic twin who died in utero. I must say I was a little confused about the basic concept here: at times it seems like the murderer alter ego is an alternate personality existing in the same body as the author but at other times he seems like a separate entity walking around independently. I’d also say that there are other aspects of this that are just a bit “meh” in execution. Timothy Hutton isn’t a terribly compelling leading man, which is kind of a problem here given that a lot of the appeal should have been seeing a really compelling actor ham it up in a duel role. I’ll also say that as alter egos go “George Stark” isn’t very scary. He’s twisted in more of an action movie villain way than as a horror slasher. The movie has its moments (the swarm of sparrows imagery is neat), but as King adaptations go it’s mid at best. **1/2 out of Five
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,624
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 22:06:09 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Oct 1, 2024 19:15:24 GMT -5
Wasn't a fan of The Dark Half either. Doesn't make a lick of sense and isn't as fun as it could've been.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,777
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 20:24:15 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 2, 2024 3:36:07 GMT -5
Film One: The Dark Half (1993) The Dark Half was George A. Romero’s second foray into making a Stephen King adaptation since he collaborated with the author on Creepshow. This one is a more straightforward feature length novel adaptation and was one of Romero’s last attempts to make a studio film before his series of late career zombie movies. The book he was adapting is not one of King’s most famous works by any mean but it’s decently well respected within his canon and is also one of his more self-referential works. It was inspired by King’s habit of writing some particularly violent books under the pseudonym Richard Bachman and he started to think about Richard Bachman as a sort of evil twin that he used to get out his darkest ideas and he eventually spun that into this book about an author who also writes under a pseudonym and starts to hear about a series of murders that are being carried out by his alter ego and we eventually learn that this has something to with the author having had a parasitic twin who died in utero. I must say I was a little confused about the basic concept here: at times it seems like the murderer alter ego is an alternate personality existing in the same body as the author but at other times he seems like a separate entity walking around independently. I’d also say that there are other aspects of this that are just a bit “meh” in execution. Timothy Hutton isn’t a terribly compelling leading man, which is kind of a problem here given that a lot of the appeal should have been seeing a really compelling actor ham it up in a duel role. I’ll also say that as alter egos go “George Stark” isn’t very scary. He’s twisted in more of an action movie villain way than as a horror slasher. The movie has its moments (the swarm of sparrows imagery is neat), but as King adaptations go it’s mid at best. **1/2 out of FiveWasn't a fan of The Dark Half either. Doesn't make a lick of sense and isn't as fun as it could've been. The ending is .... an ending. THE DARK HALF (1993)From Stephen King and George A. Romero comes, not Creepshow 3, but The Dark Half, a tale about a horror novelist battling the physical manifestation of his dark side. It’s a goofy little movie that’s well-made, has a fun score by Christopher “Hellraiser” Young and is very entertaining to watch in that very 1990’s fantasy horror kinda way.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,777
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 20:24:15 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 2, 2024 6:50:34 GMT -5
1980's nostalgia is played out. Hollywood should move on to the 90's and 2000's. That said, Lisa Frankenstein is charming enough to overcome its tired premise. Hopefully Doomsday will give it a shot this spooky season.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,528
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:33:37 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Oct 2, 2024 9:07:52 GMT -5
Day Two: Abigail (2024)
Another movie that satisfyingly delivers on what it promises. I've seen some debate as to whether or not the studio did the movie a disservice by giving away its big hook in the trailers, but for my money, that wasn't the case. Would not knowing the big reveal going in have made this movie any better? I really can't say, but nor do I care. Because how this movie was sold to me is exactly what I got and what I wanted. Abigail is a gleefully gory spin on the vampire genre from the Radio Silence directing duo, who I personally feel have been getting better and better with each of their movies since Ready or Not back in 2019. I admit, though, that I actually wasn't the biggest fan of their debut feature from the get-go, but Abigail, to me, feels like the more successful version of the type of movie that Ready or Not was trying to be. It's one that combines horror with comedy a bit more smoothly, and in ways that feel like they naturally compliment each other, and legitimately charming and fun characters who may not be the most sympathetic or dynamic necessarily, but still contain more than enough personality to make them come across as just slightly more than your average monster movie menu items. Building off that, the core cast plays well off of one another, with Melissa Barrera, Dan Stevens and Kathryn Newton in particular adding to the personality of the movie, but let's not overlook Alisha Weir as the titular Abigail, who really embraces her role here with gusto and is a big part of what helps this movie be so fun. Yet, credit there also goes to the Radio Silence directing duo, who make sure the tone of this movie stays just right. They really embrace the bloodshed, most of time in unabashedly over-the-top fashion that just adds to the occasionally bonkers tone, but just in terms of the storytelling, this movie is paced well with an always-maintained level of entertainment value. The movie admittedly indulges in an action-like climax that doesn't feel fully earned, though, and includes a sudden villain turn that undercuts the movie's actual threatening force just a little. But overall, Abigail is a lot of fun and definitely worth the recommendation for genre fans, especially.
