IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,492
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:37:07 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Feb 27, 2021 17:06:59 GMT -5
So we're just completely ruling out Sonic now?
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Feb 27, 2021 17:14:07 GMT -5
Ouija Shark
|
|
Neverending
CS! Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 65,770
Likes: 8,646
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:47:06 GMT -5
|
Post by Neverending on Feb 28, 2021 0:03:12 GMT -5
So we're just completely ruling out Sonic now? It’s the winner in our hearts.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,298
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Feb 28, 2021 9:18:07 GMT -5
Oh shit Sonic is on Hulu.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,298
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Mar 5, 2021 19:31:10 GMT -5
Not sure how much this will catch on but I'll piggyback off Phantom's Spielberg thread. It's been a while since I've tackled a director's filmography. I started with Michael Mann, went through the Coen Bros. then worked through Scorsese. Now the question is, who's next? I want to ask you guys for suggestions so you can help me settle on the next director project. I know your willingness to sabotage so right out the gate I'll say no one crummy like Uwe Boll, no one with 100 movies and no Kevin Smith or Christopher Nolan. I'll throw out a few ideas I've had, let me know if you have better ones.
Wes Anderson Andrei Tarkovsky Stanley Kubrick
|
|
thebtskink
CS! Silver
Join Date: Jul 2000
It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again.
Posts: 19,462
Likes: 4,984
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:57:17 GMT -5
|
Post by thebtskink on Mar 5, 2021 19:36:20 GMT -5
Jonathan Demme Alan Pakula
|
|
PhantomKnight
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20,527
Likes: 3,130
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 0:32:12 GMT -5
|
Post by PhantomKnight on Mar 5, 2021 19:47:25 GMT -5
I already have my next focus picked out for after I finish up Steven Spielberg.
Did you already do Alfred Hitchcock, Dooms? That's not my next focus, but just asking. I seem to recall you might have. How about Brian De Palma?
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Mar 5, 2021 20:15:00 GMT -5
Do Wes Anderson so I can ignore it guilt free.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,298
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Mar 5, 2021 21:16:25 GMT -5
I already have my next focus picked out for after I finish up Steven Spielberg.
Did you already do Alfred Hitchcock, Dooms? That's not my next focus, but just asking. I seem to recall you might have. How about Brian De Palma?
Ah yes, thanks for the reminder. I didn't do all of Hitchcock but I went through a box set I was given that had 20 or so of his films, many of which I hadn't seen. I threw in a few others that I thought were worth visiting/revisiting so there were maybe 25 movies total.
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Mar 5, 2021 21:21:08 GMT -5
I have a Hitchcock thread from a few years back. I got to the first The Man Who Knew Too Much then I cut off. If I remember right, I decided to put more time into my blog and never got back to it.
I still have all those blu-rays in boxes from my move. I should dig them out.
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Mar 5, 2021 21:26:59 GMT -5
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:10:40 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Mar 5, 2021 22:08:49 GMT -5
Not sure how much this will catch on but I'll piggyback off Phantom's Spielberg thread. It's been a while since I've tackled a director's filmography. I started with Michael Mann, went through the Coen Bros. then worked through Scorsese. Now the question is, who's next? I want to ask you guys for suggestions so you can help me settle on the next director project. I know your willingness to sabotage so right out the gate I'll say no one crummy like Uwe Boll, no one with 100 movies and no Kevin Smith or Christopher Nolan. I'll throw out a few ideas I've had, let me know if you have better ones. Wes Anderson Andrei Tarkovsky Stanley Kubrick Those sound good. Tarkovsky's great if you're willing to deal with some heavy shit. Kubrick's obviously awesome. I'm not sure what your attitude about Anderson is but he's worth looking at. While we're talking Andersons have you considered Paul Thomas?
|
|
1godzillafan
Studio Head
Join Date: Feb 2017
I like pie!
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 6,217
Location:
Last Online Nov 8, 2024 5:42:00 GMT -5
|
Post by 1godzillafan on Mar 6, 2021 8:33:19 GMT -5
Hey Doomsday. I dare you to do Takashi Miike.
|
|
donny
CS! Bronze
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,631
Likes: 1,332
Location:
Last Online Nov 21, 2024 23:07:04 GMT -5
|
Post by donny on Mar 6, 2021 9:38:34 GMT -5
Seconded on both Andersons, that would be cool.
