PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 14:41:31 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 22, 2016 14:59:16 GMT -5
I've fallen behind posting my lists here so I'll try to rectify that over the next few days. Top Five Horror Gems to Watch this HalloweenIt’s October, which means it’s time to start watching some horror movies. There are of course a ton of classics to watch, from Nosferatu to Halloween, or you could take a look at some modern horror greats like It Follows or The Witch. However there are other great horror films that, for whatever reason, haven’t garnered the reputation of the genre’s more notable classics. These gems are well worth your time however, and today I’ll be drawing attention to five lesser-known horror films that you should watch this Halloween. Keep in mind my goal isn’t to find the most obscure horror films possible. Rather, the movies I’ve highlighted here definitely have a following, they’re just not celebrated to the degree I think they deserve. 5. The Haunting (1963)The Haunting was a modest success back in 1963, but it’s only in recent memory that the film has garnered more serious praise. The film revolves around a group of people visiting a supposedly haunted house and conduct a social experiment to see if it really is haunted. This could have been another B-ghost movie in the vein of House on Haunted Hill¸ but instead Robert Wise really elevates this into something special. Using camera lenses that cause distortion deliberately, Wise creates a disorienting move which feels like slipping into another world. Julie Harris gives a great performance as a woman slowly losing her mind and Wise leans on minimal suspense and mystery rather than overt terror. The film has started to receive prominent praise in the last few years, no doubt aided by Martin Scorsese listing it among the scariest films of all-time, but I still feel like this is underseen. Hell, the fact that when you google “the haunting” the shitty remake from 1999 comes up before this is enough of a reason to want the original to get more love. 4. I Walked with a ZombieIn the 1940s, producer Val Lewton made a name for himself producing low-budget horror films for RKO. His most famous effort is almost certainly 1942’s Cat People, directed by Jacques Tourneur. That’s a good movie, but the very next year Lewton and Tourneur made I Walked with a Zombie, a film I consider to be plainly superior to Cat People. While the plot itself is nothing special, what I Walked with a Zombie specializes in is atmosphere. Set on a Caribbean island, much of the film takes place at night and features lots of visuals have hypnotized souls wandering in trance. Though this is a B-picture, Tourneur’s direction and the cinematography elevate this to something which easily can compete with more high-budget fare. Anyone who goes in expecting a zombie movie in the vein of Night of the Living Dead is gonna be disappointed (the zombies here are voodoo slaves not flesh eating corpses), but if you’re looking for some creepy black-and-white thrills, check it out. 3. The Phantom CarriageIn the early 1920s, German Expressionist films like The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari and Nosferatu broke new ground for the horror genre. Wedged between them however is this haunting ghost story from Sweden. Directed by Victor Sjöström, The Phantom Carriage involves a legend that states the last person to die in a year must take on the mantle of death in the subsequent year. The focus is on the town drunkard who finds himself in that unfortunate position. The very legend the film creates is pretty awesome, but what really makes The Phantom Carriage great are the visuals. For the time, the special effects featured were really ground breaking and even in 2016 they still look pretty damn good. What’s more, the visuals Sjöström creates are very powerful. Death in particular is a very creepy figure. The film also tells a pretty compelling story and the flashback structure was also pretty new in 1921. The film, and Sjöström in general, are known to have had an influence on Ingmar Bergman and Stanley Kubrick lifted a sequence right from The Phantom Carriage for The Shining, but the film still feels like it exists on the fringe. That’s a shame because this is a classic in its own right and deserves more attention. 2. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1931)The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is a classic horror tale and though there have been many film adaptations, and it’s never really had a definitive take on the vein of the 1931 adaptations of Dracula or Frankenstein. What’s frustrating is that the same year of those Universal classics also gave audiences a really strong take on Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. The highlight is probably Fredric March’s dual performance as Jekyll and Hyde. His Jekyll is nuanced and interesting while is Hyde is a full on bastard and a ton of fun to watch. March actually won an Oscar for his performance, which today is basically unheard of. The film also has some cool (if dated) make-up effects and the film has a lot of energy. This is a very entertaining horror film which fits in nicely with the aforementioned Universal horror films of the