***/****
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,945
Likes: 2,015
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 22:24:36 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Oct 2, 2024 10:03:28 GMT -5
Thought Abigail was a snoozer for the first hour then turned into something semi interesting. But still a whimper.
Big fan of ready or not though. Samara is a star though and they had very little star power outside legion in this one.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,528
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:33:37 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Oct 2, 2024 10:09:26 GMT -5
Disagree. Melissa Barrera, Kathryn Newton, Kevin Durand, Will Catlett, Giancarlo Esposito in his small role and especially Alisha Weir all bring it.
And I'm actually the opposite. I'd say Ready or Not was more of a snoozer than this, but I know I'm in the minority there.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,777
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 20:24:15 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 2, 2024 16:21:28 GMT -5
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,103
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 22:17:55 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 2, 2024 17:25:19 GMT -5
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,777
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 20:24:15 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 2, 2024 17:42:49 GMT -5
Film Nineteen: Dracula's Daughter (1936) While there are several films that bear his name, Dracula’s Daughter is in fact the only true sequel that was ever made to the 1931 classic Dracula, and even it only barely counts. The only returning cast member is the guy who played Van Helsing, who is being put on trial for murdering Dracula (who the authorities don’t believe is a vampire) in the first film. That’s a plotline that has potential but the movie never really makes the most of it and mostly focuses on the titular daughter, Countess Marya Zaleska, who is indeed the offspring of the famous Count and is also afflicted with vampirism. Unlike her father though, Zaleska is conflicted about being a creature of the night and is trying to find a cure (but isn’t above feeding on people until she finds one). This dithering on the part of the villainess kind of robs the movie of that sense of dread and evil it needs and the movie is consequently not very well remembered as a horror movie. It is however very well remembered for possibly having some coded lesbianism going on. Zaleska bites her female victims with much the same sexual overtones that Dracula did and there’s definitely some longing you can sense in her. These overtones were intentional by all accounts (less out of a legitimate interest in lesbianism and more because it was potentially titillating) but it was also mild enough to get past censors. Overall this isn’t much of a movie, but there are definitely worse Universal Horror sequels out there and this one held up a little better than I remembered. **1/2 out of FiveThis sequel suffers from the same stage-like approach of its predecessor, although it is a lot more technically proficient. Thematically, it is a victim of its time. The movie would have benefited greatly if it had been allowed to delve into its lesbian story. Not for titillating reasons. I just feel the cast is really strong and would have done wonders with the material. And that’s really the saving grace. It has good actors and they elevate what’s mostly a forgettable film.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,103
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 22:17:55 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 2, 2024 17:47:53 GMT -5
Day Two: Stopmotion (2024) There’s a decent argument to be made that Roman Polanski’s most influential movie wasn’t Chinatown or even Rosemary’s Baby but instead his 1965 film Repulsion, which seems to have invented an entire sub-genre of horror in which women living in apartments go insane and deteriorate (think Black Swan or May or Last Night in Soho or Saint Maud). The latest entry in this sub-genre is Stopmotion, a neat little horror film that came out earlier this year about a stop motion animator who is trying to finish a film that was started by her mother but she’s under a great deal of stress and at a certain point she seems to snap and lose her grasp on reality and starts thinking her stop motion creations are coming to life, among other things. So in broad strokes this isn’t the most original of horror movies, especially not now when psychological horror as a metaphor for trauma is almost a cliché, but the stop motion element is enough of a novelty to make it stand out. This is the feature debut of director Robert Morgan, who has been making animated shorts as far back as the mid-90s and he seems to have found an interesting way to bring his slightly disturbing style of stop motion effects into a more commercial realm here. At the end of the day I do think the movie could have stood to inject just a little more novelty on top of the stop motion gimmick but still, it’s a decent enough effort that’s worth a look. *** out of Five
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,493
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 18:14:57 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Oct 2, 2024 20:15:40 GMT -5
Oct 2 The Crazies 1973
George Romero's not-quite-a-zombie follow up to Night of the Living Dead sees a town under quarantine after being infected by a virus that makes them go mad. Though it seems to be more about the quarantine procedures rather than many scares from the proto-zombies. There is only really one horror-like kill with a sewing needle(which is good, I'll grant you), and an attack scene by a group of townsfolk against the soldiers. The woman sweeping up after the carnage made me laugh quite a bit. But otherwise its basically about the army's tactics and a small group trying to escape the perimeter.
