Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,102
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:42:21 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Jan 28, 2018 19:04:11 GMT -5
I’m a millennial, a “90s kid” if you will. I was born very late in the 80s but came of age in the 90s and experienced all the “90s kid” stuff like Nickelodeon cartoons and N64 games that the Buzzfeeds of the world have made into hallmarks of that generation. Right now the world exists to serve 90s kids and their nostalgic whims, but that hasn’t always been the case. When I was first coming of age as a pop culture enthusiast in the mid to late 2000s the online discourse and the podcasts were being run by the Gen X 80s kids and that meant that I had to put up with a bunch of delusional 20 somethings who had a habit of saying with a straight face that all sorts of lame sounding kids movies from their Reagan-era childhoods were these legitimately great films, which I was always skeptical about. To be clear, there are plenty of things from my own childhood that I have nostalgia for but which I don’t sit around claiming that I still think the likes of Jumanji, The Sandlot, and Three Ninjas are cinematic classics just because I liked them when I was 7. However, there were a lot of movies that these Gen Xers wouldn’t shut up about which I never really saw and which I wasn’t really in much of a position to push back against. My new skeptical series will seek to change that. My plan is to do one of these analyses every calendar month in 2018 and treat each one of these like it’s a round in a boxing match. If the movie doesn’t hold up and indeed was not worthy of all this retrospective praise I’ll score the round for myself but if the movie ends up surprising me and really does seem like something worth remembering I’ll score the round to the gen Xers and if I feel really strongly one way or another I’ll give out an 8/10 round if need be. Then at the end of the year I’ll take a look at the final score to prove “scientifically” if the soul of the 80s and early 90s is worth saving. Now, to do this fairly I’m sticking exclusively to movies that people of this era actually hold up as good movies still rather than movies like Red Dawn or The Wizard which these people actually keep in perspective or like ironically. Additionally, I’m only looking at movies I haven’t watched before so there are plenty of movies like The Never Ending Story and The Karate Kid which would sort of fit in with the spirit of this series but which won’t be present simply because they aren’t new movies for me. Also I want to be clear that, light hearted boxing metaphor notwithstanding, I am hoping to be pleasantly surprised by what I see with these movies and I’m not trying to just hate them for comedic effect. The Goonies (1985)
When I first came up with this series I knew the movie I wanted to start with was The Goonies as it’s a movie that would seem to exemplify exactly the kind of misplaced 80s nostalgia I’m trying to take aim at. It’s a movie that some people absolutely swear by. A poll of actors once placed it in the top 100 movies of all time and it was recently actually selected for preservation by the National Film Registry. It’s also a movie that gets quoted a lot and I seem to see all kinds of merchandise with catch phrases like “hey you guys” and “goonies never say die” written all over them. And yet it’s also a movie that tends to leave adults watching it for the first time fairly cold. It’s a movie that generally gets lumped in with the cannon of actual good Spielbergian movies of the 80s like Back to the Future and Poltergeist and yet of all the well like Spielberg productions of the time I was pretty oblivious to it when I was growing up. I could never avoid movies like E.T. or Raiders of the Lost Ark even if I wanted to, but The Goonies fandom always seemed a little less mainstream, at least until years later when the nostalgia set in. For a while I assumed it was more of a cult film no one picked up on until later, but that doesn’t seem to have been the case, it was a box office hit in 1985 but for whatever reason there was never a sequel and it never got turned into a merchandising bonanza until later. Obviously this is another one of those 80s movies about groups of children who ride around towns on bikes, which is a dynamic we’ve seen called back to a lot in a number or recent projects like Super 8, It, and “Stranger Things.” Unlike those copies, this original seems less interested in tapping into nostalgic memories about what childhood summers were like and more interested in giving its young audience the group of wacky friends they wish they had but which most adults would find to be a bit of a chore to be around. This group calls themselves “the goonies” and