day. Though made by a different studio, the film has a similar mix of literary influence and fun horror thrills. So if you’re the kind of person who lives to watch the Universal Monsters around Halloween, you should probably give this a watch too. 1. Carnival of SoulsHerk Harvey was a filmmaker of instructional videos throughout his career, but in 1962 he made a low-budget horror film with a cast of amateurs called Carnival of Souls. The film was dismissed in the day, but overtime has built a cult audience while also inspiring filmmakers like George A. Romero and David Lynch. The film follows a young woman who suffers an accident, miraculously survives, and tries to move on with her life. However she begins to be plagued by strange occurrences, and visions of a mysterious figure following her. The film has a dreamlike atmosphere, created by some very stark cinematography and a chilling score. The film is also full of creepy imagery which gradually get more intense as the film goes, but beneath the horror is a genuinely compelling story. It’s not entirely clear whether the woman is actually mad, if she actually died in the opening scene, or if there really is some supernatural presence at work. The mystery is compelling and the way the tension builds has a Polanski-esque quality. The film is perfect Halloween viewing. The haunting atmosphere is to die for, providing a lot of classic spooky visuals while also creating genuine unease.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 22, 2016 23:59:04 GMT -5
5 alternate movies to watch:
Frankenstein (1931) Psycho (1960) Halloween (1978) The Fly (1986) Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992)
5 light-hearted options:
The Raven (1963) Young Frankenstein (1974) Evil Dead II (1987) From Dusk Till Dawn (1996) Shaun of the Dead (2004)
5 kid-friendly options:
Ghostbusters (1984) Beetlejuice (1988) The Addams Family (1991) Hocus Pocus (1993) Casper (1995)
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,493
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 15:04:05 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Oct 23, 2016 8:54:33 GMT -5
I do want to see The Haunting and Phantom Carriage, but perhaps next year.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 14:41:31 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 23, 2016 9:49:07 GMT -5
I do want to see The Haunting and Phantom Carriage, but perhaps next year. Please do so.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,493
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 15:04:05 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Oct 23, 2016 9:54:45 GMT -5
I just dont think I will have time. I mean, I could always not watch them in october, but....
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,103
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 15:07:54 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Oct 23, 2016 11:39:50 GMT -5
I just dont think I will have time. I mean, I could always not watch them in october, but....
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 14:41:31 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 23, 2016 14:33:25 GMT -5
In honour of the release of Max Steel. Top Five Lamest Superhero Films (That Aren't Batman and Robin)5. Green LanternBefore Deadpool, Ryan Reynolds starred in a string of really awful superhero movies and this is one of the most notorious. A lot of people will say the movie’s failing is the source material is just too dorky (what with aliens and powerful rings) but I disagree. I think the concept of a group of people who can conjure anything their mind can conceive and serve as intergalactic cops is pretty cool, the problem is the execution here is just terrible. Despite a $200 million budget, the special effects look like crap and the filmmakers don’t do much creative stuff with Green Lantern’s powers. The jumbled plot all boils down to some generic CGI infused battle between Reynolds and a big cloud, or something. Also, while the cast does have some decent work from some of the supporting cast (namely Mark Strong and Geoffrey Rush), the only performances that stand out are Reynold’s non-performance, Blake Lively as generic love interest, and Peter Sarsgaard as annoying villain. 4. ElektraElektra…what do I even say about Elektra? Well, it’s boring as hell. All of these movies listed here are terrible, but all of them are at least laughable in their terribleness. Elektra on the other hand is just a snoozefest. Honestly it might be the worst superhero film I’ve ever seen, but its sheer dullness does sort of help it here. While I can think of all sorts of lame elements from the other films listed, I barely remember anything about Elektra. I know that it sucks and that it’s about as interesting to watch as a blank wall, but otherwise, I can’t recall any specific details or moments of lameness. So, it’s only ranking at number four. 3. Captain America (1990)Well before Marvel had established dominance in blockbuster cinema, audiences were treated to this adaptation of Captain America, fresh off the heels of Tim Burton’s Batman to boot. However the actual film turned out to be something of an embarrassment which Marvel swept under the rug (though it has developed a cult audience in recent