It was decent. Rather ordinary at times, with the usual "small band trying to survive together" tropes. They do a lot to make the army guys be more than just mindless minions in masks, which was nice. I really liked the grumpy scientist, enjoying most of his scenes and appreciating the irony of his story arc. Romero cuts the film with frenzy; lots of short cuts to enhance the action which I don't think worked for me so much. But its a pretty strong film that gets better as approaches the end.
6/10
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 2, 2024 21:41:12 GMT -5
Day Two: Resident Evil: ExtinctionOne albatross that I suspect is going to hang over this series is that Alice is a terrible protagonist. Milla Jovovich has some screen presence but the character is just woefully underwritten and unmotivated. Lack of motivation is more generally something of an issue here for both the heroes and the villains and no one is particularly compelling. Extinction mixes survivors from Apocalypse with some new faces but they all proved completely interchangeable to me. The film also continues the Resident Evil tradition of ripping off better movies. Extinction is basically "what if Mad Max was also a zombie movie" and it also recreates a scene straight from Romero's Day of the Dead. And in spite of all that, I'd say this is also clearly my favourite of the series so far. Sure, it's a bargain basement Mad Max but I still like a desert wasteland as a setting. The production value feels a bit higher than the first movie and substantially higher (and more visually interesting) than the abysmal second film. The action scenes, while nothing mind-blowing, are also a step-up and I was reasonably entertained by the climax. Resident Evil: Extinction is still a bad movie but it features the most amount of good I've seen from this series. D+
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,493
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 18:14:57 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Oct 2, 2024 23:07:33 GMT -5
Oct 2 Let the Right One In 2008
A modern look at a vampire tale told through the point of view of a 12 year old boy. The way it plays with the vampire mythology through hints and details is fascinating. Meanwhile, the emotional core of these two loners growing as friends deepens throughout the film.
There are a lot of highlights in this movie, particularly the pool scene at the end, but the film really benefits from the creepy atmosphere that is built, the way that atmosphere subsides when its just the two of them, and the overall visual composition of the film. There's a lot of great shots here, both gory and beautiful.
The ending really struck me as bittersweet this time around, mostly because I'm not sure what the future of these two are. Is he just going to end up being like the old guy at the beginning? Her Renfield? Or is he really going to change things for her? Who knows.
Its been a long times since I watched this one.
9/10
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,777
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 20:24:15 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 3, 2024 2:55:46 GMT -5
Day One: Resident Evil: Apocalypse Day Two: Resident Evil: Extinction Once you’re done with whatever this is, time to dive into WWE Films.
And yes, these would have been your Film Club selections for October if Doomsday weren’t a coward.