they apparently have a bunch of rules and traditions that seem a bit unlikely for a group like this to have unless most of their dealings before this were a lot more interesting than I suspect they were. This group is also a bit too large for its own good. There are no fewer than seven kids going on this adventure and they don’t really have a lot of time to develop beyond irritating stereotypes. The villains are also awful. The Fratellis have sort of a White Heat thing going on where the ringleader is their mother (who sort of looks like Sam Kinison) and two of the most incompetent gangsters this side of Home Alone. I think the idea behind this movie is that it’s sort of meant to be a visualization of the kind of pretend “adventures” that kids imagine themselves going on when they’re playing. The movie operates on a kind of “kid logic” where this group of children is a lot more courageous and resourceful than real kids would be and the challenges they face just so happen to align with their exact skillsets. Certain elements are plainly ridiculous like the odd and impractical inventions that Short Round carries around and uses in the highly specific situations they seem to be designed for. Then they meet a cuddly dude in a prosthetic suit that saves them and becomes their friend, which is pretty damn weird. Viewing this as a sort of meta take on childhood imagination is certainly a generous way of viewing this film’s stranger aspects, one that I don’t exactly buy even though I’m positing it. I might be more willing to run with this if the film had found a way to tip its hand a little more, but either way the fact remains that this is kind of an irritating thing to watch if you’re older than twelve. I think what makes the movie feel so weird is that it actually as decent production values. These are certainly expensive looking sets and Richard Donnor certainly makes the movie look good, but all these high production values kind of set you up to expect something a little more from the movie itself. To the ScorecardI don’t think this movie really works, but it’s not painful. If this wasn’t one of the more popular and talked about of these 80s movies it might have been a semi-pleasant surprise just because it looks good and clearly inspired a lot of other things (Barb from “Stranger Things” is clearly inspired by Stef), but the movie certainly doesn’t live up to its popularity. More than anything it’s just a very strange movie for something that’s trying to be as mainstream as it is. So, in the first round Gen X nostalgia puts up a slightly better fight than expected but not enough to win the round.
| Round 1 | Round 2 | Round 3 | Round 4 | Round 5 | Round 6 | Round 7 | Round 8 | Round 9 | Round 10 | Round 11 | Round 12 | |
| The Goonies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total | The Skeptic | 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 | Gen X | 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,299
Likes: 6,764
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 1:57:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Jan 28, 2018 19:09:29 GMT -5
Cool idea, there are definitely movies out there from the 80s and 90s that I feel everyone has seen but me. I actually first watched The Goonies only a few years ago when I was in my early/mid-twenties.
How exactly does the score work though? Like how did you get the 9 and 10 in the first round?
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,102
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:42:21 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Jan 28, 2018 19:30:52 GMT -5
Cool idea, there are definitely movies out there from the 80s and 90s that I feel everyone has seen but me. I actually first watched The Goonies only a few years ago when I was in my early/mid-twenties. How exactly does the score work though? Like how did you get the 9 and 10 in the first round? It's a "ten point must system" like in boxing. In a fight every round is either 10/9 or 9/10 with the winner getting the ten and the loser getting the 9 unless there's a knockdown or a point deduction for breaking the rules or just an insanely lopsided round in which case it's scored 8/10 (or 7/10 if there's two knockdowns). When I'm applying them to movies it basically means that if the movies is lame and I was right to be skeptical "the skeptic" gets 10 and "gen x" gets 9, but if I'm pleasantly surprised it will be the reverse. Similarly, if a movie turns out to be REALLY good or bad that will be the equivalent of a knockdown and result in an 8/10 round.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 22:27:20 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Jan 28, 2018 22:16:11 GMT -5
Cool new thread. I kind of hate The Goonies so I'm definitely on board woth round 1.