Some others:
-Cassavetes - Jeff Nichols - Spike Jonze - Billy Wilder -Ridley Scott
|
|
IanTheCool
CS! Gold
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,492
Likes: 2,864
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 7:37:07 GMT -5
|
Post by IanTheCool on Mar 6, 2021 10:56:46 GMT -5
I'm doing an informal wes anderson rewatch.
|
|
PG Cooper
CS! Silver
Join Date: Feb 2009
And those who tasted the bite of his sword named him...The DOOM Slayer
Posts: 16,647
Likes: 4,060
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by PG Cooper on Mar 6, 2021 11:36:38 GMT -5
I say do Wes so Ian can chime in with his informal rewatch. Though all choices put forth are quite good, even if I've seen very little Tarkovsky.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,298
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Jul 31, 2021 9:32:29 GMT -5
Miami Vice (2006)
Miami Vice is Michael Mann's film based on his television show from the 1980s. With this update gone are the flashy suits and signature 80s flare that Mann used to full effect in his projects of that time period. Now we're into the gritty digital era of filmmaking, one lacking any humor or emotion. If you want to see some cool shootouts and boats go really fast then this movie's for you. If you want something that might give you any sense of excitement, suspense or intrigue you might want to look elsewhere. Miami Vice stars Jamie Foxx as Ricardo Tubbs and Colin Farrell as Sonny Crockett. I had to look up the names to make sure because it was tough for me to remember just hours after finishing the movie. Mann has always walked that line of 'style over substance' and sometimes there's a great combination of both. Miami Vice is not it. It's totally devoid of any character development. It's sole focus is on these two cops who go undercover in order to infiltrate a drug ring. Sounds pretty simple right? Then why is the movie so convoluted? Throughout the movie it seemed to be almost trying to be as confusing as possible as if it made it more intelligent than it really is. At its core it's a movie where two cops go undercover until they eventually get betrayed by the guys they're trying to bring down. The movie is loaded with a ton of police jargon and terminology which usually adds to the effect of Mann's films however sometimes it can add to the confusion like it does here. It seems as if Mann wanted to make an 'adult' crime movie but someone convinced him that he can't have a clear-cut story or interesting characters, it has to play out like you know what's going on. One thing I've always admired about Mann movies for the most part is that they eschew any tired cinematic tropes and are as realistic as possible. Sometimes this is to the detriment of any character development especially with any female characters as I stated in earlier reviews. Miami Vice drops you right into the middle of things almost assuming that you know who these characters are. The reason it's so important however is because without anyone to care about on screen the tension is flat when it's finally presented. That's Miami Vice in a nutshell. There's a lot going on and there are even a few pretty cool action sequences but it doesn't mean anything when we know and care so little about anybody. Again I want to say to Michael Mann 'just because a character has sex with someone doesn't automatically equal chemistry.' What made Collateral and Heat so fresh and energetic weren't that they had cool shootouts, it's because they were cool characters who were in cool shootouts. It didn't take a whole ton of dialogue but we knew enough about Max that we were invested. Heat is all about characters and how their lives are connected. Miami Vice is textbook style over substance, something that could have been fun had it just followed some Filmmaking 101 basics and made people that we knew. I also have a personal gripe with Colin Farrell as Crockett. There was a time where I despised him more than just about anyone else making movies. My anger has tempered the past few years and I've seen him in some really good roles but here is one where they really should have cast something else. Jamie Foxx seems natural while you can tell Farrell is trying so, so hard. His scratchy, gruff voice is unnatural and his constant shouting of dialogue made me wonder if he even knew what the scenes were about some of the time. It's maybe the first time that I would say someone in a Michael Mann movie was really miscast. Miami Vice is another misfire for Michael Mann. It's strange after watching his movies again that although I still consider him one of my favorite filmmakers (I plan to do this with another filmmaker after finishing Blackhat) it's becoming more obvious that he has as many mediocre films as he does great and exciting ones. The guy is in his mid-seventies and makes a movie roughly once every five years or so. Lets hope that he has one or two more good ones in him before he hangs it up. I mean look at what George Miller just did at his age.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,298
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Jul 31, 2021 9:43:50 GMT -5
Seeing how many of these films were available to stream I decided that now might be a good time to pour through Criterion's Bergman's Cinema box set. Thirty of the filmmaker's movies, most of which I haven't seen outside of his more popular ones like Seventh Seal, Wild Strawberries and Virgin Spring. I'm going to start at the front and work my way back while jotting whatever thoughts I have in this thread. I certainly don't expect many responses to most of these as I doubt many people have seen a ton of them either but it'll be nice to have a place to store my thoughts at the very least. I also don't plan on doing a mass binge on this thing, I might watch one or two movies a month if that so it might take a bit and I'll probably shift gears in this thread as the AFI lists come out too. Anyways, here we go. Crisis (1947)