years). The film is very clearly a cheap project. Though there is some (minor) production value to the 1940s stuff, once the film moves to present day all that washes away. The cinematography is awful, the costumes look bad, the sets are dull, and there is nothing in the way of creative or well-executed action sequences. The only memorable thing Cap does is pretend he’s sick to awkwardly steal a car from an old man and later a young woman. There’s other dumb stuff here too, like Cap being strapped to a rocket aimed for the white house that he puts off course by…kicking at it…and during this scene a little boy sees him through a pair of binoculars…a boy who grows up to be the President. The guy who plays Captain America (weirdly enough J.D. Sallinger’s son) has all the charisma of a stump. I do kinda like the early make-up for the Red Skull though and that makes the film slightly less lame. 2. Superman IV: The Quest for PeaceI was no fan of Batman v. Superman when it came out back in March, but people who acted like the film was some grand travesty clearly don’t know just how awful the Superman films can get. No Superman film is as irredeemably terrible as The Quest for Peace. The film starts off with an interesting premise; Superman sees the world headed for nuclear destruction, is it right for him to get involved? Great idea, but that premise is squandered on basically every level by faulty execution. First off, the fact that Superman only starts thinking about this when some kid writes up a letter is pretty dumb, but the real problem is how the whole thing devolves into a struggle between Superman and some generic 80’s wrestler looking dude called Nuclear Man, who is created by Lex Luthor. Nuclear Man is a dumb villain who does nothing but grunt and his fights with Superman are staggering in their awfulness. Then of course there is the infamous special effects, which are so terrible they’re almost frightening. Seriously, this movie made me really uncomfortable as a kid because the effects were so fake they shattered reality. This was a movie made almost a full decade after the original Superman and the visuals are infinitely worse. The flight recreation with Lois Lane in particular stands out as does the final battle on the worst looking moon set you’ll ever see. Long story short, it’s a shoddily made film across the board and it’s full of stupidity. 1. X-Men Origins: WolverineIt’s not exactly shocking to call X-Men Origins: Wolverine terrible. Everyone agrees that the effects are syfy channel level, the story is underwritten, the dialogue is clichéd, the visuals unimaginative,, and the film also completely disregards X-Men continuity. Origins clearly sucks, but truth told I actually think it might be the best film of the five listed here. Liev Schreiber is pretty decent in it anyway, and that opening war sequence is a neat idea. So why is a film with some decent elements heading this list? Simply put, it takes a badass character and story and turns it into a ridiculous farce. Wolverine never comes off as cool or badass here, though the film certainly tries. Between Wolverine walking away from an exploding helicopter in slow-motion, driving a motorcycle out of a barn as it explodes, and running through a prison hall cutting open gates with his claws while screaming, this is a film that really wants to show-off how awesome it is. But the moments are so overdone they come off as really desperate, like watching a twelve year old say, “fuck”. Then there is shit that’s just dumb, like the boxing match between Wolverine and the Blob (which shows the tips of Wolverine’s claws coming out of a boxing glove), the wacky comedy scene with Wolverine in the bathroom, random mutants doing Matrix-esque flips and acrobatics, Professor X just showing up at the end inexplicably, and the entire performance of Will.I.Am. Oh, and it’s not just Wolverine that gets fucked. The portrayal of fan-favourite Deadpool is a total disgrace. On the plus side, the story does have a happy ending. X-Men rebounded big with First Class and Deadpool was also done justice earlier this year. X-Men Origins: Wolverine didn’t kill the franchise or anything and there’s nothing to really be mad at, but the film remains remarkably dumb and the lamest superhero film I can think of (other than Batman and Robin of course).
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 23, 2016 14:58:28 GMT -5
5 movies worse than the ones you listed:
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles III (1993) Judge Dredd (1995) Catwoman (2004) Ghost Rider (2007) Jonah Hex (2010)
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 14:41:31 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 23, 2016 15:05:07 GMT -5
5 movies worse than the ones you listed: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles III (1993) Judge Dredd (1995) Catwoman (2004) Ghost Rider (2007) Jonah Hex (2010) TMNT is so heavily associated with the cartoon rather than the comic that I don't really associate the films as comic adaptations, even if they technically are. Likewise, I associate Judge Dredd as a dumb 90s action movie more than a dumb 90s comic book movie. Ghost Rider is pretty lame, but I find it less embarrassing than the five I listed. Haven't seen Catwoman or Jonah Hex.