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,945
Likes: 2,015
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:08:38 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Jan 29, 2018 0:02:48 GMT -5
So jaded. Did have the gf watch it for the first time recently, and she was not impressed (she also hasn't seen big trouble in little China, but clearly I'm solving that shortly). Clearly a demerit but one I can live with. Goonies is beloved for a reason. And the Goonies are only the 4 the others are just made honorary members during the adventure as I recall. I mean sloth isn't a founding member or anything.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,299
Likes: 6,764
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 1:57:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Jan 29, 2018 12:22:11 GMT -5
Ah, I didn't know that's how boxing was scored. Makes sense now.
I'm curious to see what your selections are, if I had to pick some 80s/90s movies that I skipped I know a few on that list would be Labyrinth, Footloose, Rookie of the Year, Flashdance, Legend, and Dirty Dancing. Not that I'm anxious to see any of them, I just know that they're somewhat popular/nostalgic.
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,945
Likes: 2,015
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:08:38 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Jan 29, 2018 12:24:01 GMT -5
Killer klowns from outer space? Yea you're prob right. Too much of a classic.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jan 29, 2018 12:29:16 GMT -5
Ah, I didn't know that's how boxing was scored. Makes sense now. I'm curious to see what your selections are, if I had to pick some 80s/90s movies that I skipped I know a few on that list would be Labyrinth, Footloose, Rookie of the Year, Flashdance, Legend, and Dirty Dancing. Not that I'm anxious to see any of them, I just know that they're somewhat popular/nostalgic. Only one movie you need to see.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,102
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:42:21 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Feb 17, 2018 20:27:53 GMT -5
Round 2 – The Last Starfighter (1984)
“I was born in 2025, but I wish I’d grown up in the 1980s, like all my heroes” is the first line of the first teaser trailer for Steven Spielberg’s upcoming movie Ready Player One, a movie (and book) which in many ways seems like the apotheosis of the kind of questionable 80s nostalgia I’m examining in this series. The 2045 that that movie is set in does seem vaguely dystopic, but I can say with reasonable confidence that the 1980s are not something he should be aspiring to. It was a decade of constant Cold War paranoia, widespread intolerance, an AIDS epidemic, and most pertinently it was a time when American culture was incredibly dumbed down. Of course you won’t find too many traces of those social ills in the popular cinema of the 80s, which is a big part of why this character presumably thinks it would be fun to live in an era when unions were quashed and wearing Members Only Jackets was considered a good idea. On top of that, this guy would also come to learn that not all of the movies from that decade were as fun as he seems to think because for every Star Wars there were several shoddily made Star Wars ripoffs and today I’ll be looking at one of the more famous of these, a goofy piece of childhood wish-fulfilment called The Last Starfighter. Of course the phrase “Ready Player One” comes from the world of arcade machines, a form of entertainment that was booming in the 80s after Pac Man Fever sweapt the nation and Hollywood seemed to be particularly interested in tapping into the trend through gaming adjacent science fiction. The most notable of these attempts was almost certainly the 1982 film Tron but a close second was probably The Last Starfighter, about a young man who is asked to take part in an intergalactic war because he got the high score in a video game placed on earth by an alien recruiter looking for people with a knack for the kind of aerial dogfighting that the game mimics. That such video game skill would prove to have actual value in real life like that and bring the reward of an adventure would seem to be a kid’s greatest fantasy and the movie is pretty shameless in the way it presents this. In fact the movie isn’t content to make this dude a mere soldier in this war, it goes so far to have him face down the entire enemy fleet alone at the end and save the day almost single-handedly. I’m not exactly sure when it’s appropriate to invoke the phrase “Mary Sue” but I think it’s pretty safe to do it here. The one thing keeping this from being a total power fantasy is the extent to which its protagonist is reluctant at every step of becoming this “chosen one” hero figure. I was actually pretty surprised that the film’s protagonist was as old as he was given that the film is pretty clearly trying to indulge a dream that only children had in the early 80s. The protagonist is in fact in his late teens and is played by a nobody named Lance Guest