Truth be told, I quite liked this movie and reading some other reviews online after the fact I was surprised that it's considered to be that weak. Maybe compared to Bergman's later work it certainly is but then again what movie doesn't look mediocre compared to The Seventh Seal? It's a small story about a teenage girl Nelly who lives with her loving piano teacher caretaker, Ingeborg. One day Nelly finds that her biological mother Jenny has come back now that Jenny is very successful as a salon owner. Also tempting Nelly is Jack, the son of Jenny's half brother who makes a pass at Nelly (is that weird?). Ultimately Nelly goes with Jenny and lives a life of fun and success while Ingeborg is left behind and suffering from a supposedly fatal illness. Ingeborg finds herself desperate for Nelly to return while Nelly's life in the city soon costs her the innocence she once had in the small town and begins to yearn for what was left behind. As a novice filmmaker Bergman puts a lot in there to unpack and I think a lot of it works well on a dramatic level. There's some in there though that seems a little vague and almost unnecessary but on the whole I felt it worked which is why I was a little surprised to see such middling reviews. If there's one thing that really didn't work it was the score which seemed completely off from what the movie was trying to convey emotionally. On the whole I suppose it might seem like Bergman was trying to make a movie that was a little too heavy than it needed to be and might even come off as pretentious but I think it's a movie that works a lot more than it doesn't. For me this was a nice way to start what's going to be a months-long dive into Bergman's filmography.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,298
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Nov 22, 2021 13:07:40 GMT -5
Ingmar Bergman’s Cinema: Film #2
A Ship To India (1947)
The second film in the Bergman box set but Bergman's third feature overall, A Ship To India isn't really about a ship nor is it about India, and it certainly doesn't take place on a ship bound for India so get that out of your head. Almost entirely told through flashback, the film is a drama about Johannes, a young sailor with a hump on his back with dreams of sailing the seven seas but works on a salvage vessel captained by his overbearing, abusive father. The Captain is going blind but that isn't stopping him from wanting to run away with his mistress Sally and leave his dedicated wife, scorned son and salvage ship behind. Eventually Sally and Johannes fall in love which puts Johannes on a collision course with his dad which will set the course for both their futures. It's actually a rather unique backdrop for a drama about family spite but that helps make it rather intriguing. There are a few questionable things here that could either be attributed to the times or perhaps a still rather novice filmmaker, one being Johannes' attempted rape of Sally which is all but completely forgotten about in the next scene, but compared to Crisis it certainly feels like a step forward for Bergman and is a good early example of the type of human dramas he would strive to make. Again, like Crisis I see after the fact that this has some rather mediocre ratings which I feel are undeserved and perhaps exist because they preface his subsequent cinematic achievements. It's a good, involving movie that demonstrates the kind of filmmaking Bergman would embrace throughout his career and is a rather sad story showing that time sometimes doesn't heal all wounds.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,298
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Dec 8, 2021 21:41:52 GMT -5
I'll bounce back to the Bergman box set here and there but AFI announced their top 10 films of 2021. Per tradition I'll start launching into this list minus King Richard and Power of the Dog which I've already seen.
AFI MOVIES OF THE YEAR 2021
CODA
DON’T LOOK UP
DUNE
KING RICHARD
LICORICE PIZZA
NIGHTMARE ALLEY
THE POWER OF THE DOG
tick, tick… BOOM!
THE TRAGEDY OF MACBETH
WEST SIDE STORY
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,298
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Dec 8, 2021 21:46:12 GMT -5
Also, while I've seen neither movie I've heard nothing but really good things about The French Dispatch which isn't on the list while also hearing that Don't Look Up is more or less junk although that does make the list. I guess we'll judge soon.
|
|
Dracula
CS! Gold
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 5,731
Location:
Last Online Nov 22, 2024 13:10:40 GMT -5
|
Post by Dracula on Dec 8, 2021 22:09:35 GMT -5
Also, while I've seen neither movie I've heard nothing but really good things about The French Dispatch which isn't on the list while also hearing that Don't Look Up is more or less junk although that does make the list. I guess we'll judge soon. The French Dispatch isn't really materializing as an awards player. The AFI list has, IMO become kind of lame in recent years. They used to make the occasional interesting choice but now they're firmly in the "let's predict the Oscars" game and tend to just nominate the last ten movies that screened instead of looking back through the years.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,298
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Dec 8, 2021 22:14:17 GMT -5
Also, while I've seen neither movie I've heard nothing but really good things about The French Dispatch which isn't on the list while also hearing that Don't Look Up is more or less junk although that does make the list. I guess we'll judge soon. The French Dispatch isn't really materializing as an awards player. The AFI list has, IMO become kind of lame in recent years. They used to make the occasional interesting choice but now they're firmly in the "let's predict the Oscars" game and tend to just nominate the last ten movies that screened instead of looking back through the years. I will admit the lack of Free Guy was the first thing to jump out at me.