|
|
Justin
Script Supervisor
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 739
Likes: 355
Location:
Last Online Oct 17, 2017 12:05:25 GMT -5
|
Post by Justin on Oct 24, 2016 6:28:40 GMT -5
Captain America (1990) is just misunderstood
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 14:41:31 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 24, 2016 13:39:40 GMT -5
Top Five Sequels that Switched DirectorsOften a different director on a sequel film is a bad sign, but there are some examples of films which traded directors for the better and I decided to look at five films that helped improve their respective series by coming on board. As a rule, I’m only looking at the first time a director was replaced in a series, so something like J.J. Abrams taking over Mission: Impossible after Brian De Palma and John Woo each had a crack at the series wouldn’t be eligible. John Woo taking over after just De Palma though could make the list (spoilers, he doesn’t). 5. The Empire Strikes Back, Irvin KershnerI think there’s a misconception by the general public that up until The Force Awakens, George Lucas directed all of the Star Wars movie. Most geeks however know that to be false. After the mammoth success of Star Wars, Lucas stepped into a producer role so he can be more well-equipped to handle the business side of things and he was also involved with ILM in pushing special effects forward. Taking over as director was a fella named Irvin Kershner. Kershner’s resume outside of Star Wars is a little scattered, but there’s no denying his work on Empire. The cinematography is richer, the mythos is expanded, the characters feel deeper, the stakes are higher, and the climax is more emotionally charged. It’s a sequel that goes a different direction than its predecessor while simultaneously improving on the foundation. It might even be the best film in my list, but it’s also clear that Lucas still had a major role creatively. That’s not a bad thing, but for this list the emphasis is on the directors who brought a new creative vision to the series and while Kershner surely brought that too the details, the big picture was still Lucas. 4. Aliens, James CameronA hotshot young director making an action-packed sequel to a horror masterpiece directed by a top talent sounds like a disaster, but in the case of Aliens, things worked out pretty well. Crucial to the film’s success is the respect James Cameron showed to Ridley Scott’s original vision. This doesn’t replace Alien, but instead lovingly recreates that world and naturally continues Ellen Ripley’s story. At the same time, Cameron brought new elements to the proceedings with a bunch of new characters, a glimpse into the military culture of this future, and of course, a shit load of action. While the film spends a lot of time setting up all of the pieces, once the firefights start the film hardly lets up. It’s an intense battle for survival and it ends on an incredibly thrilling final twenty minutes. The end result is a film with a different style to Alien, but one which is in many ways an equal. 3. Goldfinger, Guy HamiltonThe James Bond movies were popular from the start, but it was with Goldfinger that the series’ popularity exploded. This third entry in the series would be the one that most defines what the series was about. Espionage and action, a colourful villain with a gimmick henchman, over the top evil schemes, beautiful women, creative gadgets, and a sly, somewhat silly sense of humour. It’s a formula that hasn’t always worked for the Bond series, but when it hits it hits pretty hard. Goldfinger remains the high bar for this kind of Bond movie, seamlessly blending all of the elements into a tight package that delivers just about everything you want from a blockbuster entertainment. While I probably have more affinity for original Bond director Terrence Young (particularly sophomore entry From Russia with Love) there’s no denying that it’s Hamilton’s film that most set the tone. 2. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, Alfonso CuarónI was six years old when the first Harry Potter film came out and as such I thought it was pretty great. Looking back though, it’s pretty clear that Harry Potter and The Philosopher’s Stone and its follow-up The Chamber of Secrets were fairly mediocre films. Warner Bros. must have realized this too because out went family friendly director Chris Columbus and in came visionary director Alfonso Cuarón, fresh off his amazing film Y Tu Mamá También. I’m not going to pretend that Azkaban is some modern masterpiece (it’s easily the weakest film Cuarón has made this century), but it is substantially better than what came before and also set the tone for the series going forward. Crucial to Azkaban’s success is Cuarón’s ability to bring a darker tone and visual style to the world of Potter while still capturing the sense of fun that pervaded through the first two films. This was also the first film while the characters started to feel a little older and more interesting. In short, this is the film where Harry Potter shifted from being a series for kids into something a little more mature, and its influence on the series moving forward is huge. 1. The Bourne Supremacy, Paul GreengrassI really like The Bourne Identity. It’s a cool spy-movie with a neat story, introduces an interesting character, and has a handful of effective scenes. By all measures, it’s a good movie and Doug Liman did a good job with the material. However the series identity would be defined not by Liman, but by Paul Greengrass. Starting with The Bourne Supremacy, Greengrass injected a sense of energy through frenetic editing and some very aggressive camerawork. He give the films a greater sense of immediacy and, in spite of the inherent impracticality, authenticity. That’s the thing about Greengrass’ work on Bourne, these movies aren’t all that far removed from your standard improbable action movie, but they’re made so intelligently that they feel so much better. The action scenes themselves are really awesome, not just for their visceral thrills, but for the intelligent ways Bourne is able to dispatch his enemies. Greengrass may have perfected the formula with The Bourne Ultimatum, but it was Supremacy where he took over and forever shaped the perception of Bourne with audiences.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Oct 24, 2016 17:17:42 GMT -5
Great list...but the last one's a joke, right?