who is pretty annoying here and spends most of the film whining about getting looped into this adventure. Guest also has something of a double role in the film and is actually better in the second role. The film has a b-plot of sorts where Guest plays a robot who takes the protagonist’s place on Earth while he’s up in space having an adventure. It’s a detail that doesn’t really add a whole lot to the A-plot and seems like it was mostly added to pad out the run time, but in some ways this material does work better than the space opera stuff in the film which really hasn’t stood the test of time. Rather than using the special effects techniques that looked great in Star Wars this movie, made the year before that Dire Straits “Money For Nothing” video, decided that extensive use of CGI technology was the way to go and it looks about as laughable as you’d expect. The more practically constructed scene on the interior of the ship hold up a little better, at least on a technical level, but the universe of the film doesn’t seem to have been terribly well thought through or interesting and the movie doesn’t really do enough to get the audience invested in this galactic civil war. Director Nick Castle was a friend of John Carpenter who was actually cast as Michael Myers in the original Halloween, a job he was given basically so he’d have an excuse to hang around the set and watch Carpenter while he worked. He also co-wrote Escape from New York and has a “story by” credit on Hook but as a director this was probably his most notable work. He spent most of the 90s making bad commercial comedies like Dennis the Menace and Major Payne and direct to video crap in the 2000s before basically retiring, though there are some reports that despite being 70 years old he will be reprising his role as Michael Myers in the upcoming Halloween reboot… don’t know how that’s going to work. Anyway, Castle does have a degree of professionalism and seems to have a moderately decent budget to work with, which elevates things a little. This is a movie that easily could have descended into MST3K levels of B-movie schlock and it does avoid that fate and provides some moderate entertainment value To the Scorecard: This movie is pretty bad. I don’t want to completely trash it because I do think some elements of it probably did work better back in the 80s but its general second-rate nature was probably apparent from the beginning. Truth be told this movie was probably destined to be a bit outclassed here as, more so than a some of the movies here, I think this movie’s fans are a bit more aware of its shortcomings. Still, it is a much referenced movie of the era that did not put up much of a fight so another round goes to the skeptic.
|
|
Jibbs
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 75,725
Likes: 1,657
Location:
Last Online Feb 20, 2024 18:06:23 GMT -5
|
Post by Jibbs on Feb 17, 2018 20:32:12 GMT -5
Still an awesome premise.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,299
Likes: 6,764
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 1:57:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on Feb 17, 2018 20:32:54 GMT -5
Another 80s flick I haven’t seen but it was never high on my list. I’ll absolutely take your word for it.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Mar 5, 2018 23:49:10 GMT -5
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,102
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:42:21 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Mar 23, 2018 6:30:13 GMT -5
Round 3 - The Dark Crystal (1982)Jim Henson is not a guy you think about all that often as a filmmaker but he does have a pretty substantial legacy across many mediums. This is, after all, the guy who created a TV show in Sesame Street that teaches damn near every child how to count and his roster of Muppets have been entertaining children since the 70s. His legacy on the big screen is still notable but perhaps a little less titanic. A bit of a George Lucas figure, Henson produced and more or less envisioned several movies “starring” the muppets but only officially directed one: The Great Muppet Caper. Beyond that he only has two more director credits on theatrical films: the 1986 film Labyrinth (which I’ll be getting to in a later installment) and the 1982 film The Dark Crystal, which will be the film I’m looking at today. The Dark Crystal is a film I knew only by vague reputation. It’s not a movie that critics generally have much to say about one way or another and while people do talk about it nostalgically it’s not generally a movie that people claim as a “favorite” that they watched a million times as a child. In fact when people do talk about the movie they generally talk about having been disturbed by its dark nature of frightened by its content. That is a big part of what piqued my interest about the film. In case you haven’t noticed I generally like my family movies to be darker, at least in theory, and I’ve long suspected The Dark Crystal was a movie that I would have liked if I had known about it when I was young. A lot of my hope for the