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,528
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 12:33:37 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Oct 3, 2024 9:43:01 GMT -5
Day Three: Beetlejuice Beetlejuice (2024)
Chalk up Beetlejuice Beetlejuice as the biggest disappointment of the year so far for me. I was really rooting for it, hoping it'd be a return to form for Tim Burton, especially since he kept proclaiming that this was the most fun he'd ever had making a movie. Alas, though, this doesn't deliver. In fact, I'll go further: I hated this. Yet, it wasn't an immediate hate. Rather, it was a slowly simmering one as a result of a string of severely underwhelming and/or miscalculated decisions, culminating in me finally mentally throwing up my hands in an "I give up!" fashion. But let me start with the positives: this movie absolutely does look great. In terms of visuals and production design, Tim Burton has still got it, and if there's any aspect of this movie where it/he feels particularly inspired, it's in the aesthetic and production design. Concurrently, it feels like the world of the dead here gets to be explored a bit more in the first and if anything, I appreciated that. Also on the subject of the visuals, the movie has more than a fair few that surprise me -- in a good way -- that they somehow still got away with a PG-13 rating. So, on a visual level, I do believe Burton when he said he had a blast making this. That extends, too, to Michael Keaton's performance as the titular Ghost with the Most. Keaton is hands down one of the liveliest things here -- as expected -- clearly reveling in the opportunity to play this character again and consistently delivering the film's biggest laughs as a result. Right there with him in that regard is Catherine O'Hara as Delia. Too bad the rest of the movie lets them down. Because this script really is pretty terrible. For one thing, it spends about half (maybe more) of its 105-minute running time setting up what the actual plot of the movie is, which would be one thing if that setup were any good, but it's not. Instead, it feels so belabored, forced, strained, trying-too-hard, with characterizations that ring hollow and/or too cartoonish, performances that simply feel off and worst of all, comedy that largely lands with a thud. And when one of the main genres here is comedy, that's a problem. Because, again, apart from Keaton and O'Hara, pretty much the rest of the humor here failed to get any true laughs out of me. It's not for lack of trying, but there are few things worse than a comedy going for laughs and missing the mark more often than not, and that's the case here. It's not just that, though. One of the things that made the first Beelejuice work so well is how it hung all its creativity around a charmingly simple story. This sequel, by contrast, simply feels too busy. There are so many threads going on here at the same time, that the movie hardly ever feels like it has time to breathe, being driven more solely by plot machinations rather than letting the charm of the characters help keep things steady, i.e. having its equivalent of The Maitlands to keep everything relatively grounded. And on the subject of the characters...a lot of this movie is centered around a strained relationship between Lydia and her daughter Astrid, but Winona Ryder's performance feels like she's almost overly medicated and Jenna Ortega's comes across like reheated leftovers of the Wednesday show. Lydia also feels kind of dumbed down in this. The movie offers an explanation as to why she could possibly be like this, but the intended emotion of it simply doesn't come across. I think that's due to a combination of lackluster writing and Tim Burton perhaps having lost his touch a bit in terms of directing his actors. Another thing that lands with a deafening thud, by the way? This movie's try at creating its own "Day-Oh!" possessed dance sequence. I had already conceded defeat in regards to this movie by then, but that sequence wasn't the straw that broke the camel's back -- more like the straw that caved the bones in. And I haven't even mentioned Justin Thereoux's painfully bad performance, nor the complete pointlessness of Monica Bellucci's character, but -- they're there. Overall, Beetlejuice Beetlejuice feels like an extended, live-action episode of the 90's animated series, but not in a good way. There's very much such a thing as having too much of a good thing, and Beetlejuice Beetlejuice painfully proves that point.
*/****
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 3, 2024 10:44:54 GMT -5
Day One: Resident Evil: Apocalypse Day Two: Resident Evil: Extinction Once you’re done with whatever this is That series is already on pause. The couple who are introducing my fiancée and I to the Resident Evil movies had a baby in July so I suspect it'll be a long time before we get together for a new screening.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,300
Likes: 6,767
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 19:57:56 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Oct 3, 2024 11:35:23 GMT -5
Day One: Resident Evil: Apocalypse Day Two: Resident Evil: Extinction Once you’re done with whatever this is, time to dive into WWE Films.
And yes, these would have been your Film Club selections for October if Doomsday weren’t a coward. Coop has told me repeatedly that he won't watch any movie with Hornswoggle.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 3, 2024 11:40:31 GMT -5
Once you’re done with whatever this is, time to dive into WWE Films.
And yes, these would have been your Film Club selections for October if Doomsday weren’t a coward. Coop has told me repeatedly that he won't watch any movie with Hornswoggle. That fucker ruined D-Generation X.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,777
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 20:24:15 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 3, 2024 12:48:31 GMT -5
|
|