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,493
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 15:04:05 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Oct 24, 2016 17:23:26 GMT -5
Not a Bourne fan Jibbs? Are you bitter because of how much it influenced Bond?
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 24, 2016 18:19:35 GMT -5
5 alternate films:
Beverly Hills Cop II (1987), Tony Scott Fright Night 2 (1989), Tommy Lee Wallace D2: The Mighty Ducks (1994), Sam Weismann Twilight: New Moon (2009), Chris Weitz Paranormal Activity 2 (2010), Tod Williams
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 14:41:31 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Oct 24, 2016 19:55:31 GMT -5
5 alternate films: Beverly Hills Cop II (1987), Tony Scott Fright Night 2 (1989), Tommy Lee Wallace D2: The Mighty Ducks (1994), Sam Weismann Twilight: New Moon (2009), Chris Weitz Paranormal Activity 2 (2010), Tod Williams Of those I've only seen Beverly Hills Cop II and I was a little kid at the time. I guess I might have also seen D2 but I have no recollection of it.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Oct 24, 2016 23:14:38 GMT -5
Not a Bourne fan Jibbs? Are you bitter because of how much it influenced Bond? Eh? Would you say that someone who didn't like Live Free or Die Hard wasn't a fan of Die Hard films? We are all talking about the same movie here, right? The bad middle one with the shaky cam?
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 25, 2016 1:43:09 GMT -5
Not a Bourne fan Jibbs? Are you bitter because of how much it influenced Bond? Eh? Would you say that someone who didn't like Live Free or Die Hard wasn't a fan of Die Hard films? We are all talking about the same movie here, right? The bad middle one with the shaky cam? As much as people bitched about the shaky cam, ultimately, everyone liked the movie. It did pave the way for Casino Royale.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,624
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 13:48:27 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Oct 25, 2016 12:22:26 GMT -5
5 alternate films: Beverly Hills Cop II (1987), Tony Scott Fright Night 2 (1989), Tommy Lee Wallace D2: The Mighty Ducks (1994), Sam Weismann Twilight: New Moon (2009), Chris Weitz Paranormal Activity 2 (2010), Tod Williams No.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 25, 2016 17:57:08 GMT -5
5 alternate films: Beverly Hills Cop II (1987), Tony Scott Fright Night 2 (1989), Tommy Lee Wallace D2: The Mighty Ducks (1994), Sam Weismann Twilight: New Moon (2009), Chris Weitz Paranormal Activity 2 (2010), Tod Williams No. You won't find a single person who thinks Mighty Ducks is better than Mighty Ducks 2. But you'll find people who think Star Wars is better than Empire.
|
|
SnoBorderZero
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,624
Likes: 3,182
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 13:48:27 GMT -5
|
Post by SnoBorderZero on Oct 25, 2016 18:07:39 GMT -5
Hahaha, I didn't realize Mighty Ducks was still a topic of discussion.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,300
Likes: 6,766
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 14:53:39 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Oct 25, 2016 18:17:51 GMT -5
Hahaha, I didn't realize Mighty Ducks was still a topic of discussion.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 25, 2016 18:23:08 GMT -5
Hahaha, I didn't realize Mighty Ducks was still a topic of discussion. Mighty Ducks 2 is better than Godfather III.
|
|
Nilade
Director
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,687
Likes: 426
Location:
Last Online Nov 18, 2024 0:05:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Nilade on Oct 26, 2016 2:18:58 GMT -5
Hahaha, I didn't realize Mighty Ducks was still a topic of discussion. Mighty Ducks 2 is better than Godfather III. Is it better than Rocky II?
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Oct 26, 2016 3:04:43 GMT -5
Mighty Ducks 2 is better than Godfather III. Is it better than Rocky II? You didn't see PG Cooper put Sylvester Stallone on the list.
|
|
Deexan
CS! Silver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,196
Likes: 2,995
Location:
Last Online Nov 13, 2021 19:23:59 GMT -5
|
Post by Deexan on Oct 26, 2016 6:57:05 GMT -5
I used to own a purple tartan Might Ducks jacket but I can't for the life of me find any evidence of it ever existing online.
Sorry employers, today I have received a higher calling and I must forgo my duties.
I will find this jacket. It will be mine.
|
|