movie kind of got deflated pretty quickly however as the movie opened with a long exposition dump by an omniscient narrator who outlines the state of this world in the most inelegant way possible. It was at this moment that I realized this was going to be one of these movies like Dune or Willow that Hollywood made in the wake of Star Wars which sought to take advantage of the willingness audiences apparently had to watch fantasy films but took no note of the steps that movie took to make its universe understandable and relatable. You know, the kind of movie that the fake movie at the center of Argo probably would have ended up being like. More than anything this reminds me of Disney’s similarly titled The Black Cauldron, which was another movie that tried to expand its brand into darker territory but found its many grandiose ideas to actually be something of a mess in terms of fantasy and world building and yet rather bland and formulaic as a narrative. To the film’s credit, there is something pretty impressive about trying to make a movie with this tone and on this scale using only puppets. There was some clear thought put into the film’s various creatures and the film also had some fairly impressive sets like a lab with an elaborate astronomy set-up, but there was one clear puppetry fail and it was a pretty important one: the main character. “Jen” was supposed to be this big breakthrough of puppetry but he proved to be both indistinct and boring as a design and highly unexpressive and inhuman as an effect. It doesn’t help that Stephen Garlick gives him a rather weak voice and that he’s a frankly rather boring and unrelatable character on the page to begin with. In fact when the movie was rolling into its third act I found myself to be pretty actively bored by it. Now, for all the complaining I’ve done about this movie I do want to say I didn’t hate it exactly. Rather, I’m frustrated by the movie because it does feel like there is a good movie hidden in it somewhere that was never really allowed to emerge for the simple fact that the people making it couldn’t really see the forest for the trees and made a lot of mistakes through their lack of perspective. To the Scorecard:
Man, I really thought this was going to be the round where gen X stepped up and started hitting back but that didn’t end up happening. That’s too bad because this movie seems to be having a bit of a moment right now. Netflix is apparently making a prequel series and the original film is getting a UHD release and I think Fathom is bringing it back to theaters. Truth be told I’m not so sure Netflix should want people taking another look at the movie though because it pretty clearly does not hold up.
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,493
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:08:59 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Mar 23, 2018 7:53:04 GMT -5
Dark Crystal is everywhere right now.
|
|
frankyt
CS! Gold
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,945
Likes: 2,015
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:08:38 GMT -5
|
Post by frankyt on Mar 23, 2018 9:40:31 GMT -5
The dakrk crystal creatures look like Sarah Jessica Parker.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 22:27:20 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on Mar 24, 2018 17:11:22 GMT -5
I still haven't seen The Dark Crystal. I'm VERY interested in how you're going to react to Labyrinth.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Mar 24, 2018 17:37:38 GMT -5
interested in how you're going to react to Labyrinth lol
|
|
thebtskink
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jul 2000
It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again.
Posts: 19,462
Likes: 4,984
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 15:43:24 GMT -5
|
Post by thebtskink on Mar 24, 2018 17:47:07 GMT -5
Come on, we all know he's going to hate it.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,102
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:42:21 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Mar 24, 2018 18:09:51 GMT -5
Laberynth could be a couple rounds down the road. Trying to split similar movies up.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,102
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:42:21 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on May 16, 2018 6:43:36 GMT -5