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,298
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Dec 19, 2021 10:10:15 GMT -5
tick, tick...BOOM!
I don't know where I come down on this movie. On the one hand it's a musical telling the story of the creator of the ever popular Rent. It has some catchy tunes and Andrew Garfield really gives his all here perhaps to a fault. On the other hand it's another story of a struggling artist who tries to justify his often poor decision-making by saying that he's pursuing his passion and that he can't do anything else. There's always this massive sense of entitlement when it comes to stories like this as the central characters have this view that their passion comes before everything and they expect everyone around them to relate and support or get out of the way. Naturally people drop off and go their separate ways but can you blame them? I have nothing against struggling artists but Garfield's Jonathan Larson is kind of an idiot and as someone who has known more than a few of the struggling artist types it gets frustrating seeing their opportunities fall away, job opportunities or relationship opportunities and so on, in pursuit of a goal that oftentimes doesn't demand that you put everything else on the backburner. You can pursue your passion AND have a steady job. You can work tirelessly AND have a girlfriend who supports you. There's this inflated ego that goes along with this outlook, like their work is more important because it comes from the heart while in reality much of life is built on compromise. Is there anybody who's doing exactly what they wanted to do when they were younger? Very few and that's because outlooks can change, that doesn't make them sellouts or losers. Maybe I'm thinking way too much into this but it's hard to feel compassion for someone and their struggle when it's almost purely by their own design while at the same time they act like they're being screwed. I will give it credit though because it's a pretty well crafted film and it weaves between its methods of storytelling fairly well. This is Lin-Manuel Miranda's directing debut and I know a lot of people don't like the guy, I'm not sure why because I don't know anything about him but this feels like it's something in his wheelhouse. I know there are some people who will love this movie and relate to it but unfortunately I'm not the target audience here. I won't fault it just for that though, there's some stuff going on that I think people will really enjoy.
B so says Doomsday
|
|
Doomsday
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,298
Likes: 6,761
Location:
Member is Online
|
Post by Doomsday on Dec 20, 2021 18:30:06 GMT -5
Here are a few thoughts on the AFI films I watched before the list dropped.
King Richard For the last 15 years or so Will Smith's modus operandi in Hollywood has been to veer away from the huge blockbusters that made him an international superstar and gravitate more toward films that will finally win him a goddamn Oscar. I don't think there's an actor in Hollywood who's trying harder to get that prize than Will Smith. He's done biopics, dramas, taken on fancy accents and when he's not doing that he's making After Earth. But then King Richard comes along, the movie that very well may get Will Smith the one thing he wants more than anything. I certainly hope he doesn't because there's stiff competition this year and King Richard is clear, obvious awards bait but that's what makes me think he might just walk away with it this year. But Smith aside, King Richard is about the father of Venus and Serena Williams and how he uses his meticulous, precise plan to bring them from young girls into tennis superstars. Well, I should say only Venus because the movie all but completely discards Serena around the middle of the movie which was kind of weird. Also, I'm no expert on the rise of the Williams family but Richard is played almost as a charlatan here. He's arrogant, kind of a jerk and was redeemed by success. Does that make him a bona fide genius or just the luckiest idiot on the face of the earth? I guess the truth lies somewhere in the middle but King Richard is a pretty straight forward, easily digestible and all-around inoffensive biopic that won't blow any minds, doesn't have a ton of big missteps but unfortunately is the exact type of movie that awards shows eat up. Lucky for Will Smith, maybe now he'll stop trying so hard and will go back to endlessly plugging his dickhead kids.
B so says Doomsday
The Power of the Dog A not-quite western starring some great actors directed by a well known auteur, The Power of the Dog is about rage, revenge and relationships. It's a battle of wits between two brothers, a wife and her fish out of water son. It's a story about men living in some aggrandize portrayal and how their destructive representations can bleed out and infect everything around them. It's definitely a movie that's trying to be something unique and thought provoking while keeping its intensity and rawness up to a high level. As stated in the review thread though, it seems to be a little thin in the areas where the development is needed most. It's implied that Phil Burbank and his mentor Bronco Henry had a 'moment' when trying to survive a snowstorm but it's intentionally vague which I don't think was the best creative decision. It also seems to gloss over the sudden change in direction between Phil and young Peter. Like I said, things seem to be vague intentionally which in a way adds some emphasis to the final few minutes of the film as it's one that you might not expect but I think it would have helped if there was just a little more mortar between the bricks that put this story together. Still, it's a movie I think I appreciate more after sitting on it for a few days and is probably one I'll revisit come awards time. A flawed movie but certainly one of the better ones to come out this year.
B+ so says Doomsday
|
|