Skeptic Vs. Gen X Nostalgia: Round 4 – Who Framed Roger Rabbit (1988)Of all the films I plan to look at for this series Who Framed Roger Rabbit? is probably the most famous and the most critically acclaimed. I didn’t really go into this movie expecting it to be a movie that had been propped up by blind nostalgia but it was a popular movie from the era aimed at that general audience that I hadn’t seen and this seemed like the chance to do it. This was a movie that always kind of fell into that weird spot where it wasn’t really childish enough to keep my attention when I was a kid but which looked too much like a kids movie for me to want to see it when I was older and shunning such things. I don’t think I’m the only person who was a bit confused about who exactly this movie was for. It was produced by the Disney corporation shortly before their famous “renaissance” of animated features but one look at Jessica Rabbit was enough to convince Jeffrey Katzenberg that this wasn’t exactly going to fit within their tradition of wholesome entertainment and the movie was eventually distributed by their Touchstone branch. Despite that shift this still clearly wasn’t trying to masquerade as a full-on movie for adults. It was rated PG (and yes, PG-13 was an option by 1988) and was certainly marketed to kids despite being filled with inside jokes about classic Hollywood. It is perhaps fitting that I watched Who Framed Roger Rabbit? in the month of Ready Player One as both movie employ these seemingly impossible crossovers between movie properties. In this movie we get Daffy Duck and Donald Duck performing as dueling pianists and Mickey Mouse and Bugs Bunny working together to save Bob Hoskins as well as a whole bunch of other more obscure animated cameos as well. I knew there was something of an element of that was going to be present here but not the extent of it and it’s one of the movie’s more successful elements. The other completely successful element is the special effects work, which won Academy Awards in 1988 and remain interesting today. There’s a semi-famous story that Stanley Kubrick once described going to see the movie and spending the whole movie trying to figure out what trick was being used to have the animated characters interact so extensively with the live action ones and vice-versa until he realized there was no trick, it was just a whole lot of filmmakers working their asses off to make sure every shot is ready to be animated over. Their work is not perfect and there are definitely places where you can see the seams but that’s probably a worthwhile sacrifice given that the animation here appears to have been hand drawn. Future animation/live-action hybrids would be done through digital techniques that feel a lot less organic and interesting. Another downside is that the live action cinematography here feels a bit bland, especially given that it’s a neo-noir which should be a lot more shadowy. Before watching this it had been revealed to me that Christopher Lloyd’s Judge Doom was the person who framed Roger Rabbit, which I thought was a spoiler at the time, but seeing the actual movie it’s pretty plainly obvious he’s the bad guy from the second he shows up. I think the implication is supposed to be that this guy is an actual judge, in which case I have some serious questions about the judicial system in this world as it looks like he’s been authorized to summarily execute any “toon” without any kind of due process. Yeah, I get that to some extent the treatment of “toons” here is supposed to be an allegory for racism but that’s some Nazi levels of discrimination right there and it doesn’t quite jive with the fact that most of these toons seem to be beloved entertainers that almost everyone in the city aside from Doom and Eddie Valiant seem to be cool with. The movie is also a bit inconsistent about just how invincible these toons are. If anything else about the movie doesn’t really work it’s simply that Roger Rabbit himself is just a really annoying character and it wasn’t that easy to root for him. Frankly if I was Valiant I would have thrown him right into “the dip” after a couple hours of dealing with his shenanigans. What’s more the movie pretty much forces you to picture what it looks like when Roger Rabbit and Jessica Rabbit are fucking and that is not really a healthy image to have in your head. Kidding aside, this is a pretty cool movie overall, certainly something pretty different from anything else of the era that I can really think of. To the Scorecard: The 80s needed to step it up in this round and it did. I don’t necessarily see this as quite the classic that some do, but it’s definitely a good movie and it’s earned its reputation for a reason. This clearly isn’t just a product of blind nostalgia, not that I exactly expected it to be given that it’s a Robert Zemeckis film with a sizable budget and a lot of other things going for it. Gen X nostalgia takes this one easily.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on May 16, 2018 12:44:29 GMT -5
Dracula didn't watch Roger Rabbit but he made sure to watch Bonkers.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,299
Likes: 6,764
Location:
Last Online Nov 23, 2024 1:57:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Doomsday on May 16, 2018 13:46:48 GMT -5
I only first watched Roger Rabbit maybe 4 or 5 years ago. I remember laughing out loud at this.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,062
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 22:27:20 GMT -5
|
Post by PG Cooper on May 16, 2018 19:16:44 GMT -5
Roger Rabbit is neat. Probably one of Zemeckis' best films.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,102
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 23:42:21 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Jun 8, 2018 23:27:23 GMT -5
Skeptic Vs. Gen X Nostalgia: Round 5 – Labyrinth (1986)
On January 10th 2016 it was announced that the legendary pop superstar David Bowie had passed away from a bout with cancer that had previously not been announced to the public. It was the first of many tragic celebrity deaths that occurred that year and the mass mourning for it seemed a bit different than the many other celebrity passings that had occurred previously. In the wake of this the Fathom Events company decided to mark his death by bringing one of his movies back to the big screen. The movie they chose was not one of the cinema classics he appeared in like Nicholas Roeg’s The Man Who Fell to Earth or Nagisa Oshima’s Merry Christmas, Mr. Lawrence or even one of his concert films like Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars. Instead what they screened was a family film he made with Jim Henson in the mid-eighties that was considered a box office bomb at the time but which went on to have a cult following of sorts, a film called Labyrinth. This was of course an understandable choice, as a successful musician Bowie generally only took starring roles in movies that were passion projects and this kids movie was probably his most prominent move into the mainstream. What’s more Labyrinth has become a pretty noticeable part of pop culture and is definitely one of the movies that I hear “80s kids” talk about a lot despite its initial box office disappointment. Of course one of the ironies of the great ironies of the film’s legacy is that it has become so heavily associated with the performance of a flesh and blood actor (and his strangely prominent pants bulge) when it was plainly intended to be a showcase for Jim Henson’s puppetry. There are two prominent human actors in the movie, Bowie’s Goblin King and Jennifer Connelly as the film’s protagonist. Connelly would of course go on to be a fairly prominent star in the 2000s but her work here as a fifteen year old is not great. Granted, Connelly’s character is kind of poorly drawn in the script. It seems like she’s meant to be some kind of theater kid with an overactive imagination, but the movie makes the rather strange decision to give the audience no reason to believe she has a single friend her own age and until the muppets show up spends a lot of time talking to herself in order to give exposition. I wouldn’t exactly call Bowie’s performance great acting either but he certainly has presence and to my surprise he actually performs music in the film, which was kind of an odd choice. “Magic Dance” is certainly an earworm but it certainly breaks any sense of menace that his character has and a number later on with puppets mostly just seemed like an exercise in terrible green screen effects. There are sort of two kinds of fantasy story-telling: there are the “high fantasy” stories like Lord of the Rings and “Game of Thrones” witch construct worlds and tell straightforward stories within them, which is what The Dark Crystal was, and then there are the fantasy stories that are meant to sort of be literalizations of their characters imaginations like The Wizard of Oz or Alice in Wonderland and Labyrinth is clearly trying to fit in that second tradition. At times the film feels more like a series of sketches than a true narrative and is notable for having been written by Monty Python’s Terry Jones, whose voice you can hear in parts like the scene where a cat who fancies himself a knight tries to stop our heroes from crossing a bridge, which is almost like a kid-friendly remake of the famous Black Knight scene from Monty Python and the Holy Grail. That said I wouldn’t exactly call the movie “funny” and I also don’t think it really holds together too well as a story. Really it’s more just a series of sometimes clever but sometimes simply strange little ideas. It can be a fun watch in the moment but it probably could have been a more memorable and coherent adventure with a little more attention to the script and less attention to the puppets. To the Scorecard: This one is kind of a tough call. In the context of a normal review this thing would probably be marginal thumbs down because deep down I think it’s a pretty shallow movie that is brought down by some elements that simply don’t work. However, my metric here is less strictly about quality and more about whether the nostalgia around a movie is merited rather than purely the result of rose-colored glasses and in this case I think the nostalgia is understandable. Put simply it’s a fun movie and its flaws are in many ways enjoyably weird rather than truly boring.
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,773
Likes: 8,648
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 18:30:10 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Jun 8, 2018 23:54:26 GMT -5
I would argue Jennifer Connelly was a bigger deal in the 90’s. Yeah, she won an Oscar in the 2000’s and did some artsy fartsy movies, but the average person remembers Connelly for Career Opportunities, The Rocketeer and Requiem for a Dream (which was made in the 90’s).
|
|